• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / Court of Appeal backs rights of 200,000 shared ownership leaseholders after right to manage duel with Israel Moskovitz

Court of Appeal backs rights of 200,000 shared ownership leaseholders after right to manage duel with Israel Moskovitz

June 20, 2023 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

By Mark Loveday

A great day for the estimated 200,000+ shared ownership leaseholders, as the Court of Appeal confirms they have the same legal rights as other private sector leaseholders.

In Avon Ground Rents v Canary Gateway (Block A) RTM [2023] EWCA Civ 616, (30 May 2023), the Court rejected an appeal by the litigious landlord Avon Ground Rents, which opposed a claim for the right to manage seven blocks of flats in London’s East End. Leaseholders successfully argued that 12 shared ownership leaseholders (who had not ‘staircased’ to 100%) were properly treated as tenants under right to manage legislation.

The decision brings to a successful end an extraordinary four years of litigation by residents seeking to oust Avon from management of the flats in London’s East End. But not before at least two visits to the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber), two to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) and various forays into the courts as well. Leaseholders first tried to take over the management of their blocks of flats from landlord, Avon Ground Rents, in 2019. In November 2020, the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) ruled that the 12 had “long leases” within the meaning of s.76(2) of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002, but dismissed the application for the right to manage on other grounds. In fresh proceedings, Avon argued the 2020 Upper Tribunal decision was wrong.

The outcome turned on whether the 12 shared ownership leaseholders (none of whom had proceeded to ‘staircase’ to 100% of the leases), each had a “long lease” as defined by s.76(2) of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002. If they did not have a “long lease’, their housing association landlord would be treated as the qualifying tenant – and it would have to be given separate preliminary notices inviting participation. The argument was therefore essentially that a landlord was really a “tenant” for the purposes of the Act.

In the 2020 decision of Avon v Canary Gateway (Block A) RTM Ltd and others [2020] UKUT 358 (LC), the Upper Tribunal decided the 12 shared ownership leaseholders were indeed the qualifying tenants of their flats. Eventually Avon conceded that half the blocks could acquire the right to manage. But in subsequent proceedings, Avon’s legal team argued the Upper Tribunal had been wrong in relation to the rest. It failed in the First-tier Tribunal and again in the Upper Tribunal but appealed to the Court of Appeal.

Avon argued the shared ownership leaseholders failed to meet the requirements of s.76(2)(e) of the Act, which expressly provides that a long lease includes “a shared ownership … where the tenant’s total share is 100%”. But the leaseholders relied on the default provisions of s.76(2)(a), which provides that a long lease is a lease “for a term of years certain exceeding 21 years”.

In the appeal, the RTM company was represented by barristers Mark Loveday and James Castle of Tanfield Chambers. Lord Justice Nourse, (with whom Lady Justice King and Laing agreed) reviewed four previous decisions of the Upper Tribunal and the High Court on the meaning of section 76(2) and the identically worded provisions of s.7(1) of the Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act 1993. He concluded as a matter of interpretation that:

“On the face of it, the various paragraphs represent, as was submitted by Mr Loveday, a series of gateways. A lease will be a “long lease” if any of paragraphs (a) to (f) is in point. That suggests that, as the Company contends and the Judge held, a shared ownership lease for a term of more than 21 years will be a “long lease” whether or not the tenant has a 100% interest: paragraph (e) will not be applicable, but paragraph (a) will, and that will suffice.”

But the court went further. It rejected arguments about the policy behind the provisions, based on a 2000 government consultation paper. Instead, it took the view that there:

“seems to me to be force in Mr Loveday’s argument as to the policy underlying section 76. Tenants with long shared ownership leases who have not staircased to 100% will still have an obvious interest in how the premises are managed, the more so since they will typically pay full service charges. That being so, Parliament might have been expected to have intended them to be able to participate in management issues.”

Shared ownership leases (or ‘part-rent, part buy’) are a fast expanding form of low-cost home ownership, with the government currently committed to funding another 90,000 on top of the 202,000 existing numbers[1]. Mark Loveday said:

“This is an important win for the Canary Gateway residents – but more importantly a massive win for tens of thousands of shared ownership leaseholders across the country. The Court of Appeal has sent the clearest possible message they are not a second-rate class of homeowners. They have the same legal rights as any other leaseholder”.

James Castle commented:

“The importance of this case may actually lie elsewhere. Given the definition of “long lease” in section 76(2) of the 1993 Act is identical to section s.5(2) of the 2002 Act, this confirms shared ownership leaseholders have valuable rights to extend their leases and participate in collective enfranchisement.”

The decision means the RTM Company has now acquired the right to manage.

Mark and James appeared for the respondents to the appeal, Canary Gateway (Block A) RTM Co. They were instructed by the leasehold litigation specialists, Jobsons Solicitors of Stafford.

A copy of the judgment is here.

[1] https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-8828/

Related posts:

Israel Moskovitz fails – again – to appeal against the Regent Court right to manage Israel Moskovitz loses epic Elim Court right to manage battle in landmark Court of Appeal decision Israel Moskovitz loses appeal on right to charge £36 a pop for collecting his ground rents LKP cladding scandal surveyLKP backs Sadiq Khan demand that ALL shared ownership leases to be 999 years Should the RTMF be taking the Elim Court battle for right to manage to the Court of Appeal?

Category: Latest News, News, Shared ownershipTag: Avon Freeholds, Israel Moskovitz, Mark Loveday, Shared ownership, Tanfield Chambers

Sign up to the LKP newsletter

Fill in the link here

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (44) ARMA (91) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (33) CMA (46) Commonhold (56) Competition and Markets Authority (42) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (55) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (55) Israel Moskovitz (32) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (36) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (31) Justin Bates (41) Justin Madders MP (75) Katie Kendrick (40) Law Commission (61) LEASE (68) Leasehold Advisory Service (65) Leasehold houses (32) Liam Spender (39) Long Harbour (51) Lord Greenhalgh (32) Martin Boyd (87) McCarthy and Stone (43) National Leasehold Campaign (42) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Retirement (38) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (67) Sir Peter Bottomley (211) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (34) Vincent Tchenguiz (45) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « What is the point of this government, asks Lisa Nandy as it wriggles over promised leasehold reforms
Next Post: We need retirement ground rent gaming like a hole in the head, say retirement community operators »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Lorimer

    June 20, 2023 at 11:42 pm

    Is the fee-earning Barrister writing an article about himself here?? , publicising his own win in Court to a Leaseholder-friendly media outlet?
    That would be the pinnacle of narcissism
    The irony is this;
    Six years ago, the same Barrister acted for this same (parasitic) ground rent investor and AGAINST an RTM Company in London’s Earls Court LKP

    • Martin

      June 21, 2023 at 11:11 pm

      That’s what barristers do. It was important to write up this decision as it is very important for shared owners

      We asked Mark Loveday to write a report for the site not the other way around

  2. Stephen Burns

    June 21, 2023 at 8:12 pm

    Congratulations to Canary Gateway (Block A) RTM for achieving victory in that long and hard fought case.

    I hope this news travels like wild fire through the media so that the other “200,000 + Shared Ownership Leaseholders” can directly benefit from this Legal milestone.

    Engaging top drawer Barristers to represent the RTM was clearly a sound decision that delivered the right result,

  3. victimofyymanagement

    June 25, 2023 at 4:05 am

    ah avon ground rents, just had the privilege of them raising my management charge 29% despite the fact they do little managing.

    Found out they charged me for non existent services last year, convientley not sending the service charge estimates the year introduced.

    not to mention 7000% increase in maintenance charge. Despite very little maintenance being done.

    And their wheeze adding multiple telephone hotlines.

    Could go for days how they scam me but for couple of hundred am I going to risk bankruptcy if their fees are charged back to service charge as keasecallows?

  4. Vinny Tchenguiz

    June 27, 2023 at 3:57 am

    It`s nice of Mr Moskovitz to help shared ownership leaseholders claringfying their right to manage in the home of legal skullduggery. Thanks Israel.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Barry Passmore

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2025 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web