• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / News / Leaseholders to sue government over fire safety measures

Leaseholders to sue government over fire safety measures

June 26, 2019 //  by Admin4

But housing minister says further funding must come from the building owners. (Hasn’t that been tried before?)

Manchester’s Skyline Central 1 is one of many buildings where leasehold tenants are still being pressured by third-party freeholders to pay for the removal of dangerous cladding systems. They are thought to be interested in taking legal action with other Mancunian lessees against government inaction

By Harry Scoffin

The Guardian reports that leaseholders across 12 sites in Manchester are preparing to take the government to court over their policy towards fire safety problems with privately-owned tower blocks.

Although government has recently pledged £200m to make private residential buildings safe, it only applies to high-rise properties with Grenfell-style ACM cladding.

Announced last month, the policy was prompted by the refusal of a number of freehold landlords to take action. They had rejected government exhortations not to recoup the costs of the remedial works from leasehold tenants.

It is estimated that there are at least 1,000 buildings across the country that have combustible material which is of a non-ACM variety.

Manchester-based leaseholders whose homes do not fall under the scheme are understood to be pursuing legal action on the basis of a state failure to ensure “adequate housing” as defined in international law. Their counsel is also exploring the option of suing over poor building regulations.

Residents face bills of up to £80,000.

Manchester tower block residents to sue in fire safety row

Exclusive: residents say it is unfair there is money to fix cladding but not other issues

Fran Reddington, the leaseholder who in March successfully pressured original developer Lendlease to cover the costs of remedial works and a “waking watch” at Manchester’s Cypress Place development, now helps locally to campaign to protect lessees from paying for safety works to buildings they do not legally own and which do not currently qualify for financial assistance from government.

Speaking to the Guardian, she spoke of a “cladding lottery” that has emerged:

“We feel cast aside in terms of the cladding lottery they have created… Government isn’t stepping up to help. Some residents are facing £80,000 bills and we don’t have any other choice. Fire doesn’t distinguish between the different types of dangerous material but the government is doing just that.”

James Oates, a 31-year old leaseholder living in Manchester’s Skyline Central 1 building, which has wooden cladding, is also quoted:

“If building control signed off a building like this, it is not doing its job properly. It all stems back to the government. It seems strange they can announce a fund for ACM [cladding] but not other [problems]. It feels unjust. We are being told by Greater Manchester fire and rescue that if we don’t have a waking watch in place they would have to evacuate the building.”

Meanwhile, housing minister Kit Malthouse has told Inside Housing that government has no plans to provide further funding for works to private blocks with fire safety issues:

“It’s not envisaged that there is at the moment, no. As we’ve said, building owners are responsible for the safety of their buildings.

“ACM [aluminium composite material, which was used to clad Grenfell Tower] is an exceptional situation where we’ve had to act quickly and frankly. With ACM, quite a lot of private sector owners and developers are fronting the bills anyway.

“But in those circumstances [balconies], we’re not currently envisioning any funding, no.”

After the Barking fire earlier this month, where a wooden balcony burst into flames and quickly engulfed the building, MHCLG issued a directive to freeholders to remove all combustibles from balconies “as soon as is practical”. Crucially, it included buildings below 18 meters in height.

Under law, these costs will fall on the leaseholders. This is despite the leaseholders not owning the property or the land on which it sits.

The government line that building owners have a “moral responsibility” to pay for safety works has been challenged by LKP in the past. It is either state failure because of deficient building regulations or the fault of developers.

Tchenguiz group dismisses government ‘hollow threat’ to make freeholders pay for Grenfell cladding removal

In January, it was revealed that a senior Tchenguiz group executive wrote to leaseholders at Northpoint, a former office block in Bromley, south east London with a number of safety issues including ACM cladding, to highlight the inconsistencies of government’s approach. The correspondence read:

“I firmly believe that the recent announcement by government that they would force freeholders to pay for remediation is a hollow threat and it knows it…

“… it is highly unlikely that they [national and local government] will be able to achieve secure repayment from us because of the legal position.”

Despite repeated interventions by their local MP Bob Neill, leaseholders at Northpoint are still facing crippling costs.

They have been denied government money because they have building fire safety problems additional to the Grenfell-style ACM cladding, which is thought to complicate their situation and increase costs for government.

No funding for removal of combustible balconies, says Malthouse

Kit Malthouse, housing secretary Picture: Guzelian No funding for removal of combustible balconies, says Malthouse #ukhousing #CIHhousing In an interview with Inside Housing, he revealed that despite the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) issuing guidance on Monday asking building owners to remove combustible materials, it would not contribute money towards the work.

In a speech yesterday to delegates at the Chartered Institute of Housing’s Manchester conference, Mr Malthouse suggested that his department was flushed with money. Inside Housing reports he said he was “one of the few ministers who’s not complaining about money”.

“I’ve got about £45bn to spend on the housing market in its entirety,” he added.

Leaseholders of the 272 private apartments at Northpoint say they will become bankrupt without government intervention.

They still face a personal bill of £75,000, with many working shifts as fire marshals to reduce the financial strain.

Related posts:

Leaseholders in local authority and housing association blocks will have Grenfell cladding bill paid by government Martin Boyd flags controversial civil servant letter to City Hall at fire safety meeting Grenfell cladding leaseholders despair of government doing anything .. Chris PincherBottomley leads Tory rebellion of 32 MPs, but government defeats amendment to Fire Safety Bill Harrow to hit council leaseholders with £4,500 fire safety bills

Category: Cladding scandal, Latest News, News, PressTag: Fire safety, Grenfell cladding, Harry Scoffin, UK Cladding Action Group, Waking watch contracts

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (45) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (41) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (42) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (67) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (201) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (43) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « Now it is Shanly Homes dumping its customers into unsellable homes
Next Post: Is this the best news for leasehold serfs since 1066? Quite possibly … »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Michael Epstein

    June 27, 2019 at 8:17 am

    I am pleased to hear this, though naturally sorry that innocent leaseholders have been left with no other option.
    That there have been several very well documented occurrences of fire where the cladding has accelerated the spread of fire, that the Scottish Government banned the use of this type of cladding, whilst the Environmental Committee debated cladding safety back in 2000, should I hope enhance the leaseholder’s case?

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web