Leasehold Knowledge Partnership

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

  • Home
    • Site map
  • News
    • ARMA
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Commonhold
    • Countrywide
    • Exit fees
    • Forfeiture
    • House of Lords
    • Insurance scams
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • OFT / CMA
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Quadrangle House
    • Roger Southam
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • West India Quay
  • What is LKP
    • LKP Management
    • Site map
  • Accreditation
    • Accredited Companies
      • Block Managers Limited
      • Clear Building Management
      • Diamond Managing Agents
      • Home from Home
      • HML Andertons
      • HML Hathaways
      • HML Hawksworth
      • HML Shaw
      • Hunter Grey
      • JFM Block & Estate Management
      • Jones Associates Letting & Management
      • Norwich Residential Management
      • Premier Block Management
      • Red Rock Property Management
      • Rynew Property Management
      • Town & City Management
      • Urang Property Management
      • Urban Living Property Management
      • Urban Owners
      • Walton & Allen
  • Fighting back
    • Lease Extension
    • Q&As
    • Right to buy freehold
    • Commonhold
    • Bottomley blasts leasehold crimes on video
    • LVT/Property Chamber Survival
    • Tribunal triumphs … and defeats
    • RTM
    • Video
    • Find MP … and see how many leasehold voters
    • LEASE: what’s the point?
    • Pensioners win £68,500
    • Most damning LVT ruling ever made
    • Insurance racket
    • Local authority leasehold
    • Remember to extend your lease
    • St George’s wins £1 million
    • Leasehold law: the reforms
  • Sub-letting
  • Press
  • Contact
  • Parliament
    • APPG December 14 2016
    • Commons Debate 20/12/16
    • APPG April 19 2017
    • APPG July 5 2017
  • Right To Manage
  • Lease Extension
  • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Louie Burns
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Michael Epstein
  • Donate
  • April 22, 2018
You are here: Home / News / Tchenguiz backs down over £5,000 demand for … a conservatory built 25 years ago

Tchenguiz backs down over £5,000 demand for … a conservatory built 25 years ago

March 5, 2014 By admin

TchenguizTookeyLKPsliderThe Tchenguiz Family Trust has backed down on demanding £5,000 for consent for a conservatory that was attached to a  retirement leasehold bungalow more than 20 years ago.

Two days ago, Campaign against retirement leasehold exploitation raised the issue with Estates and Management, which manages the Tchenguiz residential freehold portfolio.

The original story can be read below or here, with comments

The correspondence was also copied to Kris Hopkins, the housing minister and Michael Ellis, the MP for Northampton North, where the retirement leasehold bungalow is situated.

It was also copied to Sir Peter Bottomley and Labour MP Barry Sheerman, who has spoken in the Commons over similar demands concerning Tchenguiz freehold interests in Huddersfield.

The demand for £5,000 consent was presented to owners Simon and Susan Tookey, who were trying to sell the property at Sheraton Close for £140,000 at last November. The buyers’ solicitor queried consent for the conservatory.

The couple claim that the £5,000 fee lost the sale even though the Peverel employed house manager could confirm that the conservatory was built more than 20 years ago.

Peverel refused to allow its employee to assist the Tookeys by confirming this date because it would harm the interests of its employer at the site, ultimately the Tchenguiz Family Trust.

The bulk of Peverel’s business comes from this organisation, which until the arrest of the Tchenguiz brothers on wrong evidence in March 2011 also owned Peverel itself.

Campaign against retirement leasehold exploitation this morning received the following email from Suhail Qureshi, of Estates and Management:

Dear Mr O’Kelly,

 Following an initial query by Mrs Tookey, we made a number of enquiries to establish the facts around the construction of the conservatory at 46 Sheraton Close, including contacting the Deputy House Manager.

 We have been advised by the Deputy House Manager that she believes that the conservatory was built by the previous tenants over 20 years ago.

 Notwithstanding the fact that no documentary evidence has yet been found to corroborate this, we have made decision to waive the £5,000 fee.

 A letter confirming this has been issued to Mrs Tookey’s lawyers.

 Yours sincerely,

 Suhail Qureshi

Consents Department

 

Tchenguiz Family Trust seeks £5,000 for conservatory ‘built 25 years ago’ … and Peverel will not permit their house manager to confirm when it was built

 

The Tookey family's retirement bungalow in Northampton, built in 1988/89

The Tookey family’s retirement bungalow in Northampton, built in 1988/89

A couple who own a retirement bungalow with a conservatory face a demand for £5,000 from the Tchenguiz Family Trust freeholder.

And the money might not need to be paid at all if the Peverel house manager were permitted to confirm the date when the conservatory was built – but she has been instructed not to get involved.

The £5,000 demand presented to Simon and Susan Tookey is for retrospective consent to erect the conservatory at Sheraton Close, in Northampton.

“But my mother lived here for 17 years and the conservatory was already built when she bought the bungalow,” says Mr Tookey, a lorry driver.

There were two previous owners before his mother, and the Tookeys say the conservatory was built by the first owner as far back as 1989.

The Tchenguiz Family Trust only purchased the freehold to the site in 2008, it is stated.

The issue came to light because the Tookeys were trying to sell the bungalow for £140,000 last November. The sale fell through as the buyers’ solicitor wanted evidence of the freeholders’ consent for the conservatory.

“We contacted Estates and Management and the result was a demand for retrospective consent amounting to £5,000,” said Mr Tookey.

It is claimed that the house manager at the site, Alice Kearns, who has been employed there since it was built in 1988/9, has stated verbally to the Tookeys that the conservatory was, indeed, built in 1989.

But she has been stopped from confirming this in writing by Peverel, most of whose business comes from managing freeholds owned by the Tchenguiz Family Trust.

This is because the interests of the Tookeys clash with those of Peverel’s principal client.

“Although Alice was commendably looking to help you, we have a general duty of care for both yourselves as lessees and for your landlord,” the Tookeys were told by Chris Owens, Peverel’s head of customer relations on December 9th.

“As your respective interests clearly differ here, I am afraid that it would not therefore be appropriate for us to get involved on behalf of either party, which is why her Area Manager regrettably had to decline her suggested action.”

The Tookeys are appalled by this “fence-sitting”. Mr Tookey cannot afford the sum as he only earns £380 a week. In addition, he is ill with prostate cancer.

The Tookeys have offered to pay £870 to obtain the consent.

As the conservatory did not require planning consent the Tookeys lack a paper trail confirming when the structure was built.

But they can rely on affidavits from two friends of Mr Tookey’s mother, who will confirm that this property had a conservatory for the entire 17 years that she owned it.

Many other bungalows at the site also have conservatories that were built at the same time. Two properties were sold last year, without solicitors questioning the consents, or the issue being brought to the attention of Tchenguiz.

Campaign against retirement leasehold exploitation has contacted Northampton council for aerial photographs of 20 years ago that will show the site.

It has also contacted Estates and Management for an explanation for its £5,000 fee.

Tookey2Correspondence has been copied in to the local MP Michael Ellis, as well as Sir Peter Bottomley and Labour MP Barry Sheerman, who has spoken in the Commons about similar demands from Tchenguiz in Huddersfield.

Peverel has indicated that its house manager could reply to a request for information from the freeholder, but this has not been done.

Campaign against retirement leasehold exploitation has urged Estates and Management to seek a statement from Miss Kearns, who has worked at the site since it was built, as it would surely not wish to profit wrongly from this matter.

On December 4 2013, Mr Suhail Qureshi of Estates and Management informed the Tookeys that “a letter from Ms Kearns would not be sufficient, and it is not our responsibility to contact her”.

An alternative if this is not settled is for the Tookeys to withdraw their offer of £870 and to obtain a tribunal ruling.

If successful, they could then seek costs from the county court from Estates and Management for the loss of their house sale.

Campaign against retirement leasehold exploitation has contacted both Tchenguiz and Peverel and will publish responses.

Related posts:

Tchenguiz Family Trust seeks £5,000 for conservatory ‘built 25 years ago’ … and Peverel will not permit their house manager to confirm when it was built Tchenguiz backs down over demanding £5,000 from couple … for a conservatory built more than 20 years ago! Small-scale builder left high and dry after Tchenguiz / Peverel meltdown Ex-Israeli intelligence operatives settle dispute with Tchenguiz Hand over £100,000 house manager’s flat at retirement leasehold site and we will give you £10,000, say Peverel / Tchenguiz

Filed Under: News, Sir Peter Bottomley, Slider2, Tchenguiz Tagged With: Tchenguiz, Vincent Tchenguiz

Contact LKP

Need help?

LKPhelp2The leasehold game is weighted against ordinary home-owning leaseholders, who aren’t professional players. LKP was set up to redress the balance, to help you win your disputes or at least avoid disasters.

If you have a leasehold problem, you can email sok@leaseholdknowledge or take a chance on calling 07808 328 230.

Or fill out this form, which ensures that you provide the essential information.

Professional services

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders. Click on the logos for company profiles.

Law

Lease extension / enfranchisement


capitalleasehold6-9ins

Landscaping

limetree

LKP Managing Agents

Big managing agents are big because they have got business from developers or large-scale freehold owing companies. Doubtless they are very obliging.

Not a single one is big through consumer choice.

Managing agents accredited to LKP want business from leaseholders. Many are former leaseholders.

All have signed undertakings of good practice and have provided extensive references … from leaseholders.

They can also hand-hold leaseholders through right to manage at minimal cost.

Contact Sebastian O’Kelly at LKP for further details: sok@leaseholdknowledge.com, 07808 328 230

Please click on logos for link and details

What is LKP?

Sebastian O’Kelly
Martin Boyd
sok@leaseholdknowledge.com
martin.boyd@leaseholdknowledge.com

Please use the HELP FORM for ALL non-urgent matters.

Only call the numbers below if you are familiar with the LKP website and feel your issue can only be dealt with on the phone. Please do not casually ring up, as we can be deluged by unconsidered calls.

020 8050 2602
07808 328 230

The Leasehold Knowledge Partnership is the secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold and commonhold reform chaired by the MPs Sir Peter Bottomley (Conservative), Jim Fitzpatrick (Labour) and Sir Ed Davey (LibDem). They are also the patrons of LKP.

The deputy chairs are Justin Madders (Lab), Marie Rimmer (Lab) and Baroness Gardner (Con).

More about the aims and origins of LKP here

How your firm can apply to become an accredited managing agent here

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.

LKPnewsletter3

Find everything here …

LKP full archive

… or here

Essential reads

  • Sir Peter Bottomley
  • Martin Paine
  • Roger Southam
  • LKP full archive
  • Most damning LVT ruling ever made
  • Pensioners win £68,500
  • Benjamin Mire
  • Moskovitz / Gurvits
  • Plantation Wharf
  • Peverel Cirrus story so far
  • Sean Powell
  • Tchenguiz
  • West India Quay
  • Essential guide to lease extensions
  • Forfeiture
  • Press
  • Right to manage and taking control

The reason why

Right to manage promoter calls it a day at Quadrangle House

Right to manage promoter calls it a day at Quadrangle House

More reasons "why" ...

Press

Housebuilders and stooge conveyancing solicitors face legal action, reports The Times

Housebuilders and stooge conveyancing solicitors face legal action, reports The Times

Full Press archive

RSS Latest news from Better Retirement Housing

  • Complain to Advertising Standards Authority about misleading ‘home ownership’ when applied to retirement leasehold tenancies April 19, 2018
  • Love over 50: something we can agree about with McCarthy and Stone April 19, 2018
  • Dear Mr Fenton: I don’t regret my purchase at Rosewood Court, but ‘leasehold is a rip-off’ April 18, 2018
  • McCarthy and Stone: we want you to succeed, but you don’t need ground rents April 16, 2018
  • Park home pensioners demand MPs dump the British Holiday and Home Parks Association from its All Party Parliamentary Group February 4, 2018
  • FirstPort Retirement is admitted to ARMA – finally February 2, 2018
  • ARCO snubs McCarthy and Stone / Churchill by saying there is no need for ground rents January 31, 2018

LKP Managing Agents

Swindon

Manchester

urbanowners

London

JFMManagement

London

Town&City

Nationwide

Nottingham

UrbanLivingLeeds

UrangFulham

RedRock

Essex / Middlesex

NRMlogoNorwich

 

hmlandertonsCroydon

 

hmlhathawaysNorth London

 

hmlhawksworthPimlico

 

hmlshawRichmond, Surrey

Rynew

East London

Diamond

Epsom, Surrey

BlockManagers

Essex

jonesassociates

Macclesfield

Readers comments

  • David McArthur on The Sun urges caution over leasehold purchases, while The Times reports Barratt paying out £2m at Citiscape
  • Michael Epstein on The Sun urges caution over leasehold purchases, while The Times reports Barratt paying out £2m at Citiscape
  • ollie on The Sun urges caution over leasehold purchases, while The Times reports Barratt paying out £2m at Citiscape
  • Michael Hollands on Floorweald and ABC Estates – an ARMA ‘good guy’ – overcharged leaseholders £27,000
  • admin on Floorweald and ABC Estates – an ARMA ‘good guy’ – overcharged leaseholders £27,000
  • ollie on Floorweald and ABC Estates – an ARMA ‘good guy’ – overcharged leaseholders £27,000
  • ollie on Sesame Apartments: Yet another anonymous Long Harbour freeholder demanding £2.2 million over Grenfell cladding
  • ollie on Complain to Advertising Standards Authority over ‘virtual freehold’ and ‘home ownership’ when the offer is leasehold tenancy
  • Michael Epstein on Barratt pays out to remove Grenfell cladding at Citiscape
  • Michael Hollands on Floorweald and ABC Estates – an ARMA ‘good guy’ – overcharged leaseholders £27,000
  • Susan on Complain to Advertising Standards Authority over ‘virtual freehold’ and ‘home ownership’ when the offer is leasehold tenancy
  • ollie on Complain to Advertising Standards Authority over ‘virtual freehold’ and ‘home ownership’ when the offer is leasehold tenancy
  • ollie on McCarthy and Stone: Ground rents are not the future of retirement housing
  • chas on Complain to Advertising Standards Authority over ‘virtual freehold’ and ‘home ownership’ when the offer is leasehold tenancy
  • S McDonald on Law Commission sets out how it hopes to create a better deal for leaseholders – and look at alternatives
Tweets by @LKPleasehold

DIrection

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Find Everything

LKP full archive

Essential reads …

  • MPs’ APPG on leasehold
  • Benjamin Mire
  • House managers flat
  • Justin Bates
  • Moskovitz / Gurvits
  • Oakland Court
  • McCarthy and Stone
  • Canary Riverside
  • Peverel
  • Peverel Cirrus story so far
  • Full list of Peverel retirement sites and the constituency MPs
  • Charter Quay
  • Forfeiture
  • Plantation Wharf
  • Commons Debate 20/12/16
  • Roger Southam
  • Sir Peter Bottomley
  • Plantation Wharf
  • West India Quay
  • LEASE: what’s the point?
  • Tchenguiz
  • Sean Powell
  • Press
  • Ground rent scandal
  • Martin Paine
  • LKP anthem
  • LVT/Property Chamber Survival
  • Most damning LVT ruling ever made
  • Pensioners win £68,500

Copyright © 2018 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership