• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / To build 8,120 new flats: Government gifts freeholders £41bn, devalues flats by £200m … and torpedoes leasehold reform

To build 8,120 new flats: Government gifts freeholders £41bn, devalues flats by £200m … and torpedoes leasehold reform

July 9, 2020 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Sir Peter Bottomley two-storey planning error
Sir Peter Bottomley yesterday urged the government to drop its two-storey planning statutory instrument, which comes into force on August 1. His move has the backing of Opposition MPs
two-storey stautory instrument

Number 10 needs a new housing advisor, Sir Peter Bottomley tells Commons

The government’s two-storey planning reform will create only 8,120 new flats over ten years – but has also inadvertently gifted residential freehold owners between £21 billion and £41.9 billion in increased development value

In addition, existing flats will plummet in value by nearly £200 million.

The consequences for leasehold reform are also profound, with the Law Commission’s January proposals to reform enfranchisement now irrelevant.

LKP has examined the government’s own impact assessment of the reform, which anticipates only 800 new flats a year with a total of 8,120 new flats after 10 years. Full report here

But the statutory instrument, which comes into force on August 1, has also hugely increased the value of residential freeholds, arriving at figures of between £21 billion and £41.9 billion after an analysis of the government’s own impact assessment.

The proposal allows freeholders to build two new storeys on blocks of flats without planning consent.

It was attacked by Sir Peter Bottomley in the Commons yesterday. He said the measure would make “Wreck the lives of leaseholders who want to get their freeholds”.

MPs: Sign Sir Peter Bottomley’s EDM

Sir Peter’s EDM

He added: “It will put the price up so that people like Vincent Tchenguiz can stuff his pockets again at the expense of leaseholders.”

He urged the prime minister and chancellor “to look at this again and ask whether there can be a better housing advisor in Number 10 and the Ministry of Housing so that they do not get things wrong – again”.

Opposition MPs have signalled their support for Sir Peter’s early day motion to derail the proposal, which was first aired at the Conservative party conference last autumn. It appears to have ignored any potential conflict with government’s proposals to reform leasehold.

When LKP alerted then housing minister Esther McVey to the proposal last autumn, she was adamant that any benefit would be shared among the leaseholders – whose leases account for 95% of the value of most blocks of flats.

But only 17% of apartment blocks are owned by the leaseholders, with third party landlords owning the remainder.

While freeholders will benefit by £408 million in new flats from the reform, existing leaseholders will see the value of their properties fall.

LKP estimates that existing top floor flats will loose £50.8 million of value, and lower flats will lose £66.4 million. An additional £80 million will be lost to leaseholders during the development of the site over the permitted three years for completion of building works.

But the consequences of the proposal are wider still.

The impact assessment acknowledges:

“Freehold owners of eligible blocks of flats will benefit from any land value uplifts to their properties due to having planning permission through the permitted development right even if they do not actually extend upwards.”

Most speculators in residential freeholds do not actually construct and sell buildings. But the enhancement in the theoretical values of their freeholds is immensely important.

For example, the Tchenguiz residential freehold portfolio of the Consensus Business Group sold the ground rent income via a debenture to Goldman Sachs-founded pension investor Rothesay Life.

The freeholds themselves were only providing income to the Tchenguiz group from permission fees and commissions, such as insurance.

With the government’s planning proposal, the portfolio of freeholders will immensely increase in value.

The full LKP analysis is here:

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab
Robert Jenrick: Why give freeholders such a whopping planning windfall over two new storeys rule, like this site in Newark?
Two-storey planning windfall means billions for freeholders, reports The Times

Related posts:

Commons to debate leasehold reform next Tuesday. And Bottomley intends to name leasehold game-players … Lords warn government of “tidal wave of protest” at new right for freeholders to add extra floors without permission Don’t forget about 10 million voters, Bottomley tells the government … which omitted leasehold reform from the Queen’s speech Labour to cap ‘legalised extortion’ of ground rents and end leasehold houses … Opposition and government now compete to reform leasehold Justin Madders delays Leasehold Reform Bill and calls on the Government to provide justice for leaseholders

Category: Latest News, News, ParliamentTag: MHCLG, Rooftop development, Sir Peter Bottomley

Sign up to the LKP newsletter

Fill in the link here

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (44) ARMA (91) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (33) CMA (46) Commonhold (56) Competition and Markets Authority (42) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (55) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (55) Israel Moskovitz (32) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (36) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (31) Justin Bates (41) Justin Madders MP (75) Katie Kendrick (41) Law Commission (61) LEASE (68) Leasehold Advisory Service (65) Leasehold houses (32) Liam Spender (39) Long Harbour (51) Lord Greenhalgh (32) Martin Boyd (87) McCarthy and Stone (43) National Leasehold Campaign (42) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Retirement (38) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (67) Sir Peter Bottomley (211) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (34) Vincent Tchenguiz (45) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: «Jeremy Pocklington cladding scandal MHCLG officials tell MPs: Don’t know costs of waking watch. No idea that at least three cladding sites are uninsured. We are not to blame but ‘30 years of developer failures’
Next Post: Fewer leaseholders’ rights would help make buildings safe, L&Q tells MPs »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Alec

    July 10, 2020 at 7:41 am

    On May 13, Robert Jenrick paid tribute to Sir Peter Bottomley and other campaigners for leasehold reform and confirmed the government is opposed to “rip-off practices in the leasehold sector”. and that “draft legislation” to counter such practices would be with MPs for scrutiny “shortly”. -even before the summer recess.! Once again we must ask, where is it?

    In December 2017, Sajid Javid promised to “liberate” consumers in the leasehold sector, and following on the separate reports from the Select Committee, the CMA, and in January the Law Commission on enfranchisement, we accepted Mr Jenrick’s statement to MPs was based on the three reports and that, indeed, draft legislation would be forthcoming “shortly”.

    The promised legislation must address urgently the many issues affecting existing long leaseholders.

    May I suggest Mr Jenrick makes an urgent statement to MPs on all this and provides a date by which the draft legislation will be before MPs for scrutiny. Otherwise, he is in danger of being accused of misleading MPs in parliament.

  2. Stephen

    July 10, 2020 at 12:04 pm

    Your report fails to acknowledge that the vast majority of leases reserve the right for the landlord in the future to alter the building – so it was in the lease which was negotiated on prior to signing or taking an assignment of. So why in those circumstances should the landlord be made to distribute any future planning / development gains to the leaseholders ?

  3. martin

    July 10, 2020 at 12:31 pm

    Stephen, I note you are no longer seem to be questioning the numbers.

    While leases may sometimes allow the freeholder to alter the building they had no automatic right to do so. Leaseholders could and have actively objected to when freeholders applied for planning permission in the past. The SI makes things a lot easier. There are of course some legal protections a leaseholder might follow if their landlord decided to develop.

    You also know most ground rent investors buy into these assets on a speculative basis and the price based on ground rent incomes which is why they have been sold for such a low price in the past. There is always something they can claim to own to make a few more bob when not fiddling insurance commissions and permission fees.

    I’m not for one moment suggesting all landlords like this but quite a few are.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Barry Passmore

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2025 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web