• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / News / Division as London Assembly opposition urges Sadiq Khan to be tougher on housebuilders over cladding

Division as London Assembly opposition urges Sadiq Khan to be tougher on housebuilders over cladding

July 3, 2021 //  by Admin4

LibDem Hina Bokhari, who made history as the joint first Muslim politician to be elected to the Assembly in May, moved the motion, which was seconded by her colleague Caroline Pidgeon, who campaigned vigorously for leaseholders in the 2016-2021 term

By Harry Scoffin

Liberal Democrats, Greens and the Conservatives in the London Assembly urged mayor Sadiq Khan on Thursday to put more pressure on housebuilders over the building safety crisis.

Hina Bokhari, LibDem member elected in May who sits on the Fire, Resilience and Emergency Planning Committee, urged the mayor to weaponise the £4 billion affordable housing programme in grant funding allocation.

“He [the mayor] needs a clear policy of refusing to work with developers or housing providers who have not resolved building safety issues in their existing stock. Such a bold move will give a clear message to developers in our city. They need to take responsibility for these buildings and engage with leaseholders who are in many cases having to foot the bill, often reaching tens of thousands of bills per leaseholder.”

Ms Bokhari praised the Labour mayor for pressuring government to impose a housebuilders’ levy that would spare leaseholders and the wider taxpayers from paying out over the building safety crisis.

But Labour said that using the planning system or other such confrontational measures could end up meaning less social housing.

Leonie Cooper, the Labour member for Merton and Wandworth, urged the Assembly to propose only “realistic solutions”.

“I do have significant problems with where  talks about not working with or funding developers or housing associations who have not taken action yet to support their leaseholders. Because here we are simply pitting the needs of homeless families against the needs of leaseholders. That is a very difficult position for us to be in.”

Ms Cooper, who sits on both the Fire, Resilience and Emergency Planning and Housing committees, added that the Liberal Democrats and Conservatives were partly to blame for the crisis after advocating building deregulation under the coalition government.

It is not the first time that London Labour have been criticised for taking a hands-off approach to helping leaseholders and shared owners suffering big remediation bills and mental anguish in the building safety crisis.

Sadiq Khan told LBC radio on June 24 that if developers paid 10 percent of their profits, which he described as “a small fraction”, “that would be billions of pounds that could contribute towards remediating the buildings that Natalie’s talking about”.

When asked specifically about planning or other GLA levers to humble irresponsible developers, Khan claimed “we are using the bully pulpit to do what we can, legally”.

The LBC interview featured Natalie Carter, a leaseholder at Ballymore’s New Providence Wharf, where there was a fire on May 7, who asked the London mayor what he was doing for “the London victims” of “flammable death traps” who face “interim costs for a waking watch, skyrocketing service charges and insurance premiums”.

After social media criticism from leaseholders, Khan’s deputy mayor for housing, Tom Copley, who had appeared on the programme via videolink, made a series of tweets defending London’s policy approach and urging caution at deploying planning against housebuilders.

“Developers would appeal, win, and be no more likely to stump up more cash for remediation. Govt would probably remove the Mayor’s planning powers, meaning fewer affordable homes. So nobody would win: not leaseholders, and certainly not homeless families.”

I understand your frustration, but as we’ve discussed before to do so would be against the law and simply result in the GLA having to spend hundreds thousands of £ defending unwinnable planning appeals – money that would be better spent on continuing to improve planning policies. https://t.co/8p1N0TUCVi

— Tom Copley (@tomcopley) June 24, 2021

That’s why we need a developer levy, which Sadiq set out a proposal for in December, and which the Government committed to introduce in February (albeit a less ambitious version).

— Tom Copley (@tomcopley) June 25, 2021

Action taken by @MayorofLondon:

– new planning policies on fire safety
– new building safety standards for new developments on GLA land and affordable homes funded through the 21-26 programme
– changes to subletting policy to support shared owners who need to move but can’t sell https://t.co/7EGi4U5HnK

— Tom Copley (@tomcopley) June 27, 2021

The opposition motion can be read in full here:

London-Assembly-Opposition-Cladding-Motion-1-JulyDownload

Related posts:

LKP cladding scandal surveyLKP backs Sadiq Khan demand that ALL shared ownership leases to be 999 years Get commonhold done, London Assembly tells government London mayor Sadiq Khan launches leasehold advice portal and slams LEASE as ‘unfit for purpose’ Under £50,000 allocated for private cladding removal … and not a penny spent, says London mayor London Assembly membersShared ‘ownership’ is NOT ownership. It’s the ‘pay-day loan’ of housing and most regret having bought, London Assembly told

Category: Cladding scandal, Latest News, London Assembly, NewsTag: Andrew Boff, Caroline Pidgeon, Cladding insurance, Conservative Party, Green Party, Harry Scoffin, Hina Bokhari, LBC, Leonie Cooper, Liberal Democrats, London Assembly, London City Hall, London mayor, Natalie Carter, Planning reform, Sadiq Khan, Tom Copley, Tower Hamlets Justice for Leaseholders, Waking watch contracts

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (44) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (39) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (39) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (64) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (47) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (200) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (42) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: «Countryside Properties plc National Leasehold Campaign email dump urges developers to settle up like Aviva and Persimmon have done with CMA
Next Post: LKP rejects threat of defamation proceedings from Canonbury Management Canonbury Management»

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Gerri

    July 3, 2021 at 4:30 pm

    I have to admit that as a Labour supporter I’m stunned by the quotes in the above article from Labour councillors! First of all it’s an extraordinary admission that the planning authority is in fact powerless to do anything but grant approval. It’s alleged that a) it would face an unwinnable legal case and b) the Govt would remove the Mayor’s planning powers. However if a) is true, these powers don’t really exist so their removal would not be a significant loss!

    Secondly in most new developments in London (certainly in my borough of Waltham Forest) the percentage of so-called ‘affordable’ homes is 50% at best. Affordable means many things but in housing is often defined as no more than 80% of market value. This is still way, way out of reach of a homeless family – in fact when asked about the increased provision of social infrastructure such as healthcare, WF council countered that only a minority are family units.

    What developers want to build is fundamentally at odds with what is needed to solve the housing crisis. And if developers have the whip hand over planning authorities this is never going to change!

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web