• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / News / Cladding victims unimpressed by Robert Jenrick on BBC1’s Question Time

Cladding victims unimpressed by Robert Jenrick on BBC1’s Question Time

November 22, 2019 //  by Admin4

BBC Question Time presenter Fiona Bruce put Communities Secretary Robert Jenrick on the spot over Manchester Cladiators letter asking for government help

By Harry Scoffin

A row has broken out over building safety inaction following an appearance by Communities Secretary Robert Jenrick on BBC Question Time last night.

The fourth and final question of the current affairs programme, broadcast from Bolton, centred on whether the government “has done enough to tackle unsafe cladding”.

Audience member Alex Gill told the panel that it has been over two years since the Grenfell tragedy and referenced the inferno in Bolton that engulfed nearby student accommodation The Cube last Friday.

When Jenrick said “we’ve done a lot, but need to do a lot more,” presenter Fiona Bruce pressed him to confirm a report that leaseholders on Greater Manchester cladding sites had to wait three months before being rebuffed by MHCLG officials.

He said he did not “know about that particular letter,” to laughter from the studio audience.

The mirth of the studio audience

Manchester Cladiators, the group representing cladding sites across Greater Manchester, subsequently tweeted that “we sent a letter in August to which MHCLG replied to in November – and all of our individual blocks also sent a letter – we will resend!”

They called his performance “shocking” and provided proof of their email where they asked for a meeting with the Secretary of State.

The campaign group is pushing for government to change its current position, where it will only fund the remediation of dangerously-clad buildings that happen to have Grenfell-style ACM, leaving other leaseholders in unsafe properties to fight it out with their freeholders over who should pay the cladding bills.

Manchester Cladiator’s efforts received a boost today from Inside Housing, who have re-launched their campaign for “a fresh approach” to the cladding crisis.

End Our Cladding Scandal campaign calls on political parties to act

The End Our Cladding Scandal campaign has relaunched for the general election and calls on the next government to take action to address the “national crisis” of dangerous cladding #EndOurCladdingScandal #ukhousing The two steps to #EndOurCladdingScandal: 1. A building safety fund. 2.

Backed by assorted groups, including LKP, the National Housing Federation, the UK Action Cladding Group and Grenfell United, the trade magazine’s election-themed initiative calls for the new government to “set up a task-force, with the involvement of residents, capable of inspecting buildings, prioritising and ordering work and ensuring leaseholders are protected from unnecessary costs”.

Speaking to the audience in Bolton last night, Jenrick said that “fundamental change” is coming to building regulations.

He added that “one of the first acts of the next government, if we’re lucky enough to be back after the general election” will be new legislation to implement the recommendations by Dame Judith Hackitt to create a post-Grenfell safety regime.

LKP has in the past raised concern over whether the reforms have sufficiently engaged with issues of residents’ voice and leasehold tenure:

Reviewer of building regulations admits post-Grenfell safety regime open to abuse by rogue freeholders

When asked by presenter Fiona Bruce to confirm how many residential buildings in the country have the same HPL cladding (high pressure laminate) that was used on Bolton’s The Cube, Jenrick said his department do not “have the exact number,” but “that it will be over a thousand … a very large number of buildings”.

Labour’s Richard Burgeon criticised the government’s handling of the cladding crisis, saying:

“It goes back to a bigger question, really, about what government is for.

“We are one of the richest countries in the world and look at the amount of time it’s taken – not even to properly house the families from Grenfell – it’s also the case that, as Robert has said, there could be a 1,000 buildings with this type of [HPL] cladding on.

“The government has asked – not compelled – private owners of these blocks to remove the cladding. Asked, not instructed.”

“I think what happened at Grenfell and what happened in Bolton showcases that in one of the richest countries in the world, things are not as safe as they should be – why? – because people aren’t put first, profit is put first,” he added.

Telegraph columnist: this is a cover-up

Sherelle Jacobs, of the Daily Telegraph newspaper, weighed in on the cladding crisis, saying “for me, this reeks of a cover-up, potentially on an industrial scale”:

“I think that after Grenfell two and a half years ago, the government made a deliberate decision to only focus on auditing ACM cladding, which is the cladding that was used in Grenfell tower – despite the fact that HPL is more combustible and is used 3 times more than ACM.”

Jenrick rejected the allegation, repeating the line that ACM “is by far and away the most dangerous form of cladding on people’s buildings today.”

He also stressed that so-called building owners are responsible for the safety of their residents.

Related posts:

Top civil servant warns Robert Jenrick over £1bn cladding bailout … promises post-Grenfell blame game won’t happen again LKP response to Robert Jenrick £3.5bn ‘exceptional intervention’ to cladding high-rises today Robert Jenrick £1 billion claddingCladding leaseholders rejoice after Robert Jenrick secures £1bn in Budget … on top of £400m already pledged Jenrick’s £12bn home-building media fanfare falls flat as LBC radio returns to the cladding scandal Islington Gates £8m billsAppeal to Robert Jenrick: Islington Gates faces evacuation if cladding bills not paid on April 1

Category: Cladding scandal, Latest News, NewsTag: BBC Question Time, Cladding scandal, Dame Judith Hackitt, Grenfell cladding, Harry Scoffin, Inside Housing, Manchester Cladiators, Robert Jenrick, UK Cladding Action Group

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (70) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (44) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (39) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (39) Grenfell cladding (55) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (64) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (47) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (200) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (42) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « Ground rent baron James Tuttiett gives £8,500 to the Tories (which is a bit stingy, considering …)
Next Post: The Times reports that families ‘lost £3 billion’ on resale of leasehold retirement flats, while developers and freehold speculators made millions The Times Spread»

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Peregrine

    November 22, 2019 at 8:35 pm

    “Readers unimpressed by Admin3 article on LKP’s website.”

    Once again, LKP shows its political colours in its writing, and misses the root cause of this disaster in the process. To be fair, so does the rest of the MSM.

    Under the old (pre-2005) UK Fire Regulations this type of cladding would never have been allowed. Irrespective of costs of installation. Moreso, it would have been laughed out of the local Fire Authority’s Approval office. And the BRE office. What happened in 2005? The EU adopted and enforced new Energy Regulations on its members. Read it. All new and refurbed buildings to comply. Who was in power? Labour.

    This tragedy is to be laid at the door of the EU Commission and the EU Parliament sheep who voted it through.. It is the the bloated EU coffers that should be paying for rectification, not UK domestic taxes.

    When will an independent, professional reporter ever stand up and tell the real truth of this tragedy? It seems unlikely to happen as the MSM is heavily funded by the EU and won’t bite the hand that feeds it. It wouldn’t even surprise me if this post is redacted, or never sees the light of day.

  2. Martin

    November 23, 2019 at 3:32 pm

    Peregrine not sure where you get your information from. Cladding is tested to a British standard first created in 2002 and last updated in 2015. It’s then tested by the Building Research Establishment in England. It may turn out the problem is with our standards rather than anyone else.

    Other European countries use different and in a number of cases perhaps higher standards.

    Not sure you can blame Europe for requiring better insulated homes that’s something else we have lagged behind on for a while and is something most of the world has implemented for obvious reasons.

    As for LKP becoming MSM thats news to us as would be European funding

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web