• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / South Cliff Tower and Southdown Surveyors regarded £3m repairs consultation as ‘something to be endured’ rather than ‘influence decision making’

South Cliff Tower and Southdown Surveyors regarded £3m repairs consultation as ‘something to be endured’ rather than ‘influence decision making’

September 13, 2022 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Tribunal astonished leaseholder directors agreed to unfavourable works contract that limited contractor’s liability to £166,200 on a project that cost more than £3 million

The property tribunal has criticised a landlord, South Cliff Tower (Eastbourne) Limited, and its appointed managing agent Southdown Surveyors for messing up a section 20 consultation for a £3 million repairs South Cliff Tower, in Eastbourne.

It also expressed its surprise at the unfavourable contract terms it agreed with the contractor for the works, Faithful & Gould, in a qualifying long-term agreement.

In a decision of 20 June 2022, the tribunal stated that the landlord, South Cliff Tower (Eastbourne) Limited, which is controlled by some of the leaseholders, and its managers Southdown Surveyors “seem to have regarded consultation as an exercise which would not influence their decision making but rather something to be endured”.

It ordered that £12,000 be paid to help cover the legal costs of a couple who brought an action challenging the major works consultation.

A further source of controversy among the 72 flats was over what the tribunal refers to as a “ruinously expensive refurbishment exercise which … threatened the solvency of the Respondent landlord” is that “many flats in the South Cliff Tower have been left with excessive water penetration, draughts, excessive wind noise and other defects”.

South Cliff Tower Eastbourne

South Cliff Tower Eastbourne is a 19 storey purpose-built block of flats. The building was constructed in 1965. It was decided to remove the retro fitted cladding from the west elevation and apply a new insulated render cladding system to the east, west and rear elevations.

The landlord, whose block is managed by Southdown Surveyors, employed Faithful & Gould to carry out the works, in a qualifying long term agreement, but the landlord had “agreed a contractual limit of liability to an upper limit of £166,200 … against a potential total works cost well in excess of £3 million”.

The tribunal was not happy:

“The tribunal finds it very difficult to understand how an upper limit of contractual liability for potential error on a complex project of this kind of just £166,200 … could be regarded as suitable against a possible total cost of works which at that stage were estimated to cost in excess of £3 million.

“Other terms of the Faithful & Gould agreement mirror those which are often found in “pro-supplier” type arrangements of this kind, including a restricted ability for the Applicant to terminate, despite the duration of the contract.”

In other words, the largely retired, inexperienced and non-legally qualified directors of 19-storey South Cliff Tower (Eastbourne) Limited had signed off on a very bad agreement.

“The contractual terms upon which Faithful & Gould were appointed were notably favourable to Faithful & Gould and not to the Applicant [the landlord] …

“The Applicant has failed to adduce evidence that legal or professional advice was obtained upon the terms of Faithful & Gould’s appointment; the Tribunal is satisfied that more favourable terms could have been negotiated from Faithful & Gould or if not from other construction professionals for the same or materially identical services, had compliant consultation taken place.”

And again:

“The Applicant has failed to adduce any satisfactory evidence of alternative quotations for any part of the extensive range of different professional services offered or provided by Faithful & Gould the Tribunal is satisfied that a wider range of competitive quotations, services and terms could have been obtained for each of the components of the services offered by Faithful & Gould, had a compliant consultation taken place.”

On the other hand the couple who had paid lawyers to investigate the consultation failings claim they have spent £125,000 doing so – against an estimate of legal costs of £26,000 in 2021. Their award of £12,000 was considerably lower than both sums.

The tribunal did grant retrospective dispensation to the landlord from compliance on most of the disputed consultation points provided it paid up the £12,000 to the aggrieved leaseholders within 14 days of the hearing and:

“(ii) that this dispensation shall not take effect if the Applicant’s ability to recover or enforce its estimated losses or damage sustained by reason of FG’s acts or omissions (such allegations to have reasonable prospects of success according to the Opinion of competent Counsel) is limited or restricted by the provisions of the QLTA.”

The landlord was not to pass on its legal costs and was to pay for the hearing.

The tribunal added:

“Questions relating to the reasonableness of the costs incurred in the External refurbishment works, whether the works were carried out to a reasonable standard are not addressed in this Decision. Those issues could be the subject of a separate application …”

The relevant tribunal rulings are here:

https://www.leaseholdknowledge.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/SouthCliffTowerEatsbourneRulingMarch2021.pdf

https://www.leaseholdknowledge.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/SouthCliffTowerEastbourneTribunalRuling20June22.pdf

Related posts:

Phillips v Francis decision Leaseholders defeat landlord trying to dodge consultation over a section 20 dispute in Court of Appeal South Somerset council enters the ‘fleecehold’ racket John Christodoulou side-steps £4m ‘dou-dou’ at Beetham Tower, where leaseholders face bills of £40,000 each as the works begin Tower Hamlets Homes spends thousands to thwart recognised tenants’ association

Category: Latest News, NewsTag: Faithful & Gould, Section 20, South Cliff Tower, Southdown Surveyors

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (44) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (39) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (40) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (64) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (200) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (42) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « When inflation linked ground rents are worse than ten-year doubling ones. That would be now …
Next Post: Compass Point faces insurance price hike from £12,000 to £250,000, with 21 days to pay the bill Compass Point»

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Vincent Tchenguiz`s Dog

    September 16, 2022 at 5:15 am

    One wonders how such a monstrosity was allowed to be built among all the period Victorian property in the local area. It`s not as if Eastbourne is highly populated or lack of available land.
    Another poor planning decision of the Eastbourne town council, who have acted like amateurs for 40 years or longer.
    Seems like the incompetence is rife in the area considering the Landlord and its agent decisions too.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web