• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Michael Epstein
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Michael Epstein
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / News / Cladding scandal / Government to ask Will Astor: who is the offshore freeholder at Heysmoor Heights (where ordinary families face £18k Grenfell cladding bills)?

Government to ask Will Astor: who is the offshore freeholder at Heysmoor Heights (where ordinary families face £18k Grenfell cladding bills)?

May 17, 2018 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Louise Ellman MP raised the issue of ordinary families at Heysmoor Heights, Liverpool, facing £18,000 bills to remove Grenfell cladding – demanded by offshore company Abacus Land 4 Limited, part of William Waldorf Astor’s Long Harbour ground rent fund

The government said yesterday that it was going to haul in the agents for the Guernsey-based freeholders of Heysmoor Heights in Liverpool, which has Grenfell cladding, and demand to know who the freeholders are.

LKP has highlighted the issue of Heysmoor Heights several times. Yesterday it was raised in the Commons by local Labour MP Louise Ellman (Liverpool, Riverside), who is furious that ordinary families face bills of £18,000 to remove cladding and pay for fire marshals.

The bills are imposed by landlord Abacus Land 4 Limited in Guernsey, where the beneficial ownership is hidden behind nominee directors.

It is one of the offshore entities managed by the Long Harbour ground rent fund, said to be worth £1.6 billion, set up by William Waldorf Astor, the heir to the viscountcy and Samantha Cameron’s half-brother. For six years he worked for ex-property tycoon Vincent Tchenguiz, who at one point claimed to own one per cent of all the residential freeholds in the country.

Full debate here:

Fire Safety Cladding: Heysmoor Heights

Hansard (the Official Report) is the edited verbatim report of proceedings of both the House of Commons and the House of Lords. Daily Debates from Hansard are published on this website the next working day.

At Heysmoor Heights the builder went bust in 2010 and there is an insurance claim to pay for the cladding removal. If that fails, the bill

Ms Ellman told the House: “The residents of Heysmoor Heights cannot wait for long and potentially protracted negotiations with the insurance company to be resolved. There is no guarantee that a satisfactory solution will be reached.

“A letter I received today from HomeGround confirms that, should the insurance route fail, costs will be recovered through increased service charges. That is simply not good enough.

“The Minister tells me that he will speak to the agent of the freeholder at Heysmoor Heights. Will he attempt to establish the identity of the owner—or owners—of the offshore Abacus Land 4 Ltd, an anonymous beneficial company?”

For the government, Jake Berry, Under Secretary of State at DHCLG, replied:

“The Minister for Housing has arranged to speak to the agents of Heysmoor Heights’ freeholder, and I will certainly ask him to ask the agent who the freeholders are, because she has highlighted a very serious issue.

“We cannot have a situation in which the residents simply do not know who their superior landlord is. That would not have been acceptable to me in my old job as a property lawyer. I shall make sure that the Housing Minister presses very hard on that issue, and that if an answer is received, it is passed on to the hon. Lady so that she can forward it to her constituents.”

LKP is appalled at the prospect of ordinary families losing their homes to an anonymous, offshore landlord to pay to remove Grenfell cladding for which they were not responsible.

Last month, Adrian Flook – a former Tory MP turned PR man for Will Astor’s residential property interests – sent Sebastian O’Kelly, trustee of LKP, an email claiming a report on a similar site, Sesame Apartments, Battersea, was: “Soooooo factually wrong.”

Sesame Apartments: Yet another anonymous Long Harbour freeholder demanding £2.2 million over Grenfell cladding

We have suggested that contrary to Long Harbour’s repeated claims not all its freehold investors are pension funds and similar institutions. Among its earlier directors is billionaire Frank Sixt, a telecommunications expert at Hutchison Whampoa in Hong Kong.

We believe private equity is a large part of the fund – a point we made at the Professionals in Property conference last wee.

Mr Flook was asked whether he wished to issue a statement to addressed the supposed inaccuracies, to which he replied that his client was “considering whether we do or we don’t respond”.

Sir Peter Bottomley then wrote to Mr Astor personally, suggesting “with due respect to dear Adrian, may I gently suggest that either he restricts messages to one’s he sends before noon or that he clears each with you before pressing Send?”

LKP applauds Mr Berry’s efforts to identify offshore ownership of residential freeholds.

Given the powers they have over leaseholders, including forfeiture in the event of non-payment of service charges or ground rents, it is simply unacceptable that these speculators in other people’s homes remain anonymous and offshore.

Regarding the £18,000 bills faced by leaseholders at Heysmoor Heights, Mr Berry repeated the line originated by Sajid Javid, the former Communities Secretary, in asking freeholders not to pass on costs to leaseholders.

He also repeated the line that additional resources have been given to the Leasehold Advisory Service – still without a chairman after the sector insider Roger Southam was ousted (after several years in situ) over “perceived conflicts of interest” that should have been evident from the outset.

Related posts:

Will Heysmoor Heights leaseholders lose their homes to anonymous offshore freeholder if they cannot pay Grenfell bills? Grenfell cladding crisis prompts the question: what are freeholders actually for? John Healey says it’s ‘wrong’ for leaseholders to have to pay to remove Grenfell cladding Default ThumbnailTchenguiz, Astor and offshore freeholders like Abacus Land 4 Limited should PUBLICLY meet over Grenfell cladding, MPs told Grenfell cladding debate: Who thinks offshore freeholders will pay (apart from government ministers)?

Category: Cladding scandal, Latest News, News, Parliament, William Waldorf AstorTag: Abacus Land 4 Limited, Heysmoor Heights, Homeground Management Limited, Jake Berry MP, Louise Ellman MP, Sesame Apartments, William Waldorf Astor

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (36) ARMA (86) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (70) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (41) Commonhold (49) Competition and Markets Authority (37) Countryside Properties plc (32) FirstPort (37) Forfeiture (29) Grenfell cladding (55) Ground rents (51) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (38) Justin Madders MP (62) Katie Kendrick (35) Law Commission (59) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (44) Martin Boyd (77) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (48) Redrow (29) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (196) Taylor Wimpey (104) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (32) The Times (30) Vincent Tchenguiz (40) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « Brokenshire’s dad fixed cladding in Greenwich, Bottomley reminds Commons
Next Post: 69% of new houses in NW are leasehold. Many owners stuck in limbo. And ban fleecehold covenants, says Maria Eagle »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Michael Epstein

    May 17, 2018 at 3:31 pm

    Question? If the true freeholders of a building remain a secret, how would anyone know if a terrorist group are not financing their activities from their freehold property interests?

    • sussex

      May 17, 2018 at 4:06 pm

      Yes Michael
      You are right: Who can tell what other dodges such corporations get up to, if they are happy to help developers fudge the underlying contractual issues?

  2. Joe

    May 17, 2018 at 4:42 pm

    The freeholders could even be President Assad or Saddam Hussein.

    I thought a primary duty of government was to protect its citizens. A first step would be at least knowing who owns what property in this country.

  3. Paddy

    May 17, 2018 at 5:30 pm

    New SoS said he was outraged in House today.

    Outraged I tell you.

  4. Kevin Bell

    May 23, 2018 at 4:55 pm

    So how would this be dealt with if there were co-ownership, long leases and no ground rents? The leasehold interest has been sold and the freeholder only has the right to receive rent and the residual value of the property at the end of the lease. If there is a shift to freeholders retaining liability for the building then either prices will go up or ground rents will have to increases to cover the increased costs.

    LKP advocate co-ownership. I notice they are silent on this point.

    yes I am a ‘freeholder’. I bought in when we enfranchised our block.

    • admin

      May 23, 2018 at 5:46 pm

      A lot of supposition here.

      The person who believes freeholders should “do the decent thing” and pay up for the Grenfell cladding is former Communities Secretary Sajid Javid. The government has repeated this line. And good luck with it, although so far at least three tribunal cases have disagreed that freeholders have any liability, and that leaseholders should pay.

      LKP’s argument is that it is unfair for leaseholders to pay this and certainly wrong that they are made to do so, with risk of losing their homes to anonymous, hidden beneficial owners. But who actually pays is an open question. We have never believed that commercial freeholders secure the long term future of a building because the leaseholders are too feckless to pay up for the essential upkeep. (A nonsense that is just not substantiated around the world which does not have the leasehold system.)

      As for commercial freeholders, they are simply third-party parasites, enjoying the privileged legal position of being the “landlord”, reaping the income and unjustifiable commissions, while contributing nothing at all.

      With the cladding issues, the leaseholders are in a predicament in any litigation: they have to take action against the landlord to make him challenge the warranties, original builder or regulators. A difficult two-stage process.

      But we will see what happens comparing the issues faced at English sites over Grenfell cladding with Glasgow Harbour, which also has it, but where the flat owners in Scotland are able to mount a direct challenge.

      Both flat owners in England and Scotland are in a bad place over Grenfell cladding, but there is much more freedom of action in the latter.

      Hope that helps regarding our supposed silence over these issues.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2022 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at no charge by www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web