• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / News / ARMA / ARMA-Q must expose managing agents’ ‘financial interests’

ARMA-Q must expose managing agents’ ‘financial interests’

September 21, 2012 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Robert Plumb
, chief executive of managing agents HML Holdings, which is accredited to LKP and is a member ARMA, considers ARMA-Q and the complexity of transparency for residential managing agents

Growing leaseholder empowerment and awareness combined with the immediacy of communications will inevitably mean that managing agents will require a thorough understanding of what it means to be truly transparent.  In leasehold there are many complex permutations of the relationship between landlords, their managing agents and their leaseholders. It is, of course, the leaseholders who actually pay the bills, but often landlords who take the decisions. Given the historically poor level of transparency and the variety and complexity of leasehold structures there is significant scope for misunderstanding. In fact put more harshly there is significant opportunity for a lack of transparency and the use of “smoke and mirrors”.

An understandable and fundamental principle that we should anticipate is that in the minds of leaseholders they should be able to trust the impartiality of their managing agent.  They would like to believe that the agent (whose fees they pay) will act in their best interests when deciding which supplier or contractor to use for their building.  In relying on their managing agent to select the best value for money supplier (and best of course is not always cheapest) they would naturally want the agent not to be compromised by the agents own financial interest in the transaction or in the supplier. One can’t help observing that the downward pressure on property managers’ fees that occurs in difficult economic times, such as we have had recently, has had the effect of keeping base management fees artificially low. This may well have contributed to agents having to look at other ways of making money in order to survive. It is these additional income streams in particular that require additional transparency.

As we contemplate the consumer charter set out by ARMA under the ARMA-Q initiative, it would be valuable to have ‘impartiality’ and ‘transparency’ fully understood.

ARMA have used entirely appropriate words in describing their consumer charter. ‘Honest and fair’ and ‘avoid conflicts of interest’ are unquestionably worthy standards. We could extend our consideration of those standards and examine a little more precisely how they work in the context of related parties.

Landlords, managing agents and the disclosure of their relationship or ownership.

It could be argued that it is beyond ARMA’s remit to make their members responsible for their client landlords’ obligations to disclose their conflicts of interest to leaseholders. Others might argue that managing agents are responsible for the collection and disbursement of leaseholder money under trust law. This would mean that regardless of the terms of the lease managing agents would have an obligation to disclose any conflict of interest (including their own).

It should, at the very least, be a requirement for a managing agent to disclose to leaseholders if they are a related party to the landlord.

This should cover specifically both possible arrangements; i.e.

the managing agent owns the freehold or

the managing agent is wholly or partially beneficially owned or controlled by the landlord.

The agent’s need to disclose the nature of their third party relationships

In being fair and honest with leaseholders, managing agents should describe the nature of their interest in any services used and paid for by leaseholders.

There are many ways in which an agent can be “financially interested”.

It could involve a simple payment by the supplier to the agent for having selected the supplier or it could be that the participation is more involved e.g. a “volume discount” that results from the placement of many buildings contracts and one in which both agent and indeed the leaseholders benefit.

The managing agents could legitimately charge a fee for managing the project that includes procurement. Adequate disclosure would have been achieved if the managing agent’s fee is separately billed (and not in the form of a rebate from the supplier).

The financial relationship could exist because the managing agent owns the supplier (or has common shareholders). Such ownership should be disclosed to leaseholders (not just landlords).

Disclosure of the Landlords’ supplier relationships

Leases often dictate quite clearly (and indeed for good reasons) that the landlord has a duty to procure services (such as insurance and repairs) on behalf of leaseholders and raise money from leaseholders to pay for those services. Similarly leases can provide no process in which leaseholders can voice their opinion as to the selection of contractors. (i.e. sometimes referral to the LVT may be the only available route to getting disclosure). There is, of course, nothing illegal about the landlord employing his or her own company to supply services to undertake work on the property. It is nevertheless understandable that leaseholders would wish to see that there is good value for money in selecting the landlord’s contractor and they are entitled to rely on their managing agent to ensure that this is so. It would be good practice if managing agents disclosed to leaseholders which contractors have been used that are related to the landlord.

Written terms of business

ARMA-Q encouragement of written terms of business is very important. It is a managing agent’s opportunity to be very precise about what services are included in the management fee (set out in the written contract) and what are not. Our professionalism as managing agents is greatly enhanced by preparedness to have this clarity and transparency.

Related posts:

Default ThumbnailARMA-Q: a qualified welcome, but it is not a new dawn Default ThumbnailARMA-Q: an ethical facelift for a flawed trade body ARMA: prepare for a regulated leasehold management world Default ThumbnailManaging agents owned by landlords must come clean … says leading managing agent Default ThumbnailThe ARMA managing agent’s annual conference

Category: ARMA, ARMA-Q, NewsTag: ARMA, ARMA-Q, Rob Plumb

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (44) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (39) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (40) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (64) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (200) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (42) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « Now Daily Mail looks into Shapps’ colourful business life
Next Post: ARMA-Q: an ethical facelift for a flawed trade body »

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web