• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / Did government cop-out on retirement ground rents stuff new thinking in the sector?

Did government cop-out on retirement ground rents stuff new thinking in the sector?

November 14, 2018 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Was new McCarthy and Stone chief executive John Tonkiss was poised to unveil new retirement housing strategies, before government caved in over retirement ground rents?

The new chief executive of McCarthy and Stone John Tonkiss is delighted the government has caved in over retirement housing ground rents, while announcing strategic changes that were prompted by the prospect of this reform.

The company argued strongly in favour of ground rents because it was disadvantaged by having to provide communal areas at its sites, such as a lounge and kitchen.

But at the same time it was considering a future without ground rent sales to speculators: sales that have resulted in most of McCarthy and Stones freeholds being owned by the Tchenguiz Family Trust in the British Virgin Islands.

The issue of ground rents in retirement housing is strongly disputed, with trade body the Association of Retirement Community Operators claiming that they are not necessary or desirable.

Retirement community operators have a different housing model based on retaining the asset and managing it for the long term. Instead, of ground rents, ARCO strongly supports exit fees, usually meaning sale on death, which adds to the profitability of a site.

McCarthy and Stone was considering more imaginative alternatives to the ground rent sale model of a volume house builder.

The disadvantage is that the sale of the freehold introduces a third party speculator into retirement housing. But the advantage of ground rent sales to companies such as McCarthy and Stone is the immediate cash input used for future schemes.

“Challenging” year for McCarthy & Stone

Retirement housebuilder McCarthy & Stone has reported a 2 per cent rise in revenues but a 33 per cent drop in full-year operating profits in what it described as a “challenging year”. The Bournemouth-headquartered company turned over £671.6m for the year to 31 August 2018, up from £660.9m in the previous year.

John Tonkiss said: “We have proactively engaged with government over the last ten months on their initial proposal to reduce ground rent charges to zero to demonstrate how the retirement community sector uses fair and stable ground rents to fund the construction costs of its shared areas.

“We were therefore pleased to see that government is now proposing to allow the retirement community sector to continue charging ground rents after they are capped at £10 elsewhere. While the proposal remains at the consultation stage, this is a positive step for our customers and we will continue to work closely with government throughout the remainder of the consultation period.”

Mr Tonkiss’s statement was made as McCarthy & Stone reported a 2 per cent rise in revenues but a 33 per cent drop in full-year operating profits in what it described as a “challenging year”.

https://www.insidermedia.com/insider/southwest/challenging-year-for-mccarthy-stone

Insider Mediar reports that McCarthy and Stone turned over £671.6m for the year to 31 August 2018, up from £660.9m in the previous year.

Operating profits fell from £94.2m to £63.5m with legal completions falling by 7 per cent from 2,302 to 2,134.

McCarthy & Stone revealed a new strategy in September, which has resulted in one-off costs of £2m, with the company looking to find £40m cost savings by 2021 through “rightsizing” the operational base.

It is also looking to focus on its two core products, Retirement Living and Retirement Living PLUS, as well as improving its offering through increasing affordability, flexibility and choice.

Mr Tonkiss said:

“During the year, we conducted a full strategic review of the business and in September 2018 announced our new transformation strategy. This new strategy represents a significant shift in the business mindset away from growth and towards increasing our return on capital employed and operating margin.

McCarthy & Stone unveils new chief executive

The specialist housebuilder has appointed John Tonkiss as CEO as the company looks to focus on return on investment rather than revenue growth. Its new strategy will see McCarthy & Stone realign its workflow and cost base to deliver a “steady” volume or around 2,100 homes a year.

Challenging times for retirement builders McCarthy & Stone and Churchill Retirement

RETIREMENT housing giant McCarthy & Stone is expecting profits to fall by around a quarter, while its competitor Churchill Retirement has also seen a dip. Bournemouth-headquartered McCarthy & Stone said it had a “tough year” in the 12 months ended on August 31.

“Our focus now is on creating a more efficient business capable of delivering improved shareholder returns, while leveraging our longer term strategic opportunities. This includes increasing customer appeal by offering a broader choice of tenure options, as well as increased flexibility and affordable offerings.”

McCarthy and Stone full-year results to August 31 2018:

https://otp.tools.investis.com/clients/uk/mccarthy/rns/regulatory-story.aspx?cid=1223&newsid=1206954

Related posts:

McCarthy and Stone: Ground rents are not the future of retirement housing Please exempt retirement housebuilders from ground rent ban, pleads Sir Desmond Swayne ARCO snubs McCarthy and Stone / Churchill by saying there is no need for ground rents Government will cave in to retirement house builders over ground rents, says Times Default ThumbnailGround rents to be allowed in retirement housing, says government

Category: Ground rent scandal, Latest News, McCarthy and Stone, News, Press, RetirementTag: Ground rent, John Tonkiss, McCarthy and Stone, Retirement

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (45) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (41) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (42) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (67) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (201) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (43) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « Labour MP Helen Goodman fights ‘fleecehold’ rip-offs with Private Members’ Bill
Next Post: Let government know just what you think about property tribunal reform »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. chas

    November 14, 2018 at 8:22 pm

    I believe government did cop-out on retirement ground rents.
    Government did caved in over Retirement Ground Rents, which vary from development site. The lobbying which McCarthy & Stone (M&S) undertook, may shows it might be possible (remember cash for questions) to hire MPs, but not possible to own one.​ We at Ashbrook Court pay Ground Rent of £48.00 a year, doubling next year to £96.00 a year and for what? ​

    This is how the Government allows the Leasehold Industry to manage:- ​
    ​
    Our Ground Rent goes to MB Freeholds Ltd. They purchased the freeholds of the 28 flats from Mercian Housing Ltd, who used Meridian Retirement Housing Services Ltd (MRHSL) as a Landlord. MRHSL sold the 125 year lease to Flatlaunch Limited, both were companies linked to Firstport Retirement Ltd, who have an Ultimate Parent Company known as Lightyear Estates Holding Limited and the Ultimate Holding Company is regarded as Euro Investments Overseas Incorporated in the British Virgin Islands.
    The Ultimate Controlling Party is the Tchenguiz Family Trust.​
    ​
    Was new McCarthy & Stone (M&S) chief executive John Tonkiss poised to unveil new retirement housing strategies, before government caved in over retirement ground rents, quite possibly?​​ The new chief executive of M&S John Tonkiss must be delighted the government caved in over the retirement housing ground rents, while announcing strategic changes that were prompted by the prospect of reform.​ M&S argued strongly in favour of ground rents because it was disadvantaged by having to provide communal areas at its sites, such as a lounge and kitchen, (this is stretching the truth).​
    .​
    Most of M&S who may have been considering a future without ground rent sales to speculators are also owned by the Tchenguiz Family Trust in the British Virgin Islands.​ Some Trade Bodies, Association of Retirement Community Operators (ARCO) claiming Ground Rent is neither necessary or desirable.​
    ​
    On stating retirement flats are community operators and have a different housing model based on retaining the asset and managing it for the long term, (also stretches the truth). It is not necessary for the sale of freehold that brings in and introduces a third party speculator into retirement housing. It is the Original Lease that sets up a Tripartite where there is a:- ​
    Freeholder (Head Lessor)
    Lessor (Landlord)
    Leaseholder (Us),

    So if developments are able to go for Right to Manage (RTM) the Landlord will still be the Landlord.

  2. Michael Epstein

    November 15, 2018 at 7:38 am

    The McCarthy & Stone plan includes building “identikit”developments thus reducing building costs.
    They are bringing forward purchases so that more customers buy off plan rather than wait for the development to be built before sale.
    They also seek to improve revenue streams from their management division.
    McCarthy & Stone seek to”justify” ground rents due to the provision of communal areas.
    Since residents pay for house manager’s flats, would those house manager’s flats not be considered as communal And if so,, how can it be that so many house manager’s flats are now being sold off?
    McCarthy & Stone venture the argument that ground rent allows them to build new developments..
    Suppose I sell a Ford Mondeo for £8,000. I then demand an extra rental of £500 per year from the purchaser, so I can buy a Jaguar? Isn’t that what McCarthy & Stone is doing?
    No one (not even me) expects retirement living to be cheap. But it is crucial that the true costs are not disguised.
    Since Churchill Retirement operates in a broadly similar way I have to ask if ground rent income is so needed, how do they afford to pay stamp duty, help with moving fees and more perniciously offer £500 towards legal fees (if you use their recommended agent) to potential purchasers?

  3. Bob Campbell-Barr

    November 26, 2018 at 3:31 pm

    I’m amazed that Mr Tonkiss was able to keep a straight face for the photograph. I’ve built enough retirement housing to know that communal areas are priced as part of development costs.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web