• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / We are going to court if necessary to get ripped off leaseholders their money back, CMA tells BBCR4 MoneyBox

We are going to court if necessary to get ripped off leaseholders their money back, CMA tells BBCR4 MoneyBox

February 29, 2020 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

LKP praises report that gives ‘huge impetus’ to government to set new ground rents to zero – promised and undelivered for three years

The Competition and Markets Authority is going to launch a series of court cases against plc housebuilders to resolve the ground rent scandal, it told BBCR4’s authoritative MoneyBox programme this afternoon.

LKP warmly welcomed the CMA report saying it gave huge impetus to the key reform of setting new ground rents to zero, which has been promised by the government since December 2017 and still undelivered.

George Lusty, the CMA’s Senior Director, Consumer Protection, told the programme:

“We will be bringing cases arguing that these businesses have broken consumer law. That these escalating ground rent charges and the mis-selling of homes is illegal.

“We will take those cases to court if we need to. We are going to try to attack the behaviour and try to get people’s money back where we can.

“We are going to do everything we can to sort out this problem. It is having a huge impact. Somtheing has gone really badly wrong. The developers in particular seem to have really failed in their responsibility to treat their customers fairly.”

Presenter Paul Lewis commented “strong stuff” before asking Cath Williams, a co-founder of the National Leasehold Campaign and the owner of a leasehold house in Cheshire, whether she was mis-sold her home.

BBC Radio 4 – Money Box

The latest news from the world of personal finance

“Absolutely. Misled and mis-sold,” Ms Williams replied. “I bought the house in 2011 and there was no mention of leasehold in any of the marketing material. Even on the reservation form when I paid the deposit, which I believe is the point of sale: no mention of leasehold anywhere.

Ms Williams blamed the developer and its sales staff for mis-selling.

“They were very well trained into how to coerce people into buying these properties under false pretences.”

Paul Lewis commented: “You seem to be painting a picture of being systematically misled by the developer and the people who work for them.”

“Absolutely. I am so pleased that the CMA report supports this. I always knew that I had been mis-sold, but it is very difficult to prove, when everything was verbal at the point of sale.

“The first time that I knew the property was leasehold was after I had paid the £500 deposit and £750 for upgrades. On a tick list they went through everything with me and then at the bottom in pencil they wrote “leasehold”.

“At which point I challenged them: ‘Hang on a minute. I thought I had bought a freehold property.”

Paul Lewis asked: “Has this cost you money?”

“It really has. Because my lease was onerous. It [the ground rent] was £295 a year, which is over the £250 threshold. It was more than 0.1% of the property’s value. It was 0.3%. So when I came to sell the estate agent valued the house at £20,000 less than the equivalent freehold market property.

“And then said I might not actually be able to get anyone through the door. So the only way to sell was to buy the freehold. That cost me £15,000 in total.”

Sebastian O’Kelly, chief executive of LKP, was asked whether he was expecting the CMA report to be so strong in its findings.

“No. I am absolutely delighted by it. It is a really strong report that puts the blame squarely on our cartel of plc housebuilders and they have a lot of explaining to do. And it is going to cost them some money.

Compensation is mentioned for the first time in the report: who will get that, and how far back will it go?

Mr O’Kelly replies: “Well, the people who were mis-sold this will get that. There is an example of how this could work with the court case in Cardiff in the summer where leasehold houseowners were mis-sold their properties.

“They got the freeholds and they got back the ground rent that they had wrongly paid. And the issues was settled. We want to see something similar for all the thousands of people who were mis-sold these leasehold properties.”

The case is referenced here:

Mass email dump: leasehold home owners demand their freeholds after Persimmon caves into court action

How far back could compensation claims go?

Mr O’Kelly replied: “I don’t know. That is rather an issue for the CMA to work out. But we are talking about plc housebuilders doing this. They are still trading. They still have reputations to maintain so I think they will now get a proper compensation arrangement in place.”

LKP was also asked about the conveyancing solicitors, who a number of compo claim firms are pursuing for professional negligence.

Mr O’Kelly replied:

“The solicitors have been revealed to be nothing more than stooges for the developers. There is also a huge question mark over whether developers should recommend solicitors in the first place.

“Developers have been saying all along that it is all the fault of the solicitors for not identifying the tricks that they themselves put into the leases in the first place.

“These are toxic leases now in the property market that will be transacted: plc housebuilders need to get rid of them and put them right.”

Paul Lewis responded: “It certainly sounds as thought the CMA agrees with you on that.”

He asked Ms Williams what would be fair compensation.

“At the point of sale I did question whether I could buy the freehold. I was told I could buy it by law two to three years down the line for £2,000 to £3,000. I would have been happy to pay that at point of sale, to be honest.

“I don’t mind paying that. I am not asking for a free house. I would like the 15 grand back minus the £2-3,000 that the freehold would have cost me at the point of sale.”

Pul Lewis commented that this seemed “quite a reasonable demand”. He then asked Mr O’Kelly whether the investors who bought these residential freeholds and levy various charges against the leaseholders should also be paying out.

“Lots of these freeholds have been sold off to private equity speculators in ground rents, usually based offshore, and they have ratcheted up these costs,” replied Mr O’Kelly.

“I have come across a case this week: £15,000 to vary a lease [to RPI from doubling ground rent] because the owners happened to be a buy-to-let investor.

Long Harbour rebukes Mark Hawthorn, of Landmark Investments, for ‘falling below professional standards’ over email on doubling ground rents

“It will be more difficult to address those administrative charges, but it is the plc housebuilders that are the easier target here and really the people primarily culpable.”

Finally, LKP was asked how important this report was in the wider effort to reform leasehold.

“It is excellent because as well as putting right the issues that have gone wrong, it gives huge impetus to government to reform leasehold and to set new ground rents to zero, which they have promised for three years and still have not done.”

Clive Betts MP, chair of the Communities Select Committee which issued a brilliant report on the leasehold scandal last year, also warmly welcomed the CMA report:

Chair-elect welcomes CMA announcement regarding leasehold mis-selling and unfair contracts – Committees – UK Parliament

Inquiry: Leasehold reform Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee

Related posts:

McCarthy and Stone and Churchill: are you blackmailing government over the ground rent ban and is your business model broken? Asks BBC R4 MoneyBox Countryside Properties plc tells leaseholders wanting their freeholds: We’ve signed the pledge (and we’ve flogged them on, anyway) … BetterRetirementHousing.com reports retirement resale disasters. On BBCR4 MoneyBox today BBC R4 MoneyBox hears that a CMA mis-selling ruling could see leaseholders suing plc house builders. Hope so! Ripped-off leaseholders bring protest to central Manchester

Category: Competition and Markets Authority / OFT, Ground rent scandal, Latest News, NewsTag: BBC R4 MoneyBox, Cath Williams, CMA, Competition and Markets Authority, George Lusty, Paul Lewis, Sebastian O’Kelly

Sign up to the LKP newsletter

Fill in the link here

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (44) ARMA (91) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (33) CMA (46) Commonhold (56) Competition and Markets Authority (42) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (55) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (55) Israel Moskovitz (32) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (36) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (31) Justin Bates (41) Justin Madders MP (75) Katie Kendrick (40) Law Commission (61) LEASE (68) Leasehold Advisory Service (65) Leasehold houses (32) Liam Spender (39) Long Harbour (51) Lord Greenhalgh (32) Martin Boyd (87) McCarthy and Stone (43) National Leasehold Campaign (42) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Retirement (38) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (67) Sir Peter Bottomley (211) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (34) Vincent Tchenguiz (45) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « LKP joins ARMA initiative to urge chancellor to fund re-cladding bills set to ruin 500,000 leaseholders
Next Post: Lords hear how LKP warned government over ground rents and leasehold houses … in 2015 »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Alec

    March 1, 2020 at 7:10 am

    As I understand it, the CMA investigation of the leasehold sector is not yet complete and has yet to report.

    In the meantime, they have come out strongly against doubling GR and the sale of leasehold homes, and promise court action against transgressors with the prospect of compensation for victims.

    However, I am not encouraged by the statement from the Ministry of Housing in relation to the CMA comments to date:

    “In the past two years, the Government has taken more action to stop unfair leasehold practices than ever before…”

    Having spent more than two years waiting for Government “…to stop unfair leasehold practices” ( “unfair” being primarily a euphemism for criminal practices), I am not encouraged by this latest bland statement.

    I await a strong and comprehensive CMA report, along with the final report (due in March) from the Law Commission, after which we must have immediate Government action to finally stop all “…unfair leasehold practices…” (as promised all those – how long has it been?- years ago).

  2. Lisa Wallace

    March 2, 2020 at 9:45 am

    I own an apartment in Salford, Ordsall Lane, with the doubling ground rent. I havent been able to sell the property for many years. I have had to deal with Landmark many times. They have now offered to vary my term to be based on RPI? i have no clue how this would work or whether it would make my apartment sellable? should i hold tight? can anyone suggest where i should get advice from?

    • Tony Ward

      March 3, 2020 at 12:34 pm

      Try contacting LKP they may be able to help https://www.leaseholdknowledge.com/contact/

  3. William Hodgson

    March 2, 2020 at 11:40 am

    Just when will this leasehold scam be brought to en end, it is just so unjust. We’ve had three years of political wrangling over Brexit yet no one seems to care about the millions in leasehold properties being held hostage by overseas investors. Scotland did it so I struggle to see why it is such a problem for England. I’m sick of living in a home which just doesn’t feel my own, I get depressed having to ask for permission to make improvements and then pay for that permission and the niggling thought at the back of my mind that any transgression could result in forfeiture of my home by someone I know nothing of. It’s sickening, just sickening and my heart goes out to those young people in flats caught in the cladding scandal. Is this really 2020 or am I in some parallel universe?

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Barry Passmore

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2025 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web