• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / News / The Times reports criticisms of Jenrick’s two-storey planning windfall to what he called ‘egregious’ freeholders

The Times reports criticisms of Jenrick’s two-storey planning windfall to what he called ‘egregious’ freeholders

March 23, 2020 //  by Admin4

By Harry Scoffin

Why is Robert Jenrick rewarding an asset class he called “egregious” just last month, asked The Times on Saturday.

The report by consumer affairs correspondent Andrew Ellson considered a controversial new permitted development right that the Communities Secretary wants enshrined in law by the summer.

Freeholders attacked over cladding ‘get big windfall’

The housing secretary has been accused of giving a huge windfall to the owners of residential development freeholds days after attacking them for their response to the flammable cladding crisis. Last week Robert Jenrick announced planning reforms that would allow owners of blocks of flats to add two storeys to their sites without planning permission.

Under the proposal, freehold owners will be allowed to put two extra storeys on existing blocks of flats without planning permission.

There will be no public consultation.

Airspace and rooftop development, a nascent industry in the UK, is one way to majorly increase the value of apartment buildings.

The Times report made clear that those who hold the freeholds to people’s homes, the beneficiaries of such a permitted development right, have been heavily criticised in recent years, including by Mr Jenrick.

In comments to LBC’s Nick Ferrari, the Communities Secretary said:

“Only last month Mr Jenrick criticised a number of freehold owners, including those held in an offshore fund run by David Cameron’s brother-in-law, for failing to remove flammable cladding from their buildings.

“He called the companies ‘egregious’ and said that there was no excuse for their inaction.

“He added: ‘Just imagine what it’s like living in these buildings, knowing that the money is there to do the [remediation] work, but because you’ve got an absentee building owner who, frankly, doesn’t seem to care, the work isn’t starting.’”

The deregulation will have the knock-on effect of preventing leaseholders from buying their freedom, said LKP chief executive Sebastian O’Kelly:

“The Leasehold Knowledge Partnership, a charity that offers help and guidance to leaseholders, said that the policy would hugely increase the value of the freeholds in apartment blocks across the country because it would allow their owners to add many more homes to their sites.

“It points out that the policy would also make it more expensive for leaseholders to buy their freeholds at precisely the time the government has promised to make it easier and cheaper for them to do so. Sebastian O’Kelly, of the charity, said: ‘Increasing the supply of homes is good but it’s absurd to give such a massive windfall to the speculators in a building’s income streams, given that their freeholds are worth 1-3 per cent of a building’s total value. ‘Just as leasehold is poised to be reformed — with the Law Commission anxiously referencing freehold owners’ human rights — the last thing Mr Jenrick should be doing is giving these parasitic entities this boost.’”

In December, LKP warned against the move, saying that “freehold owners of blocks of flats will be able to argue hugely inflated values for the freehold in enfranchisement cases.”

Does Dominic Cumming’s gung-ho planning idea put a hole in Law Commission’s enfranchisement reforms by boosting freehold values?

LKP now urges Mr Jenrick to rework the policy so that only resident-owned blocks are eligible:

“The Leasehold Knowledge Partnership is calling on the government to force freeholders to share the benefits of more valuable freeholds with existing leaseholders or limit the initiative to blocks where leaseholders actually own the freehold. Mr O’Kelly said: ‘Extra storeys will be imposed on the existing leaseholders, who then end up paying for the consequences: more staircases and landings to maintain, and perhaps a new lift.’”

In its January report on valuation in enfranchisement, the Law Commission suggested that leaseholders who want to buy their freeholds should be able to opt out of paying “development value” if they have no plans to expand upwards:

“In the Report, we conclude that leaseholders could be given a power to decide to accept a restriction on future development of their block when they acquire the freehold. If they chose to accept that restriction, they would not have to pay the landlord any development value in the enfranchisement claim – so their enfranchisement premium would be reduced. If the leaseholders subsequently decided that they wanted to develop the block and therefore “realise” the development value, they could negotiate with the former landlord to release the restriction. They would, at that stage, have to make a payment to the former landlord in respect of the development value.”

However, the three reforms the body has put to ministers insist that the additional value “continue[s] to be payable” – even when the leaseholders acquiring the freehold have no intention to carry out development – a problem made worse if the “extra two storeys” permitted development right to freehold owners goes through.

Arshad Bhatti, the founder and chief executive of Apex Airspace, a firm that specialises in building new homes atop blocks of flats, has said that airspace and rooftop development is discouraged in England and Wales because of “the fear that a big fee will have to be paid to the freeholder”, calling for an end to development value in enfranchisement.

“… we believe any reform should bring forward a commitment for leaseholders taking on the freehold to only pay development value during initial build. In the first instance, this will stop the inequitable situation of new freeholders paying money for something they may not want to pursue. And, perhaps more importantly, it also means that if they do want to proceed with any development, they will have a means of immediately raising the cash through the value that they’re unlocking,” Mr Bhatti wrote in a blog for Property Week.

The Times report also highlighted the case study, first raised by LKP, in Mr Jenrick’s constituency of a freehold going to auction that could fetch considerably more with the new permitted development right.

Robert Jenrick: Why give freeholders such a whopping planning windfall over two new storeys rule, like this site in Newark?

Related posts:

Astor Tchenguiz planning windfallTwo-storey planning windfall means billions for freeholders, reports The Times Robert Jenrick windfall to freeholdersRobert Jenrick: Why give freeholders such a whopping planning windfall over two new storeys rule, like this site in Newark? Jenrick two storey giveawayHas Jenrick just handed £1bn each to Astor, Tchenguiz and Wallace Estates with two-storey planning gift? Andrew Craige CurtisFreeholder Andrew Craige Curtis to use two-storey planning give-away at a north London cladding site while leaseholders ruined with remediation bills Does Dominic Cumming’s gung-ho planning idea put a hole in Law Commission’s enfranchisement reforms by boosting freehold values?

Category: Latest News, News, Press, Rooftop developmentTag: Airspace, Andrew Ellson, Apex Airspace, Arshad Bhatti, Harry Scoffin, Jack Airey, Law Commission, Permitted development, Policy Exchange, Property Week, Robert Jenrick, Rooftop development

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (44) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (39) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (40) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (64) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (200) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (42) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: «Islington Gates £8m bills Appeal to Robert Jenrick: Islington Gates faces evacuation if cladding bills not paid on April 1
Next Post: Rip-off retirement leasehold fees give Corrie’s Ken Barlow a feast of plot lines. Let’s hope he leads a right to manage rebellion … »

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web