Leasehold Knowledge Partnership

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Menu
  • Home
    • Site map
    • Archive of posts by category
  • What is LKP
    • Privacy and Data Protection Statement
    • Site map
  • HELP FORM
  • News
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Commonhold
      • Commons Leasehold Debate 20/12/16
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • DCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Grenfell cladding
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance scams
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Leasehold Valuation Tribunal
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • OFT / CMA
      • Park Homes
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Recognised Tenants’ Association
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Accreditation
    • Accredited Companies
        • Block Managers Limited
        • Clear Building Management
        • Diamond Managing Agents
        • Dixon Emerald Associates
        • HML Group
        • Home from Home
        • Home Management Group
        • Hunter Grey
        • JFM Block & Estate Management
        • Jones Associates Letting & Management
        • Norwich Residential Management
        • Red Rock Property Management
        • Rynew Property Management
        • Sapphire Property Management
        • Town & City Management
        • Urang Property Management
        • Urban Living Property Management
  • Fighting back
      • Lease Extension
      • Q&As
      • Right to buy freehold
      • Commonhold
      • Bottomley blasts leasehold crimes on video
      • LVT/Property Chamber Survival
      • Tribunal triumphs … and defeats
      • Recognised Tenants’ Association
      • Right To Manage
      • Video
      • Find MP … and see how many leasehold voters
      • LEASE: what’s the point?
      • Pensioners win £68,500
      • Most damning LVT ruling ever made
      • Insurance racket
      • Local authority leasehold
      • Remember to extend your lease
      • St George’s wins £1 million
      • Leasehold law: the reforms
  • Sub-letting
  • Press
  • Contact
  • Parliament
      • Communities Select Committee
      • APPG
      • APPG December 14 2016
      • Commons Debate 20/12/16
      • APPG April 19 2017
      • APPG July 5 2017
      • APPG December 14 2016
  • Right To Manage
  • Lease Extension
  • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Louie Burns
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Michael Epstein
  • Donate
  • February 21, 2019
You are here: Home / News / Is LEASE an institutionally corrupted organisation?

Is LEASE an institutionally corrupted organisation?

July 29, 2018 By Admin2

“Institutional corruption is manifest when there is a systemic and strategic influence which is legal, or even currently ethical, that undermines the institution’s effectiveness by diverting it from its purpose or weakening its ability to achieve its purpose, including, to the extent relevant to its purpose, weakening either the public’s trust in that institution or the institution’s inherent trustworthiness.” – Lawrence Lessig.

Anthony Essien Chief Executive of LEASE since 2007

Over the years LKP has exposed many problems with LEASE, including the following:

  • In 2010 LKP showed that LEASE was promoting the benefits of buying ground rents by investors to the detriment of leaseholders. Taxpayer-hosted seminars explained that for a minimal investment one could obtain control of the building as well as a number of additional income streams such as 100% mark-up insurance commissions.
  • LKP showed that LEASE was selling training to landlords to help them prepare their cases against their leaseholders at the tribunal.
  • LKP showed that LEASE was selling training to landlords helping them to present their evidence against their leaseholders at the Tribunal.
  • LKP showed that LEASE’s website included advertisements for contentious services providers in the sector, including one who they knew had been found no longer fit to hold a judicial office by the Ministry of Justice.
  • LKP showed that LEASE have been happy to train some of the most oppressive landlords in the sector.
  • LKP exposed the fact that LEASE continues not to report or expose poor practices in the sector to government officials.
  • LKP exposed the fact that LEASE continues not to highlight defects in leasehold legislation.
  • LEASE claim they are not permitted to report poor practice or highlight defects in legislation due to their remit despite the fact that they were told by officials this was not the case as long ago as 2014.
  • LKP has shown that LEASE has on occasions opposed legislation changes designed to help leaseholders.
  • LKP has shown that, in the government’s unfair lease terms consultation, LEASE enthusiastically supported many smaller changes, but were somehow less forceful on larger and more important issues such as supporting the banning of ground rents on new build homes.
  • LKP exposed the fact that both the two most recent Chairs of LEASE were totally inappropriate for the role. Their combined tenure covered more than a decade.
  • LKP has highlighted the fact that there has been no leaseholder representation on the board of LEASE for many years.
  • LKP exposed the annual LEASE conference as a trade show and forced LEASE to make at least some effort to run a leaseholder event. That leaseholder event has now been canceled.
  • LKP has exposed the fact that LEASE overstates the number of customers that contact them and the level of service they provide to them.
  • LKP has exposed the fact that LEASE sometimes provides poor or very poor advice to leaseholders.
  • LKP has shown that LEASE has sometimes offered the wrong advice to leaseholders, on key issues.
  • LEASE have chosen not to provide any constructive support in any of the work that LKP and the All Party Parliamentary Group on Leasehold and Commonhold Reform (APPG) have been involved in to promote an improvement in the legislation. At best, they have been reluctant attendees at the APPG as one of their emails accidentally made clear. They have on a number of occasions sought to undermine LKP and the APPG.

Each time LKP highlights a failing by LEASE the issues raised seem to be quietly swept under the carpet by a succession of officials.

The government continues to offer its full support to LEASE as its monopoly-funded and supported provider of leaseholder help. Like a washing powder, each iteration of LEASE has become supposedly improved and yet remains ineffectual.

In 2017, having spent more than 15 years actively selling better services to landlords and managing agents than they were offering to leaseholders, LEASE’s role changed overnight and in February 2017 they suddenly became “wholly on the side of the leaseholder”, according to the then Housing Minister Gavin Barwell.

The same management that had been so happy to provide an advantage to the supply side of the sector now supposedly existed only for the benefit of leaseholders. Despite this, a year after this supposed Damascene conversion, LEASE’s chief executive was happy to explain, at the annual Institute of Residential Property Management conference, the range of improved services he had been hoping to provide to managing agents and landlords before the government told him to stop.

LKP’s thanks for exposing LEASE’s many failings over the years has been negative.

LKP has been sent to Coventry by officials on occasion and even been sat on the naughty seat in meetings with Ministers and not allowed to speak. In 2014 LEASE made a major effort to discredit LKP with a new rotation of incoming senior officials at the then DCLG. We have seen no evidence that this culture has changed.

Most recently LEASE has been provided with an additional £465,000 to help leaseholders faced with cladding problems.

We warned government from the outset that this would not help. We are now told by leaseholders living on various cladding sites that LEASE have offered little help other than to read the lease and provide them with the contact details of the National Pro Bono Centre.

After a year, LEASE has not been involved in helping to resolve a single cladding site case. They didn’t even attend the leaseholder cladding forum recently held in Parliament – the only meeting so far where flat owners faced with the trauma of Grenfell cladding have actually assembled.

When LEASE was originally created by Lord Young he intended it as a short-term measure to help the whole market understand the 1993 Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act. The organisation soon transformed and, although the 1996 Act that funds LEASE refers to the government supporting “any” group, the officials have treated LEASE as their monopoly supplier ever since.

The influence of LEASE has since become entirely toxic to any other organisation that strives to support leaseholders. Many on the supply side of the sector warmly welcome LEASE. Its passive and “impartial” approach has contributed to an environment where poor practice has been able to flourish.

As a result of the government’s position, other than LKP, there has been no other group willing to argue for leaseholder issues and against LEASE’s negative influence.

The Federation of Private Residents Associations (FPRA) is there to support residents’ associations but their content sits behind a paywall. AgeUK had to give up on providing leaseholder support many years ago; Citizens’ Advice Bureau support is random and limited.

LEASE’s institutional corruption has shown itself in many guises over the years. Sir Peter Bottomley has been particularly outspoken about the LEASE conference which ran until 2017.

“Their idea of raising money commercially was to run a conference where lawyers, accountants, surveyors and freeholders came together to swap ideas on how to put one over on the leaseholders. Only when the Leasehold Knowledge Partnership charity started pushing did some of the leaseholders get invited to a little bunfight afterwards. The trustees of LKP were not invited to the conferences, but some of them decided to go anyway. That is a crazy way of dealing with things. When I raised that with Deep Sagar and similar issues with Roger Southam— the present LEASE chairman, who I doubt will be chairman for very long—they did not respond in a way that I regard as proper.”

2014 LEASE attempt to discredit LKP
2014 saw a new set of senior officials take over the work on leasehold issues at the then DCLG. LKP and LEASE were asked to meet to consider how things could move forward more positively.

LEASE Cheif Executive, Anthony Essien, and LEASE Chair, Deep Sagar, wrote to DCLG with a list of 44 supposedly “inaccurate and unjustified” statements about LEASE which they claimed appeared on the LKP website. This list was a jumbled mess with no references to specific articles supplied.

At the time DCLG asked: “I would also request that you treat the content of the attached document [the list of 44 complaints] and your subsequent reply as ‘not for publication’ in the spirit of trying to move forward more positively.”

LKP was happy to comply with this request and spent a week checking the site and providing evidence that 42 of the 44 supposed “inaccurate and unjustified” statements about LEASE were actually entirely justified, and that the 2 remaining comments did not even appear on the LKP website, in any article.

Neither DCLG nor LEASE subsequently disputed any LKP’s evidence. It was agreed by all parties that it would best to move forward positively and for LKP not to complain about LEASE having made these false accusations. LEASE CEO, Anthony Essien, confirmed: “We are also happy to move forward and concentrate on the substantive issues in the sector.”

Sadly LEASE never engaged positively with LKP, however LKP went on to work with DCLG officials on a number of important issues, including helping them to produce the first accurate government estimate of the number of leasehold homes, and the beginnings of the move towards what has become the review of commonhold and much of existing leasehold legislation

2017 LEASE undermine Secretary of State Javid

Shortly after Secretary of State Sajid Javid made the huge announcement that he planned to crack down on leasehold abuse with “radical” proposals, LEASE came forward with an argument against the Secretary of State.

They talked about the fact that: “The elephant is the investment sale of ground rent provides additional income for the developer to make schemes viable in a lot of cases. There is the rhetoric of profiteering and finger pointing but somewhere along the way we need to have an objective conversation about the whole development cycle and how it works in all facets to ensure that the right decisions are being made for the right reason”

The Secretary of State’s officials were then contacted by LKP to point out that their “wholly on the side of the leaseholder” funded body should perhaps not be so quickly seeking to argue against the Secretary of State. This is especially true since LEASE’s argument advocates the same arguments now being put forward by the developer’s lobby, in order to oppose change.

LEASE’s article quickly disappeared from their website and was replaced with a 404 error message

https://www.lease-advice.org/article/a-message-from-lease-chair-roger-southam-5/?dm_i=OUE,52SZX,6J6YM7,JFWXY,1

However, LEASE staff then quietly re-released the same article again under a different web page, which is quite extraordinary.

Message from LEASE Chair Roger Southam – July 2017

The July 2017 LEASE board minutes record that LEASE Chair, Roger Southam, had filed a formal complaint with the Parliamentary Standards office against APPG co-Chairs Sir Peter Bottomley MP and Jim Fitzpatrick MP and against LKP as APPG secretariat. Neither Chief Executive, Anthony Essien, or Chair, Roger Southam, had the courtesy to advise either LKP or the co-Chairs of the nature of this complaint, which did not appear on the LEASE website until many months later.  Currently, the LEASE board minutes still fail to record that this complaint was dismissed by the Parliamentary Standards office who felt there was no merit in even opening an investigation. No apologies have been received by any of the parties.

 

 

This brings us back to the criteria for institutional corruption.

“Institutional corruption is manifest when there is a systemic and strategic influence which is legal, or even currently ethical, that undermines the institution’s effectiveness by diverting it from its purpose or weakening its ability to achieve its purpose, including, to the extent relevant to its purpose, weakening either the public’s trust in that institution or the institution’s inherent trustworthiness.” – Lawrence Lessig.

The government cannot allow this situation to continue and must take action.

 
 

 

Related posts:

Housing minister says LEASE must be on the side of leaseholders, and promises more money Motion of no confidence in Roger Southam as LEASE chair Not the job of LEASE to warn ministers of leasehold houses scandal, Roger Southam tells BBC Will more funding for LEASE just be: Carry on minister! Justin Madders MP demands LEASE chair has ‘no business interests in the leasehold sector’

Filed Under: Latest News, LEASE, News, Slider2 Tagged With: Anthony Essien, LEASE, Leasehold Advisory Service

Everything important

Abacus Land 4 Limited Adriatic Land AgeUK Alexander Bastin Alex Ellison Alok Sharma Amanda Gourlay Anchor Andrew Selous MP Anthony Essien APPG ARCO ARHM ARMA ARMA-Q Baroness Gardner Barratt BBC R4 You and Yours Bellway Benjamin Mire Beth Rudolf Blythe Court Bob Bessell Bob Smytherman Bovis Homes Brandon Lewis British Property Federation Campaign against retirement leasehold exploitation Campaign for Housing in Later Life Canary Riverside CARL Cath Williams CentreForum Chainbow Charter Quay Cherry Jones Churchill Retirement Living Circle Residential Management Limited Cirrus Citiscape Clive Betts MP CMA Commonhold Competition and Markets Authority Conveyancing Association Countryside Properties plc Countrywide Countrywide Estate Management Court of Appeal Cypress Place Daily Mail David Glass DCLG Deep Sagar Dennis Jackson Dudley Joiner E&J Capital Partners Ed Davey Elim Court Eric Pickles Estates and Management Esther Rantzen exit fees Federation of Private Residents Associations Financial Times FirstPort Flood Re forfeiture FPRA Galliard Gary Murphy Gavin Barwell George Osborne Glyn Jackson Grant Shapps Grenfell cladding ground rent ground rents Ground Rents Income Fund plc Help To Buy Heysmoor Heights Homeground Management Limited HomeOwners Alliance House of Lords IRPM Israel Moskovitz James Brokenshire MP James Driscoll James Tuttiett James Wyatt Janet Entwistle Janice Northover JB Leitch Jeffrey Fairburn Jim Fitzpatrick Jim Fitzpatrick MP Joanne Darbyshire John Christodoulou John Fenwick Joseph Gurvits Justin Bates Justin Madders MP Justin Tomlinson Katie Kendrick Keith Hill Laceys Lakeside Law Commision Law Commission LEASE Leasehold Advisory Service leasehold houses Leasehold Solutions Lendlease London Assembly Long Harbour Lord Best Louie Burns Mainstay Margaret Anne Kirmond Mari Knowles Mark Prisk Martin Boyd Martin Paine McCarthy and Stone Mercia Investment Properties Limited Mere Court Michelle Banks Mulberry Mews Mundy National Leasehold Campaign New Capital Quay NHBC Nigel Bannister Nigel Glen Nigel Wilkins Oakland Court OFT Parthenia Patrick Collinson Paula Higgins Persimmon Pete Redfern Peverel Philip Rainey QC Phillip Rainey QC Plantation Wharf Private Eye Professor Nicholas Hopkins Prostitutes Redrow Regent Court Rendall and Rittner Retirement Retirement Security Limited RICS right to manage Right To Manage Federation Rob Plumb Roger Southam RTM RTMF Sajid Javid Sally Keeble Sebastian O’Kelly SFO Shula Rich Simon van Houten Siobhan McGrath Sir Ed Davey Sir Peter Bottomley Sonia McColl OBE Southwark Steve Morgan Sunday Times Susan Wood Tanfield Chambers Taylor Wimpey Tchenguiz Tchenguiz Family Trust Team The Daily Telegraph The Guardian The Sunday Times The Times Triplerose Trust Property Management Vallea Court Vincent Tchenguiz West India Quay Will Astor William Waldorf Astor Y and Y Management Yianis Group You and Yours

Contact LKP

Need help?

LKPhelp2The leasehold game is weighted against ordinary home-owning leaseholders, who aren’t professional players. LKP was set up to redress the balance, to help you win your disputes or at least avoid disasters.

If you have a leasehold problem, you can email sok@leaseholdknowledge or take a chance on calling 07808 328 230.

Or fill out this form, which ensures that you provide the essential information.

LKPnewsletter3

Professional services

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders. Click on the logos for company profiles.

Law

Right to manage

Lease extension / enfranchisement


capitalleasehold6-9ins

Landscaping

limetree

LKP Managing Agents

Big managing agents are big because they have got business from developers or large-scale freehold owing companies. Doubtless they are very obliging.

Not a single one is big through consumer choice.

Managing agents accredited to LKP want business from leaseholders. Many are former leaseholders.

All have signed undertakings of good practice and have provided extensive references … from leaseholders.

They can also hand-hold leaseholders through right to manage at minimal cost.

Contact Sebastian O’Kelly at LKP for further details: sok@leaseholdknowledge.com, 07808 328 230

Please click on logos for link and details

Comments

  1. Nicholas says

    July 29, 2018 at 3:47 pm

    Money politics at its worst. I cannot believe this is still being funded by the taxpayer.

  2. Jo Darbyshire says

    July 29, 2018 at 4:33 pm

    Truly appalling that this tax payer funded organisation has done nothing to protect leaseholders, yet LKP without the same financial benefits have been instrumental in raising awareness and fighting for leaseholders. Surely it’s time to make LKP the tax payer funded leasehold organisation of choice? Things would change overnight and the wonderful guys that run LKP can get the resources they need to do even more. I would be more than willing to be the leaseholder representation on the Board. I’ve spent the last 18 months learning more about Leasehold tenure and the way that the system is so biased in favour of freeholders. Change is needed urgently and LKP should be given the funding they need and deserve.

    • chas says

      July 29, 2018 at 10:53 pm

      chas says
      July 29, 2018 at 5:09 pm
      Your comment is awaiting moderation.
      Jo,
      This has been going on as long as I am aware since the government failed to properly fund LEASE allowing them to market the Landlord & Freeholder. It is appalling that this QUANGO a tax payer funded organisation did very little to protect leaseholders.
      Landlords & Freeholders then realised they could influence the members in charge and instead help those who kept funding, who had a different agender.
      LKP have been brilliant and yet receive no funding from government because they fight for the Leasehold Tenant. Some MPs and family’s are Landlords, why should they give up lucrative and profitable life style by changing their way of life.
      LKP without the financial benefits of LEASE have been instrumental in raising awareness and fighting for leaseholders. It is time to make LKP the tax payer funded leasehold organisation of choice, things then could change, but not over night.
      I also would be more than willing to be a leaseholder representative. I have spent 10 years helping to prevent Firstport Retirement was Peverel Retirement from charging residents for Service Charges they did not have to pay, check out Peverel Action website which closed down allowing CARLEX and LKP to rise from the ashes.
      Change is needed urgently and LKP should be given the funding they need and deserve, but do not rely on Senior Cabinet Or Housing Ministers to provide the help that is needed, until it was accepted that they could benefit.

      • David McArthur says

        August 1, 2018 at 10:11 am

        “This has been going on as long as I am aware since the government failed to properly fund LEASE allowing them to market the Landlord & Freeholder.”

        Chas, interesting. Is this the reason (lack of government funding) LEASE effectively went rogue and became an agent for landlords?

        • martin says

          August 1, 2018 at 12:01 pm

          David,

          I am afraid its a fib promoted by LEASE that they only helped landlords and freeholders because “they were not properly funded” They had been actively selling services to the supply side of the sector for more than a decade.

          They were being encouraged to obtain more funding from the private sector in more recent years but it was always LEASE’s choice that they felt they wanted to obtain that income from selling more and more services to the supply side of the sector. That is until Gavin Barwell said STOP.

          The truth is LEASE’s resources have continued to grow over the years but they always wanted more and more.
          .
          Readers can do run their own simple LEASE credibility test. Since the potentially most important thing that any group of leaseholders can do is form recognised tenants association you would expect LEASE to provide lots of useful information?

          Have a look for “RTA” on the LEASe web site. This is the main result returned:

          “A tenants’ association is a group of tenants (normally leaseholders) who
          hold houses or flats on leases/tenancies from the same landlord on
          similar terms. A Recognised Tenants’ Association is one where the
          members have come together to represent their common interests so that
          the association can act on the tenants’ behalf, and which has been
          recognised for the purposes of section 29 of the Landlord and Tenant Act
          1985. An association is recognised either by notice in writing from the
          landlord to the secretary of the association, or by application to a
          First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber).”

          It is difficult to see how you could make that advice and more anodyne.

          One of the links about RTA’s takes you to the LEASE submission on the 2017 DCLG consultation on making it easier to form an RTA. Yes, of course, LEASE got some of things wrong and yes their submission proposed ways to make it harder.

          • David McArthur says

            August 1, 2018 at 3:26 pm

            Thanks for the clarification, Martin. LEASE were not driven into the arms of the leasehold industry, they drove themselves. That makes sense to me.

        • chas says

          August 2, 2018 at 11:10 am

          David – it is more likely they chose the best way to make money to raise the profile of those in charge.

          You say interesting, is this the reason (lack of government funding) LEASE effectively went rogue and became an agent for landlords?

          I believe this – having attempted to use LEASE many-many years ago.

          Martin has his views and uses fib, should it not be lie.

          • David McArthur says

            August 3, 2018 at 10:12 am

            Chas,

            You contradict yourself, first you appear to agree with Martin – in your first paragraph, then you suggest LEASE only went rogue due to lack of government funding.

            Whatever, there is an extremely important campaign going on to rid England and Wales of our obscene leasehold laws. Internecine warfare distracts from this wholly worthy goal, egos should be dampened down.

            I haven’t the depth of knowledge of either you or Martin about LEASE, indeed of leasehold itself. My instincts tell me, however, that LEASE is like many other similar bodies – quangos and professional/trade organisations, and ombudsmen. They are self serving, and worst still they have an affinity with one side and regard joe public as a nuisance.

            There is a long established order of things which benefits those with power and money, LEASE, and others, have as much interest in maintaining this established order as those with the power and money they are above all things, lackeys. LEASE are not impartial, nor disinterested. Why in God’s name are they at this very moment making representations in defence of leasehold laws?

          • David McArthur says

            August 3, 2018 at 10:22 am

            Hardly “warfare”, lets call it unnecessary and a distraction..

    • chas says

      July 31, 2018 at 6:12 pm

      Jo,
      We need LKP as the replacement for LEASE and remove all the old guard from the LVT now FTT and bring in new blood..

      Our friend Norman Greed can explain the way he was treated at the LVT after being informed he had a case by the Chairman.

  3. Susan Keane says

    July 29, 2018 at 5:43 pm

    Drain this swamp.

  4. Cath W - NLC says

    July 29, 2018 at 7:04 pm

    Thank you to LKP for this comprehensive and thorough expose of LEASE.
    Surely this hard hitting but accurate account is more than enough evidence for LEASE to be disbanded or at least investigated by government officials?
    Leaseholders deserve so much better and by continuing to support LEASE both financially and strategically, government are laughing in the faces of ordinary folk just trying to own their own homes.
    Disgusting

  5. Jenny H says

    July 29, 2018 at 7:52 pm

    When I had problems with my managing agents and their constant flouting of my Lease requirements I was advised to call Lease as they would be the body to help and support leaseholders .

    Great I thought someone to offer some wisdom. How wrong was I , i came away thinking they were working for my Managing agents and Freeholders .

  6. David McArthur says

    July 29, 2018 at 8:52 pm

    YES, absolutely corrupt.

  7. Joy Dickinson says

    July 29, 2018 at 11:39 pm

    Appalled with the poor misleading advice I got from LEASE. I have ended up trapped in a leasehold Redrow home and I can’t even buy a true freehold. I can’t afford to enfranchise so I’m truly stuck! LEASE could have and should have advised me correctly.

    LKP have helped me more for FREE than LEASE. Time to shut LEASE down as the corruption is endemic and use the funds for LKP!

  8. Joe says

    July 30, 2018 at 8:01 am

    LEASE is institutionally corrupt is strong language and a charge LEASE must answer.

    Could be another job for the Select Committee to investigate.

    LEASE needs a leadership which actively supports ordinary homeowners not vested interests

  9. Michael Hollands says

    July 30, 2018 at 9:47 am

    It is not surprising that some regard LEASE as a corrupted organisation, as it advises upon and promotes a Leasehold system which in itself easily leads to corruption when dishonest and ruthless operators use it to their advantage.
    But there are many others who are to blame, what about the Government who finances them, and after eight years in power and around nine different Housing Ministers have only just begun taking an interest in reform and still continue to finance LEASE.
    And there are the Trade organisations like ARHM and ARMA who although they promote good practise, do very little to enforce it, and are prepared to entertain having some less reputable companies as members. Organisations like these rely on Leasehold and the membership fees of the companies who operate it for their existance, so it is not surprising they only pay lip service for major reform.
    Serious campaigning has for many years been left to LKP(formally Carlex) its supporters and a few brave MPs. And in the last two years the formation of NLC has given the campaign a tremendous boost.
    Now is the time for the Government to recognise there have been eight wasted years and get behind LKP and NLC.
    Either divert to them some of funding they give to LEASE or bring together LEASE, LKP and NLC under one umbrella to act and advise on reform in a real and meanable way.

  10. Chris says

    July 30, 2018 at 4:08 pm

    @Michael Hollands is correct in identifying the so many changes in housing ministers over a period of time that is not providing any consistency. Lately, due to Brexit and the mess with constant resignations, ministers are not in positions any length of time to see the job through. This period of political instability only goes to strengthen the ancient leasehold tenure laws. Secretary of State Sajid Javid was seemingly making all the right noises. Despite that he never said much about existing leaseholders ground rents being set low…only the newest and subsequent leasehold houses and flats for the future We are heading for a two tier system of leasehold UNLESS all ground rents are set to zero to stop the monetisation of hard working citizens.
    But there is a lot of old money, the big London estates, inherited through some dalliance with royalty 500 years ago, new money as in ground rent speculators – all strongly opposed with some influential clout.

  11. David McArthur says

    July 31, 2018 at 10:19 am

    “Each time LKP highlights a failing by LEASE the issues raised seem to be quietly swept under the carpet by a succession of officials”.

    “The government continues to offer its full support to LEASE as its monopoly-funded and supported provider of leaseholder help”.

    “LKP has been sent to Coventry by officials on occasion and even been sat on the naughty seat in meetings with Ministers and not allowed to speak”.

    The very honourable Crispin Blunt spoke of, ““Present-day “onerous ground rents” are, more likely than not, the resultant of UNCONSCIONABLE conduct carried out by one sector of society who have superior information flow (developers, freeholders’ funds, financiers, solicitors) at the expense of an unsuspecting and more naive part of society (consumer homebuyers)”.

    LKP, you have been bold in asking the question, is LEASE corrupt? But not bold enough. The DCLG, and government itself, have allowed LEASE to (corruptly) function. And government has allowed “one sector of society” – from Crispin Blunt’s statement above – to impose its obscene practises on ordinary people seeking home ownership. Even now government, talks of REFORM, and not ABOLITION of our leasehold laws.

    Shame the devil, and say it as it is, the entire system is corrupt – government, civil service, judiciary, and all else involved with leasehold.

LEASE

London mayor Sadiq Khan launches leasehold advice portal and slams LEASE as ‘unfit for purpose’

London mayor Sadiq Khan has launched a new leasehold advice portal, and has condemned the taxpayer-funded Leasehold Advisory Service as “unfit for purpose”. He also backed “wholesale reform of leasehold, including a long-term shift toward alternative tenures such as commonhold”. Today’s statement from the mayor’s office reads: “Government funds the Leasehold Advisory Service (LEASE) – […]

New LEASE chair declines to endorse peppercorn ground rents on BBC

And there will be no leaseholders on the board of LEASE The new chair of the controversial quango the Leasehold Advisory Service declined an invitation to endorse no-monetary value ground rents on BBC R4’s You and Yours today. Instead, Wanda Goldwag said only that contracts should be “fair”. Former Communities Secretary Sajid Javid undertook to […]

New interim chair for troubled quango LEASE

Wanda Goldwag, a former marketing executive for British Airways, has been appointed interim chair of the controversial Leasehold Advisory Service. Ms Goldwag, who ran BA’s Air Miles, is chair of the Office for Legal Complaints, which controls the legal ombudsman service for England and Wales. Four trustees of the Leasehold Knowledge Partnership have been declined […]

Leasehold Advisory Service has ‘been under review’ for 10 years. Here are the findings …

The Leasehold Advisory Service, the government funded Leasehold Advisory Service, has been under review by the government for much of the last ten years. This seems to suggest that something is wrong, yet the government’s long-standing support for the Leasehold Advisory Service continues. LKP has, after many requests, obtained the two most recent reviews of […]

Can the Leasehold Advisory Service monopoly survive devastating questioning by Select Committee?

– Select Committee deluged with complaints about taxpayer funded organisation – It failed to alert government to scandals over ground rents and proliferation of leasehold houses – Why did it hold seminars advising freeholders how to exploit leaseholders? – ‘Huge credibility problem’ for LEASE among leaseholders, says MP: it is working against them – Why […]

Even if you only respond to one question, take part in the Law Commission consultation!

By Sebastian O’Kelly LKP and the National Leasehold Campaign are organising a public meeting for leaseholders with the Law Commission tomorrow afternoon. Law Commissioner Professor Nicholas Hopkins and his team will explain their work on enfranchisement, lease extension and commonhold. Other speakers will include Professor Susan Bright, of Oxford University, and barrister Amanda Gourlay. There […]

LKP’s essential leasehold guide in The Sunday Times … feel free to add

By Sebastian O’Kelly It was good to be able to use a small Q&A article in yesterday’s Sunday Times to offer a mini guide for leaseholders. This is the sort of thing the Leasehold Advisory Service should be putting out, if it were not in thrall to the commercialisers in the sector. Indeed, it was […]

Martin Boyd should be the chair of LEASE

By Sebastian O’Kelly, LKP trustee There is only one outstanding candidate to be chair of LEASE and that is Martin Boyd. He is the only person involved in leasehold activism with the knowledge and abilities that will hold credibility with the sector. He is respected on this subject by ministers, MPs and civil servants. As […]

LEASE chair Roger Southam resigns

The taxpayer-funded Leasehold Advisory Service, LEASE,  has announced this evening that its non-executive chair, Roger Southam, has resigned with immediate effect. No explanation for the resignation is given, but it follows calls from the Leasehold Knowledge Partnership that he resign, questions in the Commons from MPs such as Justin Madders and LKP patron Sir Peter […]

National Leasehold Campaign tells Roger Southam to resign from LEASE

  UPDATE: Has Roger Southam resigned from Savills? His LinkedIn profile suggest his employment there discontinued at the end of last month. He is now associated with the Eighty Nine Consultancy, which has no website and may be self-employment. The National Leasehold Campaign Facebook group today urged Roger Southam to resign as chairman of the […]

LEASE chair Roger Southam launched complaint to Parliamentary Standards Commissioner against Sir Peter Bottomley and Jim Fitzpatrick (and LKP, naturally enough)

‘Why was I left out?’ asks Sir Ed Davey Roger Southam, the chairman of the Leasehold Advisory Service, issued a complaint to the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner about Sir Peter Bottomley and Jim Fitzpatrick He added LKP in the official complaint, in its role as secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group. “I am disappointed not […]

Thanks LKP for raising Grenfell issues. Now we are giving yet more money to LEASE, says housing minister

The housing minister Alok Sharma has thanked LKP for raising Grenfell cladding issues in private apartment blocks. We have intervened in a number of these cases, and will continue to do so. Our intervention at Blenheim Centre / Reflexion on behalf of leaseholders resulted in freeholder Legal and General agreeing to pay the £165,000 a […]

We are dissatisfied with the running of LEASE, APPG chairs tells housing minister

Earlier this afternoon two of the co-chairs of the Leasehold and Commonhold Reform All Party Parliamentary Group made a submission to the backbench business committee for a debate on leasehold and commonhold issues. At approximately 2:47 Sir Peter Bottomley states that he wishes to “place on the record we are dissatisfied with the running of […]

Sector foxes warn that changing leasehold will be ‘dangerous’. But for whom?

The government now understands something that LKP has been saying for years: leasehold is a deeply flawed system. It is also a critical and growing part of the housing market in England and Wales. The Housing White Paper entitled “Fixing our broken housing market” launched in February 2017 made this very clear. This has come […]

Roger Southam silenced on LEASE website as blog is removed

The sector fights back … er, deploying LEASE chair Roger Southam The blog of Roger Southam, the controversial chairman of the Leasehold Advisory Service, was removed this afternoon. The article was seen as an apologia of the existing leasehold system that has brought misery to tens of thousands of leasehold owners, particularly those in new-build […]

The sector fights back … er, deploying LEASE chair Roger Southam

A message from LEASE Chair Roger Southam – The Leasehold Advisory Service July 2017 It is great to see the two DCLG consultations launched and the opportunity to have open engagement to address the issues. In reality leasehold is not the evil thing that is being portrayed. Doubling ground rents and unreasonable administration fees are […]

Not the job of LEASE to warn ministers of leasehold houses scandal, Roger Southam tells BBC

  Roger Southam, the controversial chairman of the Leasehold Advisory Service, told the BBC today that it was not the quango’s job to alert ministers to the leasehold houses scandal. Mr Southam said that LEASE was not a lobbying organisation and that it was tasked with giving impartial advice to all in the sector. Asked […]

Motion of no confidence in Roger Southam as LEASE chair

DCLG stakeholders’ meeting for leaseholders told property manager chairman must go UPDATE: Roger Southam and Jim Fitzpatrick MP are being jointly interviewed on leasehold homes tomorrow on BBC R4 You & Yours 12.15 A motion of no confidence in Roger Southam, chairman of the Leasehold Advisory Service, was proposed at the DCLG leasehold stakeholders’ meeting […]

Is this LEASE being ‘unapologetically on the side of leaseholders’, Mr Barwell?

Two months after the housing minister told the Leasehold Advisory Service that it would be funded to free itself from commercial dependence on the sector, it is selling its services again. Gavin Barwell told LEASE at its humiliating annual conference on February 1, that: “What we really want is for [LEASE]  to help leaseholders. To […]

DCLG rejects second complaint about Roger Southam as LEASE chair. He was appointed on merit, it claims

The Department of Communities and Local Government has rejected a second complaint about Roger Southam being the chairman of the Leasehold Advisory Service. “Mr Southam has not done anything in his private business that impinges upon his role as Chair of LEASE,” the DCLG tells the National Leasehold Campaign Facebook group. The group represents many […]

Bottomley tells BBC R4: Clear out sector stooges from LEASE. Stop barring LKP trustees. Bring justice quickly to leasehold house owners.

BBC R4 You & Yours link  Sir Peter Bottomley MP, patron of LKP, told the BBC today that the “scandal” of the Leasehold Advisory Service being packed with freeholder stooges needs to end. “The charity trustees of the Leasehold Knowledge Partnership should be regarded as qualified to be on the board of the government advisory […]

MP Justin Madders questions role of Roger Southam as LEASE chair

Justin Madders, MP for Ellesmere Port and Neston, called for an urgent review of the LEASE Chair in Parliament today. In his strongest statement yet, Madders explained that the LEASE Chair  “Roger Southam has extensive previous business interests with freeholders and has even boasted of maximising ground rent opportunities for them” The exchange in Parliament […]

Justin Madders MP demands LEASE chair has ‘no business interests in the leasehold sector’

Justin Madders MP has asked the Secretary of State at the DCLG Sajid Javid to ensure that the chairman of the Leasehold Advisory Service has “no business interests in the leasehold sector”. He has also asked that at least one member of the LEASE board be “an independent representative of leaseholders”. The written parliamentary questions […]

Will more funding for LEASE just be: Carry on minister!

By Martin Boyd Leaseholders have been hugely relieved that we finally have a housing minister, Gavin Barwell, who understands that too many things in the leasehold world have been broken for far too long. The Ministers speech at the LEASE conference was particularly strong explaining there was “No excuse for leasehold houses we will stamp […]

‘Dump Roger Southam. Appoint Sebastian O’Kelly,’ National Leasehold Campaign tells housing minister

The pugnacious leadership of the National Leasehold Campaign, a Facebook group with 1,300 members, has demanded that Roger Southam step down as chairman of the Leasehold Advisory Service. His place should be taken by Sebastian O’Kelly, trustee of LKP, the group has told housing minister Gavin Barwell. The National Leasehold Campaign represents leasehold house owners […]

Leaseholder activists rejected for positions on LEASE board

Two prominent advocates on behalf of leaseholders have been rejected for the new board positions on the Leasehold Advisory Service. LKP trustee Sebastian O’Kelly was rejected for the second time to the board; Bob Smytherman, prominent LibDem councillor in Worthing and chairman of the Federation of Private Residents Associations was also turned down – for […]

DCLG rejects complaint over LEASE chair Roger Southam, who pledged to ‘maximise ground rent opportunities’ for freeholders

The Department of Communities and Local Government has rejected a complaint by LKP that leasehold sector professional Roger Southam is conflicted as the chairman of the Leasehold Advisory Service. Mr Southam was “appointed on merit” and “LEASE is totally separate from his private business”, the DCLG said. LKP raised concerns in November, but the issue […]

‘If I fail to offend anyone, I will do it next time,’ Bottomley tells appalled LEASE annual conference

Leasehold sector insiders were aghast at the address given by Sir Peter Bottomley on Wednesday at the Leasehold Advisory Service “annual conference”. The event was packed with surveyors, valuers, lawyers and property managing agents paying £350 a head to attend what has until now been the most important trade show of the sector. Earlier housing […]

Housing minister says LEASE must be on the side of leaseholders, and promises more money

The Leasehold Advisory Service will be funded so that it can unambiguously represent the interests of leaseholders without dependence commercial deals with the sector, the housing minister Gavin Barwell said yesterday. “This means information must be free in financial terms, but it must also be free from any bias; impartial; a service dedicated to leaseholders,” […]

Gavin Barwell: ‘No excuse for leasehold houses or punitive ground rents and we will stamp them out’

Gavin Barwell, the housing minister, said yesterday that there was no excuse for leasehold houses or onerous ground rent terms, and the government was going to stamp them out. Speaking at the “annual conference” of the Leasehold Advisory Service – in fact, a trade show for professionals employed in the leasehold sector who pay £350 […]

More Posts from this Category

DIrection

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Find Everything

Essential reads …

  • Ground rent scandal
  • Parliament
  • MPs’ APPG on leasehold
  • Benjamin Mire
  • Moskovitz / Gurvits
  • Oakland Court
  • McCarthy and Stone
  • Persimmon
  • Recognised Tenants’ Association
  • Grenfell cladding
  • Canary Riverside
  • John Christodoulou
  • Peverel
  • Peverel Cirrus story so far
  • Charter Quay
  • Forfeiture
  • Plantation Wharf
  • Law Commission
  • Plantation Wharf
  • West India Quay
  • LEASE: what’s the point?
  • Tchenguiz
  • Sean Powell
  • Press
  • Exit fees
  • William Waldorf Astor
  • Martin Paine
  • LKP anthem
  • LVT/Property Chamber Survival
  • Most damning LVT ruling ever made
  • Pensioners win £68,500
  • Park Homes
  • Redrow
  • Retirement

Copyright © 2019 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership