• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / News / Dame Judith Hackitt’s uninterest in leasehold tenure is like ‘wanting to build cars with no idea how they are driven’, says LKP

Dame Judith Hackitt’s uninterest in leasehold tenure is like ‘wanting to build cars with no idea how they are driven’, says LKP

October 4, 2020 //  by Admin4

No engagement with leaseholders throughout the Hackitt review, Communities Select Committee is told

By Harry Scoffin

Dame Judith Hackitt, the government’s de facto building safety tsar, was criticised by LKP on Monday at the Communities Select Committee for not bothering to understand the governance of blocks of flats.

LKP had tried to interest Dame Judith Hackett, the former Health and Safety Executive chair who headed the post-Grenfell review into the construction, occupation and maintenance of England’s high-rises, into the legal structures underlying freeholds and leases as well.

LKP chair Martin Boyd told the committee: “When we first met Dame Judith Hackitt, at the very beginning of her work, and tried to explain the impact that leasehold will have on how a building is managed, her view was that she was not interested in tenure type and that her interest was only in building safety. Unfortunately, that is like saying you are interested in making cars, but not how they are going to be driven.”

Mr Boyd observed that the Building Safety Bill, which will enshrine in law Dame Judith Hackett’s final recommendations, was silent on what happens to the big and complex mixed-use schemes where each section of interest within a block may involve “two, possibly three or even more accountable entities”.

Mr Boyd said that it was unclear who will assume ultimate responsibility with the new state-backed regulator on sites characterised by multiple and possibly competing building landlords.

Mr Boyd is himself chair of the enfranchised, mixed-use Charter Quay, on Kingston’s riverside. He argued that Dame Judith Hackett had failed adequately to distinguish between the construction of a development from its occupation phase:

“There is no clear evidence of defective behaviour during the occupation phase. What has not failed so far is property management, as far as this Bill is concerned. We are not seeing buildings that are being damaged while they are running in a steady state. We are seeing buildings that have defects in the construction phase, and we have obviously seen the tragedy with the refurbishment that took place at Grenfell.”

By assuming properly built apartment buildings in their occupation phase to be inherently “dangerous entities”, the Building Safety Bill could undermine a transition towards commonhold and other democratic forms of flat living, argued Mr Boyd.

“There is also the problem that you have to make a number of these roles such that an ordinary person is able to take them on. Buildings are not per se dangerous entities. They are not oil refineries. We all live in buildings. We do not have a safety officer outside our front door, most days.

“We appoint a professional managing agent to make sure that they look after the building for us. As we move to an era of commonhold, we are going to have that as the de facto system that exists. A commonhold is collectively owned by the people who live in that building.”

Mr Boyd made specific reference to the way the Bill conceives sanctions, putting home owners, who bought their properties in good faith, on the same level as developers, architects, engineers and inspectors – those actually responsible for the design and building of flats.

Under the new building safety regime, a failure to comply with the Hackitt-inspired regulations carries up to two years in prison and an unlimited fine.

Yet future flat-buyers would not be able to bring a civil case challenging the original developer for selling them a defective building. There is a precedent for this in other jurisdictions, such as Australia.

LKP is calling for a 10 year new-build defects period as many residential blocks are sold to last for 999 years.

“Ordinary people do not have the right to take these criminal actions. Are we reliant on Dame Judith Hackitt to decide to take action?” Mr Boyd told the committee.

Mr Boyd’s concerns around the impacts of the robust regulatory regime on self-governing residential towers, where the third-party freeholder is removed from potentially compromising the structural integrity of the property through neglect and aggressive income extraction, was shared by Nigel Glen, CEO of the Association of Residential Managing Agents (ARMA).

Mr Glen, who is himself a leaseholder who gets to direct the managing agent on his site, said that he too would not agree to be the accountable person designated in the Bill, and thereby risk being slapped with criminal charges by the building safety watchdog.

He advised the cross-party group of MPs that lay directors should be permitted to outsource the accountable person role to a professional who had the risk appetite and insurance cover, but cautioned that they would still need to be remunerated, which means higher service charges.

These issues will only grow as Mr Boyd pointed out the Building Safety Bill lacks provisions for commonhold ownership, which is set for a revival after this year’s Law Commission report urged it as the “preferred alternative” to the unique leasehold system in England and Wales.

Cladding crisis reveals why freeholders are an impediment to any solution

Mr Boyd suggested that Dame Judith Hackitt’s influence on the Bill has had the effect of propping up the current “divide and rule” system, where blocks of flats are run as fiefdoms by investor freeholders, housing associations and managing agents. These professionals decide amongst themselves how much information may be given to the leasehold owners – even though their combined financial stake in a block dwarfs the value of the freehold and can amount to 98%.

Mr Boyd was scathing of the qualified chemical engineer’s record on resident voice:

“We can sum it up by saying that Dame Judith Hackitt’s approach to resident engagement throughout the whole of her project was that she has had no engagement with private residents whatsoever.

“We have never met her to discuss the issues she thinks are relevant to residents. That tells you her mindset. The way she looks at this is that she is going to set up a committee at some point in the future, as is proposed in the Bill, to decide how these residents should be engaged with. It is a very top-down approach.”

Safer and better managed high-rises mean “a culture change” with an end to residents being treated as children, he said.

“If we are going to engage properly with residents, we have to give them the resources to organise themselves professionally.”

Every block of flats should have a built-in residents’ organisation with none of the current restrictions on who can participate, said Mr Boyd.

He cited the fact that leasehold law prevents the rental tenant from joining the recognised residents’ association as a formal member.

Under LKP proposals submitted to the committee and housing minister Lord Stephen Greenhalgh, residents of all tenures and none would be empowered to have a greater say over the management of their homes without having to go through the rigmarole of being legally recognised.

Here is an example of an aggressive freeholder spending £74,000 on a QC to resist recognition of a Recognised Tenants’ Association:

West India Quay’s victory against £74,560 legal onslaught … for a recognised residents’ association

They would be freed from the bureaucracy that saw just five successful tribunal applications for recognition in the first year following a shakeup of the rules in 2018.

There would also be no room for stalling tactics and other game-playing from landlords.

Adriatic Land and HomeGround, part of the £1.8bn freehold fund Long Harbour whose chief executive Richard Silva appeared remotely before the cross-party group of MPs in the second session, for example, sat on a request by leaseholders of east London’s New Festival Quarter.

In a statement to LKP, leaseholders at the cladding site in Poplar said:

“In order to get the residents association recognised the leaseholders at the New Festival Quarter site in Tower Hamlets in London approached our freeholder (Adriatic Land) through its agent (HomeGround) back in 2018 following us finding out that the development had a cladding issue. Even though we had sufficient number of members the freeholder found various reasons not to recognise our association for approximately 1.5 years despite our persistence.

“It is unacceptable that the freeholders/managing agents are not properly regulated. Our estate is comprised of c. 500 flats – we feel that we don’t have many rights as leaseholders in this country and the freehold/leasehold regime is an anachronism which is heavily abused by the developers.”

Related posts:

Will government dump Dame Judith Hackitt’s £60,000 a year building safety managers job creation scheme? Dame Judith HackittDame Judith Hackitt says cladding leaseholders risk ruin with rip-off charges. She wants to help. But is still at sea over leasehold law … Building Safety BillGovernment dumps Dame Judith Hackitt’s ‘building safety managers’, but what do the latest amendments to the Building Safety Bill mean for leaseholders? Hackitt and Knight back dumping unregulated sector-insider ‘building safety managers’ onto leaseholders at £60,000 a year, MPs told Reviewer of building regulations admits post-Grenfell safety regime open to abuse by rogue freeholders

Category: Communities Select Committee, Latest News, NewsTag: Adriatic Land, ARMA, Building Safety Bill, Building safety reform, Building safety regulator, Charter Quay, Commonhold, Dame Judith Hackitt, Harry Scoffin, Homeground Management Limited, Law Commission, Lord Greenhalgh, Martin Boyd, New Festival Quarter, Nigel Glen, Recognised Residents' Association, Richard Silva

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (45) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (41) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (42) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (67) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (201) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (43) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: «Andrew Craige Curtis Freeholder Andrew Craige Curtis to use two-storey planning give-away at a north London cladding site while leaseholders ruined with remediation bills
Next Post: ‘Get out of your ivory tower’: Tory MP turns on Jenrick over ‘shocking betrayal’ of cladding leaseholders »

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web