• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / Long Harbour hits reverse on forfeiture to £800,000 flat over £400 ground rent … and JB Leitch halves its legal bill

Long Harbour hits reverse on forfeiture to £800,000 flat over £400 ground rent … and JB Leitch halves its legal bill

June 10, 2019 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

The forfeiture case at Nautilus House concerning a Chinese national, with a mortgage from Bank of China, is a stark warning about the precarious nature of owning leasehold residential property in England. Valuable properties can be forfeited for relatively trivial amounts of money

Both Long Harbour and debt collectors JB Leitch hit reverse gear after a forfeiture threat to an £800,000 flat over a late £400 ground rent bill was raised publicly by the Leasehold Knowledge Partnership.

And JB Leitch has now halved its £2,000 legal costs demand to £1,000.

Millie Li, a Chinese citizen, visited China in November last year and failed to pay her £400 ground rent before returning in March.

The £400 ground rent should have been paid in January.

She returned to find her flat under threat of forfeiture, and her mortgage lender, the Bank of China, was also warned by JB Leitch on May 13 [below]: “Note that your security is at risk should a possession order be obtained.”

The case is a stark warning to thousands of foreign owners of English leasehold properties – and their banks – that flats worth hundreds of thousands, or even millions, are at risk of being lost in entirety owing to lease forfeiture over relatively small unpaid debts.

Ms Li contacted the Leasehold Knowledge Partnership because neither Long Harbour / HomeGround nor JB Leitch would discuss what she considered to be excessive fees in reclaiming the debt.

In total these were:

  • £400 ground rent
  • £145 admin to HomeGround
  • £355 court fees
  • £2,000 JB Leitch costs
    Total: £2,900

On May 21, JB Leitch acknowledged that Ms Li had paid the outstanding ground rent.

“This part payment is not considered full and final settlement of the matter. In order to settle this matter, you are required to pay our Client’s administration fees and the legal costs …

“To clarify, after allocating the aforementioned payment of £400.00, the remaining costs outstanding total £2,500.00.”

When Ms Li contacted LKP our advice was immediately to pay the outstanding amount in full, and then seek a tribunal ruling on the reasonableness of the legal costs.

Ms Li immediately paid the full amount outstanding.

In correspondence copied to LKP’s patron MPs and the Communities Secretary James Brokenshire, LKP director Sebastian O’Kelly raised the issue with both Will Astor, the CEO of Long Harbour, and JB Leitch.

Neither responded directly.

Sir Peter Bottomley

Sir Peter Bottomley twice asked them to do so, meaning that the following questions were not answered:

“If there is a problem, please ask the debt collectors to contact me for a direct conversation.

“I would want to quote their explanation of their approach and their costs.

“If they are acting on your instructions on process, I would wish to represent accurately your explanation.”

LKP questioned whether JB Leitch receives any payment from Long Harbour for pursuing this debt, or whether it is remunerated from whatever fees it loads on to the case while doing so.

LKP questioned whether this meant the debt collectors were remunerated for dealing with the matter aggressively.

Long Harbour was asked how this form of debt collection serves the long-term interests of a harmonious relationship between freeholder and leaseholder.

Long Harbour was also asked whether it believed this manner of debt resolution accords with the Code of Practice of freehold owners endorsed by Mr Brokenshire and signed by Long Harbour.

In addition, the freehold owner is Adriatic Land 5, based offshore in Guernsey, where the ultimate beneficial ownership is hidden.

Therefore had Ms Li’s property been forfeited over this matter, she would have lost her home, and the Bank of China would have lost its mortgage, to beneficial owners who have chosen to remain secret.

Long Harbour was asked whether the anonymity of beneficial freehold owners, common to Long Harbour freehold assets, is in the spirit of the Code of Practice endorsed by the Secretary of State.

LKP has been informed by Long Harbour’s lobbyist / PR helpmeets – as have media organisations – that the majority of Long Harbour freehold owners are UK pension funds.

Long Harbour was asked whether the Adriatic Land 5 freeholds belonged to pension institutions based in the UK and, if so, why is the company registered offshore and the beneficial ownership hidden?

Last week, JB Leitch contacted Ms Li and “as a gesture of goodwill” halved their fees:

“We note your comments in relation to legal fees and we maintain that the entirety of our client’s legal fees were reasonably incurred and reflect the level work undertaken on their behalf.  

“Our client’s legal fees in these matters are regularly scrutinised and approved by judges during proceedings and it is entirely reasonable that our client recovers their costs in these circumstances.  

“As stated in our email of 30 May 2019, our client does not look to profit from forfeiting a property which is evident from the existence of their ‘no windfall’ policy ensuring any and all proceeds realised as a result of residential forfeiture are returned to the resident or other entitled beneficiary after any debts and costs have been discharged.

“As indicated in our email of 30 May 2019, and in light of your undertaking to pay future ground rent sums as they become due, our client has instructed us as a gesture of good will to issue a partial refund to you of £1,000 of the legal costs previously paid.”

There is no question that Ms Li wrongly failed to pay the ground rent she had undertaken to pay when she signed the lease with legal advice.

HomeGround had told her on November 13 that the ground rent was due in January.

It wrote a reminder on January 23, and again on February 13 with a £45 late payment fee, and on February 27, when the demand totalled £545.

It was thereafter that the matter was passed to JB Leitch, which issue a claim for possession of the property on May 3 and contacted the mortgage lender the Bank of China on May 13.

Ms Li wrote to LKP after the dispute was resolved:

“My deepest gratitude goes to all of you who have provided me legal advice and supports when I desperately needed them the most.

“The legally legitimate claims that demand horrendous amount of legal fees have been nightmares for many leaseholders, as hiring a solicitor to fight the cases or representing on the court cannot be a win, given the high costs and efforts put in.

“Many of them including myself had acknowledged the negligence, but been struggled to accept the unfairness for the legal fee. I cannot thank you all enough for defending the leaseholders and facilitating in improvement of the system. Best Wishes, Millie”

Related posts:

JB LeitchBlunder forces Pier Management and debt collector JB Leitch to scrap £3,265 late ground rent bill (and forfeiture threat that accompanied it) Justin Madders MPJB Leitch loaded leasehold ground rent debt by 222%, Justin Madders tells Commons How JB Leitch just cannot resist the F-word … for forfeiture Long Harbour BoardOh, dear! Long Harbour private equity speculators buy freehold where ground rent FALLS from £250 to £143 Rebecca Long-Bailey leaseholdRebecca Long-Bailey asks Will Astor why Long Harbour is demanding £10,000 to vary toxic doubling ground rent leases

Category: Advice Case Study Disasters, HomeSlider, JB Leitch, Latest News, News, Sir Peter Bottomley, William Waldorf AstorTag: Bank of China, JB Leitch, Long Harbour, Nautilus House, Sir Peter Bottomley, Will Astor

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (45) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (41) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (43) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (67) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Liam Spender (31) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (201) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (32) Vincent Tchenguiz (43) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « Barking fire site is owned by anonymous investors in Adriatic Land
Next Post: Will CMA investigation at last give cheated leaseholders the chance to sue plc house builders? »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Michael Epstein

    June 14, 2019 at 12:18 pm

    Should anyone be facing court action involving Firstport and J.B Leitch always get the case transferred to a local to you court. This is a standard procedure and the court will always accommodate the defendant if a reasonable excuse is given, such as difficulty or expense of travel, work or family commitments. J.B Leitch may challenge not in the expectation of having their choice of court, but as a tactic to put pressure on the defendant.
    If the case goes ahead apply to the court to have the costs and the original claim treated separately.
    This means that J. B Leitch will be put to proof to justify their costs. They may not be overly keen on having their charges being subject to scrutiny?
    As is quite common, Firstport/J.B Leitch may as a “gesture of goodwill” decide to settle immediately before the due date of the case.
    It could be that they offer to drop/reduce the costs or accept a lower figure to resolve any dispute?
    They will tell you that all you need do is sign a form that informs the court that a resolution has been arrived at and that the case is discontinued.
    This is a TRAP!
    By all means come to an agreement if you so choose? But never sign the form It is an admission by you to the court that you have accepted the plaintiff’s case (irrespective of the settlement)
    Insist that J. B. Leitch/ Firstport inform the court, otherwise you could end up paying substantial costs.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web