• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / Dire state of apartment re-sales in London revealed in Hamptons report

Dire state of apartment re-sales in London revealed in Hamptons report

January 12, 2026 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly//  6 Comments

‘London sellers were more likely than anyone else to sell their home for less than they bought it for’ – David Fell, Hamptons

The disastrous state of London resales has been confirmed in a report by Hamptons drawing on Land Registry data showing 14.8% of sellers sold up in 2025 for less than they originally bought – worse even than the North East: the property black spot of the last decade.

The London figures are also far worse than in Manchester (6.7%) or Birmingham (7.3%).

The link is here and includes a nationwide interactive map:

https://www.hamptons.co.uk/articles/2025-seller-gains#

Flat sellers accounted for 60% of London sales last year, but represented 90% of homes sold at a loss.

Even sellers who bought a decade ago face getting back less than they paid – an unthinkable outcome with residential property in the first decade and half of the century.

The trend is confirmed in case studies coming to LKP, where a buy-to-let investor bought a £175,000 flat in Feltham, south east London, and a £220,000 flat in Wimbledon, in south west London.

Both sites have cladding issues, and as a Non-Qualifying Leaseholder under the building safety regime, the investor is haemorrhaging cash on waking watch etc.

Auctioneers estimate the flats’ values now at £70,000 and £130,000 – a £195,000 loss.

This article by Joe Douglas, a resident management company director and a leasehold reform activist, lays out the despair of being a Help-To-Buy leasehold flat owner in the capital: of how doing everything that society wanted of a young professional – taking a first step in having a material stake in it – has blighted the lives of him and his partner to the point that it has stopped them considering having children.

News on the Block | Apartment Building Management Resource

News on the Block | Britain’s Best Apartment Building Management Resource | over 7000 pages including advice on leasehold, service charges & enfranchisement

The author of the Hamptons report, the firm’s lead analyst David Fell, says that as recently as 2019, 29.9% of North East sellers sold for less than they paid compared with 9.2% in London, reflecting the region’s slow recovery from the 2008 financial crash.

But loss-making sales in the North East fell to just 13.9% in 2025.

In contrast, London’s figure has risen markedly.

Hamptons says: “This trend has been driven largely by flat sellers who, despite accounting for 60% of London sales last year, represented 90.0% of homes sold at a loss, up from 78.4% in 2019.

“Last year, 28.2% of sellers in Tower Hamlets [which has the highest density of flats second to Westminster] sold for less than they paid, the highest figure in both the capital and the country, with flats making up 90%+ of all sales in the area.”

The City of London (26.2%), Kensington & Chelsea (22.4%), Westminster (22.1%) and Hammersmith & Fulham (20.8%) complete the top five local authorities where more than a fifth of sellers sold at a loss in 2025. Meanwhile, in Barking & Dagenham – London’s cheapest borough – just 5.3% of sellers sold below purchase price.

Hamptons says: “While the average London seller in 2025 still achieved a price of £172,510 (44.6%) above what they originally paid, most of this uplift stems from historic house price growth.”

Half of London sellers last year had owned their home for more than a decade, which accounted for 77% of the total gains.

It gets worse:

“Over the next few years, more sellers are likely to have missed out on London’s 2012-16 house price boom, having bought instead at what turned out to be the top of the market. That could make trading up increasingly challenging.”

House owners recorded higher gains than flat owners: 59.6% over an average of 10.3 years, compared with 35.4% for flats over a similar 10.1 year period.

Hamptons says: “London house sellers were more than six times less likely than flat sellers to make a loss (3.5% vs 22.2%). This widening gap has made it increasingly difficult for flat owners to bridge the step up to a house.”

It adds: “Across England & Wales, 8.7% of sellers in 2025 got back less for their property than they originally paid, down slightly from 8.8% in 2024. However, this figure masks a sizeable divide between property types: 19.9% of 2025 flat sellers sold at a loss, compared with just 4.5% of house owners, down from 5.7% in 2024.”

“The recent slowdown in house price growth nationally is likely to reduce the uplift homeowners achieve when they come to sell in the coming years. But for many, moving remains a discretionary decision, heavily influenced by the value they can achieve.

“If the numbers don’t stack up – and sellers risk losing part of their original deposit – many choose to stay put. This means some homeowners, particularly those unable to secure a gain, are likely to remain out of the market.”

Related posts:

New build flat sales volume has fallen 60% and re-sales trail old and new houses Telegraph reports rip-off leasehold sales packs Martin Paine demanded ground rents of thousands from two London leaseholders ONS trumpets collapse in sales of new-build leasehold houses Last year: £64.8bn leasehold properties sold. £13.7bn was new-build. Leasehold house numbers double. Developers make £300-500 million a year from ground rent sales

Category: Latest News, NewsTag: Hamptons, Joe Douglas, London, Re-sales

Sign up to the LKP newsletter

Fill in the link here

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (44) ARMA (92) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (33) CMA (46) Commonhold (58) Competition and Markets Authority (42) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (56) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (55) Israel Moskovitz (32) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (36) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (31) Justin Bates (41) Justin Madders MP (75) Katie Kendrick (41) Law Commission (61) LEASE (68) Leasehold Advisory Service (65) Leasehold houses (32) Liam Spender (52) Long Harbour (57) Lord Greenhalgh (32) Martin Boyd (88) McCarthy and Stone (43) National Leasehold Campaign (42) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Retirement (38) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (68) Sir Peter Bottomley (211) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (34) Vincent Tchenguiz (45) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « Ex-minister Justin Madders becomes co-chair of APPG. Full list below:
Next Post: Death knell for leasehold »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Stephen Burns

    January 17, 2026 at 2:38 am

    Leasehold ownership is clearly a depreciating asset in respect to the above detailed analysis. Oh dear.

    Reply
  2. Stephen

    January 18, 2026 at 12:19 am

    Many leaseholders whose blocks are managed by an RMC, RTM, or who have a share of freehold, and whose ground rents are modest and unremarkable, may feel that some of the aggressive campaigning has been counterproductive. The perception among buyers—particularly first-time buyers—is that flats are universally problematic, regardless of the ownership or management structure.

    Introducing commonhold is likely to create a two-tier market, forcing RMCs, RTMs, and share-of-freehold arrangements to incur significant costs simply to rebrand themselves as commonhold, while seeing little, if any, tangible benefit.

    What is needed is a calmer, more measured debate. Proposals to cap all ground rents at a peppercorn, for example, do little to foster the mature, nuanced discussion the sector requires.

    Reply
    • MR Bryan Wildman

      January 19, 2026 at 8:19 am

      Are you a freeholder per chance?

      Reply
      • Rob

        January 20, 2026 at 7:30 pm

        Stephen is indeed one of the ‘businessmen’ involved in perpetuating the leasehold system. You can find him on practically every public forum repeating the same tired old arguments almost verbatim.

        Reply
    • Stephen Burns

      January 20, 2026 at 12:54 am

      Stephen,

      Are you a Leaseholder, and If so, what are your ground rent terms and what is your service charge demand ?

      Both our Daughters and eldest Grandson had the good sense to avoid buying a Fleecehold tenancy thus avoiding being potentialy “robbed blind” through the duration of the limited lease duration by the Fleeceholder.

      They avoided the often “extortianiate” unjustiefied service charge and the dreaded “deficit letter” which are often sent with out supporting evidence and are sometimes as clear as “mud” in terms of justification and or even basic explanation.

      The current Fleecehold system resembles the ” WILD WEST” according to certain Ministers of State.

      Radical charge is very long over due and the exploitation of those with limited incom must be ended in respect of satisfying the insatiable GREED of some FLEECEHOLDERS

      Reply
  3. David Colin McArthur

    January 20, 2026 at 1:53 pm

    From The Guardian “The measure (capping ground rents) was part of a draft leasehold bill due to be published last year, which was delayed after (Rachel, The Chancellor) Reeves became concerned that capping ground rents could deter property investors”.
    When something is wrong, it is wrong and the very existence of leasehold is not only wrong it is wrong on stilts. The socialist(?) Rachel Reeves wants ordinary hard working people to finance rich property developers. If my blood wasn’t already boiling, it would be boiling over and flooding the kitchen.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Barry Passmore

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2026 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web