• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / Kate Osamor MP asks parliamentary questions for Long Harbour on ground rents, says Daily Telegraph

Kate Osamor MP asks parliamentary questions for Long Harbour on ground rents, says Daily Telegraph

September 18, 2018 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Labour frontbencher Kate Osamor asking a series of parliamentary questions on behalf of ground rent speculators lifts the lid on lobbying for the sector.

Miss Osamor, the shadow international development secretary, submitted six questions drafted by lobbyists Pagefield acting for the £1.6 billion Long Harbour fund, the Daily Telegraph has claimed.

LKP has contacted Labour’s housing shadow John Healey for a statement.

Long Harbour is run by William Waldorf Astor, half brother of Samantha Cameron (the wife of the former Conservative prime minister) and heir to a viscountcy.

For six years Mr Astor worked for residential freehold financier Vincent Tchenguiz, and the Long Harbour business model bears a strong resemblance to that of the Tchenguiz model.

LKP has also repeatedly invited Mr Astor to present to the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform, which would have the advantage, presumably to all, of making his lobbying transparent.

The Daily Telegraph claims that Pagefield approached Ms Osamor, the MP for Edmonton in north London, for a meeting days before she submitted the questions on July 9.

These included asking James Brokenshire, Communities Secretary, if he had considered the ­“potential effect on the viability of the leasehold sector” of regulating ground rents or removing the costs altogether, as well as about the “implications” for the building of affordable homes and “the level of house building in each ­region”.

The questions appeared to be an effort to gauge the degree of research undertaken by civil servants into the effects of “setting ground rent to as low as zero”, as the government is pledged to do.

The newspaper added:

“The Telegraph understands that Pagefield is coordinating a campaign on behalf of five firms in the leasehold sector, including Long Harbour.

“It is running a parallel campaign for the same group of firms against government efforts to force them to replace cladding on their buildings that is similar to that used on Grenfell Tower.”

Pagefield declares Long Harbour as a client in the lobbying industry register, but declined to say why the other firms were not also listed.

Long Harbour lobbyists also met LKP patron Jim Fitzpatrick MP, having repeatedly declined to do so if LKP were also part of the meeting.

Mr Fitzpatrick described their presentation as slick and plausible, although it was never likely to make much progress with one of the most active MPs calling for reform of the sector.

LKP, as secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform, has repeatedly invited Mr Astor to attend its meetings. Lord Astor, his father, is a member of the APPG and has attended once.

Our invitations stand as a means to ensure that those seeking to influence the political process on leasehold do so openly.

Long Harbour told the Telegraph: “We were pleased to be able to help inform Ms Osamor’s parliamentary questions which sought to better understand the Government’s timetable and approach to reform… There is nothing new in companies… helping parliamentarians as they go about their important ­business of questioning ministers.

Asked about the coordinated ­campaign in relation to cladding, Long Harbour said that it was attempting to “move ­forward the current slow progress of ­implementing the warranties for the apartment blocks we have which are affected by ACM cladding.”

Some of its freeholds are owned through offshore entities such as Abacus Land 4 Limited based in Guernsey, where the beneficial ownership is hidden.

It will be taking the decision on cladding issues faced by unaffluent families at Heysmoor Heights in Liverpool.

The 6 Parliamentary written questions asked by Kate Osamor MP

Q1) 16th July “To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what steps his Department has taken to consult with (a) housebuilders and (b) residential property investors on the Government’s proposals for reform of the leasehold system.”
Q2) 17th July “To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether he has made a comparative assessment of the potential merits of (a) capping ground rents at a nominal sum and (b) reducing their value to zero.”
Q3) 17th July “To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what progress his Department has made on bringing forward legislative proposals to ban (a) onerous ground rents and (b) the sale of new build leasehold houses.”
Q4) 18th July “To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assessment he has made of the potential implications for the level of housebuilding in each region of reducing the financial value of ground rents to zero.”
Q5) 18th July “To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what assessment he has made of the potential implications for the provision of affordable homes of reducing the financial value of ground rents to zero.”
Q6) 18th July ” To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether he has made a comparative assessment of the potential effect on the viability of the leasehold sector of (a) regulating ground rents and (b) removing the financial value of ground rents; and if he will make a statement.”

 

Baz Jafar, a leasehold activist and constituent of Kate Osamor MP wrote to her yesterday:

Dear Kate

The Times has recently written about the fact you have met with representatives of the Long Harbour fund, and asked questions of the Housing Minister seemingly off the back of your meeting:
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/labour-mp-kate-osamor-in-spotlight-over-meeting-q37zs09dd

Based on our previous meetings, you should be aware that Long Harbour seem to be the ultimate owners (or at least heavily involved) in matters surrounding the freehold of Prowse Court.

You should also be aware that the freehold to Prowse Court was sold out from under our feet to Long Harbour, bypassing our legal right of first refusal based on some agreement and legal loophole between Countryside Properties and Long Harbour that was never communicated to leaseholders or potential purchasers.

You are also aware that Prowse Court leaseholders suffer from onerous doubling ground rents, and that Long Harbour chose not to engage with any of the leaseholders until their hand was forced to offer a deed of variation to an RPI linked ground rent due to the bad publicity and media attention generated by Prowse Court leaseholders. To this day, our only communication with Long Harbour is by sporadic email with their agent, Homeground Management Limited, which mainly consists of demands for ground rent due.

Long Harbour have hired a PR firm to represent their interests, so I’m naturally interested to understand what you discussed with Long Harbour and what prompted this meeting?

I’m concerned your recent meeting represents an effort by Long Harbour to lobby MP’s that have constituents blighted by unfair ground rents, in an attempt to limit the damage of any future government reforms to their business model.

Your meeting seems to have spurred some questions in parliament that concern the interests of funds such as Long Harbour, so I thought I would write to you and hear the facts directly from you about your meeting with Long Harbour, and the choice of question to the Housing Minister quoted in The Times article. I know you have previously been supportive of our fight against unfair ground rents so has anything changed?

Looking forward to your reply,

Basim Jafar

 

Related posts:

Long Harbour lobby MP Kate Osamor bars leasehold activist from Twitter feed Default ThumbnailQuestions for MPs to ask Taylor Wimpey and Long Harbour today … Why is the Tory party not supporting real home ownership, asks Daily Telegraph Will Astor ‘tried to nobble reform of ground rents’, Daily Mail claims Are hedge funds behind Long Harbour, asks Tory MP

Category: Latest News, News, Parliament, William Waldorf AstorTag: Kate Osamor MP, Long Harbour

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (70) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (44) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (39) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (39) Grenfell cladding (55) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (64) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (47) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (200) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (42) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « New trustees and changes at LKP
Next Post: The Social Housing Green Paper – the government should do more, says ex-civil servant »

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web