• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / Commonhold is back! House builder offers flats without leasehold tenancies

Commonhold is back! House builder offers flats without leasehold tenancies

September 10, 2018 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Five flats might not amount to a revolution, but it might be an indication of where market sentiment is heading.

If so, Stewart Moxon, founder of Hopton Build, is going to be well ahead of the curve.

He is selling five two-bedroom apartments at Liversedge, near Huddersfield, as commonhold units rather than leasehold.

And the reason he is doing so is because of his own unsatisfactory experiences as an investor in leasehold properties: so he is one of the 94% of dissatisfied leasehold owners who regret their decision to purchase, as identified in the National Association of Estate Agents report last week.

“We were involved a lengthy battle to regain control of a residents’ management company after paying too much on service charges. So when it came to selling these flats, we decided to sell them commonhold, which means the buyers have control of their costs and without having to pay annual ground rents and the other nonsense.”

The apartments are priced between £129,500 and £136,500.

The flats went on sale last week and already one has serious interest.

The unfamiliarity of commonhold is a concern, but Mr Moxon does not reckon it will impact on likely sales.

“Most of our likely buyers will be cash purchasers who are downsizing, for whatever reasons. So they will be older buyers who will understand the concept of commonhold.”

Some mortgage lenders won’t lend on commonhold, although the Leeds, Yorkshire and Nationwide building societies do do so.

The commonhold site of Spire View, in Pickering also in Yorkshire, was organised with commonhold tenure by its New Zealand developer, who went bust along with many other small operators in 2008.

Ironically, it was repossessed by RBS which did not lend on commonhold tenure.

Given that so many mortgage lenders are wary of leasehold trickery – such as doubling ground rents from plc house builders such as Taylor Wimpey – Mr Moxon might find that commonhold is not an issue at all these days.

We wish him the best of luck and urge all other ethical house builders to follow suit.

Related posts:

LKP persuades government to allow commonhold tenure on Help To Buy CML: Will mortgage lenders lend on commonhold? No. Yes. Maybe … er Housebuilders WILL benefit from commonhold, Hopton Build developer tells Law Commission For God’s sake! Now it emerges £8.3 billion Help To Buy scheme – that turned house builder executives into multi-millionaires – is not available on commonhold properties! Scale of leasehold house scandal revealed in mass email dump to house builder bosses

Category: Commonhold, Latest News, NewsTag: Commonhold, Hopton Build, Spire View, Stewart Moxon

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (45) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (41) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (42) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (67) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (201) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (43) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: «forfeiture by neighbour Neighbour forfeits leaseholder’s £600,000 London maisonette for putting in a new bathroom
Next Post: Sunday Times and MoneyWeek reference £600,000 forfeiture case »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Nikki

    September 11, 2018 at 8:40 am

    Persimmon could not pay £100,000,000 bonus to its CEO if it wasn’t part funded by Government Help to Buy and the leasehold model of monetisation of homes for future income streams.

    They don’t even have to pay for remedying building defects such as Grenfell style cladding. Why would big developers voluntarily change such a self serving business model.

    The Law Commission knows Leasehold is too difficult to reform. Abolish leasehold is simplest solution.

    • David Colin McArthur

      September 11, 2018 at 9:43 am

      The Law Commission (and the legal fraternity) is part and parcel of the problem, as is government. They (The Law Commission) have said that leasehold is complex and difficult to reform, these words are self serving and a forewarning that it’s recommendations (to government) will fall short of what is required.

      All reforms fall short of what is required. I have been trying to educate myself on how modern day leasehold came about, it has been hard work finding an authoritative account. The best account suggested that it all kicked off in the 1920’s when legislation was enacted to control rents and restrict landlords rights to evict.

      Landlord’s profits fell, their saviour was the existence of feudal leasehold laws. Landlords began to lease their properties/land to gain another income flow. It is not difficult to imagine how things developed from that point, developers and builders latched onto leasehold. They began to sell newly built houses on the very same basis.

      Fast forward to now, the age of amoral corporate capitalism, and the age of young go getters in sharp suits, pointy shoes, and slicked back hair. Amateurs (provincial landlords) had discovered the ancient treasure, but their use (exploitation) of leasehold had been woeful and weak – 999 year leases and low fixed ground rents. We can do better than that.

      And so they did do better than that, with shorter leases, doubling ground rents, creating a whole new freehold industry, etc etc etc.

      “Let it be” is a Beatles’ song, it is also the English translation of the French term “laissez faire”. A more sophisticated definition is, “abstention by governments from interfering in the workings of the free market” And that is precisely what successive governments have done over time, abstained. Oh! yes government has intervened from time to time with reforms, but only when intervention and reforms could not be avoided. And all reforms were the minimum required, and all reforms satisfied the sharp suited, pointy shoe brigade, and pacified the masses……….. until the next time.

      Let there not be a next time, ABOLISH our domestic leasehold laws now.

      • chas

        September 14, 2018 at 3:13 pm

        My friend attended a meeting at the Dept of Justice on 06/09/2018 in his capacity as a Right to Manage (RTM) Company Director. He was invited by representatives of the Law Commission looking into reforms to current Leasehold legislation. Justin Bates was there which tells you everything.
        Information Notice to the Landlord is required once the RTM Company is set up in the usual way. This notice would request details such as:

        * scope of the buildings
        * service charges
        * list of management contracts
        * list of management functions

        The Law Commission were considering the following timeline.

        1. Landlord has 30 days to respond to the information notice .
        2. RTM Company has 30 days from the Landlords response to serve the claim notice for RTM
        3. landlord has 30 days from the date of the claim notice to serve a Counternotice
        4. If after 14 days from receipt of the Counternotice the parties have not agreed the allocation of management functions the RTM Company has to apply for a statutory-approved form of mediation
        5. If parties fail to reach agreement within 30 days of the mediation either party would have the right to apply to the Tribunal for a determination

        If Justin and his Landlord employers get this legalistic tosh into leasehold law it could deter many from going for RTM and may fall into the hands of dishonest greedy landlords.

  2. Shaun McDonald

    September 11, 2018 at 11:40 pm

    Abolition of leasehold is needed not reform.

  3. Chris

    September 12, 2018 at 7:31 am

    Why go through all the hard work to reform and try and fix something that shouldn’t exist in the first place. Abolish leasehold and assign it to history where it belongs!

  4. Fiona

    September 22, 2018 at 6:10 am

    URGENT….URGENT….URGENT

    PLEASE, Please, Please complete the Law Commisions survey on lease ENFRANCHISEMENT on line.

    Thank you.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web