• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / MPs demand action on cladding scandal, but the question remains: what?

MPs demand action on cladding scandal, but the question remains: what?

January 14, 2020 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Sir Peter Bottomley
Martin Boyd, chair of the Leasehold Knowledge Partnership at the meeting it organised at Westminster on January 9, flanked by the charity’s joint patron MPs Sir Peter Bottomley (Conservative) and Justin Madders (Labour). The meeting was so full that there was standing room only

A packed meeting of the Leasehold Knowledge Partnership / APPG on January 9 heard calls for urgent action on the cladding scandal that has rendered thousands of leasehold homes worthless.

It was standing room only in the Thatcher Room of Portcullis House – the MPs offices – as Hilary Benn, Labour MP for Leeds Central, called for government to intervene to help leaseholders whose lives are on hold as a result of the cladding scandal.

This was echoed by LKP patron Sir Peter Bottomley and other MPs present, including leaseholder Meg Hillier, Labour MP for Hackney South and Shoreditch.

The APPG heard a depressing assessment from engineer Dr Jonathan Evans, of consultancy and cladding manufacturer Ash and Lacey.

One of the experts called in after the Grenfell tragedy, he explained how the government had misunderstood the evidence on cladding right from the start of its inquiries in the crisis.

It is this that has caused a rippling effect in subsequent decisions, leading to Advice Note 14 which reduced to zero valuations on thousands of flat.

Dr Evans said he urged the testing of other forms of cladding than simply Grenfell’s aluminium composite material.

But as a result he was thrown off the technical panel.

“The whole approach of MHCLG has been to absolve itself from either criminal or financial liability in this crisis,” Dr Evans told the meeting.

Meg Hillier MP
Meg Hillier, Labour MP for Hackney South and Shoreditch, is a leaseholder, with considerable sympathy for others caught up in the cladding and ground rent scandals

Professor Susan Bright, of Oxford University, said:

“There has been an inadequate and weak response from the government today leaving many existing buildings unsafe.

“And I have argued elsewhere that this constitutes a breach in the government’s duty to protect life under article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights.”

The message from the Leasehold Knowledge Partnership was that officials and ministers need to meet leaseholders, and stop simply relying on meetings behind closed doors with the lobbying interests in the sector.

The only three meetings held in Westminster for cladding – including last week’s – have been organised by the Leasehold Knowledge Partnership.

The Greater London Assembly is being more effective, offering a meeting room at London City Hall for cladding leaseholders: the first meeting is scheduled for February 6 at 6:30pm.

LKP warned government and was ignored

Martin Boyd, LKP chair, chaired the event, welcoming leaseholders from Leeds, Sheffield and Manchester, as well as closer to Westminster.

He said:

I remind everyone it is now 939 days days since the Grenfell tragedy.

There has been some progress in sorting out the cladding that contributed to that disaster: a third of social housing sites have had the combustible cladding removed and the rest of still in progress.

But the position is much bleaker in the private sector.

Government figures show less than 10% of private cladding sites have been remediated. About 15% have had work started, but that leaves about 75% where nothing has happened.

For leaseholders, that means the anxiety of living in a high-rise with cladding; of not being able to sell their home or not being able to borrow the money to pay for the cladding remediation; of not being able to move job; or, in some cases, not even able to move on with their lives, perhaps when a relationship has broken down.

Three Secretary of States and numerous Housing Ministers have spent all this time saying that the “building owner” – the owners of the freehold, or the income streams of blocks of flats – must pay to remediate these buildings and the leaseholder should not.

The Leasehold Knowledge Partnership warned the government in November 2017 that most so called “building owners” would not pay up.

We warned that most leases would make the leaseholder pay and that if matters went to court the leaseholders would lose.

We urged government to help the leaseholders organise themselves and to communicate among themselves. This would help them face the stress of this disaster and to help them represent their interests.

Instead, it has been left to the Leasehold Knowledge Partnership to organise these meetings – this is the third – and to self-help groups of leaseholders to organise themselves.

What help the government has provided – which applies only to the Grenfell cladding sites – comes with conditions.

Foremost of those is that in taking the remediation money leaseholders are effectively being asked to accept that they are liable to pay for any costs which the government itself does not pay.

So in exchange for the promise of a grant, they must accept the liability for the cladding.

The majority here tonight do not live in Grenfell ACM sites, and unless the government changes its mind it has made clear that it will not pay.

It does not have clear plans for the remediation of non ACM sites. It does not actually know how many sites there are. The government has absolved itself from the fact that advice from the Department has inadvertently destroyed the value of your homes.

The government has gone back to its mantra that the building owner should pay, but they very clearly know that will not happen.

The surveyors, the lenders, the insurers and the managing agents have all had to work together to find a way to value hundreds of thousands of homes. But this now means that every site will need a new survey which needs to comply to a different set of rules that are set out in the government advice notes.

So my message today is as follows. The government has faced an awful problem perhaps because of faults in building regulations, perhaps because of faults in buildings inspection, perhaps because of the building design.

It is utterly ridiculous that we sell flats with 999 year leases but developers sell them with just a two year repairing obligation and an 8 year warranty that gives a limited set of cover.

This has to change.

If the brakes on your second-hand moped have a design defect even after 12 or 15 years, the manufacturer is expected to fix them at no cost. Why is this not the case with our homes?

In dealing with this the government has chosen to meet different groups in the sector behind closed doors to work out what to do.

But the one group it has chosen not to meet are the very leaseholders forced to live in and pay for a mess that they did not create.

We have a representative of the new Protection Board which has responsibility for oversight of building safety. We would urge the Board to either allow us as the APPG to hold cross-sector meetings to find ways to move forward or for the board to do so. Either way we must stop meetings behind closed doors, only with the commercial interests involved.

I can only give one positive announcement today. Following on from the success of the Manchester Cladiators we have finally managed to persuade the Greater London Authority to accommodate us so that cladding leaseholders can meet to help each other.

We will be holding these as joint events with the UK Cladding Group once every three months.

The first meeting will take place at City Hall on the 6th February at 6:30pm. The head of the remediation board has agreed to come along. Details will be available from ourselves and UKCAG in the next few days.

Related posts:

Welsh Assembly evidence over Grenfell cladding costs by FPRA ‘consultant’ Cassandra Zanelli is called into question Question Time: Zoom meeting with LKP cladding funding proposal team, Tuesday 5pm February 9 2021 Cladding victims unimpressed by Robert Jenrick on BBC1’s Question Time Grenfell cladding crisis prompts the question: what are freeholders actually for? EWS1 Inside HousingWhy hasn’t EWS1 restarted the market in flats caught in the cladding scandal?

Category: APPG, Cladding scandal, Latest News, NewsTag: APPG

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (40) ARMA (89) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (46) Commonhold (53) Competition and Markets Authority (41) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (49) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (55) Israel Moskovitz (30) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (69) Katie Kendrick (39) Law Commission (60) LEASE (67) Leasehold Advisory Service (64) Leasehold houses (32) Liam Spender (34) Long Harbour (49) Lord Greenhalgh (31) Martin Boyd (81) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (39) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (57) Sir Peter Bottomley (202) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (32) Vincent Tchenguiz (44) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: «Professor Susan Bright ‘Propriety’: A genteel word to transform our rapacious residential property market
Next Post: Special thanks to SNP Alison Thewliss MP for joining APPG to end leasehold unfairness (as Scottish system is so much better) Alison Thewliss MP»

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Phil Davis

    February 3, 2020 at 8:35 pm

    Well done APPG – you are trying to give leaseholders a voice. Birmingham was also represented at the meeting. In Brum we are being squeezed by insurance companies on cladding sites, with 5 fold increases in premiums. We need a Government guarantee that insurance will be available – Government must sit down with the insurance industry to fix this, as was done for flood-hit areas. Please demand this, APPG….

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Barry Passmore

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web