• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / At last a housing minister who seems to want to reform leasehold, and knows legal costs are being gamed to keep freeholders on top

At last a housing minister who seems to want to reform leasehold, and knows legal costs are being gamed to keep freeholders on top

December 15, 2022 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Housing minister Lucy Frazer amid the leaseholders: Sir Peter Bottomley MP and Martin Boyd, LKP chair

But will the government unravel before implementation?

By Sebastian O’Kelly

For the first time in the ten-year struggle of the Leasehold Knowledge Partnership we have in Lucy Frazer KC a housing minister who seems to understand at the outset leasehold’s injustices and how legal stratagems invariably keep freeholders coming out on top.

She told the All-Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold and commonhold reform on 12 December that she had read the Law Commission reports on leasehold reform. As she is a former senior barrister, leaseholders may be optimistic that she understood them, too.

Mrs Frazer was particularly alert to the incessant gaming of legal costs, which account for so many of landlords’ easy victories in the ever-accommodating property tribunal. Of course, many other challenges never get started because of the unbalanced cost regime.

Put simply: landlords get their costs under the lease, leaseholders can blow a packet on lawyers but will never get theirs.

“We are really keen to look at the issue about costs,” Mrs Frazer told the All-Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold and commonhold reform on 12 December.
“I know, as a former lawyer, that costs are a reason why people sometimes don’t take things to court, and they can escalate. And so we do want to make sure that the system process is fair and that leaseholders will be able to recover their costs.
“And leaseholders should not be subjected to unjustified legal costs.”

Sir Peter Bottomley, the APPG co-chair, added for good measure that she needed to look at leaseholders excluded from the insurance ombudsman because they are not a legal party to landlord-placed insurance contracts (although they pay for it all).

Mrs Frazer promised to do so.

Overall, the minister went out of her way to reassure leaseholders than the leasehold reform agenda is a priority and that the government is fully committed – even though, as Lord Truscott (Labour) pointed out, it only has 18 months or so to deliver.

The minister said:

“Leasehold reform is absolutely critical to the government and we have a secretary of state (Michael Gove) who has a reputation for delivering significant reforms, and it is very important to be working with him on that agenda …
“I think we have a shared agenda to end unfair practices in the leasehold market and I know, and I’ve read the Law Commission’s important recommendations in this area.”

A number of questioners in the audience quizzed the minister on when these reforms would come in, the most noteworthy came from former leasehold and cladding minister Lord (Stephen) Greenhalgh.

Former housing and building safety minister Stephen Greenhalgh asked where leasehold stood in relation to the other housing measures that the government is committed to putting through. A question for Michael Gove, was the reply

He asked where the leasehold reforms stood within the wider housing agenda of levelling up, increasing supply, planning and private rented sector reforms.

“I fear that might be a question to ask the secretary of state,” was the minister’s reply.

Leaseholders will be eager to see whether leasehold reform makes it into the King’s Speech next year, as it was reputedly pushed out of the Queen’s Speech in April by Boris Johnson’s Number 10 strategists, before his own removal.

Of course, a big concern then will be whether the leasehold reforms – outlined in the Law Commission, understood and refined by officials – actually gets over the line before the expected election in 2024.

The minister said:

“I know that the Law Commission has done significant amount of work on this issue, and I’d like to thank them for their extremely detailed work.

“They’ve made over 300 recommendations. And I have spent hours with the team in the department building up my understanding of the issues that you’ve been looking at for some time.

“Because I want to consider all those recommendations in detail to see how we can bring them forward and make sure we get it right, because we do want legislation that works.”

She also made clear that issues concerning building safety are part of the portfolio of Lee Rowley, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Local Government and Building Safety.

Related posts:

Lord GreenhalghLord Greenhalgh becomes the housing minister responsible for leasehold Heather Wheeler leaseholdBlessed is the sinner that repenteth … former housing minister Heather Wheeler joins APPG to reform leasehold, Harry Scoffin, Bottomley thanks Number 10 for leasehold reform … while colleague brands Persimmon ‘crooks, cowboys and con artists’ at prime minister’s questions Labour to cap ‘legalised extortion’ of ground rents and end leasehold houses … Opposition and government now compete to reform leasehold New Housing Minister hits the ground running

Category: Latest News, News, ParliamentTag: Lord Greenhalgh, Lucy Frazer MP, Michael Gove, Sir Peter Bottomley

Sign up to the LKP newsletter

Fill in the link here

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (44) ARMA (91) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (33) CMA (46) Commonhold (56) Competition and Markets Authority (42) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (55) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (55) Israel Moskovitz (32) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (36) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (31) Justin Bates (41) Justin Madders MP (75) Katie Kendrick (41) Law Commission (61) LEASE (68) Leasehold Advisory Service (65) Leasehold houses (32) Liam Spender (39) Long Harbour (51) Lord Greenhalgh (32) Martin Boyd (87) McCarthy and Stone (43) National Leasehold Campaign (42) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Retirement (38) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (67) Sir Peter Bottomley (211) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (34) Vincent Tchenguiz (45) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « Metropolitan housing association MTVH tells MPs: we won’t collect ground rent, we have ditched marriage value and all leases are 990 years (where possible)
Next Post: £100k major works bills wipe out council leaseholders. But why are 40% of Right To Buy homes now owned by investors? »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Ripped off leaseholder

    December 18, 2022 at 10:04 am

    What about the Regulation of Managing Agents, promised years ago?

    • Henry Lee

      December 22, 2022 at 8:19 am

      Firstport now Emeria without fail add £500/leaseholder every end of the adjustments. That’s 800 units in my estate. The explanations had to extracted with the most reluctance. The explanations were fuzzy, so confusing that you simply give up. Surprise MCA is not willing to investigate. Perhaps, it’s not a rip off affected a small portion of the population unlike cost of energy crisis.

    • Henry Lee

      December 22, 2022 at 8:20 am

      Firstport now Emeria without fail add £500/leaseholder every end of the year adjustments. That’s 800 units in my estate. The explanations had to extracted with the most reluctance. The explanations were fuzzy, so confusing that you simply give up. Surprise MCA is not willing to investigate. Perhaps, it’s not a rip off affected a small portion of the population unlike cost of energy crisis.

    • Daniel King

      December 24, 2022 at 12:28 pm

      I’m a leaseholder of a retirement apartment in one of the 30-odd Retirement Security properties (Courts) that were created over the last 33 or so years. The original leases were set up with Management Agreements that made RS the Services Manager (Managing Agent). The financial affairs of each Court is the responsibility of the Court’s Board of Directors. RS do not charge Ground Rents and there is no charge for lease extensions (at the last notes on policy). Each of the Courts is a not-for-profit business. This means that if a Board of Directors are authorised by the Owners to change Services Manager, I have never found a competent Services Manager (or agent of a block management company) who is interested in taking on the Court, with one exception.

      In 2021, there was a period of six months during which when we had three months of only partial Services Managemant and another three months of very sparse service. During this time the Board had to take decisions about the Court’s affairs which should have been dealt with by a Services Manager.

      We have calculated (as fairly as possible) the proportion of our Management Fee (about £7500) for which we ought to be recompensed. During this time the Board had to take serious decisions about the Court’s affairs which should have been dealt with by a Services Manager.

      As a Board, we have complained about this to RS with no result except an offer of £1300, which we were advised by our Services Manager to accept, and eventually did. The new CEO was unable to offer an amount commensurate with our work during the six months, although she admitted that mistakes had been made. I later embarked on RS’s formal Complaints Procedure. By the time I had a reply from RS’s Company Secretary, it had become clear that RS would not reply to my basis of complaint, which was non-perfomance of the terms of the Management Agreement. Instead, they used the terms of the Lease to threaten me with the argument that if I were compensated as an individual member of the Board and an Owner, an accusation could be made of non-payment of my part of the Service Charge attributable to Management Services. I decided to drop the matter because I could see no way forward and felt that no good could come of further action.

      RS is a member of ARCO and of ARHM. I’ve studied their Codes of Practice and concluded that they are in breach of best (or even decent) practice in this matter. Unfortunately, the way the Complaints Procedures are set up one has to have exhausted the Managing Agent’s Complaints Procedure before approaching the trade organisations, and then an Ombudsman.

      This is all very discouraging. Good luck to us all. Thank you for all your efforts to improve things, which I’ve followed with interest since the days of Carlex.

    • robert philcox

      January 3, 2023 at 2:53 pm

      Unfortunately for leaseholders the word commission is written into the small print of a leaseholders contact. The commission is ambiguous in that it does not mention specifics
      ie’ amount of commission and what it apples to – building Insurance springs to mind. Major works also present the Managing agent with an opportunity to add yet more commissions sometimes as much as 20% listed as consultancy fees and other.

  2. Tony Turner

    December 19, 2022 at 8:06 am

    SORRY – I`m sticking my nose again into matters in which I`m not immediately affected – but the synergies between the leasehold fiascos and the grossly exploitative semi and retiement residential Park Homes market are much akin – the hallmarks being the so far enabled insatiable greed of those who couln`t give a toss about social well-being, decent housing and the environments in which decent people are expected or forced to live – instead in grossly profiteering and in perpetuating fuedalism.

    The now involvement of Luzy Frazer KC is a welcome move forward and hopefully, she will recognise the same and spread her wings further. What has always been needed is competent leadership and continuity, so hopefully she`ll remain in place for as long as possbile. There`s much to be done and with an election looming, not a lot of time to do it. So let`s hope she can make the most of it.

  3. Cherry Jones

    December 19, 2022 at 9:07 am

    I won’t hold my breath with any housing minister actions speak louder than words. Many moons ago Mark Prisk MP was ex Property Manager and housing minister so understood all too well exactly what was happening, but as soon as he started reform he disappeared as have all the other housing ministers that try to push things through.
    Government just does not have a stomach for it and doesn’t’ want to upset those at the top who help to fill their coffers.
    This whole fiasco with everything relating to flats, cladding, ground rent, greedy freeholders with insurance, Section 20’s, electric you name it they contaminate it and on and on. I would suggest labour need to get a grip of all this and in doing so, would probably secure a huge majority of votes for those effected by all these scandals.

  4. Rawlston

    December 22, 2022 at 9:32 am

    Is the formula that is used to calculate what the freeholders through their managing agents use to calculate the price that leaseholders must pay to renew their expiring leases? In many cases leaseholders cannot afford to renew their leases because the extortionate charges that freeholders and their agents demand, nor can leaseholders afford to challenge these exorbitant charges and fees as in general, the Tribunals would use the same very archaic formula in reviewing any challenge. So, until or unless this onerous cumbersome unfair formula is drastically modified or removed, leasehold renewals will continue to be a win-win situation for freeholders and a lose-lose one for leaseholders.

  5. Ray Lancefield

    December 22, 2022 at 11:19 am

    Hear hear Rawlston’s comment above.
    Also, a better formula for Freeholder ‘compensation’ is required. Already for example our small development of flats have handed over £90,000+ in ground rent. It will be reviewed in 2028 and they will naturally increase it and we will have to pay a share of surveyor costs etc.. Even worse will come if we contest it! It is already 0.2% and not set at 0.1%
    EVERYTHING is weighted against the (very) poor Leaseholder not only with GR, MA charges, permission fees etc., plus Council Tax … It is good that along with Sir Peter Bottomley and a handful of others who do understand the injustice of a totally corrupt and outdated system and now latterly Lucy Frazer KC, might be able to get the desperately needed major reform through within this Government’s last gasps of control?
    The past has been bleak enough, we do not need an even bleaker future!

  6. Jonathon Dempsey

    December 22, 2022 at 12:37 pm

    What a brilliant response to an awkward question….. well, that’s a question you need to address to someone else!
    Why didn’t I think of that? The next time somebody asks a question, where providing a truthful answer would expose me as being a total *hit, I’ll deflect it and say you really ought to ask that of etc.etc.
    Call me an old cynic ( I’ve been called a hell of a lot worse I can tell you) but with these Tories I wouldn’t trust anything they say. The Landlord-Tenant chasm can never be bridged, because its rooted in our materialistic money driven culture. The judges earn £000,000;s…. and are part of the establishment , and its members of the establishment that own the properties. QED.

  7. Edward

    December 22, 2022 at 8:56 pm

    There also needs to be implementation and enforcement of regulation of managing agents.

    Unenforced trade association Codes of Practice such as that of the
    ‘Association of Retirement Home Managers’ are a failure and just make a mockery of having Parliamentary Approval.

  8. Simo

    December 31, 2022 at 10:26 am

    Lease extension is the largest cost and greyest area. A calculator or methodology would be the best single step while they untangle all of the other leasehold complexities. Perhaps combined with a cap on hidden legal fees.

    Our leaseholder is a investment firm, who appointed a trustee which is the same company as our property management firm, lots of conflicts of interest.

  9. Edward

    January 27, 2023 at 2:07 pm

    The ARHM (Association of Retirement Home Managers) also abuse the Tribunal costs system.

    Parliamentary approval of the ARHM Code of Practice is used by the ARHM and members for advertising purposes only, and without any intention whatsoever of enforcement or compliance!

    The ARHM’s Code of Practice is a failure and the ARHM instructs leaseholders that complain to them to take matters to the FTT.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Barry Passmore

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2025 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web