• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / Has Jenrick just handed £1bn each to Astor, Tchenguiz and Wallace Estates with two-storey planning gift?

Has Jenrick just handed £1bn each to Astor, Tchenguiz and Wallace Estates with two-storey planning gift?

June 30, 2020 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

We must “Build, build, build” says the government … but must that really mean “Shaft, shaft, shaft” the consumers. How on earth has this giveaway to rich and anonymous investors benefited society?

Speculators in residential freeholds have today seen them leap in value as the government eases planning on existing blocks of flats … and torpedoes leaseholders trying to enfranchise.

From August 1 blocks of flats up to 30 metres in height can extend by two storeys without the need for planning consent.

The rule change to permitted development rights applies to all detached buildings of more than three storeys that were purpose-built between July 1 1948 and March 5 2018.

This will be a huge boost to the value of the portfolios of the Consensus Business Group (Tchenguiz), Long Harbour (William Waldorf Astor) and Wallace Estates (Prop: Count Luca Padulli) and all the assorted anonymous and offshore investors.

Curiously, LKP met the then housing minister Esther McVey in autumn last year where she said categorically that the easing of planning constraints on building extra storeys would be to the benefit of leaseholders only.

Robert Jenrick: Why give freeholders such a whopping planning windfall over two new storeys rule, like this site in Newark?

Ms McVey, who is the only housing minister to express some empathy for leaseholders, was adamant that the planning gain would not be to the enrichment of the existing freeholder. Especially the anonymous ones based offshore, who make up a good chunk of the private equity investors in the Long Harbour fund, for example.

Ms McVey was sacked soon afterwards.

The government announcement:

PM: Build, Build, Build

Boris Johnson has announced the most radical reforms to our planning system since the Second World War, making it easier to build better homes where people want to live. New regulations will give greater freedom for buildings and land in our town centres to change use without planning permission and create new homes from the regeneration of vacant and redundant buildings.

Leaseholders will be the losers, however, as freeholds to these buildings will have leapt in value. Any attempt to enfranchise and purchase the freehold has just been made more expensive.

The hand-out to freehold speculators also undermines the work of the Law Commission to make leasehold enfranchisement “simpler and more cost effective”.

Whereas freeholders had to go to the trouble to concoct often spurious arguments to talk up the development potential of a site – and hence its value – now they just need to reference Mr Jenrick’s change of rules.

Government creates new PD right for two-storey upwards extensions | EG News

The government has created a new permitted development right to allow upwards extensions of two-storeys on a block of flats without the need for planning consent. Regulations will allow buildings of up to 30m, when it comes into force on 1 August.

Changes to permitted development rights allowing redundant offices to be converted to lucrative residential have created 100,000 new homes. But they have also been criticised as building “slums for the future”.

It is an open question whether this initiative is actually wise, given that the post-Covid 19 property market is likely to be very different to the past.

The Times reports criticisms of Jenrick’s two-storey planning windfall to what he called ‘egregious’ freeholders

Making rich anonymous punters in residential freeholds even richer is also not a good look for the embattled housing secretary.

Even Estates Gazette, the Bible of property interests, referenced Mr Jenrick’s handling of the £1 billion Westferry Printworks planning approval. Mr Jenrick ignored recommendations from the planning inspector to refuse the scheme, helping media tycoon Richard Desmond to avoid £45 million in CIL owed to Tower Hamlets council.

The draft Bill can be seen here.

Related posts:

The Times reports criticisms of Jenrick’s two-storey planning windfall to what he called ‘egregious’ freeholders Astor Tchenguiz planning windfallTwo-storey planning windfall means billions for freeholders, reports The Times Andrew Craige CurtisFreeholder Andrew Craige Curtis to use two-storey planning give-away at a north London cladding site while leaseholders ruined with remediation bills Two-storey planning give-awayTory councillors and Labour MP back leaseholders in blocking ERE freeholds shoving up two more storeys under Jenrick’s planning give-away Robert Jenrick windfall to freeholdersRobert Jenrick: Why give freeholders such a whopping planning windfall over two new storeys rule, like this site in Newark?

Category: Latest News, MHCLG, News, Rooftop developmentTag: Esther McVey, Permitted development, Robert Jenrick, Rooftop development, Tchenguiz, Wallace Partnership Group, William Waldorf Astor

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (45) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (41) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (42) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (67) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (201) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (43) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: «UN Human Rights cladding United Nations criticises UK government’s approach to the cladding crisis
Next Post: Barking Riverside fire survivors round on secretive freeholder Adriatic Land, reports BBC R4 »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Cath Williams

    June 30, 2020 at 1:04 pm

    I am beginning to despair with this government. Jenrick & Co appear only willing to listen to developers and billionaire offshore investors when looking at building policies. Leaseholders’ voices are drowned out by the rustle of massive donations.

    We cannot compete with that BUT we can make leasehold toxic to buyers through education and strengthening links with those MPs from all parties who actually get leasehold for what it is – a total scam.

  2. Michael Epstein

    June 30, 2020 at 2:58 pm

    And still those freeholders will not pay to make buildings with cladding safe?

  3. Alec

    July 1, 2020 at 5:42 am

    How about unscrupulous freeholders who purchased residential freehold titles to blocks of flats without the knowledge of the majority qualifying long leaseholders in criminal breach of their right of first refusal (as amended by the Housing Act 1996).?

    Will such freeholders be disqualified from taking advantage of the proposed legislation?

    Adding a couple of levels to an existing building surely involves major remedial work to the entire building – e.g. new lifts!

    Who will get charged for all this?

    At which point does it become cheaper (or more practical) to knock down an old c. 1960s building and put up a new one?

    This proposed legislation is in danger of legitimising fraud!

    In May, Mr. Jenrick informed parliament that the government remained opposed to “rip off practices in the leasehold sector” and promised “draft legislation” – hopefully before the summer recess. Where is it?

    Following the Select Committee report, and the CMA report, has the Law Commission submitted its final report?

    This is important as one essential feature of new reform must be to allow disputes to be heard by the 1st Tier Tribunal -Property and not the Courts as at present (at disproportionate cost to leaseholders)

  4. Tania

    July 2, 2020 at 11:12 am

    This article says blocks of more than 3 stories are affected, others say 3 stories and above. I live in a 3 storey block, and the freeholders have already tried and failed to get planning permission to extend upward. I need to know which it is.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web