• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / Brixton Hill Court wins right to manage after first effort cost £25,000

Brixton Hill Court wins right to manage after first effort cost £25,000

October 2, 2014 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Brixton Hill Court has won right to manage, defeating a strong legal challenge by freeholder Springquote Limited
Brixton Hill Court has won right to manage, defeating a strong legal challenge by freeholder Springquote Limited

The residents of Brixton Hill Court have won their right to manage application after their first attempt saw them looking at legal costs of £42,000, subsequently reduced to around £25,000.

The ruling is dated September 27, which means there is still a possibility of the freeholder appealing.

After the disaster of the first application, the residents contacted the Leasehold Knowledge Partnership, which highlighted the case as yet another example of freeholders deploying expensive legal teams to frustrate RTM.

The residents application had been handled by a London solicitors’ practice, which had made successful RTM applications in the past, but not against a freeholder determined to resist.

LKP advised the residents to use the services of the Right To Manage Federation, headed by Dudley Joiner. It has taken around 250 blocks to right to manage, including more than 70 retirement blocks, and has successfully fought against freeholders using every legal stratagem to hold on to the property management.

In both actions at Brixton Hill Court, the freeholder Springquote Limited, whose directors are given as Rivka Gross, 66, and Abraham Y Klein, 51, of north London, deployed Liverpool solicitors JB Leitch and barrister Adrian Carr, of Tanfield Chambers.

The RTMF uses the services of lawyer Margarita Madjirska-Mossop, of Mayfield Law, who at one point worked for the Leasehold Advisory Service.

Brixton Hill Court RTM directors Angela Saul, Andrew Tracey and Dorothy Leiper
Brixton Hill Court RTM directors Angela Saul, Andrew Tracey and Dorothy Leiper

The ruling granted by Judge Mrs N Haria could be appealed, but appears robust. It will be at significant financial risk if the Springquote decides to appeal.

The freehold owners’ barrister Adrian Carr claimed the freeholders had suffered prejudice because although they owned 10 flats in the block and had not received “notice of invitation to participate” in the RTM.

This was like a “person who has not received an invitation to a party”, he said.

But he could produce no witness statements, while the tribunal found that solicitor James Compton, who handled Brixton Hill Court’s original application, and resident Dorothy Leiper, who had organised the notices for the RTM, were “honest and credible”.

An attempt by Carr to persuade the tribunal that the RTM issues had already been raised in the previous hearing and therefore should not be argued anew also failed.

“Ms Madjirska-Mossop stated that the tribunal should weigh up any prejudice to the respondent against prejudice to her client. She also pointed out that there is public interest in certainty in proceedings and parties are entitled to be able to get on with their lives …

“The tribunal finds the public interest argument put forward by Ms Madjirska-Mossop compelling. The tribunal is of the view that it is in the interests of justice and in the interests of the parties for there to be finality in legal proceedings which extends also to efficiency and economy in litigation.”

LKP has repeatedly expressed its frustration at property tribunals turning down right to manage applications owing to expensive lawyers disputing the most petty and pedantic errors in the application.

Judge Naria is to be congratulated for seeing the wider issues at play at Brixton Hill Court, where the residents have already lost £25,000 is seeking to exercise their “right” to manage the block themselves.

“We are absolutely delighted that this issue seems at last to have been resolved,” said resident Angela Saul, 78, one of the Brixton Hill Court RTM company directors.

“Obtaining right to manage should not be as difficult as this and it has cost us all thousands of pounds to achieve.”

The full ruling can be read here:

Brixton Hill FTT Decision

Related posts:

Brixton Hill Court battles on for RTM after demand for £42,000 costs is cut to £18,000 Retirement site loses right to manage appeal after three years. Now what’s the cost? Should the RTMF be taking the Elim Court battle for right to manage to the Court of Appeal? LKP managing agent Jones Associates wins right to manage for retirement site ‘There is no sight more venal than that of someone making money out of other people’s misery’ – Angela Saul

Category: Brixton Hill Court, JB Leitch, Latest News, News, Right To Manage Federation, RTMTag: Abraham Y Klein, Adrian Carr, Angela Saul, Brixton Hill Court, Dorothy Leiper, Dudley Joiner, JB Leitch, Judge N Haria, Magarita Madjirska-Mossop, Mayfield Law, Right To Manage Federation, Rivka Gross, RTMF, Springquote Limited, Tanfield Chambers

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (45) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (41) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (42) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (67) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (201) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (43) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « LEASE should not pitch callers into ALEP’s ‘den of cheque books’
Next Post: Residents say: ‘Don’t give up. You can and will win’ »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. martin

    October 2, 2014 at 6:11 pm

    Congratulations to the leaseholders. A very good decision. However, since the Tribunal is intended to be suitable for lay applicants what the heck is the Judge doing referring to “res judicata”? Latin was meant to have gone from the courts years ago.

    Some of the original Campaign against retirement leasehold exploitation members were faced with a claim that “the matter had been decided before” and the case ended before they even knew what the Latin gibberish spoken by the chair meant.

    Unless the leaseholders want to tell us the term “res judicata” was clearly explained during the hearing LKP will be writing to the president of the tribunal to remind her that Latin terms are not meant to be used in a lay court to the exclusion of some of the parties in attendance.

    • admin

      October 2, 2014 at 7:03 pm

      Ave! Ave! Hic dixit Boydius veritatis colosseo. And other codswollopia ad infinitum

      • Michael Epstein

        October 3, 2014 at 2:29 pm

        What memories! My Latin Teacher was an absolute stunner. I asked her out for a date, but she declined!

  2. Paul Joseph

    October 2, 2014 at 9:45 pm

    Congrats to the RTM Company on a well deserved success. What a relief it must be.

    It’s a great pity to see a reputable firm like Tanfield behaving like … a hackney cab? but hardly a surprise.

  3. Michael Epstein

    October 3, 2014 at 8:01 am

    Paul,
    I presume you mean the “first cab on the rank principal” which means the “first cab takes the first job”
    This is the principal the law works on, so if someone approached Tanfield, they would have great difficulty in not providing legal services.(and of course they must deploy every legal argument possible on behalf of their client). Of course this principal also means a leaseholder could approach JB Leitch to represent them against a freeholder. Now that would be fun!

    • Paul Joseph

      October 5, 2014 at 11:29 am

      Michael,

      No, not the principle I had in mind.. I substituted hackney cab instead of referring to an older profession willing to do almost anything for money. Mercenaries were what I had in mind, of course.

      • Michael Epstein

        October 5, 2014 at 3:20 pm

        Paul,
        Please don’t equate the “oldest profession” with some (and we know who) in the Freehold/PropertyManagement sector. at least with the “oldest profession” you get something for your money!
        I understand Liverpool based JB Leitch have made a record, called Ferry Across the Merceniary!

  4. Karen

    October 3, 2014 at 6:35 pm

    Another good news story…. this gives others going through the same scenario hope that there will be light at the end of the tunnel.Congratulation to the owners and to the RTMF and Ms Madjirska-Mossop.

    As for the use of latin by the judge! This just proves the whole system is just full of pontification and pivel to justify their own positions…

    Verb..
    To pontificate is to express your opinion in an annoying way, often because you go on too long or because you are too much of a know-it-all.
    An example of pontificate is the actions of a self-important professor who rambles on and on.

  5. Michael Epstein

    October 5, 2014 at 7:50 am

    This hard fought and magnificent victory for the Brixton Hill Court RTM company, should also put the “Ground Rent Graizers” that the “expected” income they have borrowed against can be taken away.

  6. Michael Epstein

    October 5, 2014 at 7:55 am

    Re Last Comment Typo, Pleae add “On Notice

    • anon

      October 5, 2014 at 2:38 pm

      RTM doesn’t affect the obligation to pay ground rent (and you could still face forfeiture for non-payment).

      • Michael Epstein

        October 5, 2014 at 3:25 pm

        anon,
        You are absolutely correct. What i refer to is the situation where companies (known as Ground Rent Graizers) buy up freeholds using large loans to fund the purchase and securing those loans against not just the freeholds, but the income they can derive from innocent leaseholders by inflating insurance commissions, or appointing themselves as managing agents. In effect they use leaseholders money to fund themselves.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web