February news archive (headlines)

29.02.12  Stop ‘opaque’ charges, says London Assembly

In the most hard-hitting report in years on the property management business, the London Assembly says half a billion pounds in service charges is being spent every year by Londoners in a business that is overdue for reform. Our news report and the full Assembly report can be read here after the mid-night news embargo

29.02.12 Visit to Town and City Management Limited based in Darlington

Today we visited Town and City, whose first year of LKP accreditation for non-retirement developments is coming to an end, and they are now seeking to be re-accredited. There are some recognised issues that need addressing in their RTM procedures, and we will be including some of this in our future accreditation paperwork. These will continue to be a work in progress even when we achieve United Kingdom Accreditation Standard.

We had an in depth discussion concerning an ex Peverel development, Constantine Court in Middlesborough, which achieved the right to manage more than 18 months ago, and appointed Town and City as its new agents.

Recently, the development has suffered from divisions of opinion on important subjects, and the two leaseholder directors and one from the managing agent, were under the number really needed to spread fairly the workload and achieve  consensus, and ensure decisions taken are wise ones. Following our meeting with the managing agent, we went to take part in what became a serious mediation exercise with 37 of the residents present, a lot of whom were brave enough to express their concerns.  After one and half hours we left in the knowledge that: the number of those prepared to act as directors for 6 months on a rolling schedule was increased to seven and all the issues that had been causing the divisions had been brought well out into the open. The residents were a lot more knowledgeable about the duties of the RTM company, the house manager, the managing agent and general legal responsibilities, than before we arrived.

We look forward to being kept informed of progress in the future and will write further on the subject when confidentiality allows as events at this development may well mirror those elsewhere.

28.02.12 Nottingham based managing agent enjoying success with Peverel RTM’s

LKP this morning met two senior directors from Walton and Allen for a very positive and lively discussion regarding their management activities in the non retirement leasehold sector in the Nottinghamshire area. Walton and Allen have been extremely successful in terms of wresting control from Peverel in more than a dozen blocks in the area, with two going to the LVT for determination.  They are very keen to repair buildings that have been allowed to fall into disrepair, and to ensure service charge arrears are fully cleared to protect the financial health of RTM’s going forward.

Walton and Allen do appear to demonstrate the qualities of transparency and integrity that are required to become accredited, and they are now investigating the criteria contained within the Accreditation Scheme for Managing Agents and considering whether they wish to become further involved with LKP. They resigned from ARMA after being a member for six months. We will post further on this in due course.

This evening we met the two directors of Urban Living Property Management – another managing agent who have been borne out of leaseholder frustration. Peter and Paula Twist totally understand the requirements for transparency, as they have been on the receiving end of the opposite side of the spectrum, and took control of their own building several years ago. They now manage 6 blocks and are looking to grow their business in the Leeds/Nottingham area. They have entered the accreditation process and we will be checking their paperwork and taking up references over the next few days.

In the recent past they have assisted  with several RTM’s.  Paula has a legal background, and Peter’s is in Building Control and NHBC, so they are ideally suited to a property management career. See www.ulpm.co.uk for further information.

Peverel sale update

The latest statement from Simon Appell of the Administrators Zolfo Cooper is now available for all to see on the CarlEX website, carlex.co.

27.02.12 East Midlands agent poised to sign up

The LKP team has received plenty of fascinating insights into the world of East Midlands property management from Susan Hunt, of Hunter Grey, based in Loughborough, who is in the process of being accredited.

There appears to be no shortage of dud or dodgy freeholders/agents in Leicestershire, and we will be reporting on her tussles with Mainstay in due course. Meanwhile, see the news page for her RTM struggles over the Zenith Block in Leicester.

25.02.12  LKP tour of the north and see CarlEX website for major update on their investigations

We have been contacted by several more managing agents recently who wish to demonstrate their capability to manage leaseholders with transparency, honesty and using their experience to effect cost control.  We are off up North starting Monday to interview five of them.  Hopefully this will enable many more people to escape the clutches of bad management, and will avoid the frying pan to fire possibility.  LKP will report on these meetings and accreditation progress over the next few days.  With the continued lack of any concrete news re the Peverel group sale, the likelihood is that there will continue to be a lot of people trying to achieve RTM and all leaseholders need to know who the good managing agents are.  The number of LKP accredited companies is going up on a monthly basis – see the relevant page if you need a recommendation in your area.  It is really good to know that several of them are part of the new breed of professional managing agents, ex leaseholders themselves who knew there could be a better way of doing things, and are now proving it with growing portfolios of buildings they manage, with much happier residents to show for it.

This week, two Surrey based and one Leicestershire based managing agents have started the accreditation process which includes an evaluation of 85 criteria over six sections including financial, service and maintenance, personal interviews and reference checking. We will publish their results in due course.

See the CarlEX website for news of their current investigations.

OFT chief John Fingleton quits

Soon after we reported on the uncertain results of the OFT investigation into exit fees…..look what happens…..

Office of Fair Trading chief executive John Fingleton is to step down after seven years in charge of the regulator.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financial-crime/9102197/OFT-chief-John-Fingleton-quits.html

If you have time look at the comments under the article related to the latest unsatisfactory performance by the SFO. They are not terribly polite as far the SFO is concerned.  We could not put it better ourselves bearing in mind the experience we have had with this organisation. Link here:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financial-crime/9099320/Tchenguiz-fraud-case-could-collapse-after-SFO-admits-to-evidence-mistakes.html

More Freehold sales

We have just been supplied with this link to another interesting article about freehold sales, this time in Yorkshire, involving Fairhold – just for a change.

http://www.examiner.co.uk/news/local-west-yorkshire-news/2011/09/22/london-landlords-take-huddersfield-home-owners-to-court-86081-29464788/

24.02.12 Sunday Times doesn’t know the half of it

Freeholders make huge profits from insurance commissions without leaseholders knowing anything about it. It’s perfectly legal and every professional body knows it happens and has done nothing. The practice has even been actively promoted at a LEASE conference! Bring plenty of tissues and read more

20.02.12 More managing agents come forward to join the LKP accreditation scheme.

JJ Homes of Carshalton and HML Andertons of Croydon have entered the accreditation process, as have Hunter Grey.   Next week we are visiting five managing agents in Bolton, Darlington, Macclesfield, Nottingham and Loughborough.

21.02.12 Why the rich should buy freeholds

The Sunday Times recommends the wealthy should buy freeholds, with lots of scope for loading insurance costs and trousering hidden commissions. One fund paying 5.8 per cent. See news

20.02.12 For 48 days work ousted managing agent charges £9,381.22

The epic RTM struggle at Zenith Building, Leicester, has a sting in its tail: ousted managing agents Hurst, part of Sinclair Garden Investments (just Google it!) hands in its bill. Click here for more

 16.02.12 Baroness Gardner to take up the cause against rip-off leasehold service charges

Melissa Briggs and Baroness Gardner at the House of Lords

Baroness Gardner is to raise the issue of rip-off leasehold service charges as soon as the London Assembly report is published later this month. Several other peers are also backing the issue, which was raised by Melissa Briggs and Sebastian O’Kelly at a meeting in the Lords today.

A report is now loaded on our new Leasehold Reform page – click here to view it.

15.02.12 Results of LKP meeting with Hanover are reported on the News page

Revised ASMA, ASMA NR and ASDAB documents loaded on the Accreditation Schemes page today.

14.02.12 Susan Hunt wins RTM battle

Read how Susan Hunt won the epic right-to-manage battle to free the Zenith Building, in Leicester, from old-hand practitioners of the “dark arts”.  Read more.

14.02.12 Joanna Worth, 49, is defying Peverel over exit fees.

Joanna (below) is renting out a retirement flat in Beckenham, in Kent, and the country’s favourite managing agent wants 1 per cent of the capital value of the flat … it has asked three times. Click here to read more

13.02.12 You may view the latest CarlEX news headlines re leasehold reform and the OFT CEO’s salary by clicking:

http://carlex.co/carlex-visit-to-the-house-of-lords-and-carlex-forums

11.02.12 – See news section to find link to  read astonishing second response from the OFT re Exit Fees.

CarlEX has new editorial loaded about the recent re-incarnation of Peverel Cirrus into Appello Telehealth, and the appointment of new director, that well known character, Keith Edgar.

10.02.12 – Melissa Briggs interview with Paul Lewis was broadcast on Radio 4, Moneybox, on Saturday

Melissa Briggs appeared briefly on Radio 4′s Moneybox, on the subject of exit fees and related leasehold issues, this Saturday 11th February, between 12.04 and 12.28. It will be possible to download the podcast shortly or catch it on iPlayer.

Link to relevant Moneybox webpage: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/moneybox/9695265.stm

10.02.12 First OFT statement received by email Friday

The OFT investigation (into the use of transfer (exit) fees in the contracts entered into by occupants of purpose built owner occupied retirement homes) is progressing but a number of complex economic and legal arguments have been raised by the parties under investigation which we have been considering in detail.

Whilst we appreciate that this remains a pressing matter for those affected, we cannot give a firm deadline by which our investigation will be concluded. We continue to endeavour to progress the investigation as efficiently and fairly as possible and hope to be in a position to provide a substantive update in the Spring.

Details that we are able to disclose about the progress of the OFT’s investigation is limited to information that is publicly available on the OFT website at: www.oft.gov.uk/OFTwork/consumer-enforcement/consumer-enforcement-current/retirement-homes/. Statutory restrictions prevent us from disclosing the names of the parties we are currently investigating or the state of play of any discussions with those parties.

Editorial page updated with new articles today.

*********

09.02.12 Charter Quay in the News, and read the detailed job description for CE of ARMA

See our main News page for various important points reproduced from the job description of the new Chief Executive of ARMA. We are hoping the implications of the appointment of Michelle Banks of the DCLG are matched by future reality in terms of improved governance in the leasehold sector. Also news about Chelsea Bridge Wharf and their RTM. The Vincent Tchenguiz cartoon with accompanying comment is now on our editorial page.

LKP – New Accountant Appointment

We are pleased to announce the appointment of Imogen Restell who will be responsible for our new RTM company formation service. See our Management page for details. LKP are happy to assist with the RTM process for leaseholders. A downloadable document explaining how we can help will be available on the “I want to break free page” in the next 24 hours. LKP would like to make it clear that we have absolutely no involvement with the RTMF based in Kent.

New page loaded today for BlocNet Limited, our newest approved managing agent.

We are now talking to Anderton’s about accreditation, amongst others, and have a meeting with Hanover in the next few days.

07.02.12 – Block Manager’s page loaded on the LKP website

New page loaded today in Accredited Companies section for Block Managers Limited, one of our latest two managing agents to gain approval status.  Many managing agents are now following us on Twitter, so it would seem that LKP’s activities are being noticed on an increasingly wide basis.

02.02.12 – What’s the point of ARMA?

That’s a question being discussed on The Truth About Solitaire website. For years this organisation has enjoyed a very cosy relationship with some of the least appetising outfits in property management. These agents have been repeatedly criticised in Leasehold Valuation Tribunal rulings, the most damning of which was the November 22 ruling last year at Charter Quay against the Tchenguiz/Peverel set-up. It was described by the tribunal as “disgraceful”, the deliberately obfuscatory Tchenguiz company structure was deemed “quasi biblical” and contracts were being doled out to other Tchenguiz companies without being tendered for, negotiated, or even read!

Very late in the day ARMA is now bleating about the need for regulation and “transparency”. Hilariously, even Peverel has appointed an ombudsman.

David Hewett, the outgoing chief executive, says 30 members of ARMA have been expelled in 10 years, but then conceded that many of these were for failing to pay the annual subscriptions. Not one has ever been named.

He also says that, personally, he does not agree with freeholders and managing agents being owned by the same business interest, but has never done anything about it.

ARMA now wants to set up a disciplinary procedure within 18 months, and that will be the first task of Michelle Banks, the in-coming CEO from the Dept of Communities and Local Government, who arrives next week.

But it is too late for that. ARMA sold its soul to the freeholders that appoint the managing agents, to the detriment of leaseholders. Now that has unravelled as leaseholders in London’s landmark apartment blocks have fought back and won millions in LVT rulings and settlements.

A predatory business practise that was so effective with pensioners in retirement blocks – for whom the legislative protections for leaseholders were impossible in practice – hit the buffers when coming up against lawyers, bankers and the rest who live in upmarket London new build flats.

Here is The Truth About Solitaire article …

Andy Billson starts his new job with Barratt Homes today

01.02.12 – Andy Billson, late of Peverel, starts at Barratt today in order to set up a bespoke property management organisation for the developer. Owing to the “toxic” reputation of Peverel – to quote the description of a senior Barratt executive – Peverel is not being assigned the management of any future Barratt developments.

Most new appointees experience a “learning curve” as they get to grips with their job. LKP hopes that Barratt’s recruit from Peverel will experience an “unlearning curve” as well. More to follow …

 

 

 

21.2.12 Leaseholders will see that the rich survive

Depressing news for anyone living in a leasehold flat: buying up freeholds is one of the best ways the wealthy can increase their wealth, according to the Sunday Times. One fund rose 5.8 per cent last year. This means freeholds are an attractive alternative to artworks or stamps, although London parking spaces have shown a return of 9 per cent, it is claimed.

“Additional income comes from commissions for arranging building insurance for the leaseholders and renegotiating leases,” says the Sunday Times. In other words, trouser commissions for as many services as you can and make life difficult for leaseholders in order to squeeze them dry. In most jurisdictions, these would be criminal acts.

Freehold Income Trust, which owns 65,000 freeholds, each paying an average of £119 in ground rent, targets  a yield of 4.25 per cent, but did significantly better than that over the past 12 months with 5.8 per cent. The fund is up over 18 per cent over the past three years, and 34 per cent over the past five – these are really impressive results, given the collapse in capital values of virtually all non-prime London flats. Retirement flats have fallen further than most.

“A Cambridge college recently invested a sizeable amount for the first time.” says Anthony Wyld, of the trust. (Historical note: No surprise there, sadly. All Souls, Oxford, had huge stakes in the slave trade.)

The fund is unregulated – so no compo if it fails – and minimum investments are £5,000 with an initial charge of three per cent and an annual management fee of £1.3 per cent. The iniquities of feudal leasehold law are part and parcel of Merrie England, so it’s no surprise that the position of freeholders is monetised.

16.2.12 Report re House of Lords meeting

Click here to read the latest update re our meeting with Baroness Gardner and other members of the Lords. We have called this new page Leasehold Reform and will publish updates on this page as they occur.

15.2.12 Hanover meeting note

We met Tony Tench, Director of Retirement Housing Division and James McCarthy, Director of Technical Services at Hanover Head Office this morning. Hanover is a housing association with charitable status, owing to their defined purpose which is to relieve the problems of advanced age. All profits are re-invested into the business.

Tony Tench

They have 15,000 units under management – 11,000 rental and 5,000 private (leasehold) ownership. Since we met their managing director about a year ago, they have comprehensively re-examined their management practices and are now totally aware that leaseholders: do not want to pay spurious commissions on intercompany contracts, they want their maintenance properly controlled with accurate advance costings and they want to know that their utility bills are being regularly evaluated for cost control/best value. They are both freeholder and managing agent in some developments and understand the iniquities of certain lease terms. Occasionally if all agree, sub letting charges are waived for example. Hanover is as keen as some leaseholders to undo vetoes on subletting as they cannot make use of empty properties, and they only charge a £200 administration fee when a sub let tenancy agreement is arranged. (This compares rather favourably against Peverel’s £1,500.) Their exit fees are 1% or less and they stated that they hoped the OFT would report for clarity.

A year ago Hanover would not have been able to successfully apply for accreditation status owing to the fact that they were obtaining zero interest on their contingency funds.  Recognising this as an important issue, they have now managed to obtain 0.75% by moving all their bank accounts and dividing the funds into instant access and longer term deposit accounts which pay 1.6%. This is a lesson for other managing agents who still maintain they are gaining 0% on contingency funds, despite many millions being held. We now await their decision as to whether or not they wish to join the LKP accreditation system. Hanover are not members of ARMA, although they are part of the ARHM. (James McCarthy is a former chair.) When we asked why they support ARHM, their reason was that they abide by the ARHM code.

We also discussed the merits of commonhold tenure with them in view of the fact they are considering future development strategy and the different forms of tenure available. They may consider whether this is a viable form of tenure for the operation for the future.

Joanna Worth thinks Peverel’s 1% tax on sub-letting is wrong

14.2.12 Joanna Worth, 49, is defying Peverel over exit fees.

Joanna Worth is renting out a retirement flat in Beckenham, in Kent, and the country’s favourite managing agent wants 1 per cent of the capital value of the flat … it has asked three times. Click here to read more

14.2.12 – RTM Victory after two and a half years, click here to read more

13.2.12 – Second response from the OFT re Exit Fees

Anyone faced with having to pay exit fees from retirement flats may wonder whether John Fingleton, chief executive of the Office of Fair Trading, deserves his £279,999 salary

To view the latest email received from Jason Freeman, the head of legal at the OFT, click here.

 

10.2.12 – Another one bites the dust

Three is a row for Vincent … After settlement at St George’s Wharf and humiliation at Charter Quay, the loss of Chelsea Bridge Wharf to an RTM is another blow to Tchenguiz.

Chelsea Bridge Wharf, the biggest central London riverside development, has won the right to manage from Peverel.

Vincent Tchenguiz, who owns the head lease, has appealed and next week it will be ruled admissible or not.

“There’s something about his name that gets people moving,” says on-site estate agent Charlie Garton-Jones. “I sent a student round to gather signatures for RTM, and as soon as he told residents that Tchenguiz had appointed the managing agents, they could not sign up fast enough.”

The right to manage process has been undertaken by Roger Southam, of Chainbow, a property figure known for his purple suits and bow ties.

Last week, he sold off a large chunk of his property managing agency business, Chainbow, to Trinity (Estates) Property Management to form Trinity Chainbow, which will service 40,000 leaseholders.

Southam intends to focus on the emerging professional private rented sector – which has long been campaigned for by the British Property Federation.

 

Rich should buy freeholds and cream commissions, says Sunday Times

Depressing news for anyone living in a leasehold flat: buying up freeholds is one of the best ways the wealthy can increase their wealth, according to the Sunday Times. One fund rose 5.8 per cent last year. This means freeholds are an attractive alternative to artworks or stamps, although London parking spaces have shown a return of 9 per cent, it is claimed.

“Additional income comes from commissions for arranging building insurance for the leaseholders and renegotiating leases,” says the Sunday Times. In other words, trouser commissions for as many services as you can and make life difficult for leaseholders in order to squeeze them dry. In most jurisdictions, these would be criminal acts.

Freehold Income Trust, which owns 65,000 freeholds, each paying an average of £119 in ground rent, targets  a yield of 4.25 per cent, but did significantly better than that over the past 12 months with 5.8 per cent. The fund is up over 18 per cent over the past three years, and 34 per cent over the past five – these are really impressive results, given the collapse in capital values of virtually all non-prime London flats. Retirement flats have fallen further than most.

“A Cambridge college recently invested a sizeable amount for the first time.” says Anthony Wyld, of the trust. (Historical note: No surprise there, sadly. All Souls, Oxford, had huge stakes in the slave trade.)

The fund is unregulated – so no compo if it fails – and minimum investments are £5,000 with an initial charge of three per cent and an annual management fee of £1.3 per cent. The iniquities of feudal leasehold law are part and parcel of Merrie England, so it’s no surprise that the position of freeholders is monetised.

LKP prompts Lords debate

16.2.12 Report following our meeting in the House of Lords

Having sat in the gallery and watched Questions, we are happy to report that Messrs. Lawson, Lamont, Tebbitt, Whitelaw, the Archbishop of Canterbury and many others all seem to be in fine form.  We will post some pictures on the photo gallery page shortly. The action was very reminiscent of time spent in Arun Council Chamber, although the surroundings were a lot more magnificent.

We met Baroness Gardner, along with Baroness Masham, Lord Seldson and Lord Flight this morning to discuss steps that we can take to increase exposure of the necessity for leasehold reform, and learn how we may best achieve genuine progress. Leaseholders want to obtain some form of amendment to solve the mixed development right to manage problem, to crack down on unfair lease terms, and to control service charges to curtail the inexorable rises that are unjustified and way beyond the rate of inflation, and to ensure that spurious inter company commissions are outlawed.

These issues were discussed along with the review of Service Charges currently being carried out by the London Assembly. Baroness Gardner has now requested a short debate on the subject, and when it is tabled, we will arrange to be present to hear how it goes. We were left under no illusions of how difficult legislative progress may be to achieve, but that makes us more determined to keep up the pressure we are exerting. We also understand the process required, and have made several more valuable contacts whose support we will be seeking.

Many members of the House of Lords live in leasehold properties in the nearby streets, so there is a great deal of sympathy for the CarlEX campaign and we think we can count on quite a bit of senior support when the debate takes place.  More news will be posted on our progress in due course.

As we left, we spotted David Hewett entering. Does anyone know who he was visiting or why?

Exit fees: Not fair and I’m not paying

Joanna Worth thinks Peverel’s 1% tax on sub-letting is wrong

 

A fanfare of trumpets for Joanna Worth, 49, who is making a stand on the great exit fee rip-offs.

Joanna is defying Peverel, which is demanding one per cent of the capital value of her flat in Beckenham, Kent, because she has sub-let it out to a pensioner.

So far she has received three communications from Peverel, including a last one on December 23 2011 threatening legal proceedings within 14 days.

“This is completely wrong and I think someone needs to make a stand against them,” says Joanna, who heard Melissa Briggs, co-founder of Carlex.co, being interviewed on Radio 4’s Money Box Live last Saturday.

Are exit fees a turn-off at Park Court, where three properties are for sale?

Joanna, who worked for the Citizens Advice Bureau for many years, bought the one-bedroom flat at Park Court in September 2007 to provide a home for an elderly friend, but the friend moved out after a couple of years.

She then sub-let it to a woman in her sixties.

In July 2010 she received her first letter from Peverel, claiming that the house manager believed that the flat had been sub-let.

“It is simply a rip-off that these charges are levied,” says Joanna. “Peverel does absolutely nothing for them whatsoever.”

Peverel does not do badly out of the 30-unit Park Court as it is. Joanna pays £2,468 a year in service charges and a heafty £494 in ground rent.

“I just hope Carlex can organise a class action to get these rip-off fees banned,” says Joanna.

It is astonishing, given that she is too young actually to be allowed to live at Park Court, that her conveyancing solicitor did not warn her of these fees – which, as is customary, were buried deep in the lease.

One thought may occur to Peverel and prompt it to drop the fees: sales to Park Court are sluggish and three flats, priced between £149,000 and £157,000 are on the market.

Without occupants, the milch cow yields no milk.

Zthank ‘eavan, Paul Chevalier has been given the push from Zenith Building, Leicester

 

Triumph of British judicial procedure: Leaseholders at Zenith Building, Leicester, were tied up in knots with legal delays for two-and-a-half years before exercising right to manage.

 

An epic right to manage battle, begun in July 2009, involving some of the most controversial figures in property management finally comes to a conclusion this week.

The Zenith Building, a smart block of flats in the centre if Leicester, went out of the frying pan and into the fire after its landlord, City and Thames, sold the freehold to Sinclair Gardens Investments (Kensington) Ltd – which is generously mentioned on the Internet.

“People think right-to-manage is the solution to all their problems, but with freeholders who fight every step of the way, the amount of time it takes to finally take control of the place where you live is beyond belief,” says Susan Hunt, of HunterGrey managing agents who fought the RTM action.

Hunt got involved in the Zenith Building after Sheel Dhir, 33, a friend who has a flat there, called her in as felt she was being overcharged by the then landlord City and Thames (Leicester) Ltd.

“What leaseholders want is consultation over expenses, transparency in their dealings and disclosure of all relevant information, including expenditure,” says Hunt. “And they weren’t getting it.”

Zenith, has 58 residential units and two commercial ones, but around 120 leases, as there are separate ones for the ground-floor car parks.

Two extra parking spaces seem to have been created and sold elsewhere.

The Landlord, who is based in London, was served a section 82 notice but failed to respond and had to be prodded with notice of default to offer up the details of the leases. He dropped the bombshell that he was selling the freehold for £375,000.

This price was way beyond the means of the leaseholders, and, in fact, he sold the freehold to another company, Sinclair Gardens Investments, for £375,912.

Susan Hunt

Sinclair Gardens Investments may not have been aware of the RTM underway, as its modus operandi are all too familiar:  move in its managing agents Hurst, which then employs its own insurnace broker Princess Insurance Agencies.

Arm-twisting comes in the form of a firm of solicitors called Chevalier and Co, headed by Paul Chevalier, who also figures strongly in a Google search.

The landlord, managing agent and insurance broker are based at the same address in Bognor Regis, which is hardly the ideal place to manage an apartment block in Leicester.

They resisted the RTM at every possible stage as can be seen in the chronology below.

“They made the original landlord seem like a saint,” says Susan Hunt, who acts as company secretary for the RTM company.

“It does not bear thinking about how much time this has taken us. It is horrific. Fortunately, LVTs are quite sympathetic to lay people taking control of the place where they live.”

For the residents of Zenith Building it will hopefully be worthwhile.

Sheel Dhir says the epic struggle would never have succeeded with an ordinary solicitor.

“Susan was prepared to put the time into this and she was fanatastic,” she says. “There were times when I felt completely bullied by these people. It got so bad I actually moved out of my flat.

“It is so ironic. I am actually a property developer, but I got stuffed at my home in the Zenith Building.

“I have never behaved anything like this in my dealings as a property developer. You build flats and you sell them, you don’t sneak around squeezing the residents for more money by passing on the freehold to sharks.”

In its first year of management, Susan Hunt – who, like so many of the best managing agents got into this line of work by accident – is having to lay heavy charges as there is no reserve fund. But its estimate of £58,000 for 2012 is still a bargain compared with Sinclair Gardens/Hursts estimate of £92,000.

“The Leasehold and Commonhold Act 2002, introduced by the Labour Government, should have resolved these problems. It had the chance then to stop leasehold being sold to flat owners, in its present form, and to insist that everything newly built should be commonhold or that the Block Freehold should always we transferred to the Leasehold Owners without charge’.

 

‘It should make us ashamed that our law allows people to behave in that way’ – MP

Footnote: Dr Ian Twinn, former Tory MP for Edmonton, referred to Mr
Chevalier in these terms in the House of Commons on March 8 1996:

“Paul Chevalier and Linda Malthouse deserve to have their names mentioned as much as possible, especially under the cover of parliamentary privilege in connection with their disgraceful activities. They have threatened and abused leaseholders and extorted money in the most disgraceful way. It should make us ashamed that our law allows people to behave in that way. They have used bullying tactics and threatened the full force of the law to try to seize properties when small parts of bills have not been paid, and have tried to load up mortgages behind home owners.”

 

CHRONOLOGY
July 7 2009:                             Zenith RTM company incorporated
September 18 2009:              Section 82 notice served on City and Thames
March 4 2010:                        Notice of Default served on City and Thames (Leicester) Limited
April 27 2010:                         City and Thames hand over lease details
July 22 2010:                           Freehold sold to Sinclair Gardens Investments (Kensington) Limited
August 25 2010:                      Notices of Participation sent to Leaseholders
January 19 2011:                     The Notice of Claim was served on Sinclair Gardens Investments (Kensington) Limited and Hurst Management
February 18 2011:                   The Counter Notice was served by P Chevalier and Co (Landlord’s Solicitors)
April 14 2011:                           Zenith RTM apply to the LVT for determination
May 11 2011:                             Directions issued by the LVT
June 1 2011:                              Respondent (Sinclair) served their case to the LVT
June 27 2011:                           Zenith responded with skeleton arguments
July 5 2011:                              Attended the hearing at the LVT offices in Birmingham accompanied by one of the Directors.
July 13 2011:                            The Leasehold Valuation Tribunal found that Zenith RTM Company Limited did have the Right to Manage
July 19 2011:                            Zenith submit Section 93 notice duty to provide  information (no response)
July 29 2011:                           Chevalier submit application for leave to appeal
August 4 2011:                         Zenith reply why leave should be refused
August 25 2011:                      Permission to appeal refused by LVT
September 6 2011:                 Chevalier and Co apply to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) for permission to appeal against LVT’s refusal to allow the appeal
October 12 2011:                     Letter and bundle of documents received dated the 10th October 2011 from the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber)
October 17 2011:                     Zenith respond to Upper Lands Tribunal
November 17 2011:               Upper Tribunal refuse permission to appeal
November 18 2011:               Zenith submit Section 93 notice duty to provide information
November 21 2011                Chevalier write stating the Date of Acquisition will be the  May 17 2012, because they may apply to the Senior Court for a Judicial review
November 23 2011:              Zenith respond saying the Date of Acquisition is  February 17 2012 – three months from the determination of the last appeal
December 2&8 2011:            Further correspondence over this issue of take over date
January 2012:                       Hurst sends out request for 6 months service charges and a shortfall from 2011.
February 1 2012:                  Hurst write in response to a leaseholders letter saying that unaccounted funds will be passed over to the new managing agents
January 30 2012:                 Concession from Landlord’s Agents (Hurst Management) saying that they will allow us to take over the maintenance and cleaning from February 17 but will only answer the Section 93 notice if we send £300.
February 3 2012:                 Letter from Hurst saying that the date of acquisition is three months after the landlord decided not to proceed with the Judicial review. That they want £300 for information payable to their solicitors and that we can expect another bill for landlord’s costs. They have NO reserves or services charge monies to hand over to us whatsoever
February 3 2012:                Zenith reply that we are taking over on the February 17 2012 because that is the date three months after the final appeal (Section 90 (5) of the 2002 Act)

 

6.02.12 Susan Hunt, of HunterGrey, adds this message re the epic strggle for RTM at Zenith Building, Leceister:

You may be interested to note that we have received a letter today (16.02.12 ) from Hurst Management charging the following to the service charges for termination of their management:

1st January 2012 to 24.03.2012 (bearing in mind the acquisition date is 17.02.2012)   £4036.42
Notice fee to terminate their agreement                                                                                   £4384
Administration fee to close accounts                                                                                            £960

In other words, for 48 days management they want £9381.22.  They want £300 to send any paperwork to us and P Chevalier Solicitor wants £1,531 for Landlords costs.

This abuse of leaseholders is absolutely disgusting.