Leasehold Knowledge Partnership

The registered charity for leaseholders

Menu
  • Home
    • Site map
    • Archive of posts by category
  • What is LKP
    • Privacy and Data Protection Statement
    • Site map
  • HELP FORM
  • News
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • DCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Cladding crisis
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance scams
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Leasehold Valuation Tribunal
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • OFT / CMA
      • Park Homes
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Recognised Tenants’ Association
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Accreditation
    • Accredited Companies
        • Block Managers Limited
        • Clear Building Management
        • Diamond Managing Agents
        • Dixon Emerald Associates
        • HML Group
        • Home from Home
        • Home Management Group
        • JFM Block & Estate Management
        • Jones Associates Letting & Management
        • Norwich Residential Management
        • Premier Block Management
        • Red Rock Property Management
        • Sapphire Property Management
        • Town & City Management
        • Urang Property Management
        • Vestra Property Management
  • Fighting back
      • Lease Extension
      • Q&As
      • Right to buy freehold
      • Commonhold
      • Bottomley blasts leasehold crimes on video
      • LVT/Property Chamber Survival
      • Tribunal triumphs … and defeats
      • Recognised Tenants’ Association
      • Right To Manage
      • Video
      • Find MP … and see how many leasehold voters
      • LEASE: what’s the point?
      • Pensioners win £68,500
      • Most damning LVT ruling ever made
      • Insurance racket
      • Local authority leasehold
      • Remember to extend your lease
      • St George’s wins £1 million
      • Leasehold law: the reforms
  • Sub-letting
  • Press
  • Contact
  • Parliament
      • Communities Select Committee
      • APPG
      • APPG December 14 2016
      • Commons Debate 20/12/16
      • APPG April 19 2017
      • APPG July 5 2017
      • APPG December 14 2016
  • Right To Manage
  • Lease Extension
  • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Louie Burns
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Michael Epstein
  • Donate
You are here: Home / News / Benjamin Mire / Judge Tim Powell explains First-Tier Tribunal … but leaseholders are not happy that justice is being done

Judge Tim Powell explains First-Tier Tribunal … but leaseholders are not happy that justice is being done

November 27, 2013 By admin


Tim Powell, a former London solicitor and now a judge in the First-Tier Tribunal, addressed the annual meeting of the Federation of Private Residents’ Associations on November 12.

His talk aimed at informing leaseholders of the changes that came into effect on July 1, replacing the old LVT.

He was accused of being “disingenuous” by a member of the audience when he emphasised that the property tribunals were a low-cost forum.

LKP is at a loss to explain why the Residential Property Tribunal Service is so keen to emphasise this – which struck a wrong note as two people who claim to have suffered significant financial loss as a result were in the audience.

Julian Shersby, from Sussex, lost £44,000 in leasehold litigation and publicly states that he blames LEASE, the Leasehold Advisory Service for misleading him into believing that costs would be limited to £500.

LEASE re-drafted its website on the guidance of LKP earlier this year.

Dennis Jackson, from Battersea, is another leaseholder who has suffered horrendous financial loss after believing that costs would be limited to £500 at the LVT.

He has had to pay £76,000 for the freeholders’ legal fees and his £800,000 flat was forfeited in January this year – a decision that LKP and Sir Peter Bottomley managed to get overturned.

LKP urges the RPTS to stop emphasising that it is a low-cost tribunal, when costs are limited only in certain circumstances. They can, in fact, be unlimited, and can be awarded by a superior court. The LVT in the Jackson case ruled that costs could not be levied from the service charge.

Lawyers – some unsavoury players in the leasehold game – have corroded the RPTS’s original intentions and intimidation by legal costs is routine.

It would also be gratifying to see the RPTS take a firmer line against lawyers playing the system against leaseholders: dumping a voluminous amount of submissions on the day of the hearing is not a coincidence, for example.

The number of leaseholders who loathe the RPTS and feel they have not had justice is a concern.

Further sources of worry are the scrappy and inefficient recording and archiving of RPTS decisions on what appear to be basic photocopies.

Spelling mistakes – even of the principals’ names – pages in the wrong order and an archiving system that is haphazard are not encouraging.

Finally, leaseholders could do with reassurance regarding the panel members who sit on the RPTS. Earlier this month, it emerged that Benjamin Mire, a controversial managing agent, would have been sacked from his judicial appointment following complaints that were heard earlier in the year. In fact, he resigned before this was necessary.

Is the RPTS confident that there are not other panel members who really should not sit on both sides of the bench?

Sir Peter Bottomley is certainly agitated on these issues. In his speech to the FPRA’s annual conference, which can be seen here, he warned that legal careers would be blighted if “conduct that is frankly scandalous” is not brought to an end.

Related posts:

Benjamin Mire ‘resigns’ from property tribunal panel after complaints Tribunal rules Citiscape leaseholders must pay to remove Grenfell cladding. Will this mean some lose their homes? Bye, bye Leasehold Valuation Tribunal. Hello First-tier Tribunal Justin Madders delays Leasehold Reform Bill and calls on the Government to provide justice for leaseholders It’s unfair, say Chelsea Harbour leaseholders lumbered with £300,000 legal costs after neighbours fail at tribunal

Filed Under: Benjamin Mire, FPRA, LEASE, Leasehold Valuation Tribunal, LVT/Property Chamber Survival, News, Plantation Wharf, Sir Peter Bottomley, Video Tagged With: Federation of Private Residents Associations, FPRA, Julian Shersby, Tim Powell

Contact LKP

Need help?

LKPhelp2The leasehold game is weighted against ordinary home-owning leaseholders, who aren’t professional players. LKP was set up to redress the balance, to help you win your disputes or at least avoid disasters.

If you have a leasehold problem, you can email sok@leaseholdknowledge or take a chance on calling 07808 328 230.

Or fill out this form, which ensures that you provide the essential information.

LKPnewsletter3

Professional services

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders. Click on the logos for company profiles.

Law

Right to manage

Lease extension / enfranchisement


capitalleasehold6-9ins

Insurance

Landscaping

limetree

LKP Managing Agents

Big managing agents are big because they have got business from developers or large-scale freehold owing companies. Doubtless they are very obliging.

Not a single one is big through consumer choice.

Managing agents accredited to LKP want business from leaseholders. Many are former leaseholders.

All have signed undertakings of good practice and have provided extensive references … from leaseholders.

They can also hand-hold leaseholders through right to manage at minimal cost.

Contact Sebastian O’Kelly at LKP for further details: sok@leaseholdknowledge.com, 07808 328 230

Please click on logos for link and details

Comments

  1. Insider says

    November 28, 2013 at 9:36 am

    Well the whole system is biased against the leaseholder. The Chairman of the FTT is usually a retired solicitor or barrister and, let’s face it he (or occasionally she) would prefer to deal with another solicitor and generally it is the rich landlords who can afford to appoint one. I’ve seen the “knowing nods and winks” that go on between the Chairman and the landlord’s solicitor. Leaseholders appearing in person are seen as a nuisance.

    And the second person on the panel is a valuer/surveyor, many of whom have worked for big landlords or are RICS members. Hardly independent I would say.

    That leaves the third panel member, the so called lay member. How are they appointed? I suspect a lot of them are appointed via the old boys’ network. How many lay members are leaseholders? I’ve no idea, but I suspect very few. It ought to be a requirement that the third member is a leaseholder.

    The system is stacked against leaseholders and is a gravy train for solicitors. Whether this will change appreciably under FTT is debatable. So much depends on the chairman, a retired solicitor!!

  2. AM says

    November 28, 2013 at 11:25 am

    Decisions accessed via the Court and Tribunal Sites are, for some time now, in HTML and Word. I understand that in future this will apply to the FTT-PC. As decisions have been typed in Word for a long time , there is I agree no excuse for a lack of accuracy and extracting the right names etc from the case files and transferring them to a PDF without printing and scanning!

    The Tribunal does remain a low cost option in so far as their costs. The argument is therefore whether they, AND “Lease”, should add a “health warning” as to the possibility of large costs under the lease, personally and/or in service charge, on appeal , the protections of CLRA sch 11, and to therefore first read their lease and take advice ( or ask LEASE for that).

    • admin says

      November 28, 2013 at 11:52 am

      Here is an example of a supposed HTML file on the Ministry of Justice website:
      http://www.residential-property.judiciary.gov.uk/Files/2013/September/LON_00AC_OCE_2013_165_25_Sep_2013_09_37_47.htm

      It is simply a reproduction of a photocopy, as is the PDF.

      For non-techies: a proper HTML file is what the articles on this website are. This means it is easy to find names or terms throughout the site and copy the material. A static reproduction of a photocopy is simply an image with no other archiving/ search possibilities other than the file name.

      This is an inadequate system, as Judge Siobhan McGrath conceded at the LEASE annual conference earlier in the year.

      • AM says

        November 29, 2013 at 11:05 am

        I am sure that the answer lies in the usually bizarre and paranoid Civil Service acquisition systems and rules about software…. However as documents are produced in Word, they are easily transferred, without printing or copying or scanning to a PDF, using Adobe or any number of cheap or freeware “virtual printers”.

        These include full Cntrl F search functionality, are easily uploaded, and do not require the additional step of HTML use. I know in one panel’s case it is in part a refusal of some staff to adapt and the inability to get new software installed without the cry for training funding etc, even though “it’s a piece of …..” 🙁

  3. Gill says

    December 9, 2013 at 2:04 pm

    The first resource of benefit to leaseholders would be a database of searchable LVT/FTT decisions and, in this day and age, it is frankly astonishing that such a database is not provided! As AM says there is no technical excuse, given that most decisions will be produced originally in Word.

    Consider for a start how many wasted costs and pointless cases might be avoided if the leaseholders understood, from their research into previous cases, that they were unlikely to succeed. Leaseholders are not lawyers, so even with all the legal resources available, they may be misled into believing that the law actually means what it says. Searchable decisions are used by all other courts for the convenience of solicitors and barristers, why not for leaseholders?

    I agree with Insider that the third panel member ought to be a leaseholder (chosen at random?) because I have witnessed too many cases of connivance. eg a barrister who exchanged email addresses with a panel chairman, and even a barrister who received a copy of a personal, private medical certificate sent to the LVT in confidence.

    We’ve come along way, but there’s a lot more to be done.

    • AM says

      December 28, 2013 at 10:03 am

      To a broad extent LEASE does offer that, and resources like BAILLI are searchable for subjects in the FTT and UTLC “and beyond”. Some like me do try and help in other fora, with “stickies” giving broad explanation of rights on insurance letting and underletting fees, major works and validity of invoices especially on “late fees” . Perhaps the forum should be opened up here, resources willing and LKP member firms encouraged, anonymously or otherwise, to contribute. I do spend some time on that as “charity work” 🙂 but its helped a lot of people, at least so they say in replies.

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

LKP’s tribunal survival guides

Lawyers offer pro bono aid to leaseholder facing QC in £24,000 dispute in Upper Tribunal

Solicitor Mari Knowles and barrister Justin Bates have offered their services pro bono to leaseholder Michelle Baharier who is fighting a £24,000 Upper Tribunal case against a QC. The lawyers, who are both working on the leasehold reform agenda at the Law Commission, stepped in after reading the case on the LKP website today. Michelle […]

Leasehold law – the first real changes in 14 years?

The contentious Housing and Planning bill has now been enacted after much debate in Parliament. The bill was not originally intended to address any leasehold legislation but, during its passage, two key leasehold amendments were introduced in the Commons and the Lords. These amendments went on to be supported by both the government and the […]

10 essential rules to surviving the leasehold property chamber … by the man who won back more than £500,000

Readers are warmly urged to comment on the ‘LVT survival guides’ articles and include their own advice and tips By Martin Boyd 1) If the freeholder produces a large bundle of documents just before, or in the week before, a hearing, you must tell the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal that you do NOT accept them. It […]

Gill Nieuwland’s guide to property tribunal survival (1)

Gill Nieuwland, a lay applicant, wrote this guide to surviving the LVT, but its points are just as valid for the new First Tier Tribunal The Leasehold Valuation Tribunal offers freeholders and leaseholders an accessible and speedy approach to dispute resolution. At least, so it is repeated. Designed for use by laymen, the setting is […]

Gill Nieuwland’s guide to property tribunal survival (2)

  “It should never be forgotten that tribunals exist for users, and not the other way round.”  Carnwath LJ (as Senior President of Tribunals (UK)) at the Commonwealth Law Conference 2011 Part 1 of this guide is here   By Gill Nieuwland Perhaps the best piece of advice I ever got from a solicitor about […]

Judge Tim Powell explains First-Tier Tribunal … but leaseholders are not happy that justice is being done

Tim Powell, a former London solicitor and now a judge in the First-Tier Tribunal, addressed the annual meeting of the Federation of Private Residents’ Associations on November 12. His talk aimed at informing leaseholders of the changes that came into effect on July 1, replacing the old LVT. He was accused of being “disingenuous” by […]

Bye, bye Leasehold Valuation Tribunal. Hello First-tier Tribunal

  Barrister Amanda Gourlay – who has her debut in the new tribunal tomorrow – guides leasehold owners through the new tribunal service   The new context The new rules begin with a definition section. The four jurisdictions now gathered under the First-tier Tribunal umbrella are defined here. Do not be caught out: service charge, […]

All change for Leasehold Valuation Tribunals on July 1

By Amanda Gourlay   In the first of a series of articles, barrister Amanda Gourlay looks at how the arrival of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) will change the leasehold world as we know it …   On July 1, the rent assessment committee (also known as the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal / residential property tribunal) will […]

DIrection

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Find Everything

Essential reads …

  • Ground rent scandal
  • Parliament
  • MPs’ APPG on leasehold
  • Benjamin Mire
  • Moskovitz / Gurvits
  • Oakland Court
  • McCarthy and Stone
  • Persimmon
  • Recognised Tenants’ Association
  • Cladding crisis
  • Canary Riverside
  • John Christodoulou
  • Peverel
  • Peverel Cirrus story so far
  • Charter Quay
  • Forfeiture
  • Plantation Wharf
  • Law Commission
  • Plantation Wharf
  • West India Quay
  • LEASE: what’s the point?
  • Tchenguiz
  • Sean Powell
  • Press
  • Exit fees
  • William Waldorf Astor
  • Martin Paine
  • LKP anthem
  • LVT/Property Chamber Survival
  • Most damning LVT ruling ever made
  • Pensioners win £68,500
  • Park Homes
  • Redrow
  • Retirement

Copyright © 2019 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership