• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / Why hasn’t EWS1 restarted the market in flats caught in the cladding scandal?

Why hasn’t EWS1 restarted the market in flats caught in the cladding scandal?

February 22, 2020 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

External Wall System 1, drawn up in December by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors and lenders in UK Finance, is an effort to restore mortgage certainty to high rise blocks of flats.

Ever since the former Communities Secretary James Brokenshire banned combustible materials in new builds above 18 metres in height – Advice Note 14 published in December 2018 – the sale of flats in high rises has become progressively more difficult.

It has reached the point now that LKP is contacted every day with several cases of sales falling through as lenders baulk at the prospect of combustible cladding on a site.

What had once involved Grenfell-style ACM (aluminium composite material) cladding, now involves cladding of different sorts, whether HPL (high pressure laminate) or timber.

With every fire, the fire safety regulators (and lenders) get more jittery.

The EWS1 review process was introduced in December 2019 to restore mortgage confidence in high rises, but it has not had immediate effect.

Indeed, ARMA reckons on eight month waits before high rises can be re-assessed.

https://www.insidehousing.co.uk/insight/why-the-attempt-to-fix-the-cladding-and-mortgage-crisis-is-not-working-65112

Inside Housing magazine – whose day job is reporting the social housing sector – has been at the forefront of reporting the cladding crisis in private blocks of flats.

Here Jack Simpson explains the aim of EWS1:

At its heart, the EWS process was moving away from the binary approach of Advice Note 14, which states that external walls on all buildings over 18m must be checked and if materials were combustible they must pass a large-scale test.

The EWS process is more nuanced and allows a “competent chartered professional with fire expertise” to check materials and give assurances to lenders that it is safe or in need of remediation.

The expert must first assess whether materials of limited combustibility are present. If they are present, it is given a clean bill of health for mortgage companies. If the materials are found to be combustible, but a fire risk assessment deems the risk to be low, it is also given the green light for lenders. The guarantee lasts for five years.

If an external wall is found to have combustible materials, then a chartered fire engineer must be appointed to carry out a more in-depth assessment.

If they deem the fire risk to be low then lenders are again given assurances. If deemed high risk, remediation work is then needed.

And here is Inside Housing’s infographic explaining how it (should) work:

But the first hurdle is the delay in getting the building assessed – the Association of Residential Managing Agents is referencing eight months.

A second is an insurance crisis as building inspectors cannot obtain professional indemnity (PI) insurance, with insurers nervy at the prospect of another Grenfell tragedy.

Even when the building is inspected, some remediation is still the likely outcome given the presense of combustible material.

Simpson writes:

“With the pace of remediation work glacial, this could mean a delay of many years before a sale goes ahead. The leaseholder could also very likely find themselves footing the bill for the work.”

John Baguley, tangible assets valuation director at RICS, claims EWS1 is working and that some sales have completed.

LKP is not habitually contacted by leaseholders without problems, but we have certainly heard from sites deemed safe where sales have fallen through as nervy lenders seek assurances that no one can give.

We had an example in a Southampton site yesterday, while Inside Housing references a leaseholder in a Leeds where an EWS inspection had deemed the building to be low risk had been unable to secure a mortgage from Halifax.

What’s more the government’s consolidated guidance in January, which replaced Advice Note 14, called for EWS style checks on all buildings regardless of height.

LKP is also being contacted about sales falling through in these lower buildings.

Dr Jonathan Evans, CEO of Ash & Lacy, who spoke at the LKP / APPG Westminster meeting in January, has been openly critical of the government’s fire safety regime.

Until it has confidence of mortgage lenders – perhaps certifying EWS findings – the cladding scandal will continue to wreak misery on leaseholders, who had no part in putting the cladding up but will – leasehold law being what it is – made to pay to remediate it.

Unless government intervenes, that is.

Related posts:

RICS and lenders ease EWS1 for under-18m blocks which has blighted the re-sale market Robert Jenrick claddingLKP survey of EWS1 shows that 90% of cladding sites DO need remediation Steve Morgan EWS1Justin Madders urges Redrow founder Steve Morgan to speed along EWS1 form so leaseholder can sell flat Cladding WorkNew fire safety certificate to unlock UK high-rise flat market after Advice Notice 14 resulted in valuations of zero, FT reports Sector announces new building safety test for leasehold blocks to ‘keep the high-rise property market flowing’

Category: Cladding scandal, Latest News, NewsTag: Dr Jonathan Evans, EWS1, Inside Housing, Jack Simpson

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (45) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (41) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (42) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (67) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (201) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (43) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: «cladding scandal vultures ‘Predatory investors’ prey on cladding sites that government advice made valueless
Next Post: ‘Worst building safety scandal in modern history’ worst building safety scandal in history»

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Stuart Greaves

    February 24, 2020 at 11:30 am

    Our daughter is in this predicament in Manchester she wants to move but because there as been no definite decision as to wether the cladding is 100% save both Manchester City council and Northwood Housing have been less than reassuring throughout this matter getting answers as been extremely difficult and disappointing.

  2. Loan

    March 15, 2020 at 4:04 pm

    I loved this post. I read your blog fairly often. You frequently have great stuff.
    I shared thiss on my Facebook page & it was very popular.
    Keep up the good work.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web