• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / News / Neighbour forfeits leaseholder’s £600,000 London maisonette for putting in a new bathroom

Neighbour forfeits leaseholder’s £600,000 London maisonette for putting in a new bathroom

September 7, 2018 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Time for government to end forfeiture windfalls to landlords

The first floor maisonette in North West London, worth £600,000, that was forfeited in August

This story has since been taken up by The Times journalist Andrew Ellson and reported on MailOnline, The Sun and The Mirror:

Leaseholder’s £600k flat seized over ‘redecoration’

A leaseholder has had a £600,000 flat confiscated by his freeholder after “redecorating” it in what campaigners say is the most extreme case of forfeiture they have seen. Charles McCadden’s case has prompted calls for reform of a law that ultimately allows freeholders to take ownership of a

Flat owner has £600,000 London home SEIZED by freeholder

Charles McCadden has been left ‘feeling suicidal’ after home was confiscated Freeholder Afshan Malik seized property when Mr McCadden breached lease Mr McCadden, who has chronic illness, says legal battle has left him ‘anxious’ Have you had your property seized? Email sophie.law@mailonline.co.uk A leaseholder has been left with nothing after his £600,00 flat was seized in a ‘redecorating’ dispute.

Man suicidal after £600k flat he OWNED is seized ‘because he redecorated’

A HOMEOWNER has been left ‘suicidal’ after his £600,000 flat was confiscated from him because he redecorated. Charles McCadden purchased the property in 2016 on a leasehold basis but didn’t seek permission with the freeholder before having a new kitchen and bathroom installed.

Man redecorates his £600k flat without permission and suffers ultimate penalty

A man has been left “suicidal” and with no home after his £600,000 London flat was seized when he redecorated. Charles McCadden bought the upper-floor flat of a two-storey Victorian terrace on Burrows Road, Kensal Green, Brent, in 2016 using inheritance money.

A leaseholder in North West London has had his £600,000 maisonette forfeited by his freeholder neighbour.

The property of Charles McCadden, 43, was bought for cash with no mortgage following the sale of two flats on the south coast.

As things stand, he has lost the lot.

Forfeiture was granted on August 6 with possession on August 22.

This is the single worst case of forfeiture that LKP has encountered and it reveals the unfairness of enormous windfalls received by freeholders following a forfeiture decision.

Forfeiture was recommended for reform by the Law Commission in 2006 but nothing has happened.

LKP urges the Law Commission to include its earlier report in its proposals to reform leasehold which are presently being considered.

Mr McCadden was taken to the property tribunal by his downstairs neighbour Dr Asfan Malik, a PhD medical researcher, for breach of covenant having fitted out a new bathroom and undertaken other works without consent.

The tribunal held a hearing last year, which Mr McCadden did not attend, and ruled in November that he had repeatedly failed to allow access to his flat so that the freeholder could inspect it.

He had also “carried out unauthorised structural alterations and removed landlord’s fixtures without consent”.

The tribunal also ruled that Mr McCadden “has caused nuisance to the occupants of the ground floor flat”.

The tribunal added: “These are serious breaches and the next step will be for the applicant to apply to the County Court to forfeit the lease. The Respondent [Mr McCadden] is advised to seek legal advice at the earliest opportunity.”

Mr McCadden, who bought the flat for £518,250 cash in April 2016, tells LKP that he contacted two solicitors, but was dissatisfied with the advice that he received.

He had not attended the hearing as he was looking after his ailing father in Scotland; Mr McCadden also has a long-term medical condition. He says he did not receive the notification of the forfeiture hearing.

LKP has spoken to one of the solicitors involved to understand how matters could have unravelled to the degree that Mr McCadden had the lease of his flat forfeited and a possession order granted to his neighbour.

The tribunal ruling said: “The tribunal is satisfied that the Respondent [Mr McCadden] has taken an informed decision not to engage with these proceedings.”

Dr Malik, who was represented by a property manager, told the tribunal that she had had an “excellent relationship with the two previous upstairs tenants”.

The tribunal made a site inspection but could not gain access to Mr McCadden’s maisonette. But it was satisfied that “a new bathroom, kitchen and central heating have been installed”.

Holes had been made in external walls and a new flue cut near a plastic gutter, and there were “redundant flue holes from the old boiler”.

Floorboards, toilet and radiators – “landlord’s fixtures” – had also been removed.

Mr McCadden had also rendered the front wall. The tribunal said: “This wall is not part of his demise. He had no right to do this.”

The works caused cracks in the downstairs flat and dust. Building waste was left in the front garden” “The rubble has included a toilet,” said the tribunal.

“The works have been executed without any regard to the impact on the ground floor flat.”

For eight years, Dr Malik had an “informal arrangement with her tenants and bills were split equally as they were paid”. After Mr McCadden’s arrival, a property manager was appointed.

The tribunal ordered that Mr McCadden pay his share of service charges.

In most forfeiture cases the mortgage lender steps in and pays the debt to protect its loan on the property – which would otherwise also be lost in forfeiture.

LKP is aware of overseas investors who have lost their properties as a result of forfeiture, where no loan was attached to the property.

But the loss of a £600,000 asset is a loss out of proportion to the dispute at hand.

Mr McCadden has been found to be a most inconsiderate neighbour and a leaseholder with no understanding at all of his obligations under the lease.

The sensible course would have been to reverse the works or settle up with Dr Malik for having carried them out wrongfully.

It may even be argued that Mr McCadden deserved to have his flat compulsorily repossessed owing to his conduct.

What is not just is that a relatively minor dispute has resulted in Mr McCadden losing his entire asset worth around £600,000 to his neighbour.

LKP has urged Mr McCadden to employ an established landlord and tenant solicitor.

But it is by no means obvious what can be retrieved of this situation, if anything.

We estimate that around 60-70 forfeitures take place every year.

It is worth noting that leaseholders are treated considerably more severely in forfeiture cases than fraudsters in the criminal courts.

In Regina v Waya the criminal courts were scrupulous in returning the seed capital to a convicted mortgage fraudster.

Leasehold forfeiture: why is LEASE so pathetic over this, too?

The full ruling and forfeiture are here:

CharlesMcCaddenTribunalRulingBreachOfCovenant

CharlesMcCaddenSection27A

PossessScan_20180826

Related posts:

Moskovitz forfeits £400k Camden flat from 24-year-old woman ‘whose brother did not forward correspondence for two years’ Affluent London leaseholders are just as likely to be kicked around as poor ones, finds the Sunday Times Is Salisbury Cathedral justified in putting the squeeze on leaseholders living on its close? LKP London meeting for leaseholders November 10 Woman has £165,000 flat forfeited over what began as £290 ground rent demand

Category: Advice Case Study Disasters, Forfeiture, HomeSlider, Latest News, News, NewsSlider, PressTag: Charles McCadden, Forfeiture

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (44) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (39) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (40) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (64) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (200) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (42) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « Is your leasehold home – from Taylor Wimpey, Persimmon etc – a life sentence? Ask the estate agents who can’t sell them
Next Post: Commonhold is back! House builder offers flats without leasehold tenancies »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Sophie Peach

    September 8, 2018 at 11:42 pm

    Had it been the other way round ? ie the freeholder flat being an inconsiderate neighbor, failing on his obligations- what would have been the penalty?

  2. Sebastian O'Kelly

    September 9, 2018 at 7:28 am

    That makes the point perfectly.

  3. Stephen

    September 11, 2018 at 8:41 am

    Relief from forfeiture is available in the six months from when the landlord gains possession

    He must make an application to the court without delay

    There are two sides to every story and then there is the truth . It would appear he has shown scant regard to the lease and has behaved badly towards his neighbour by undertaking building work often in the early hours of the morning – as I said I suspect there is a lot more to this story than meets the eye

    • admin

      September 11, 2018 at 9:45 am

      I doubt that there is much more to this: the tribunal ruling is thorough; detailed the respondent’s actions; noted he had taken a considered decision to ignore the process; and mentioned the possibility of forfeiture at least twice. (Mentioning, presumably with approval, that the applicant’s daughter was studying at Oxford was perhaps a superfluous detail.)

      The key point is the one made by Sophie Peach above: what justice would a leaseholder obtain if it were the freeholder being vexatious? A council noise abatement order, perhaps?

      Certainly not the loss of a £600,000 asset.

      If you are making a case to defend the windfall aspect of lease forfeiture, you will be in a very lonely spot even among your colleagues in the sector.

      Also, when we overturned the forfeiture of Dennis Jackson’s £800,000 Battersea flat we were working to a deadline of 28 days after which forfeiture could not be challenged.

      Dennis Jackson and Plantation Wharf: Did it have to end like this?

      COMMENT by Sebastian O’Kelly Two days ago when the barrister Alexander Bastin successfully asked the judge at Wandsworth County Court to throw me out of his court – citing the Human Rights Act – the whole sorry saga of Dennis Jackson and Plantation Wharf reached a new low-point …

  4. Stephen

    September 11, 2018 at 1:58 pm

    The idea of approaching the local authority seems the correct path to go down but they have not he resources including time to resolve it

    So if you live below what do you do to get the lessee who is breaching his lease to moderate their behaviour – threaten forfeiture. In almost all cases this should get the lessee to reconsider their actions

    If the lessee ignores it all despite being advised to the contrary then as the law is currently drafted he could lose his property if he does not apply for relief from forfeiture

    Going forward the law should be changed so the property is sold and the lessee in breach receives the sale proceeds less costs and damages

    • Sophie Peach

      September 17, 2018 at 1:36 pm

      What do you suggests as a fair penalty when the freeholder is in breach? Especially when the freeholder cannot actually be found, He (if he does exist) is hiding behind layers of dodgy lawyers and managing agents.

      • Sophie Peach

        September 17, 2018 at 1:42 pm

        https://acp.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/ViewCase.aspx?Caseid=3177045&CoID=0

        here is a real life case. The freeholder did not simply ‘redecorate’, he caused nuisance, and he actually destroyed, a rarely found and well preserved Regency Interior, within the Bloomsbury conservation area. What would you say is a fair penalty for that?

  5. stephen

    September 17, 2018 at 5:09 pm

    The Land Registry records as at the date I write show that the title has not been closed, neither is their a pending application to have the title closed. So all is not lost.

    He MUST make an immediate application for relief from forfeiture. I cannot stress the importance of him making that application now – not next week – but now.

    • Sophie Peach

      September 17, 2018 at 6:50 pm

      yes he should.

      but I have posted a case above, where the freeholder removed a lot more than the an old bathroom and out of date kitchen. The freeholder above carried out illegal alterations removing walls and original features from a Listed regency townhouse. Those original features technically belong to the nation. What, in your view, is a proportionate penalty ?

      • Stephen

        September 18, 2018 at 12:53 am

        I would have thought in both the case above and the case you refer is that the property is sold and after damages and costs are paid out then the balance returned to the lessee.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web