• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / Sir Peter Bottomley calls on ministers to listen to ‘whistleblower’ ex-employees of Richard Davidoff (of ABC Estates)

Sir Peter Bottomley calls on ministers to listen to ‘whistleblower’ ex-employees of Richard Davidoff (of ABC Estates)

November 19, 2021 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Sir Peter Bottomley, Father of the House and co-chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold and commonhold reform, has waded into the controversies surrounding Richard Davidoff and his property firm ABC Estates.

In an Early Day Motion, he has called “on the Government to listen to the former employees of Mr Davidoff raising whistleblowing details of his business practices”.

Sir Peter has advanced the motion:

“That this House questions whether the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) has effective power to investigate the actions and conduct of the court appointed property manager Richard Davidoff; recognises the need for urgent action to implement statutory regulation of the leasehold property management sector outlined in Regulation of Property Agents: working group report, chaired by Lord Best, published on 18 July 2019; seeks an effective Government response to the recommendations; and calls on the Government to listen to the former employees of Mr Davidoff raising whistleblowing details of his business practices.”

LKP has been informed that two former employees are entangled in alleged defamation issues. Others have also contacted the veteran MP: peter.bottomley.mp@parliament.uk

Earlier this week Siobhan McGrath, the chamber president of the property tribunal, informed LKP that – “as far as I can ascertain from the Tribunal records” – there were two other blocks where Mr Davidoff is appointed as an officer of her court.

Additionally, she told leaseholders who had raised concerns that she could not “comment on Tribunal determinations or the reasoning given for any decision. Nor do I have power to conduct an inquiry into the conduct of Mr Davidoff in respect of any other property where he been appointed as a manager”.

Property tribunal chamber president Siobhan McGrath says Richard Davidoff has two other section 24 court appointments – ‘as far as I can ascertain’ – and proposes a new practice code to encourage section 24 appointees to behave

The EDM can be read here: https://edm.parliament.uk/early-day-motion/59161

Sir Peter’s intervention follows two recent property tribunal decisions involving Mr Davidoff, both as a section 24 court-appointed managing agent and a right to manage application against a nominally residents’ management company of which Mr Davidoff was the sole director, and at which his own company ABC Estates was the block manager.

Richard Davidoff, of ABC Estates, ‘breached his fiduciary duties’ after disastrous performance as a court-appointed manager, rules property tribunal
Richard Davidoff fails to block right to manage – from a residents’ management company where he is the only director

In addition, the Association of Residential Managing Agents expelled Mr Davidoff’s ABC Block Management Limited as a member on 4 November 2021.

Related posts:

Two ex-employees of ABC Estates fail to stop Richard Davidoff defamation action over critical Google reviews with fake names (and ‘face £36,000 costs so far’) IRPM Ricahrd DavidoffRichard Davidoff of ABC Estates expelled from IRPM Sir Keith LindblomWell, can Sir Keith Lindblom do anything about Richard Davidoff’s continuing role as an officer of the property tribunal? Siobhan McGrathProperty tribunal chamber president Siobhan McGrath says Richard Davidoff has two other section 24 court appointments – ‘as far as I can ascertain’ – and proposes a new practice code to encourage section 24 appointees to behave RichardDavidoffRichard Davidoff, of ABC Estates, ‘breached his fiduciary duties’ after disastrous performance as a court-appointed manager, rules property tribunal

Category: ARMA, IRPM, Latest News, News, Property tribunal, Richard DavidoffTag: ABC Block Manager, ABC Estates, ARMA, IRPM, Richard Davidoff, Siobhan McGrath, Sir Peter Bottomley

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (44) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (39) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (40) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (64) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (200) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (42) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: «Siobhan McGrath Property tribunal chamber president Siobhan McGrath says Richard Davidoff has two other section 24 court appointments – ‘as far as I can ascertain’ – and proposes a new practice code to encourage section 24 appointees to behave
Next Post: FirstPort faces leasehold rebellion over service charges at St David’s Square St David's Square»

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Somerville

    November 19, 2021 at 7:16 pm

    “[….] and calls on the Government to listen to the former employees of Mr Davidoff raising whistleblowing details of his business practices”.

    This is fantastic news. Let us hope that the Government also listens to the leaseholders that have been impacted by Richard Davidoff and his various companies.

  2. Gulliver

    November 19, 2021 at 8:50 pm

    The Association of Residential Managing Agents, the First Tier Tribunal, the Institute of Residential Property Management, the Property Redress Scheme and the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors have various powers to sanction errant managing agents. Some might argue that they issue these sanctions too sparingly.

    As things presently stand, none of these entities have the power to stop a managing agent trading.

    We therefore have an absurd situation where managing agents such as Richard Davidoff and ABC Block Management Limited can continue trading even if their practices have been deemed by a court to be abusive and unacceptable. If a managing agent’s practices have been deemed by a court to be abusive and unacceptable (as in this case) we need an entity with the power to stop the managing agent trading. This can only be achieved by an independent regulator.

    Leaseholders have waited long enough.

  3. Kim

    November 19, 2021 at 9:14 pm

    This is the tip of the iceberg…….The stories I could tell ( based by credible evidence) of section 24 appointed managing agents. They would make your teeth curl… I just wish someone would give me a platform. Dynamite!!

    • chas

      November 21, 2021 at 9:42 pm

      Kim, I will light your fuse on the About Firstport Website I believe you are aware of. this!

      As for The Association of Residential Managing Agents, (ARMA), the First-Tier Tribunal, (FTT), and the Institute of Residential Property Management, (IRPM) the Property Redress Scheme (PRS), and the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) and other types of QUANGOS have over the years refused to act as expected as they are deemed Body Guards for these so-called organisations.

      When will Regulation be introduced by this government who are well aware of what is going on and have refused to do anything?

      Michael Gove has wanted to change things since being demoted to Housing Secretary but recently items have appeared on websites castigating him.

      Is this what happens when MPs try to help Leaseholders?

      • Andy

        November 25, 2021 at 1:01 pm

        Hats off to you Chas. You are a beacon of truth in this whole nasty mess. You have fought FirstPort relentlessly.

        Kim, I urge you to go for it. Speak to Chas. I once spoke to a ‘rogue surveyor’ who told me stories of how property managers of one of the most well-known managing agents were taking inducements from service providers. It led me to forensically look through all our invoices. We got a whole year’s service charge refunded in the end. What people don’t always realise is that these companies are incompetent and arrogant. If you do the research and build a case over time you can defeat them. There will come a time when this whole sordid market collapses, but it needs people like you to keep throwing petrol on the fire. We have to push hard now. Sir Peter Bottomley has been fighting this almost singlehandedly in parliament and as the father of the house, he will want to hang up his boots in the near future and I just don’t see anyone stepping forward to take up his mantle.

    • Ash

      November 25, 2021 at 8:29 am

      I am having problems with another managing agent. I have emailed my local MP about the issues that I am having and have asked my MP to sign EDM 672, tabled on 19-11-2021 by Sir Peter Bottomley.

      If other people having problems with managing agents do the same, we could have a real shot at making change happen!

  4. Lewie

    November 21, 2021 at 4:21 pm

    Another year of leasehold injustice is soon to pass, there is legislation coming forward for future leaseholders but that is still to be passed, but here we are again no regulation after all the committees and reports all saying leasehold needs regulating, its all blah blah blah.

    Its the same old story…no regulation of Managing Agents, leasholders having to pay for building work that should have had standards enforced, current leaseholders waiting for the reform that never comes just like waiting for the High Speed Train in Leeds.

    How has all this injustice come to pass? .. there is one simple answer.. lobbying.. by powerfull companies who can afford to ‘advise’ ministers…companies who can afford to pay the price for their requirements in order that their steady income stream is not disrupted.

    Up till recently there has not been a lobbying group for leaseholders so what chance have individuals who have been left to the mercy of the unscrupulous, and I don’t believe that lobbying for the benefit of leaseholders provides the lucrative pay off needed to change things….and that is why they haven’t changed!

    Looking at the current ‘Corruption Perceptions Index’ for 2021 it appears that over the last ten years or so the UK has risen in the league, it is unfortunate that this index does not really relate to the last few months, I am sure that in time to come this year will see the UK in the top ten! if not ‘Number One’ !

    In my 73 yrs of life I have never seen a Government so embroiled in such a disregard for peoples well being, it has come to the point where ordinary people have come to expect to be treated as if they were criminals when at the same time those who exploit them using unjust laws and lack of regulation are commended and left to carry on as if nothing has happened..!

    If I were a young man again I would **** off from this awful country !!

  5. Gulliver

    November 22, 2021 at 12:31 pm

    All leaseholders and others that are serious about having an Independent Regulator for the sector should email their local MP to ask them to sign EDM 672.

    This is because (if I have understood it correctly) the EDM is not only about Richard Davidoff and ABC Estates but also about “the need for urgent action to implement statutory regulation of the leasehold property management sector outlined in Regulation of Property Agents: working group report, chaired by Lord Best, published on 18 July 2019 [….]”.

  6. David McArthur

    November 23, 2021 at 7:07 am

    You can stick your leasehold legislation up your arse – altogether now, you can stick your leashold legislation up your arse……………………………………………

    • Lewie

      November 23, 2021 at 2:54 pm

      Dear David…

      yes I agree…
      Yes that is what tory MP’s would like..they don’t want legislation to disrupt the brown envelopes.

  7. tony turner

    November 25, 2021 at 9:56 am

    Sir Peter Bottomley is right to call for this motion but sadly, I doubt the government`s willingness to step in – and even if it does, to do what needs to be done.
    In the not dissimilar residential retirement Park Homes Market, the 2013 government comitment to rid the sector of serious malpractice has resulted only in its expansion and whilst the First Tier Tribunals need not investigate because the evidence is regularly put before them, this remains in the applicants bundles, the task of exposing them left to fearful victims and willing campaigners who are advised that it`s down to the hapless residents to do their own due diligence, whilst unregistered leases are handed to sham companies, extraordinarily afforded the right to issue and defend legal proceedings. When a child, an early day motion was a routine involving defecation. That suggested by Sir Peter and backed by Lord Best and LKP should not go the same way, ending up flushed down the pan

    • Andy

      November 25, 2021 at 12:48 pm

      I personally found the First Tier Tribunal to be another weak government organisation which is not interested in fighting for residents rights I’m sad to say. It’s so easy for them to give you the brush off and say they can’t help you if it looks remotely difficult. We’re having to fund our own fight against a Management Company, but the legal costs are eye watering and this is where the Management Companies win. Residents do not have the will or cannot get together collectively to fight these people. We have achieved some success but were caught in a HomeGround/FirstPort/Countryside sandwich – need I say more.

      • tony turner

        November 26, 2021 at 6:44 am

        I did pause before this reply to Andy because I`m soon to again represent a residents group at an FTT and upsetting the panel beforehand might not be the best move – But sadly, I have to agree. On previous occasions the bias in favour of the frequently dubious characters posing as property management companies is plainly obvious, as is the lack of knowledge of the most basic of contract law. Many see FTT`s as justice ( or not ) on the cheap, albeit less so when up against the crooks – and having previously fought similar battles in the County Courts, I know which forum I would prefer.

  8. Edward

    November 25, 2021 at 11:46 am

    Chas above could not have put it better.
    My own experience with the ‘Association of Residential Home Managers’ (ARHM) trade association, is that they act like a Body Guard in defending complaints against their members such as Millstream Management Services who (falsely) advertise to adhere to, whilst in practice stubbornly refusing leaseholders requests that they comply with the ARHM’s Code of Practice.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web