• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / News / Housing minister urges transparency over retirement exit fees

Housing minister urges transparency over retirement exit fees

February 2, 2017 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Gavin Barwell urged greater transparency over retirement exit fees as the Leasehold Advisory Service “annual conference” yesterday.

“More than one in 12 people in the UK will be aged over 80 by 2039, according to the National Office for Statistics.

“The UK’s population is set to rise by over 4 million in the next decade, and by 10 million in 25 years – driven in part by an increasingly expanding older population.

“So it is important that there is greater transparency around ‘event fees’ charged in the retirement leasehold sector that can help to defer service charges so older people can ‘enjoy now and pay later’.

“Fees apply when an older person sells or sublets their property, which can affect older people at a vulnerable time in their lives. That’s why we asked the Law Commission to undertake a wide-ranging review of event fees.

“The Law Commission is preparing to publish its final recommendations by April 2017.

“This will promote greater transparency over the disclosure of event fees at the point of sale and remedies for consumers where landlords, or their agents, fail to disclose event fee information.

“Greater transparency over the use of event fees will make a significant difference in helping to re-establish confidence in the residential retirement leasehold sector and release the current stalling on new supply in this sector.

“However, we can always do more and I am very keen to explore how we can promote greater transparency, fairness and efficiency, and to work with consumers and the sector to improve leaseholders’ experience of home ownership.

Sebastian O’Kelly, of LKP, asked a question of the minister from the floor:

“Minister, are you aware that the retirement exit fees can be extremely complicated.

“I’m dealing with a case at the moment of a widow in an upmarket retirement who has run out of money.

“But the exit fees amount to £72,500, so she can’t afford to move and she can’t afford to stay. I have exhausted looked over the website of the housebuilder concerned, and there is no reference to these exit fees at all.

“If you want a healthy retirement housing market, I think you are really going to have to nobble issues like this.”

Mr Barwell replied:

“The fundamental principle of exit fees works for many people: they go into a nice environment that they may not be able to afford in income terms, yet pay later at the end.

“But it has to be absolutely clear on what terms they are entering.

“The Law Commission has been very useful in working up our ideas in this area, and we look forward to its report in April.”

Related posts:

APPG July 11: Retirement fees whether ground rents or event fees need to be for defined services not open-ended profits, says AgeUK DCLG stakeholders hear of ‘calamitous’ Law Commission report on exit fees My granny’s Audley Retirement home ‘was a money pit’ costing £48,000 in exit fees Default ThumbnailOFT cuts deal with Tchenguiz on leasehold retirement sub-letting fees, but exit fees on sale still stand The Times: ‘Exit fees and poor resale values: the uncomfortable truth about retirement homes’

Category: Latest News, News, RetirementTag: exit fees, Gavin Barwell, Retirement

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (70) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (44) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (39) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (39) Grenfell cladding (55) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (64) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (47) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (200) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (42) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « Housing minister says LEASE must be on the side of leaseholders, and promises more money
Next Post: ‘If I fail to offend anyone, I will do it next time,’ Bottomley tells appalled leasehold professionals at LEASE annual conference Sir Peter Bototmley Leasehold Advisory Service»

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Michael Hollands

    February 2, 2017 at 5:45 pm

    Rather than making Exit Fees transparent why not abolish them altogether and just charge the Service/Management fee.
    Service /Management fees can be substantiated as they should be based on actual costs/invoices.
    Exit Fees are a figment of the Freeholders imagination designed for profit motives only.
    By making them transparent to a purchaser only makes it a take it or leave it situation.for elderly people who really need this type of accommodation.
    If we all lived for ever there would not be any income from Exit Charges in Retirement Complexes. So really it is a charge for dying.

    • Leaseholder

      February 2, 2017 at 7:01 pm

      Actually service/management fees are also a figment of the freeholders imagination….all too often.
      The legal fees to sort out the management fees are so high, most people just prefer to quietly pay the freeholder and move on.

    • chas

      February 2, 2017 at 7:51 pm

      Exit Fees should be considered as unfair contract terms.
      Peverel Retirement now trading as Firstport Retirement use the Information Pack (IP) which they charge circa £308.00,

      This is really an Exit Fee!

      This is a charge paid by all, including those who pass away or decide to sell.

      The IP contains information already available when a new leaseholder purchasers.

      What leaseholders do not know is they pay twice for this IP as the production of this literature is included in the Management fees everyone pays, see literature produced by Peverel Group up to 2015 then watered down by Firstport who state they no longer charge???

  2. Michael Epstein

    February 2, 2017 at 7:02 pm

    Michael Hollands,
    You end your comment with the words “So really it is just a charge for dying”
    Were you aware that when the Tchenguiz group companies financed his portfolio part of the assets giving rise to the valuations actually allowed for people dying as their deaths gave rise to exit fee income?
    A death in a retirement development that Tchenguiz Group companies had an interest in were also flagged up as an opportunity for Retirement Homesearch to generate a sale!

    • Leaseholder

      February 2, 2017 at 7:13 pm

      ????

    • Michael Hollands

      February 2, 2017 at 7:25 pm

      Michael, so I assume that Peverel would never have promoted a healthy lifestyle, as it would only delay an income from Exit Fees and Sales Fees.

      • Kim

        February 3, 2017 at 8:30 am

        The Tchenguiz toe rags should have banged up for ‘something a long time ago in my opinion. Pity that the FSR bungled the arrest several years ago.. I have recently been made aware that one of their ‘Regional managers’ ( Hench Men/ women) harassed and terrorised an elderly woman ( 80’s) to pay upwards of 17’000 as her share of the ‘ Major works’ in a block of 30 flats in East Sussex full of elderly folks with a bit of cash! Scum.

  3. martin

    February 5, 2017 at 10:37 pm

    LKP will be in touch with the Minister in the near future to explain we do not believe

    “fundamental principle of exit fees works for many people: they go into a nice environment that they may not be able to afford in income terms, yet pay later at the end”.

    It may be true in a small number of cases but for many people it is an enforced gamble. The Law Commission may have accepted this but they have provided no evidence to show this is the case.

    .

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web