• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / Michael Gove: Is this the robust inquiry into leasehold insurance fiddles that you wanted from the FCA?

Michael Gove: Is this the robust inquiry into leasehold insurance fiddles that you wanted from the FCA?

April 7, 2022 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Sarah Olney, LibDem MP for Richmond Park, and Sir Peter Bottomley have clearly had enough with the insurance industry and its apologists gaming leasehold insurance. Meanwhile, LKP has looked at the questionnaire put out by the Financial Conduct Authority and asks: is it deliberately setting out not to know the answers? How can such a lavishly funded public body be so unfailingly inept?

And again, 11 April 2022:

The Financial Conduct Authority (annual budget: £632 million) is doing the least it can possibly get away with in response to Communities Secretary Michael Gove’s instruction that it investigate leasehold insurance fiddling, LKP believes.

Our criticisms, based on scrutinising the FCA’s badly drafted and spineless questionnaire to the insurance sector (below), echoes those made by Sir Peter Bottomley – along with Labour MP Justin Madders and LibDem leader Sir Ed Davey, a patron of our organisation – to Insurance Times yesterday.

“There ought to be criminal prosecutions for any insurance company or intermediary that continues with a system where residential leaseholders pay excess premiums for insurance on buildings they do not own,” said Sir Peter.

“Every kickback, commission and douceur should be either stopped or declared. Second, the Competition and Markets Authority with the FCA should say to people that if the level of commission is unreasonable, you should expect to pay penalty fines when a case is upheld.”

His strong language is repeated by Sarah Olney, LibDem MP for Richmond Park, who publicly wrote – in a joint letter with LibDem councillor and Tower Hamlets mayoral candidate Rabina Khan and Lord (Dick) Newby – and to the Competition and Markets Authority this week (below).

LKP’s criticisms concern the FCA questionnaire to insurance brokers which does not ask any questions about the fundamental point: that is, commissions paid to landlords. Or “bribes”, as Sarah Olney prefers to call them.

There are no questions about offshore insurance captive companies, either. Owning one of these was Rendall and Rittner’s justification for its statement that that it “did not accept commissions for insurance”. No, it just owned an offshore captive routinely making a 40% profit on premiums:

Rendall and Rittner … no insurance commissions, but it owns an offshore ‘captive’ insurance company making a 40% profit on leaseholders’ premiums

Muddled questions – Q7a and Q7b – mix up commissions paid to managing agents and to freeholders, yet the FCA has known since 2005 that the prime problem with leasehold insurance is the commissions paid to freehold-owning landlords.

Further questions concern commissions paid to the insurance broker, which is absolutely not the point of the exercise.

The questions concerning problems in obtaining insurance on buildings caught up in the building safety crisis are very limited. There are no questions about the potential impact of the ICOBS rules.

Finally, the FCA asks for responses by May 18, which ignores Mr Gove’s three-month deadline issued on January 28.

Mr Gove said:

“The market lacks transparency and there is not currently useful data to explain the rationale behind the increasing premiums charged by insurers and the conditions associated with the cover. The role and remuneration of brokers, managing agents and freeholders is also unclear … My overall goal is for there to be a more affordable marketplace for buildings insurance that offers widely available and affordable cover for those who live in flats and other multiple-occupancy buildings.”

LKP has told the co-chairs of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold and commonhold reform that there is very little prospect of that given the FCA’s efforts. We have very little confidence that it is making any genuine effort to discover the level of problems in the leasehold insurance market.

Meanwhile, Sarah Olney, the LibDem MP for Richmond Park, has sent a letter to the Competition and Markets Authorioty (annual budget: £91 million), which is doing excellent work over the mis-selling of homes with aggressive ground rents.

Ms Olney dismisses euphemisms such as “commissions”, “distribution costs”, “facilitation fees” in favour of the word “bribes”, and the key person to bribe is the freehold owning landlord:

“In a block of residential flats, it is the freeholder (often, with his property managing agent) who is the person whose judgment needs to be influenced and whose position is prone to being influenced by reason that the costs of insurance does not come from his pocket but his leaseholders. The insurer and their broker are motivated to secure a sale and are in a position to wield influence over the freeholder.

“All parties undoubtedly are aware that the ultimate person paying for the cost of insurance is the leaseholder. Yet, the leaseholder is the only party in the chain who is denied access to know the true cost of the insurance policy. Instead, what the leaseholder is asked to pay is a bundled price known as the ‘premium’. This amalgam, more often than not, includes a deal sweetener benefitting solely the freeholder and property managing agent, not the leaseholder.”

Paying and receiving “facilitation fees”, argues Ms Olney, “acculturates a rent-seeking mindset in society”.

“The system is self-sustaining because to be the first insurer to opt-out of paying ‘facilitation fees’ would render that insurer uncompetitive in the market place,” says Ms Olney.

She tells the CMA, which really ought to forward it on to the FCA:

“Weak governance and weak institutions lead to corrupt practices and ineffective competition in the markets. More than before, the UK needs to stand as a sovereign state possessing credible and robust institutions, especially in the financial sector. The governance and ethical practices of insurance companies and property managing agents has already been questionable for over a decade.”

Like LKP, Ms Olney noted the contribution of James Dalton, director of general insurance policy at the Association of British Insurers, to the Levelling Up, Housing and Communities select committee.

Gove calls on complacent FCA to stop the leasehold insurance rip-offs, and urges the CMA to get stuck in as well

Mr Dalton told MPs:

“One of the significant costs in the price of insurance is commission and if we are going to do anything to reduce the costs that fall on leaseholders, all things need to be on the table. And my submission to you is that commission and distribution should be one of them.”

James Dalton to Select committee

FCA survey can be read here:

https://www.leaseholdknowledge.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/FCA-Multi-occupancy-insurances-survey.pdf

Sarah Olney MP letter to CMA can be read here:

https://www.leaseholdknowledge.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Buildings-insurance-in-residential-blocks.pdf

Related posts:

James Walton, ABIGove calls on complacent FCA to stop the leasehold insurance rip-offs, and urges the CMA to get stuck in as well Financial Conduct Authority under pressure to force open secretive insurance commissions, so leaseholders can see what they are paying for Insurance insiders call for an end to secretive leasehold insurance commissions following Canary Riverside ruling OFT leasehold management inquiry includes housing associations and council properties – and will report in September Rendall and Rittner … no insurance commissions, but it owns an offshore ‘captive’ insurance company making a 40% profit on leaseholders’ premiums

Category: Competition and Markets Authority / OFT, Insurance, Latest News, NewsTag: CMA, Competition and Markets Authority, FCA, Financial Conduct Authority, Lord Newby, Rabina Khan, Sarah Olney MP, Sir Peter Bottomley

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (44) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (39) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (40) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (64) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (200) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (42) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: «Platinum Skies Retirement housebuilder Platinum Skies breached shared ownership rules with onerous ‘staircasing’ charges in the lease
Next Post: Leasehold debt collector JB Leitch received £470,000 furlough, and paid out a £500,000 dividend to owners JB Leitch»

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Simon

    April 8, 2022 at 9:26 pm

    I am fairly new to leasehold but I understood commissions from insurance came to the residents? I got this from the RICS Codes of Practice:
    =====
    5.19 Remuneration, including commissions
    Leaseholders should be notified annually of any remuneration, commission and other
    source of income and related income or other benefits received by the landlord or the
    managing agent (see section 6.7) in connection with the placing or managing of
    insurance (see section 12.6), or the provision or procurement of services or utilities.

    Any commissions, fee income or remuneration of any sort received by a landlord should
    be offset against the costs recoverable as service charges, unless the landlord is able to
    demonstrate that the remuneration is in return for a service, the cost of which would
    otherwise be recoverable as a service charge. Any service provided by the landlord
    should be supported by a service level agreement or contract.

    The amount or value of the income should be declared annually with the year-end
    service charge accounts/summary of expenditure, and should be proportional to the
    value of the service provided.
    ====
    Are we saying the act of obtaining the insurance is the service that is carried out which the commission pays for, and that is why the landlord gets it and not the leaseholders.?

    • Jeremy

      April 25, 2022 at 9:50 am

      Thank you Simon for citing details from the RICS Codes of Practice. I hadn’t realised that RICS addresses this issue; but I will be following this up. In particular I need to find out if my landlord or his managing agent subscribes to these Codes.
      Meantime, it seems to me that costs incurred in obtaining insurance should come out of the managing agent’s annual management fee. And there lies another can of worms!

    • Z Strachan

      May 12, 2022 at 10:13 am

      Does this extend to councils who are landlords?

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web