• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / Data tells us sprinklers work, waking watch doesn’t, and freehold punters aren’t picking up the tab, Martin Boyd tells ODI

Data tells us sprinklers work, waking watch doesn’t, and freehold punters aren’t picking up the tab, Martin Boyd tells ODI

December 10, 2021 //  by Admin4

Martin Boyd’s mirth at the ‘long-term custodians’: freehold investors being lumped together with developers in the monthly government cladding remediation data dumps only signals that they control everything but pay for nothing in a block of flats and are little more than an investment asset class in other people’s homes

By Harry Scoffin

Bad advice on the effectiveness of sprinkler systems in the years running up to the Grenfell Tower fire tragedy and a failure at government level to build an open and trustworthy data ecosystem for the sharing and accumulation of even basic information concerning the country’s blocks of flats have culminated in the “utter chaos” that we see in today’s leasehold flats market, where sales have plummeted 60 per cent in just three years, was the message of LKP chair Martin Boyd in a speech to the Open Data Institute last month.

Mr Boyd called for better data and spoke about a little-known survey from New Providence Wharf, the Ballymore cladding site near London Docklands that played host to a major fire in May, which found that the costly interim measure of waking watch patrols did not work in notifying occupiers to leave their apartments during the blaze, with only one person out of the 224 asked saying that the fire wardens played any role in their evacuation.

The poll of New Providence Wharf residents calls into question the need for waking watches which cost £331 per month per household to run on average in England, with the typical London flat leaseholder having to pay approximately £499 each month. In September 2021, it was confirmed that 1,053 buildings in the capital have “simultaneous evacuation strategy” in place which can involve paying for the 24/7 wandering high-vis workers.

Housing data needs to help Bob Cratchit, not Ebenezer Scrooge

In December 2019, as part of the same ODI Fridays lunchtime lectures series, Mr Boyd showed how good quality data has been essential in raising awareness of the leasehold scandal and incentivising government action, with policymakers vastly underestimating the size of the sector until LKP convinced officials in 2014 to change the methodology and improve the data on the number of leasehold dwellings which, four years later, was already 51 per cent lower than what it should be, at 6.5 million flats and leasehold houses in England and Wales.  

Government’s ‘flawed data’ underestimates scale of leasehold home scandal by 50pc

The Government is accidentally underestimating the extent of the leasehold problem because official figures exclude millions of homes, according to new research. Many leasehold properties require expensive and unfair payments to be made to the freeholder. These can include a yearly ground rent that rises over time, leaving properties unsellable, as well as other high charges.

Speaking via video link before the ODI last month, evidencing another instance of housing data helping Scrooge freeholders instead of leaseholder Bob Cratchits in the cladding and building safety crisis, Mr Boyd noted that in the monthly releases by government on the progress of remediating private sector blocks with Grenfell-style ACM cladding, a distinction is not being made between developer and freehold investor, information which should be very easy to make public.

This omission, deliberate or otherwise, is unhelpful as disaggregating “developers or freeholders” would reveal that almost all cladding sites where someone other than the taxpayer has covered the works have had remediation either paid for by the original developer or sorted by them with the warranty provider.

It would raise awkward questions of the ground rent funds or third-party freeholders who, despite being exhorted by numerous housing ministers to “do the right thing” and “pay up” in recent years and claiming to be “professional” landlords to thwart leasehold and commonhold reforms, are primarily interested in the legally enforceable income streams of an apartment building and, as LKP chief executive Sebastian O’Kelly said in his introduction, are often anonymous and offshore.

So, “why on earth would they do something as unremunerative as that, as litigating on behalf of the tenants in the building” or put their hands into their own pockets?

Showing the failure of these so-called long-term custodians, including those from private equity, in failing to pay to make safe their own property for residents through making such data publicly accessible would only further discredit leasehold as a system of organising flats, unique in the world to England and Wales.   

Martin Boyd’s talk from last month is now available on YouTube here: 

Related posts:

Martin BoydReform laws on track for ‘second half of 2020’, Martin Boyd tells Property Week Government may help over waking watch bills Please sort out ‘waking watch’ yourselves owing to coronavirus, says freeholder of Circle 109, Liverpool Martin Boyd flags controversial civil servant letter to City Hall at fire safety meeting Jeremy Pocklington cladding scandalMHCLG officials tell MPs: Don’t know costs of waking watch. No idea that at least three cladding sites are uninsured. We are not to blame but ‘30 years of developer failures’

Category: Cladding scandal, Latest News, NewsTag: Cladding scandal, Dame Judith Hackitt, Harry Scoffin, Martin Boyd, New Providence Wharf, NHBC, ODI, Open Data Institute, Sebastian O’Kelly, Sir Ken Knight, Sprinkler systems, Waking watch contracts

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (88) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (45) Commonhold (53) Competition and Markets Authority (41) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (46) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (55) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (68) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Liam Spender (33) Long Harbour (48) Lord Greenhalgh (31) Martin Boyd (81) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (56) Sir Peter Bottomley (202) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (32) Vincent Tchenguiz (43) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: «Mike Amesbury Matthew Pennycook Shadow housing brief passes from Mike Amesbury to Matthew Pennycook
Next Post: Well, can Sir Keith Lindblom do anything about Richard Davidoff’s continuing role as an officer of the property tribunal? Sir Keith Lindblom»

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Bob Crathitch

    December 12, 2021 at 12:57 pm

    The Legal System and the Legal proffession in this country ARE A LAUGHING STOCK.

    • chas

      December 18, 2021 at 11:53 pm

      Martin, I thought this would cheer some leaseholders up
      Jennifer Viccars-Moxham – UK Cladding Action Group 14 December 2021

      BEEN SERVED A DEMAND TO IMPLEMENT A SUPER EXPENSIVE AND POTENTIALLY INEFFECTIVE WAKING WATCH?

      PLEASE READ BELOW…
      – I’m the volunteer Director of the Management Company for 426 flats.

      – Like so many of you in this group, our buildings are missing cavity barriers, have noncompliant balconies and parts of our buildings have flammable cladding.

      – In May 2021, our local fire and rescue service served us an enforcement notice to implement a Waking Watch and gave us 28 days to implement.

      – We asked for an extension to the deadline, which they rejected.

      – So we took our local fire and rescue service to the magistrates court.

      – There was a full hearing and cross-examination, followed by a lengthy summary of arguments from both sides.

      AND WE JUST FOUND OUT TODAY THAT WE WON THE CASE!
      I’m speechless and so proud. But now I want to share our story with every other group of leaseholders in the same position as us.
      There is clearly a lot of detail behind this, but none of us should be stuck forking out thousands of pounds for Waking Watches for a situation that we didn’t ask for and can’t resolve, finally, a court has ruled something in our favour!

      I’m happy to write up our full story for anyone interested, so drop your names below if that would be useful and I’ll be in touch.

      Jennifer
      Volunteer Director of a Resident’s Management Company looking after approx 426 flats.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Barry Passmore

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web