• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / Sapphire Fields comes clean over leasehold terms

Sapphire Fields comes clean over leasehold terms

January 9, 2017 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Survey on onerous ground rent data. Please fill this in if you have a leasehold house with exploitative ground rent terms


You click here to get Taylor Wimpey’s guide to leasehold

Taylor Wimpey has revised its sales team’s information leaflet to buyers of leasehold apartments at Sapphire Fields, in Oxfordshire.

New guidelines – apparently introduced on December 20, the day of the leasehold debate in the House of Commons – seek to make consumers more aware of what they are buying.

The leases here only apply to flats, as Taylor Wimpey is selling freehold houses at Sapphire Fields, part of 3,300 new homes at its Great Western Park development on the edge of Didcot.

Indeed, following LKP’s exposure of the company’s doubling ground rent scandal, Taylor Wimpey has announced that it has ceased the construction of leasehold houses form January 1.

[Leasehold houses have spread across the country – Persimmon being the main offender – as developers leap at the chance of creating an investment asset class at the expense of their own customers.]

LKP reproduces the information about leasehold terms, and adds a little more information in italics below”

“The lease is 125 years”

This is a short lease, which means the developer is creating an investment asset class at the expense of its own customers.

Leases will evaporate in value if they get below 80 years, so the lease will have to be extended. That means an income stream for whoever owns the freehold.

The ground rent is £250pa and is “reviewed” (increases) every ten years in line with the Retail Price Index.

Customers should ask themselves: what service is the ground rent for?

This is a question asked of MPs by Philip Rainey QC.

Absolutely nothing, according to small retirement housebuilder Bob Bessell, who thinks ground rents are wrong. https://www.leaseholdknowledge.com/tag/bob-bessell

Taylor Wimpey won’t retain ownership of the freehold “in common with most developers”.

So the freehold will be sold to a life insurance company such as Aviva (if you are lucky), or to murkier investors, sometimes offshore (if you aren’t).

LKP estimates that housebuilders earn £300-£500 million a year through ground rent sales.

You are strongly advised that you should take independent legal advice

Hear, hear. And that means not appointing a solicitor recommended by any developer. That in itself is a reason not to employ that particular firm.

Leasehold conveyancing is complicated and deeply flawed, according to the Conveyancing Association. It is very important that you chose a solicitor experienced in leasehold. Contact LKP if necessary.

Anything else a leasehold buyer should know?

Yes, and quite a lot actually.

Buying a leasehold flat means that you are a tenant, just a long term one. But all issues go down the rabbit hole of landlord and tenant law, quite unlike a real freehold homeowner.

Investors in freeholds are buying far more than ground rents, and pay handsomely for them.

Why?

With a minority investment in a block of flats (often less than 5 per cent of the collective value of the flats) they control the site.

This means the freeholder appoints the property management company. That is unless Sapphire Fields leases have a residents’ management company (RMC) incorporated.

Taylor Wimpey London made a complete mess of these RMCs which ended up excluding the leaseholders and being owned by Roger Southam, then proprietor of Chainbow and, inexplicably, the chairman of the taxpayer-funded Leasehold Advisory Service. 

Mr Southam was named in the Commons by Sir Peter Bottomley on December 20.

If a freeholder controls the management of the site he is on to a winner: management contract, insurance commissions, deals with contractors.

These can be worth far more than the ground rents as developers, who draw up the leases, know very well.

So who buys leasehold?

Ordinary people. First-time buyers. The old. The single. The poor. Or, in prime central London, the rich.

It is very rare indeed to encounter anyone employed in the leasehold game who does not own their home freehold.

 

Related posts:

Last year: £64.8bn leasehold properties sold. £13.7bn was new-build. Leasehold house numbers double. Developers make £300-500 million a year from ground rent sales I had to spend £14,000 to change double ground rent to RPI at Ausden Place. But will I get compo from Taylor Wimpey? Taylor Wimpey CEO to meet MPs over ‘cancer’ of doubling ground rents (which were deterring astute buyers in 2007!) Taylor Wimpey abandons the leasehold houses racket from January 1 Sajid Javid pledges Help To Buy clampdown on ‘feudal’ leasehold terms

Category: Ground rent scandal, Latest News, News, Persimmon, Taylor WimpeyTag: Roger Southam, Sapphire Fields, Taylor Wimpey

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (44) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (39) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (40) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (64) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (200) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (42) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « Shaken ground rent whistleblower pulls out of BBC radio interview after lawyer’s letter
Next Post: ITV News says 45,000 leasehold houses sold in last five years. LKP claims £300-500m new home freeholds sold every year »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Paul Joseph

    January 9, 2017 at 5:15 pm

    Does leasehold not meet the definition of Mrs May’s “everyday injustices”? What is the Conservative Party going to do about it?

    My prediction: nothing of any substance.

    • Leaseholder

      January 17, 2017 at 12:25 pm

      Excellent point! “Every day injustices ” in a grand scale.

  2. Trevor Bradley

    January 9, 2017 at 7:22 pm

    Paul, that is exactly what crossed my mind earlier on today.
    The more one investigates the worse it gets. They (Taylor Wimpey( even admitting, now in writing, they always intend to sell a freehold – so their promises to House Leasehold Purchasers of buying the Lease in a couple of years for say approx. £4K, was absolute lies as they knew the freehold would be sold to a ground rent muncher by then, and we know what the munchers want for a freehold purchase. I bet the deal wit a muncher is already done before the houses are even built.. The “business scam, sorry, plan, is all in place before a brick is laid.
    I note the reference to leasehold is not very prominent in the sales team info leaflet. I also downloaded a sales brochure and cannot see anything in their that highlights leasehold.
    Also when they say GR of £250pa will increase by RPI in year 10 they should give a monetary example so the lease purchaser fully understands what they are walking into

    • Kim

      January 14, 2017 at 8:32 am

      I couldn’t agree more Trevor. These individuals are going to have to be dragged kicking and screaming to the altar of ‘Honourability’ for the beleaguered, shafted leaseholders to be recompensed. BOYCOTT TW and picket outside their offices / show homes ( peacefully of course) . This scandal should be afforded the same revolt as the disgraced ‘Poll Tax’. The Thousands of affected leaseholders should organise a demonstration that should be held in London as It will garner more media coverage ( sad but true).I will march in solidarity even though I am unaffected by this scandal, other than I cannot bear injustice! COME ON PEOPLE, SHOW YOUR STRENGTH!!

      • Michael Hollands

        January 14, 2017 at 4:22 pm

        This should be interesting, will you be leading the Taylor Wimpey Martyrs.
        I hope it does not replicate the Monmouth Rebellion and bring back another Judge Jeffreys
        At least with all this shocking publicity TW are going to have to do something to protect their image, or what remains of it. Sir Frank Taylor must be turning in his grave.
        I hope that the TW Directors follow this website, if they do I would urge them to take some urgent action as to compensating their unfortunate customers who have had their lives blighted. Time is fast running out for them to take this action.

        • Kim

          January 14, 2017 at 10:07 pm

          Michael, I can vouch that I will certainly support the leaseholders shafted by TW by joining them on their demonstration and picketing the ‘Show homes’ of these unscrupulous operators. TW reputation is irrevocably tarnished and who gives a shite whether”Sir Frank” is “Turning in his grave”. I am quite sure that the shafted leaseholders do not! Michael, with respect, it’s time to stop reminiscing about ‘All your yesterdays’. OK? You can “Urge” TW all you like – It doesn’t amount to a hill of beans.

          • Michael Hollands

            January 14, 2017 at 10:37 pm

            Kim, You can deal with it your way, and I shall continue my way. But please aim all your flack at TW and not some at me.
            I have contacted many different organisations, Government, MPs and TW themselves to get something going. I have correspondence with the TW hierarchy on this subject.. It may help, it may not. But your criticism will not make me give up.
            When will your first protest march be taking place?

  3. Michael Hollands

    January 9, 2017 at 8:39 pm

    The fact that TW have just issued this revised Leasehold/Ground Rent statement is an admission by them that they got it wrong.
    They now pass the onus onto the Purchaser and the Purchasers chosen Solicitor, releasing themselves of any responsibility.
    Previously the onerous terms were played down and the Purchaser was encouraged to use the TW Solicitor who would not highlight these conditions.
    This is a TW U-Turn
    So now TW need to put the situation right with those who have suffered.

    • Kim

      January 15, 2017 at 8:19 am

      Michael, stop being so thin skinned. I was not criticising you ,however you are not above criticism.simply beacuse………? The TW ‘Hierarchy ‘ of whom you speak are clearly a dishonourable bunch, so good luck with them. If you read my posts You will find they are crystal clear E.G.- “The shafted leaseholders should organise a demonstration and I will support them on that demo and picketing the ‘Show Homes’ of these spivs”. I suggest you put your question of when the demo takes place to a shafted leaseholder and hope that you will urge them to take this action.

  4. Trevor Bradley

    January 9, 2017 at 10:55 pm

    aaaaah, so that’s ok now then. TW are now making it quite clear that the onus is on the solicitors to pick up on any “unacceptable wrongdoings” the builder/landlord may have in a lease (concerns flats only now of course – if they also keep to their word when they start building the “new villages”)
    This releases themselves (TW) of any responsibility, as we have “been warned”.
    As a responsible customer caring company there should not be any need for a solicitor to have to examine the lease with a magnifying glass.
    And yes, there is a mammoth task ahead for them to put things right for hundreds of leaseholders who were sold down the river and have had their lives ruined.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web