• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / News / Martin Paine demanded ground rents of thousands from two London leaseholders

Martin Paine demanded ground rents of thousands from two London leaseholders

February 22, 2016 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

 

View over London from Nunhead to the south east of the city
View over London from Nunhead to the south east of the city
[pro_ad_display_adzone id=”11520″ popup=”1″ delay=”7″ exit_popup=”1″ popup_opacity=”0.3″]It is not just Blythe Court … two London leasehold owners also faced demands of thousands of pounds in unexpected ground rents after purchasing flats in different parts of the capital.

The leaseholders came forward following the publication last month by the Leasehold Knowledge Partnership of the issues at Blythe Court.

Both bought flats in sites where the freeholds are owned by companies controlled by Martin Paine and / or his wife [Margaret] Anne Kirmond. Deeds of variation had been introduced to the leases that meant thousands of pounds a year were owed in inflated ground rents.

Like the flat owners at Blythe Court, the London flat owners took legal action against their conveyancing solicitors to extricate themselves.

This is a course of action that is encouraged by Martin Paine, as correspondence at Blythe Court demonstrates.

Both the London leaseholders decline to be named at this point, but LKP has discussed the issues with them and their solicitors.

One of the London leaseholders bought his flat in Nunhead, in south-east London in August 2011. The site is two converted flats, with the freehold owned by Chamber Estates, whose directors are Martin Paine and F.t.z. Limited, of which Mr Paine is the sole director.

The site is managed by Mr Paine’s Circle Residential Management Limited.

Preliminary research in the Land Registry suggests that Mercia Investment Properties, whose directors are Martin Paine and F.t.z. Limited, own the freeholds of 73 properties. F.t.z. Limited may own a further 19.

As part of the purchase, the London buyer’s conveyancing solicitor sort to extend and vary the lease.

At some point in the negotiation, Mr Paine inserted a ground rent review clause that was not picked up by the conveyancing solicitor before the document was signed and contracts were exchanged.

“The clause effectively increased the ground rent from £300 per annum to the amount of £6,932 per annum, something I only discovered when Martin Paine sent me a demand for this amount later in 2011,” says the lease owner.

“Not being willing or able to pay this amount I had to make a professional negligence claim against the solicitors, an outcome Martin Paine had clearly designed and which he actively encouraged me to pursue

“The whole matter was finally settled in June 2014 at huge cost and with Martin Paine being paid a significant sum to agree to revert the ground rent to the original amount.

“As you can imagine this was extremely stressful for me personally.

“I wouldn’t wish this experience on anyone and I feel for the other people who have suffered but I am also grateful that this has been brought to light by LKP.

“I kind of regret I didn’t do anything to escalate this at the time, but as I’m sure you can imagine a situation like that can make you feel rather helpless and that the odds are stacked against you.

“At the time I wasn’t aware of any suitable recourse, so in that sense I’m glad to have come across your articles and website and I have nothing but admiration for you bringing the issues of Blythe Court to light.”

The other owner signed confidentiality agreements as part of the settlement and, as a result, does not wish to be named. However, LKP has discussed the case with the both the conveyancing solicitors, and the litigation solicitors who had to sue them.

Only after a substantial claim was made against the conveyancing solicitors’ professional indemnity insurers was the matter concluded.

The leasehold buyer did issue the following statement to LKP:

“My wife and I bought a flat in London in 2010 on the assumption (confirmed by our conveyancing solicitors) that the ground rent was £150 per year.

“The previous leaseholders had negotiated an informal lease extension to 90+ years with Mercia Investment Properties, via their agent Circle Residential Management (both of whom, of course, are in effect Mr and Mrs Paine).

“These previous leaseholders then sold on to us and, once we started to have the problems outlined below after the sale, refused to enter into any further correspondence with us.

“The deed of variation extending the lease included onerous ground rent clauses to which our conveyancing solicitors did not alert us.

“These included a doubling clause dating back to the start of the original lease in the 1970s, and a minimum ground rent provision linking the ground rent to the “rentable value” of the property.

“We received a demand for ground rent, several months after buying the flat, for c. £8,000.

“When we queried this with our conveyancing solicitors, it became apparent that they had not read the relevant portions of the lease extension properly, nor even forwarded this document to us before we completed our purchase of the flat (the terms of the lease extension would have led to a ground rent of over £600,000 before the expiry of the term).

“We then began legal action against their firm for professional negligence, with the aid of new solicitors.”

Martin Paine was contacted for a comment before publication of this article.

Related posts:

Barnard Marcus withdraws Blythe Court flat from auction Stop auction of ‘worthless’ flat at Blythe Court and alert authorities, Commons asked Martin Paine sells on Blythe Court, where ground rents reach £8,000 a year Spreading Paine: the freeholds owned by Martin Paine and his wife (Margaret) Anne Kirmond Martin Paine 'crook' MPs toldMartin Paine ‘is a crook who is turning sleaze in leases into an art form’, MPs told

Category: Martin Paine, NewsTag: Blythe Court, Chamber Estates Limited, Circle Residential Management Limited, F.t.z. Limited, Margaret Anne Kirmond, Martin Paine, Mercia Investment Properties Limited

Sign up to the LKP newsletter

Fill in the link here

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (44) ARMA (91) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (33) CMA (46) Commonhold (56) Competition and Markets Authority (42) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (55) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (55) Israel Moskovitz (32) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (36) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (31) Justin Bates (41) Justin Madders MP (75) Katie Kendrick (40) Law Commission (61) LEASE (68) Leasehold Advisory Service (65) Leasehold houses (32) Liam Spender (39) Long Harbour (51) Lord Greenhalgh (32) Martin Boyd (87) McCarthy and Stone (43) National Leasehold Campaign (42) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Retirement (38) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (67) Sir Peter Bottomley (211) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (34) Vincent Tchenguiz (45) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « Richard John Clarke
Next Post: Dig out your own leasehold flat »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Karen

    February 22, 2016 at 11:38 am

    Well well, so it seems that this is a common practice for Mr Paine and his companies.

    If I had a few minutes spare, I would buy the land registry data for all of Mr Paines’ property portfolio and write to the leaseholders and ask them if they too have fallen foul of this practice and if so, I would recommend they all get together and speak to a solicitor as a group and ask what can be done to rectify this issue.

    There would be quite a few good solicitors practices who would love to take this case on I am sure on a no win no fee basis!

    • Michael Hollands

      February 22, 2016 at 6:09 pm

      This sounds to be a very cleverly thought out racket, Is it legal and does Mr Paine have a solicitor who coludes with him..
      I wonder if Mercia Investment Properties will be applying for ARMA Q, and how many years it would take them to consider his application.

  2. Leaseholder

    February 22, 2016 at 7:40 pm

    No surprises there. If there is a good loophole in the system, one may as well make the most of it. The only solution is for the leasehold system to undergo radical reform, finally eliminating “opportunities’ for the freeholder. The freeholder (and the entourage of managing agents, solicitors, accountants etc) can do this full time, since it’s their job. Leaseholders have limited resources and time to spend on this, since most of us are not “professional leaseholders’ we just happened to buy a flat and we need a fair system to protect us.

  3. vivien aldred

    February 23, 2016 at 10:20 am

    The elephant in the room here – which nobody has identified – is the failure of the solicitors to pick up the Deeds of Variation.

    If I was entering into a contract of any kind and employing a lawyer to deal with this and to advise/protect my interests I would be extremely angry if they failed to pick up changes which cost me thousands of pounds.

    What is the point of employing them if they fail in their basic duty to their client?

    Surely this is an issue for the Law Society?

    • martin

      February 23, 2016 at 2:07 pm

      Vivian,

      The issue of insurance has been a key point in these cases. A number of conveyancing solicitors have had to make major claims on their insurance in one case we understand over £100,000 was paid out.

      As we have mentioned the problem is the wording of the critical words in the deed of variation are obscure which is why it keeps being missed.

      The issue is also with the Law Society who will be warning their members to look out for this sort of clause.

    • anon

      February 23, 2016 at 4:37 pm

      This seems a to be a reply by someone with a vested interest.

      Of course the real issue here is not the solicitors but the inclusion of clauses in Leases which are manifestly wrong. Why are they being included in the first place.

  4. Michael Epstein

    February 23, 2016 at 3:29 pm

    Lesson! Never skimp on the cost of a solicitor when purchasing a property, and never be tempted by the “helpful” suggestion of the vendor to use their solicitor.
    Most leases are relatively straightforward. In these cases they appear to have been drawn up in a way that disguises their true intent.. Fortunately, if a solicitor fails to spot this, they are indemnified against any losses caused to the purchaser.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Barry Passmore

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2025 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web