• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / News / Local authority leasehold / Florrie’s Law won’t help me with £43,000 demand from Haringey council

Florrie’s Law won’t help me with £43,000 demand from Haringey council

August 18, 2014 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Haringey

Almost immediately after Eric Pickles announces Florries Law – his £15,000 cap for local authority leaseholders over bills for major works – up when up pops another anomaly.

The Leasehold Knowledge Partnership has been contacted by an 88-year-old lady regarding a £37,000 demand from Haringey council. The fee comes on top of a £6,000 bill for a lift repair last year.

As the repairs won’t be funded by a central government grant, Haringey will not cap the costs for the 40-odd leaseholders in the block of 116.

When LKP first reported Pickles’ initiative – called Florrie’s Law after Florence Bourne, 93, who died feeling stressed from owing £50,000 to Newham council – we recognised that it would only help at schemes being refurbished with central government funding.

The issue has pitched Conservatives – who continue to see validity in the right to buy policy – and mainly Labour councils that have plenty of run-down city centre housing.

In this case, it is not entirely clear whether the refurbishment is an initiative based on local or central funding.

The Haringey Council Report for the Cabinet on November 12 2013, “Enhancements to Leaseholders Payment Options for Service Charge Invoices”, suggests that as the work will not involve government funds it is immune to any capping.

However, the project is being presented to residents as a Decent Homes project, which does involve central funds.

The wider issue is whether taxpayers should really be spending millions making life easier for local authority leaseholders.

Here the 88-year-old lady has lived in her three-bedroom flat since 1963. She bought it for £20,000 in 1992, discounted from £68,000.

She estimates its market value at between £350,000 – £380,000, which is a considerable asset for her family.

She claims that equity release has proved impossible to obtain, or other loans, and the money will have to be paid by her son.

“The methods Haringey have offered to pay off this amount stretching years into the future would be impossible for me to service, involving hundreds of pounds each month,” she says.

Of course, private leaseholders are caught up in these major works dilemmas as a matter of routine – here is a spectacular example.

Many are just as hard-up as local authority leaseholders, and there is no prospect at all of a cost cap on major works. And if the leaseholders don’t or cannot pay up then they get their leases forfeited.

Eric Pickles has waded in here to protect the Conservatives’ cherished right to buy policy, which was such a vote winner in the Eighties.

But times have changed, and the UK’s population has swollen markedly since then.

There is a housing crisis that is particularly acute in the South East and London, and home ownership levels are declining fast.

Young, UK-born citizens face the prospect of never being home owners at all. Understandably, they feel cheated and let down.

They are told by the older, greedier and more cynical generation that home-ownership does not really matter that much, and in other countries, such as Germany, half the population does not own a home.

The young, who have seen staggering house price rises throughout the South-East are not persuaded. They want a material stake in society just like their parents had.

The big house builders have been urging build-to-let schemes for years, and urging big institutions to invest in vast rental schemes. These are, in fact, coming into fruition – for example, at the Olympic Village site.

In the face of the wider housing crisis, doling out taxpayers’ money to subsidise a minority of families to maintain a valuable asset seems like an indulgence.

That said, one has to sympathise with local authority leaseholders who face these bills.

Who in their right mind would employ a local council to carry out major refurbishment of their own house?

It would almost be a guarantee of poor quality workmanship and overpriced.

This was the tragedy of Farieda Chandoo reported here

She absolutely refused to pay £40,000 for appalling workmanship at her site in south London.

She lost her court case against Southwark council, appealed but fell out with her firm of lawyers (who appear to comment on these issues on this site).

LKP urged her to seek legal advice or drop the legal action. But she just could not do that.

For some reason, the courts cruelly set aside four days to hear her appeal, which amounted to nothing more than a repetition of the same non-forensic arguments that had failed first time round.

She lost, and she now faces total bills of more than £100,000.

Related posts:

Florrie’s Law fails again as Haringey council dumps £100,000 bills on leaseholders in the midst of the Covid-19 disaster Enfield council’s Town Road leaseholders hit for £25,000 bills Florrie’s Law means new £15,000 cap on repair bills for council leasehold owners Southwark council leaseholders see major works bill slashed from £17,000 to £8,000 George Osborne’s childhood nanny facing £115,000 bill to council

Category: Local authority leasehold, NewsTag: Eric Pickles, Farieda Chandoo, Florence Bourne, Florrie's law, Newham, Southwark

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (44) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (39) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (40) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (64) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (200) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (42) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « Holcroft Court chased for fees worth less than £40
Next Post: Red Rock saves 156 leaseholders from £187,200 repair bill »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. AM

    August 19, 2014 at 4:08 pm

    Even if it is not a DH project, it is still centrally funded by virtue of teh way that councils are centrally funded.

    In short like any leaseholder a contribution has to be made to major works as aprt and aprcel of home ownership so the genral housing problems are not relevant.

    What is relevant is that, as you say, the dogs breakfast that is the procurement of public works, and that their cost is such an avalanche for the flat owner due to years and years of inaction and neglect.

    Given that councils and their almos have to publish capital works programmes, even if they can find them, leaseholders can look back over the years and see that the works are rarely if ever done, and therefore, understandably, come to beleive that they never will be.

  2. AM

    August 23, 2014 at 10:03 am

    It is interesting that the councils that try hardest to circumvent these matters are the leftie ones. Some might expect it if it were say H & F or Wandsworth but it is Tower Hamlets, Hackney ( both of whom asked the Tribunals to exempt them from consultation, ever) and now Haringey!

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web