• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / Leaseholders duck £430,000 legal bill to block celebrity architect Sophie Hick’s underground house next door

Leaseholders duck £430,000 legal bill to block celebrity architect Sophie Hick’s underground house next door

August 15, 2022 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

A couple who live in a block of five flats in affluent Holland Park in west London have escaped paying out £430,411.50 in legal costs in a long-running war to block celebrity architect Sophie Hicks from building an underground house next door.

This means that the four other flat-owners between them will have to divvy up the £2 million costs – described as “eye-watering” in the ruling – adding more than £100,000 each to the toll.

The upper tribunal ruling last month is the latest in a series of marathon court wrangles since Sophie Hicks in 2012 bought a 23ft by 140ft plot of land next door to 89 Holland Park Road.

She did so although the land had a deed of covenant from the freehold of 89 Holland Park, which now belongs to the flat owners at the enfranchised site.

Celebrity architect LOSES fight with wealthy neighbours

Sophie Hicks had hoped to build a futuristic underground house in west London But neighbours in exclusive Holland Park objected to plans on aesthetic grounds The High Court last year ruled they were wrong to stop plan on matter of taste The Court of Appeal today reversed the High Court’s original decision A celebrity architect who wants to build a modern glass-fronted house in Kensington’s ‘millionaire’s row’ has lost the latest battle in her legal fight against wealthy neighbours opposed to the development.

Although the architect received planning permission for her two-level underground dwelling, the leaseholders have successfully enforced the covenant in spite of “expert reports on arboriculture, engineering, heritage and aesthetics, as well as legal representation by solicitors and by leading and junior counsel”, says the ruling.

“By 2021 when the FTT gave its decision the total costs incurred were over £2.7 million.

“Costs paid or to be paid by Ms Hicks are to be deducted from that figure, but further costs have been incurred since it was calculated; overall the costs to the respondent will have been in the region of £2 million – a salutary reminder that the recovery of costs in litigation may still leave a successful party seriously out of pocket.”

Andrew and Jennifer Dell, who live on the top floor of the block, disagreed with the massively expensive legal warfare backed by their fellow leaseholders and freehold owners in resisting Ms Hicks’ development.

Sophie Hicks’s proposed underground house in Holland Park has Victorian white stucco converted flats on one side, and a 1960s apartment block on the other

Although Mr Dell had been “at the heart of the resistance to Ms Hicks’ plans from the outset” as a director of 89 Holland Park, he stood down in 2013 when the couple moved abroad.

When litigation started again in July 2014 the Dells, who cannot see the garden area from their flat, told their neighbours:

“We are perhaps less concerned by the eventual outcome (rightly or wrongly), but have tried to be neighbourly and supportive to date. We have now reached a conclusion that we do not wish to spend any more on this series of legal actions. We also wanted to be very clear that we have no objection to anyone continuing with an action but we do not wish to be a party, either in law or financially.”

The others, however, continued their legal actions on the service charge, and the First Tier Tribunal ruled that they were entitled to do so, hence the Dells’ appeal.

Their key argument, deployed by Mark Loveday and Mattie Green, of Tanfield Chambers, concerned clause 4 of the Dells’ lease:

Mark Loveday appears in “single largest service charge claim” appeal: Dell v 89 Holland Park Management Ltd

“To employ all such surveyors builders architects engineers tradesmen solicitors accountants or other professional persons as may be necessary or desirable for the proper maintenance safety and administration of the Building.”

And:

“Without prejudice to the foregoing to do or cause to be done all such works installations acts matters and things as in the reasonable discretion of the Lessor may be considered necessary or advisable for the proper maintenance safety amenity and administration of the Building.”

The question whether litigation costs can fall within service charges has been considered on a number of occasions in the courts, and the Upper Tribunal referenced a good number of them.

Judge Elizabeth Cooke ruled:

“I repeat that the respondent was entitled to refuse consent to the development, and entitled to defend the legal proceedings (in which it was to a large extent successful). That is not the issue here; the issue here was whether the respondent was obliged to do so under clause 4(4) of the lease, to which my answer is no.”

As a result, the Dells escaped paying up £430,411.50, but with this lot and these sums, it is an open question whether the case heads off to the Court of Appeal.

The ruling is here:

https://www.leaseholdknowledge.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/89HollandPark.pdf

And interesting analysis of the case here:

A stitch in time may not always save nine

Back to insights hub In a promotional video celebrating a recent project, award-winning architect Sophie Hicks said: “I think it’s very important for a new house to sit very comfortably and fittingly in its landscape”. ¹ However, protracted litigation with neighbours over Ms Hicks’ development plans for her home in Holland Park, London, demonstrates how subjective and divisive opinions and perspectives on this can be.

Related posts:

Dr Jonathan EvansGovernment’s approach to cladding crisis has been to duck the blame, says engineer who was shown the door by officials Default ThumbnailSolicitors squabble in High Court, while leaseholders face a £30,000 right to manage legal bill Default ThumbnailMarathon House celebrates its ‘first’ LVT victory – £425 of legal costs Bristol leaseholders fail to win freeholds to their homes as one was not a house, in Covid-19 online court case New Lawrence HouseLeaseholders and freeholder of evacuated Manchester block win £10.8m insurer payout for ‘serious defects’

Category: Latest News, News, Property tribunalTag: 89 Holland Park, Mark Loveday, Sophie Hicks

Sign up to the LKP newsletter

Fill in the link here

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (44) ARMA (91) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (33) CMA (46) Commonhold (56) Competition and Markets Authority (42) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (55) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (55) Israel Moskovitz (32) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (36) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (31) Justin Bates (41) Justin Madders MP (75) Katie Kendrick (40) Law Commission (61) LEASE (68) Leasehold Advisory Service (65) Leasehold houses (32) Liam Spender (39) Long Harbour (51) Lord Greenhalgh (32) Martin Boyd (87) McCarthy and Stone (43) National Leasehold Campaign (42) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Retirement (38) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (67) Sir Peter Bottomley (211) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (34) Vincent Tchenguiz (45) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: «Mick Platt Can’t we hear why leasehold reform is bad straight from the top: from Count Padulli, or Will Astor, or James Tuttiett, or the Gould brothers, or Vincent Tchenguiz … ?
Next Post: Barratt off the hook from CMA over mis-selling leasehold homes Steinbeck Grange»

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Stephen

    August 16, 2022 at 9:00 am

    An outstandingly beautiful house which has this modest piece of land separating it from a tall 1960 tower block

    I find it surprising that such passion can arise over such a development that a sum of £2.7million can be expended trying to stop it

    The applicant in this case actively supports the others in the beginning and sets off on this fantastically expensive journey and then gets off halfway along the journey leaving the others to pay the fare

    I am sure there is or will be all manor of bickering and squabbling over the coming years between them all conducted inside this magnificent building

    • Stephen

      August 16, 2022 at 9:05 am

      If the applicant decides it’s best to sell up the costs of selling and purchase of a property in that price bracket would dwarf the £400k they avoided paying – as in so many matters there are two sides to every story and then there is the truth

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Barry Passmore

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2025 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web