Young barrister who won ‘legal torture’ case is nominated for award

Stephanie Smith

The young barrister who represented for free the pensioners in the notorious ‘legal torture’ case at Oakland Court in Worthing is up for an award.

Stephanie Smith, a barrister in her twenties, defeated Justin Bates, who was acting for the freehold-owning landlord and is a more senior lawyer in her own Arden Chambers.

Bates is an expert on leasehold law who frequently represents freeholders in actions against leaseholders. He was instructed by Laceys solicitors of Bournemouth, who style themselves “honorary solicitors” to the trade body, the Association of Residential Managing Agents (ARMA).

The freeholders repeatedly challenged whether the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal should hear the case. When the pensioners eventually won the case in May this year, two of the original applicants had died.

The local MP Sir Peter Bottomley condemned these legal stratagems as “legal torture” on the LKP website and in the House of Commons. The case was referred to during the LKP / Carlex briefing at Westminster for MPs, hosted by Sir Peter earlier this week. [Read more...]

Full ‘legal torture’ tribunal ruling is published

The full Leasehold Valuation Tribunal rulings at Oakland Court in Worthing – including the preliminary decision, refusal of leave to appeal by the LVT and the final determination – has been published on the Ministry of Justice website. The link is below.

The pensioners were contesting the notional rent of the house manager’s flat, but the landlord’s barrister, Justin Bates, assisted by Laceys solicitors of Bournemouth – who also style themselves the ‘honorary solicitors’ of ARMA – repeatedly argued that the case should not be heard. Sir Peter Bottomley, Conservative MP for Worthing East, told the House of Commons that these legal stratagems amounted to “legal torture” of the pensioners.

Two of the original applicants had died by the time the dispute was settled in the residents’ favour. Search Oakland Court on this site for full details, or click the Oakland Court menu on the “news by category” index.

http://www.residential-property.judiciary.gov.uk/Files/2012/May/CHI_45UH_LIS_2011_31_14_May_2012_12_35_19.pdf

‘Legal torture’ pensioners settle for £68,500 … but two of the original leasehold applicants have since died

The landlords’ lawyers repeatedly delayed the LVT case of the leasehold pensioners at Oakland Court, which was criticised as “legal torture” in the Commons by Sir Peter Bottomley

Leasehold residents at the Oakland Court retirement development in Worthing today accepted a £68,500 settlement of their dispute with their landlord over the notional rent of the house warden’s flat.

Sadly, two of the original applicants have died and three have moved to full-time nursing care since the application to the LVT was made in April 2011.

The £68,500 amount equates to one-half of the £137,000 referred to in the decision of the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal in May, which was the total payment for the warden’s flat dating back to the Eighties.

The payment has been made by the landlords, the Oakland Pension Fund, whose lawyers’ stratagems to delay the case were described as “legal torture” by local MP Sir Peter Bottomley in the House of Commons.

The landlord employed as solicitors Laceys, of Bournemouth, who descibe themselves as “honorary solicitors” of ARMA, and barrister Justin Bates.

The £68,500 amounts to almost 12 years’ notional rent in respect of the warden’s flat for which leaseholders were confident of obtaining judgement had they had to go to court to enforce the LVT’s decision.

The residents’ association says the settlement of £68,500 is best viewed as representing more than full repayment of all sums erroneously charged to present leaseholders and has 100 per cent  support among them.

One of the alternatives to settling would have been to go the county court for the full £137,000, much of which would have been paid by former residents who have been dead for many years.

Full details of this case and the political fallout from it can be found on this site by searching ‘Oakland Court’

Stop this ‘legal torture’ of pensioners, says MP

Sir Peter Bottomley denounces LVT stratagems in post on LKP

Sir Peter Bottomley attacks “relentless money-grabbing opponent”

A senior Tory MP has posted on LKP today to express his utter disgust at the delaying tactics used by the freeholder  – whose lawyers included Laceys, who proclaim themselves the “honorary solicitors” of ARMA – at the Oakland Court LVT earlier this month.

Sir Peter Bottomley, MP for Worthing West, claimed that this amounted to “legal torture” and he condemned the entire LVT process, referring to “the series of actions and expensive stratagems faced by elderly frail constituents without the financial resources to play unending tribunal games with a relentless money grabbing opponent”.

The £137,000 action [see below] was won by the 40 pensioners, but two of the original applicants died and three went into care before the LVT was heard.

[Read more...]

Pensioners in £137,000 victory

Leasehold residents wrongly charged for warden’s flat … dating back to 1986!

Landmark victory at Oakland Court, in Worthing, means notional rent for a warden’s flat cannot be paid out of service charges

 

In a landmark case, 40 elderly leaseholders have won an epic battle against paying for the notional rent of their warden’s flat through the service charge.

Since 1986 this has cost the residents in Worthing, Sussex, £137.000.

The battle was fought in the face of repeated delaying tactics by their landlord, the Oakland Pension Fund, which challenged whether the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal should hear the case.

This form of delay is difficult in the civil courts, which is where this case is now headed unless the leaseholders get their money back.

But they are permitted with LVTs, which were set up to provide supposedly low-cost, simple tribunals to resolve leasehold disputes.

John Fenwick, who led the residents

“It is a fantastic victory,” said John Fenwick, 65, a former law firm employee who led the action. “Eight of our members are in their 90s, 13 in their eighties, 12 in their seventies and six in their sixties.”

The case has huge implications for other leaseholders who are being charged for the notional rent of their house manager’s flat, even though this is not mentioned in the lease.

[Read more...]