• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance scams
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Michael Epstein
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance scams
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Michael Epstein
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / News / Competition and Markets Authority / OFT / Woman has £165,000 flat forfeited over what began as £290 ground rent demand

Woman has £165,000 flat forfeited over what began as £290 ground rent demand

September 18, 2014 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

LKPCampaign against retirement leasehold exploitationCMAForfeitureexample001

A woman in east London had her £165,000 flat forfeited over what began as £290 owed in ground rents.

The property had no mortgage, so the massive financial loss is entirely borne by her.

The woman added to her problems by then failing to pay £3,140 in service charge arrears, which with interest added up to £4,056 by the time the matter came to court in April last year.

The freeholder’s legal fees added another £5,491, so she owed £9,547 at the point that the flat was forfeited.

Forfeiture is the nuclear weapon in a freeholder’s arsenal and can result – as here – in a massive cash windfall for the freeholder when dealing with a leaseholder who for some reason or other falls through the system.

We covered in depth the forfeiture of Dennis Jackson’s £800,000 Battersea flat, over debts which arose from a Leasehold Valuation Tribunal action that he substantially won.

The Leasehold Knowledge Partnership, which won a press award for its coverage – little consolation though that was to Mr Jackson – managed to overturn the forfeiture on the 27th day of the 28-days before forfeiture became absolute. More here

Worse, the judiciary considered this case in a closed court from which the public were excluded.

This forfeiture has been submitted by LKP to the Competition and Markets Authority as en example of the excessive and unjustifiable power of forfeiture.

Obviously, there will be occasions when leaseholders simply refuse to pay their share of the communal charges of a flat.

In these cases, it is blindingly obvious that repossession, with the restitution of those monies not required to pay outstanding debts, would be fairer.

Why do our political leaders and regulators allow this massive power of forfeiture to be deployed by lawyers on behalf of some of the worse spivs making a living out of residential property?

Related posts:

Default ThumbnailWideboy freeholder cuts £4,000 demand for leasehold flat refurb to £2,000 Long Harbour hits reverse on forfeiture to £800,000 flat over £400 ground rent … and JB Leitch halves its legal bill Woman signs up to doubling ground rent to extend lease on £70,000 flat. Is it now sellable at all? LKP helps cut Hyde Group £600 ground rent demand to £50 Moskovitz forfeits £400k Camden flat from 24-year-old woman ‘whose brother did not forward correspondence for two years’

Category: Competition and Markets Authority / OFT, Forfeiture, Latest News, NewsTag: CMA, Competition and Markets Authority, Dennis Jackson, Forfeiture

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (33) APPG (34) ARMA (77) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (31) Cirrus (26) Cladding scandal (54) CMA (27) Commonhold (48) Countryside Properties plc (27) FirstPort (30) Forfeiture (28) Grenfell cladding (54) Ground rents (40) Help To Buy (29) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (29) Justin Bates (33) Justin Madders MP (52) Katie Kendrick (32) Law Commission (53) LEASE (64) Leasehold Advisory Service (60) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (43) Martin Boyd (65) McCarthy and Stone (38) National Leasehold Campaign (35) Persimmon (46) Peverel (61) Redrow (27) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (27) Roger Southam (45) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (52) Sir Peter Bottomley (174) Taylor Wimpey (100) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (31) The Times (28) Vincent Tchenguiz (38) Waking watch contracts (38) Will Astor (27)
Previous Post: « LKP submission to CMA leasehold inquiry
Next Post: After only a week, FirstPort (formerly Peverel) makes a debut in the Eye »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. AM

    September 20, 2014 at 2:54 pm

    On one occasion where my clients ( a freehold owning RMC) had to resort to forfeiture, on my advice they agreed to do just that, take costs, sell the flat and pass the proceeds to the defendant.

    Bizarrely though they were a little unwell mentally and alone in the world, that they had what was considered a windfall in train, social services declined to help further!

    In the end they were given a life tenancy @ £ 1 a year rent, ( the same day) rather than see them homeless especially as they were vulnerable, and the proceeds put in trust to defer the service charge.

    Sad to say that a few flat owners were furious that the windfall was not taken and distributed but there are bad pennies everywhere.

  2. AM

    September 20, 2014 at 2:55 pm

    What is also upsetting is that there are so many free legal advice centres nearby like Bromley By Bow, that the poor lady could have gone to. 🙁

  3. Michael Epstein

    September 21, 2014 at 7:42 am

    This is an unusual case, in that an application for forfit cannot be made unless the amount owing for ground rent exceeds £350 or has been owing for more than 3 years.
    Unlike service charges, ground rent disputes are really limited to “lack of service” or failure to demand ground rent in the prescribed manner. In practice, ground rent should always be paid to safegurd a lease. In the case of court action (as is the case with service charge disputes) you must insist te dispute is separate from the costs.. Often freeholders inflate legal costs (in the hope that a combined judgement will not leave them open to scrutiny.. In many cases the freeholders will settle for a vastly reduced amount of costs, rather than expose them before a judge.

  4. AM

    September 24, 2014 at 6:45 pm

    “rather than expose them before a judge” -rarely a good idea 🙂

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Leasehold Law logo

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2021 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at no charge by www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web