• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / DCLG rejects second complaint about Roger Southam as LEASE chair. He was appointed on merit, it claims

DCLG rejects second complaint about Roger Southam as LEASE chair. He was appointed on merit, it claims

March 28, 2017 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

The DCLG has rejected the complaint of the Facebook group, the National Leasehold Campaign, that Roger Southam is conflicted as chairman of the Leasehold Advisory Service

The Department of Communities and Local Government has rejected a second complaint about Roger Southam being the chairman of the Leasehold Advisory Service.

“Mr Southam has not done anything in his private business that impinges upon his role as Chair of LEASE,” the DCLG tells the National Leasehold Campaign Facebook group.

The group represents many of the leasehold house owners in the North West, and has successfully engaged media attention on this issue.

The DCLG notes the “serious nature of the allegations raised”, but claims: “He [Mr Southam] was appointed on merit following a fair and open competition process, as regulated by the Commissioner for Public Appointments.

“… The Department has investigated the concerns raised regarding Mr Southam. This review confirms that Mr Southam’s role as chair of LEASE is totally separate from his private business.

“Therefore any requests sent to him in his capacity as chair of LEASE are distinct and separate from those relating to matters of his personal business.”

The leaseholders at Mulberry Mews, a Taylor Wimpey London site where Mr Southam’s Chainbow owned the embedded management company, claimed that they were hesitant to approach LEASE for advice because of Mr Southam’s conflicted role.

Indeed, one issue over insurance commissions was resolved after gave its opinion on the matter.

Following the intervention of LKP, Chainbow surrendered control of this company which then became a “residents’ management company”, of which all leaseholders were the participating members.

Without LKP’s involvement this would not have happened.

Related posts:

LEASE chair Roger Southam resigns Justin Madders MP demands LEASE chair has ‘no business interests in the leasehold sector’ DCLG rejects complaint over LEASE chair Roger Southam, who pledged to ‘maximise ground rent opportunities’ for freeholders LEASE chair Roger Southam launched complaint to Parliamentary Standards Commissioner against Sir Peter Bottomley and Jim Fitzpatrick (and LKP, naturally enough) Motion of no confidence in Roger Southam as LEASE chair

Category: Latest News, LEASE, News, Taylor WimpeyTag: DCLG, National Leasehold Campaign, Roger Southam, Taylor Wimpey London

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (44) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (39) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (40) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (64) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (200) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (42) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « Leaked Taylor Wimpey document showing doubling ground sales TODAY is “an oversight”
Next Post: Leasehold houses expose ‘gulf between the letter and the spirit of the law’, say ministers »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Michael Epstein

    March 28, 2017 at 3:29 pm

    Until and unless Lease appoint someone with the genuine interests of leaseholders at heart, nobody is going to have any faith in them and they become just another meaningless trade body(of which there are many)
    That Mr Southam doesn’t get it rather proves the point!

  2. ollie

    March 28, 2017 at 4:34 pm

    Its interesting to read DCLG’s line of reasoning :

    “Therefore any requests sent to him in his capacity as chair of LEASE are distinct and separate from those relating to matters of his personal business.”

    Its true they are distinct roles but its also the same brain inside Roger’s head making and implementing decisions when sitting in the chair at LEASE or in his own business . He certainly won’t make any decisions which are conflicting or may damage his own business interests.

    It shows that DCLG decision making process is aligned with Roger’s interests and not with the leaseholders .

  3. Michael Hollands

    March 28, 2017 at 4:55 pm

    I t is not surprising that the DCLG have come up with this decision.
    I have been pressing them since 2010 for some Leasehold Reform, but have either been ignored or received “fob offs”.
    They will be of the same mind as Roger Southam in that we all need educating and cause a big fuss over nothing.
    Their attitude is that the current system provides enough protection, so we should stop moaning, all go back into our little boxes and pay the fees.

  4. Kim

    March 28, 2017 at 6:28 pm

    Hello folks. Well, let’s see if the NLC who are great in number will have the staying power and unity to effect change regarding LEASE hierarchy. ! It is my belief that NLC waited far too long for a response from Barwell and allowed itself to be treated dismissively? Bad move. . I think they missed an open goal!! However, if NLC is dedicated to the cause then I am sure it will be victorious. Look what the poll tax protestors achieved- however, there were no ‘Safe spaces’ back then… I am truly very disappointed .

    • Michael Hollands

      March 28, 2017 at 6:51 pm

      I don’t think 2700 protesters are going to have much affect on the Housing Minister. Maybe a limited affect upon the Housing Developers who will do something , but the least possible to help the worst affected leaseholders.
      It will take something like a mass non payment of Ground Rent to stir this Government.
      We have had five Housing Ministers since the 2010 General Election.
      Grant Shapps,Mark Prisk, Kris Hopkins, Brandon Lewis and Gavin Barwell.
      All have shown a little bit of sympathy apart from Grant who showed none.
      But none have ever followed their intentions through to conclusion, and anyway have been sacked or replaced after a short period.
      It is my belief that this Government will never promote extensive leasehold reform, however sympathetic a Housing Minister may be.
      Unless of course they are forced into it by a really serious mass action.
      And with Brexit occupying the next few years the excuse will probably be “the time now is not right”.

  5. Kim

    March 28, 2017 at 7:55 pm

    MH, 2700 folks if very vocal would have a huge effect on the housing Ministers actions. I reiterate that I believe the NLC missed an open goal by not following up the Iinitial letter of complaint complaint with the drafted follow up letter CC to the PM . I think it is very telling that a meagre 44 protestors attended the protest organised at Redrow…. why so few??? In my view that sent a clear message to Barwell……NLC is mainly all hat and no cattle! Sorry, but that how I see it.

  6. Michael Epstein

    March 29, 2017 at 6:30 pm

    Kim, An avalanche that can sweep an entire community away starts with a movement the size of a snowball!

    • Michael Hollands

      March 29, 2017 at 7:32 pm

      Rather like the Ground Rent which starts off as a small sum, but keeps doubling itself until it reaches a small fortune. Let’s hope that the snowball can win.

    • Kim

      March 29, 2017 at 9:12 pm

      Indeed Mr Epstein, however I am bitterly disappointed that the intial letter to Barwell ( written by me on behalf of the NLC) was not followed a second letter ( written by me on behalf of the ( NLC) . If one starts a fight one has to to finish it. I truly believe an open goal was missed.

      • Michael Epstein

        March 30, 2017 at 8:33 am

        Kim, that is part and parcel of a long term campaign where initially campaigners lack experience. As frustrating as it is at times, there will be plenty more opportunities to score an open goal.
        Already the campaign is having great effect which will only increase as time goes by.
        I remember many years ago a disgruntled resident posting his thoughts about Solitaire/Peverel(now called Firstport) on the internet.
        It was gradually picked up by others who added their comments and thus a campaign was born! Hence The truth About Solitaire, Peverel Action and About Peverel. And though working closely together (but not connected) we now have LKP/Campaign against retirement leasehold exploitation.
        Those that lacked experience took further action(such as withholding service charges were routinely hammered by Peverel/Firstport, who were very confident the protest would fizzle out., But crucially lessons were learnt.
        Where an a action was successful the route to success was all over the internet, if an action failed the reasons for the defeat were posted so that the next leaseholders taking action would not make the same mistake.
        Protesters wised up! They started winning. Huge repayments to development accounts were ordered. Many discovered Right To Manage was possible and exercised those rights. Peverel/Firstport lost development after development.
        Indeed an argument once broke out as to what constituted the biggest RTM action in the history of leasehold. Was it Century Wharf in Cardiff or Metro Central in London?
        In no small part due to the campaign, Peverel/Firstport collapsed into administration in 2011, to be “rescued” in a controversial financing that meant they had to pay up to 15% in interest charges on loans.
        Currently Peverel/Firstport have a negative value of -7m pounds.
        So you see, if we keep going whatever mistakes (which we will learn from) anything is possible!

        • Michael Hollands

          March 30, 2017 at 10:09 am

          The problem here is that the campaign is to get the Government to change its policies.
          A vocal and long campaign campaign can have some affect upon Companies if it diminishes their reputation or profit margins. But even First Port are still at it.
          But with a Government as we have already seen, 7 years of continual hammering away has had very little affect.
          Probably due to some very wealthy and influential people who have a lot to lose if reforms were introduced.

          • Paul Joseph

            March 30, 2017 at 1:29 pm

            > I believe this hits the nail on the head

            Consider that Vincent Tchenguiz and family, the most notorious monetising freeholder in the country and user of British Virgin Islands offshore companies to siphon off profits, has been a repeat six figure donor to the Conservative party.

            The guff about the country “that works for everyone not the privileged few” is just that, guff, unless and until we see evidence that such gross injustices as the abuse of leaseholders becomes a political priority.

            Whatever one’s views on Brexit one thing has been made clear in the recent past: it will place demands on the UK legislature and civil service that mean other parliamentary work will take a back seat for a very long time, up to a decade according to some commentators, possibly longer.

            That shouldn’t be a recipe for despair. The Conservatives can and should be held to their commitment, and they should be looking for some easy evidence of their sincerity. So far, however, there’s not the slightest sign of that.

          • Paul Joseph

            March 30, 2017 at 1:30 pm

            That should have been

            > Probably due to some very wealthy and influential people who have a lot to lose if reforms were introduced.

            I believe this hits the nail on the head

        • Kim

          March 30, 2017 at 5:39 pm

          Wise words indeed Mr Epstien and I shall heed them. However in my defence – I am incredibly miffed that my 2x letters ( rather good ones I felt) written for the NLC were not followed up with the heft that was required by the NLC. I was made aware that Mr Essie ( of Lease) had contacted a senior campaigner of NLC and offered to travel up to the North of England to meet said campaigner. What happened? Did they meet? Who knows.. I do believe that at the very least Sebastian O’ Kelly would have been on the board of LEASE if the NLC had followed through. Not ideal I know- but a bloody start!!

        • Kim

          March 31, 2017 at 7:55 am

          Incidentally Mr Epstein. The CEO of Solitaire was the founder of the infamous ‘County Estate Management’ and is now the director and major shareholder of Westbury Residential Ltd.( CEM went into liquidation after the excoriating Charter Quay ruling.) …He boasts online of his success in purchasing ground rents / Freeholds . Check out RCP ltd and ‘Coast fund’. It will be interesting to see if there is any involvement in the current scandal ??

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web