• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / RICS dreams up another feeble ‘code of practice’, as Lord Best’s statutory regulator of property managers falls victim to Covid

RICS dreams up another feeble ‘code of practice’, as Lord Best’s statutory regulator of property managers falls victim to Covid

August 13, 2021 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Leaseholders are invited to tell RICS what they think about its latest code of practice … Lord Best’s proposals for a tough statutory regulator having got nowhere – in spite of the abuses seen in leasehold property management ad nauseam. Meanwhile, RICS has a few problems with noses in the trough closer to home, with accountants BDO warning that RICS was at risk of “unidentified fraud, misappropriation of funds and misreporting of financial performance’, according to The Times

Outside the walls of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) the reputation of residential property managers is pretty dismal and getting worse.

Huge and impossible bills are being dumped on leaseholders to make good the historic build defects of others, and even government ministers suspect that they will fill their boots with the £5.1 billion of public money being doled out to high rise sites with dangerous cladding.

Inside the walls of RICS – essentially a property lobby that squats across Parliament Square from our elected legislators – it is business as normal.

This time it has dreamed up a tokenistic and cynical “code of practice” to try to stop unregulated and unscrutinised property managers from making off with leaseholders’ money.

It is full of wishful pieties on how property managers ought to behave: insurance commissions and other earners “should” be declared; management charges need to be reasonable and pre-agreed; conflicts of interest should be avoided and even declared “when unavoidable”; the management fee should include the recruiting of staff at sites and they should be trained to “welcome complaints and value them as a way to learn and improve services”.

All fine, and leaseholders are invited to share their views of these worthy platitudes in a consultation that closes on 14 September:

https://consultations.intstandards.org/blockmanagement/consultationHome?done=VOTConsultationNotOpen

But, hold on, what has happened to independent peer Lord (Richard) Best’s Regulation of Property Agents working ground that issued a final report in July 2019?

https://www.leaseholdknowledge.com/lord-best-report-on-regulating-managing-agents-and-service-charges-to-be-unveiled-tomorrow/

It was not advocating code of practice cooked up by the same duds who preside over the current state of leasehold.

It urged:

“We recommend that the new regulator take over responsibility for the approval of property agent redress and client money protection schemes …

“There are numerous potential sources of complaints against property agents (e.g. other agents, whistle blowers, accountants) that have few if any places to go to raise concerns. The new regulator should be able to consider complaints from all sources. Where solicitors, lawyers or other professionals have evidence of possible illegal agent behaviour, they should be obliged to present it to the new regulator.”

The new regulator was supposed to “work with the sector (property agents, developers and consumers) to draw up the detail of the regulatory codes”.

“The regulatory code should include standards for transparency; potential conflicts of interest (e.g. mandatory disclosure of commissions and management fee charges); communication and use of service charges; administration charges; permission fees; use of covenants; and protection of client money.

“Standard industry cost codes, as have been developed for commercial service charges, should be developed to help consumers to more easily identify and compare items of expenditure, and to form a standard basis for accounts for managing agents.”

It also urged that the statutory regulator “takes over from the First-tier Tribunal the power to block a landlord’s chosen managing agent where the leaseholders have reasonably exercised a veto”.

How come this all ended up with RICS – and the largely irrelevant Property Ombudsman – coming up with something utterly pathetic?

Insiders carve up code of practice for property managers – having been silent on systemic abuses for years!

In the absence of any government initiative, RICS set up a steering group under Labour peer Baroness Dianne Hayter: the Leasehold Knowledge Partnership declined to take part, a view shared by the national Leasehold Campaign and the Federation of Private Residents’ Associations.

In October 2020 Hayter, who has said that her role is unremunerated, publicly criticised LKP at a meeting of the Institute for Residential Property Managers for not taking part, wrongly stating that we were upset at not being invited onto her steering group.

Baroness Dianne Hayter criticises LKP for not taking part in property managers’ new code of practice

Lord Best’s report was “on the back burner because of Covid”, so RICS and the Property Ombudsman decided to step in by providing a code during this “dormant period”.

Here are some reasons why we don’t think the trade bodies should mark their own homework by setting the agenda for a new code of practice.

First off, RICS has one or two problems of its own, with BDO accountants warning of “unidentified fraud, misappropriation of funds and misreporting of financial performance” at the standards-setting trade body:

RICS governance row rocks property industry to its foundations

From its grand headquarters on Parliament Square in London, the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) looks out over the property industry. The RICS is the world authority on standards and qualifications in building surveying. It maintains the Red Book, the bible of commercial property valuations.

Here’s RICS disciplinary fiasco over Benjamin Mire (and 300 struck-off chartered surveyors who have had to be reinstated):

Case against Benjamin Mire collapses, as RICS disciplinary process descends into shambles

And here’s former Labour minister Sally Keeble walking out as the regulator of the Association of Residential Managing Agents, whose efforts at self-policing completely failed when members in the naughty corner threatened to sue it:

ARMA regulator Sally Keeble quit ‘after being blocked’ from ruling on Warwick Estates lift shaft fatality

Sally Keeble also wrote an article for the LKP website explaining why self-regulation does not work:

ARMA regulator Sally Keeble outlines five areas where statutory regulation is needed in leasehold

And here’s ARHM feeble response to the OFT finding of a bid-rigging racket by Peverel’s subsidiary Cirrus:

Nine months late, the ARHM makes ruling on Cirrus scandal … – Better Retirement Housing

ARHM STATEMENT INTO PEVEREL PRICE FIXING / COLLUSION FOLLOWING INVESTIGATION BY FORMER OFT. Starts The ARHM Audit and Regulation Committee has been working with Peverel to review the outcome of the OFT investigation into collusive tendering in relation to the supply and installation of certain access and alarm systems to retirement properties.

Dallas Banfield, a chartered surveyor and “judge” with the First-tier Tribunal, chaired the sessions to come up with the RICS code: “So many of the cases that come before the First-tier Tribunal have a lack of transparency at their heart. Anything that brings greater understanding of the respective rights and duties that exist between landlords and lessees must be welcomed.”

Related posts:

Baroness Dianne HayterBaroness Dianne Hayter criticises LKP for not taking part in property managers’ new code of practice Leaseholders excluded from code of practiceInsiders carve up code of practice for property managers – having been silent on systemic abuses for years! Siobhan McGrath property tribunalProperty tribunal judge chairs sector-driven code of practice review that is boycotted by leaseholders Will Lord Best’s regulator help break the power of freeholders over their leaseholder victims? ARMA regulator Sally Keeble outlines five areas where statutory regulation is needed in leasehold

Category: Latest News, News, RICSTag: ARMA, Baroness Hayter, Benjamin Mire, Dallas Banfield, IRPM, Lord Best, Property tribunal, RICS, Sally Keeble, The Times

Sign up to the LKP newsletter

Fill in the link here

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (44) ARMA (91) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (33) CMA (46) Commonhold (56) Competition and Markets Authority (42) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (55) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (55) Israel Moskovitz (32) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (36) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (31) Justin Bates (41) Justin Madders MP (75) Katie Kendrick (40) Law Commission (61) LEASE (68) Leasehold Advisory Service (65) Leasehold houses (32) Liam Spender (39) Long Harbour (51) Lord Greenhalgh (32) Martin Boyd (87) McCarthy and Stone (43) National Leasehold Campaign (42) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Retirement (38) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (67) Sir Peter Bottomley (211) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (34) Vincent Tchenguiz (45) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: «St David's Square Fees come first for FirstPort: leaseholders billed at least £39,000 for applications to the Building Safety Fund … And so it begins
Next Post: FirstPort charges leaseholders 33% commission on temporary staff recruitment »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Jane Randle

    August 14, 2021 at 4:18 am

    No more codes / regulation hiding behind more regulations and codes. Help set right the wrongs. Help

    Get the building regs right. Get the building safety regs right – job done ! Pay for remediation costs with the Polluters Pay Bill support – job done!

    Charter a surveyor to look at your own processes and procedures – you need work done !

  2. Michael Epstein

    August 14, 2021 at 7:38 am

    Are you trying insinuate some kind of Masonic conspiracy behind the clear failings of the RICS?
    Otherwise ,the purpose of showing Mr Banfield as a Freemason is what precisely?
    It is only a matter of weeks ago that I had to voice my strongest objections to a cartoon published on this site (which was immediately removed) depicted poor people bent double giving money to men with no long noses.
    Please do not undermine all the good work you do with lazy and unjustified tropes.

  3. Kim

    August 14, 2021 at 9:56 pm

    Mr Epstein,

    Forgive me but I believe you are far too sensitive. I say this as a black woman.
    What do you mean by “ Poor people giving money to men with no long noses”?
    If you were being ironic then, ok i didn’t get it. Am probably not sophisticated enough……………..

    • Sebastian O'Kelly

      August 15, 2021 at 8:57 am

      I did not agree with Mr Epstein’s earlier objection that Brueghel’s 1621 painting The Village Lawyer (a copy in Norwich museum and many elsewhere) was anti-semitic as it has no Jewish association, but I removed it owing to his sole opposition.

      I replaced it with Irish peasant evictions in the 1880s to illustrate the inequitable powers of landlord and tenant. https://www.leaseholdknowledge.com/make-sure-ground-rents-are-dead-and-buried-by-improving-the-leasehold-reform-ground-rent-bill/

      The picture of Mr Banfield in his masonic outfit was published and circulated on Twitter from May 24 2018 by the Watford Lodge and is therefore in the public domain.

      Brueghel’s Village Lawyer is here:

      Pieter BrueghelVillageLawyer

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Barry Passmore

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2025 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web