• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / Three quarters of Churchill Retirement flats have lost money when resold, says The Times

Three quarters of Churchill Retirement flats have lost money when resold, says The Times

October 5, 2023 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

An analysis of Land Registry data has shown that three-quarters of the flats built by Churchill Retirement – owned by the McCarthy family who founded McCarthy and Stone – have resold at a loss, according to The Times.

The average fall in value has been 18%, or £43,000, the newspaper said, with one flat in Leatherhead, in Surrey, bought from Churchill Retirement in 2016 for £495,000 selling five years later for £290,000.

Only a quarter of Churchill Retirement flats resold for profit, with an average gain of 10% or £23,000.

Repeating a business model pioneered by McCarthy and Stone, Churchill Retirement sells independent living leasehold flats, with a part-time housemanager and some communal areas such as a lounge and kitchen.

Service charges average more than £4,000 a year, and ground rents were above £500 a year until they were banned from being in the leases of new retirement flats after 1 April this year.

The average buyer of a Churchill Retirement flat is a woman aged 79 who lives in the home counties, according to the newspaper, which added:

“It is far from the only developer to see the value of such properties fall.”

The report continued:

“With more than 4,000 homes built by Churchill yet to be sold by their owners, thousands of families are sitting on significant losses that they probably have no idea about.”

The newspaper reports that over the past five years Churchill Retirement has made pre-tax profits of £173 million.

The analysis looked at nearly 5,500 Churchill homes listed on the Land Registry website since 2000. It found that 1,400 of these properties had resold at least once after they were first purchased from the company. Their collective value fell from £328 million to £291 million, a loss of £37 million, the newspaper reports.

It claimed that had the properties increased in value at the same rate as flats in their local markets, they would have been worth a collective £400 million, an increase of £72 million.

“This means that the owners of Churchill homes who have sold already are effectively £109 million worse off, about £78,000 each,” the report said.

Sebastian O’Kelly, of LKP and Better Retirement Housing, which campaigns for improvements to the industry, is reported in the article saying:

“Retirement flats have plummeted in value from new as evidenced on the Land Registry. A reason is the leasehold system along with high fees and service charges that leaseholders have little to no control over.

“The truth is that the developer, freeholder and property manager still get their ground rent and service fees regardless of the property’s value so there is no alignment of interests. It’s terrible that families are ploughing money into some of these flats, only to see the value evaporate. And it’s a huge shame because families desperately need this sort of housing for older relatives who are bereaved or need the support network of close neighbours.”

Churchill Retirement is reported in the article for claiming it had among the lowest service charges in the sector, and is quoted:

“Whilst everyone wants the best resale price for their property, our retirement communities are about far more than just the cash return on the bricks and mortar. In buying these properties, older people are investing in a safe, sociable place to live where practical help is on-hand and where they can continue to live independently in their own home among friends as they get older. This range of affordable benefits and the quality of life these deliver have immense value for our customers, particularly those whose family may live some distance away.

“As with all retirement properties where you have an age-restricted market, the performance of resales is based on a range of factors including the condition of the property, the way in which it is marketed and the urgency with which the family or executors are seeking a sale. We are there to support our customers in getting the best value for their property.

“While many other companies prohibit owners from renting out properties, Churchill has established a buoyant rental option for people wishing to sublet and we have seen strong uplifts in value in many of our developments.”

The full article can be read here: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/retirement-flats-life-savings-value-homes-housing-market-uk-2023-f6xx5hd6k

Tories making housing crisis worse, says Churchill Retirement Living boss

Churchill Retirement Living, builder of flats for over-60s, has taken aim at the government for worsening the housing crisis after its profits fell by a third l

Related posts:

The Times SpreadThe Times reports that families ‘lost £3 billion’ on resale of leasehold retirement flats, while developers and freehold speculators made millions McCarthy and Stone resale valuesThe Times reports that families ‘lost £3 billion’ on resale of leasehold retirement flats, while developers and freehold speculators made millions The Times: ‘Exit fees and poor resale values: the uncomfortable truth about retirement homes’ Bottomley to raise with Churchill Retirement its decision to continue charging ground rents Swayne McCarthy StoneChurchill Retirement donates £150,000 to Conservatives. To retain ground rents, by any chance?

Category: HomeSlider, Latest News, News, PressTag: Churchill Retirement Living, Land Registry, McCarthy and Stone, Sebastian O’Kelly, The Times

Sign up to the LKP newsletter

Fill in the link here

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (44) ARMA (91) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (33) CMA (46) Commonhold (56) Competition and Markets Authority (42) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (55) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (55) Israel Moskovitz (32) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (36) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (31) Justin Bates (41) Justin Madders MP (75) Katie Kendrick (40) Law Commission (61) LEASE (68) Leasehold Advisory Service (65) Leasehold houses (32) Liam Spender (39) Long Harbour (51) Lord Greenhalgh (32) Martin Boyd (87) McCarthy and Stone (43) National Leasehold Campaign (42) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Retirement (38) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (67) Sir Peter Bottomley (211) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (34) Vincent Tchenguiz (45) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « Marriage Value: How your freeholder hitches a ride on the uplift of value on your flat
Next Post: Park home owners demo against 10% sales commissions »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Stephen Burns

    October 6, 2023 at 12:20 am

    Leasehold property’s are potentially highly toxic in terms of return on investment, and may cause severe financial hardship to Landlords for purchase of said

    This on going and Century’s old business model is not fit for purpose and needs abolition at best, or radical reformat worst, a sticking plaster reform will not work.

    Who would buy a Leasehold property if they were in possession of all the facts prior to purchase?

    The Big swindle continues the winners are the Freeholder, and their specially selected Managing Agent, the loser is without doubt the Leaseholder, the above article proves that.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Barry Passmore

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2025 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web