• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / My granny’s Audley Retirement home ‘was a money pit’ costing £48,000 in exit fees

My granny’s Audley Retirement home ‘was a money pit’ costing £48,000 in exit fees

April 3, 2017 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Click to open

The Sunday Times yesterday published a powerful article by Harriet Meyer revealing how her family spent £48,160 in fees on selling at Audley Retirement flat.

Audley Retirement is one of the upmarket providers in the sector, which Campaign against Retirement Leasehold Exploitation has long argued has even greater exploitative practices at the higher end than the lower.

Harriet’s grandparents John and Margaret Porter bought a £523,500 flat from Audley Retirement in 2003 at the imposing Willicombe Park site in Kent.

The Victorian mansion has been kitted out with communal facilities, a swimming pool and care could be arranged. It is one of 15 luxury villages around the country.

Mr Porter died in 2006, and Mrs Porter in February 2015 aged 99 after having been bedridden for several years.

“For my family and me, it was a blessed relief that she passed away peacefully at home, as she wanted,” Miss Meyer writes.

The flat went on the market for £800,000 through Audley’s own sales team. The price then dropped to £725,000. Meanwhile, service charges mounted up on the empty property.

Last July the price was slashed again to £650,000.

Miss Meyer looked into appointing another agent, but was told that no one had ever sold a property using an “outside” agent and there would be a fee for doing so, under the lease.

Finally, an offer came in of £540,000, which rose to £560,000 on negotiation. The flat was sold in December last year, 22 months after Mrs Porter died.

The exit and estate agency fees totalled £48,160.

In addition, there were £23,794 to pay in service charges for the empty flat. (We believe subletting is not permitted at Willicombe Park.)

What Audley Retirement charges

Audley Retirement’s estate agency fee was 2 per cent

In addition, there is an administration fee of one per cent

There is an exit fee (“deferred management fee”) capped at 5 per cent at Willicombe Park. This fee is potentially much higher at newer Audley Retirement sites, where 1 per cent a year exit fees with no cap can be charged.)

Nick Sanderson, CEO of Audley Retirement, told the Sunday Times that all these terms were explained to Mr and Mrs Porter before purchase.

“This has been an upsetting situation for the family and we are sorry to hear they had a difficult time. On average, our resale prices track the UK house price index, and although many outperform this index, some do perform less well.

“Mr and Mrs Porter would have been told of all the associated fees, and certainly their solicitor should have made it clear in his report before purchase. Both the level of the fee and what the money is used for would have been explained to them.”

Some Audley Retirement resale prices from the Land Registry can be read here: http://www.betterretirementhousing.com/dire-retirement-housing-values-revealed-land-registry/

Exit fees have long been controversial in retirement housing, and the defunct Office of Fair Trading rightly described them as a potentially unfair contract term in September 2012.

Last month, however, the Law Commission recommended that exit fees were fine so long as they were transparent: ie made clear to the purchaser.

LKP has been strongly critical of the Law Commission’s report, and recommends that the housing minister rejects it.

http://www.betterretirementhousing.com/law-commissions-tokenistic-report-helps-retirement-house-builders-freehold-investors-not-families-needing-house-relative/

Exit fees established in the lease give a guaranteed and legally enforceable income stream, which also permits corporate gearing on a large scale.

They helped make Vincent Tchenguiz one of the most important corporate players before the financial crash.

It is less clear, to those who pay them, what the exit fees are actually for.

Sebastian O’Kelly, of LKP, told the Sunday Times: “What other investment could somebody have made in March 2003 only to sell for not far off the same sum 13 years later, with huge penalties on resale?

“The fees seem nothing more than an easy way of exploiting a vulnerable group of people.

“The bad reputation of retirement flats is entirely justified and explains why only 2% of people over 65 in the UK live in designated retirement properties, compared with 12% in north America and 17% in Australia.

“Until the property industry stops treating it as a get-rich-quick bonanza, the sector is never going to change.”

Nick Sanderson, of Audley Retirement, told the Sunday Times:

“Our deferred management charge ensures owners are not presented with unexpected cost when large maintenance and replacement projects are required – for example, repairs to the swimming pool or restaurant, as well as the exterior of the home.

“This means the monthly cost of living in an Audley property is kept to the absolute minimum.

“Because we collect these deferred fees and sales fees, it means no owner will eve be asked for extra money. That’s the certainty we offer.”

LKP questions this explanation.

What certainty is there that if major expenditure is required it would be paid for by these exit fees? The fees are not allocated for any specific service, and do not go into a contingency fund.

So, if a few sites had major unexpected repairs and Audley Retirement also, say, wanted to give a bonus to its CEO, how would it raise the money?

Indeed, LKP would be curious to know of unexpected major works bills faced by leaseholders at Audley Retirement sites.

Related posts:

DCLG stakeholders hear of ‘calamitous’ Law Commission report on exit fees Family outraged by £50,000 exit fee on sale at Retirement Villages’ Mayford Grange The Times: ‘Exit fees and poor resale values: the uncomfortable truth about retirement homes’ Housing minister urges transparency over retirement exit fees Default ThumbnailOFT cuts deal with Tchenguiz on leasehold retirement sub-letting fees, but exit fees on sale still stand

Category: Latest News, News, Press, RetirementTag: Audley Retirement, Retirement, The Sunday Times

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (45) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (41) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (43) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (67) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Liam Spender (31) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (201) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (32) Vincent Tchenguiz (43) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « Daily Mail ‘reveals’ Will Astor’s ‘links to leasehold rip-offs’
Next Post: Ask Louie Burns: The leasehold houses scandal and what you can do about it »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Michael Hollands

    April 3, 2017 at 7:48 pm

    Sold for £560000
    Original cost £520000 plus £48000 Exit Fees plus £24000 Management Fees whilst selling. That a loss of £32000 over a period of 13 years when property prices must have increased considerably.
    Although Mr and Mrs Porter may originally have been shown all the documentation, they could not have anticipated this sort of loss.
    It is an expensive way of living as the current management and ground fees would be around £800 plus per month.
    And very soon the lease will need extending. Built 1999 on 125 year lease, only 98 years remaining. I wonder how much that will cost.
    Having said all that it does look to be a luxurious Retirement Complex.

  2. Trevor Bradley

    April 5, 2017 at 9:36 pm

    Due to my knowledge and experience of retirement leasehold, on behalf of a friend, I did look into Audley when they opened their flash building in Leamington Spa, Warwickshire a few years ago. It did not take long to realise that under Audleys terms who actually do need “money to burn”..
    MH sums it all up nicely.
    Its all very well the ceo spouting ” the customer would have been advised the terms etc at time of sale bla bla bla”. Get sick of hearing that statement from these legal scammers and spivs.
    My advice to anyone who thinks about Audley or similar is, burn your money instead or give it to a GOOD cause.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web