Building Safety Bill

Government dumps Dame Judith Hackitt’s ‘building safety managers’, but what do the latest amendments to the Building Safety Bill mean for leaseholders?

Will government dump Dame Judith Hackitt’s £60,000 a year building safety managers job creation scheme?

Ted Baillieu: Your misconceived Twitter thread over the ‘polluter pays’ amendment should be removed

The Building Safety Bill: what do the government’s amendments mean for leaseholders?

The Building Safety Bill: what’s next and what can leaseholders do?

Making the polluter pay

Hackitt and Knight back dumping unregulated sector-insider ‘building safety managers’ onto leaseholders at £60,000 a year, MPs told

Curiouser and curiouser: the Building Safety Bill has Second Reading in the Commons

Building Safety Bill: Made by officials. By themselves. Talking to themselves. Will the cogs turn?

Building Safety Bill is a device for which the batteries aren’t included. It could be improved, if only officials would listen …

Self-interested freeholders and property managers chorus: ‘taxpayer must pay over cladding’ … which, as it happens, leaves their income streams untouched

‘Get out of your ivory tower’: Tory MP turns on Jenrick over ‘shocking betrayal’ of cladding leaseholders

Dame Judith Hackitt’s uninterest in leasehold tenure is like ‘wanting to build cars with no idea how they are driven’, says LKP

Sector says ‘no, thanks’ to controversial Building Safety Bill

URGENT: Respond to Building Safety Bill call for evidence

Building Safety Bill means … leaseholders are going to have to pay a lot of money to clear up the mess of other people