• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / News / Grant Thornton had ‘direct interest’ in the Tchenguiz arrests, which should have been revealed

Grant Thornton had ‘direct interest’ in the Tchenguiz arrests, which should have been revealed

August 1, 2012 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Vincent Tchenguiz at court, with his support team

Accountants Grant Thornton “had direct interest” in the arrest of Vincent and Robert Tchenguiz in March 2011 which should have been known about beforehand.

This conclusion has been overlooked in the media coverage of yesterday’s High Court ruling into the debacle of the Serious Fraud Squad’s handling of the investigation.

The judicial review into the arrests, where the Tchenguiz were represented by Lord Goldsmith, a former attorney general, and Lord MacDonald, a former Director of Public Prosecutions, runs to 64 pages and is perhaps the most costly prose to have been published this year.

The SFO “relied very heavily on the work and conclusions of Grant Thornton”, according to the High Court, but when search warrants were authorised  by Judge Paul Worsley, he was told “nothing about the role of Grant Thornton in the allegations”.

The judge should have been “alert to any possibility that the SFO was being used to promote the interests of one party to civil litigation”.

Grant Thornton, acting as administrators for the collapsed Icelandic bank Kaupthing, cried foul after mistakenly believing that the Tchenguiz had obtained £100 million loans on retirement development freehold assets that were already pledged.

The judicial review established that in no less than six places these superior agreements were made clear in the so-called “Pennyrock Loan”. In short, Tchenguiz was not hiding anything.

Acting for Vincent Tchenguiz, Lord Goldsmith, the former New Labour attorney general, argued that  “the judge should have been told of that fact and of the fact there was litigation between Kaupthing and the companies controlled by the Tchenguiz Family Trust in which Grant Thornton were acting for Kaupthing”.

The High Court added: “It was contended that Grant Thornton had a direct interest in the civil proceedings because of the allegations made against them in respect of their actions as receivers … Therefore the judge should have been put on notice so that he was alert to any possibility that the SFO was being used to promote the interests of one party to civil litigation.

“We consider that submission to be well founded. This is a case where it appears that the SFO relied very heavily on the work and conclusions of Grant Thornton.

“In the absence of independent verification by the SFO’s own independent experts of those conclusions, it was essential that the judge be told of the extent of the interest of Grant Thornton in relation to each transaction.

“Grant Thornton may have been right, but the judge needed to know of their interest and the lack of independent verification of their conclusions.”

Grant Thornton did not provide evidence to the judicial review and the High Court noted:  “They declined in answer to a request from Vincent Tchenguiz to make available the evidence on which such serious allegations were advanced to the SFO.”

In the event, Grant Thornton failed to find a buyer for the retirement development freeholds and quietly sold them, and a number of other assets – including the freeholds of St George Wharf, Vauxhall, and Charter Quay, in Kingston – pledged against the Oscatello loan, back to the Tchenguiz Family Trust in September last year.

In short, Grant Thornton undermined the process that it had started a full nine months before the SFO investigation into Vincent Tchenguiz collapsed.

The SFO investigation into Robert Tchenguiz continues

Related posts:

Tchenguiz’s compo claim ‘liberally interspersed with assertions of fraud, falsity, dishonesty …’, says judge Tchenguiz falls out with his ex-Israeli intelligence operatives … and now they are suing each other Default ThumbnailTchenguiz brothers fall out among themselves, says The Times Tchenguiz’s Israeli ‘military intelligence’ operators Black Cube ‘were employed by Harvey Weinstein over sex accusations’ Default ThumbnailARMA-Q members to be revealed next month

Category: News, TchenguizTag: Tchenguiz

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (70) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (44) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (39) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (39) Grenfell cladding (55) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (64) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (47) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (200) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (42) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « Solicitors squabble in High Court, while leaseholders face a £30,000 right to manage legal bill
Next Post: What is LKP? »

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web