• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / News / Long Harbour rebukes Mark Hawthorn, of Landmark Investments, for ‘falling below professional standards’ over email on doubling ground rents

Long Harbour rebukes Mark Hawthorn, of Landmark Investments, for ‘falling below professional standards’ over email on doubling ground rents

February 18, 2020 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

The £1.8 billion residential freehold fund manager Long Harbour has rebuked Mark Hawthorn, of Landmark Investments, for an email that fell “below the professional standards upheld and expected by Long Harbour”.

In correspondence copied to Communities Secretary Robert Jenrick and to local MP and Labour leader contender Rebecca Long-Bailey, LKP raised the issue of two sisters, who are buy-to-let investors, being charged £30,000 to vary the doubling ground rent leases on their three properties.

Owner-occupiers, on the other hand, can vary their leases from doubling ground rents to ones aligned with RPI for free.

The sisters bought the flats in 2006 at The Quay in Ordsall Lane, Salford, which have 999-year leases and ground rents that double every ten years, starting at £75.

As a result, lenders won’t lend on the properties and the now £150 a year ground rents also exceed 0.1 per cent of each flat’s value, a further disqualification to most lenders.

Rebecca Long-Bailey asks Will Astor why Long Harbour is demanding £10,000 to vary toxic doubling ground rent leases

Guernsey-based Abacus Land 4, a residential freehold-owning entity of the Long Harbour ground rent fund, owns the headlease but Landmark Investments manages the asset and has been communicating with leaseholders.

As a result, LKP wrote to both Will Astor, CEO of Long Harbour, and Mr Hawthorn, asking why these charges applied as the freeholders’ government-backed “Pledge to Leaseholders” undertook to vary toxic doubling ground rent leases.

Both Long Harbour and Landmark Investments are signatories:

Public pledge for leaseholders

For existing leaseholders: 1. Identify leases within our portfolio which contain a clause whereby ground rent doubles more frequently than every 20 years, contact leaseholders to inform them, and offer to amend to one linked to RPI. 2.

LKP argued that the wider object was to remove these toxic leases from the property market so they are not dumped on someone else.

The Pledge includes these undertakings:

3. Assist any leaseholder who approaches us to request such a doubling clause be reviewed (or any other matter regarding their lease), even if they have not previously taken up an offer  of variation.

4. Should a leaseholder with such a doubling clause approach us, we will offer to amend the clause to one linked to RPI.

In an immediate and intemperate response to Sebastian O’Kelly, LKP’s chief executive, Mr Hawthorn accused LKP of spreading “lies and and misinformation”. He copied the reply to the Secretary of State, Miss Long-Bailey and LKP’s MP patrons Sir Peter Bottomley, Justin Madders and Sir Ed Davey,

He further referenced that one of the sisters was wealthy and “looking to leverage any means to gain a financial advantage”.

The other had “a criminal record in connection with the death of an elderly lady”. This was a traffic accident involving a cyclist in 2012.

“These are not the innocent consumers as you would have others believe,” Mr Hawthorn wrote.

LKP appealed to Long Harbour for a more considered response, without the need to reference extremely painful and unrelated issues.

It replied: “Thank you for bringing this case to our attention. The “unrelated matter” [the traffic accident and conviction] referred to in Mr Hawthorn’s email falls below the professional standards upheld and expected by Long Harbour.”

Long Harbour responded in further detail to Miss Long-Bailey, who before becoming an MP was a landlord and tenant solicitor:

“We remain fully committed to supporting leaseholders through the process of varying their lease if it contains a clause whereby the ground rent doubles more frequently than every 20 years (as set out in the leaseholders’ pledge).

“The cost of such variations will necessarily vary on a case by case basis and will take into account whether the leaseholder is a home owner or an investor themselves.

“As I am sure you will understand, it is important that we secure fair compensation for our pension fund investors but we remain committed to offering variations at a fair price in all cases (always significantly below what would be achieved through the statutory route) and, in particular, keeping the cost at nil for home owners.”

Long Harbour offered to discuss the matter further with Miss Long-Bailey.

The sisters have thanked Long Harbour for intervening, as they are no longer “comfortable” dealing with Mr Hawthorn.

But they argue that the investment flats “have hardly been stellar performers, owing in large part to the doubling ground rents” and as a result there was “not much cause to treat investor leaseholders and owner-occupiers differently”.

They expressed surprise at Long Harbour referencing “fair compensation for our pension fund investors” … “because the ultimate beneficial ownership of Abacus Land 4 Limited in Guernsey is hidden and no one other than yourselves know whether they are a pension fund or not”.

Furthermore, they added:

“It has been argued that a lease with ground rents revised every 10 years in line with RPI throughout the lease term of 999 years is actually a better investment prospect for the freehold owner than one doubling on five occasions only.

“Miss Long-Bailey, as a former landlord and tenant solicitor, may well be of the same mind.”

Related posts:

Tory MP Stephen McPartland shames Long Harbour / Adriatic Land into dropping doubling ground rent leases Default ThumbnailGleeson tells ground rent speculator Landmark Investments to remove testimonial Freehold for Elan Homes leasehold house doubles in price to £15,900 four months after being sold to Landmark Investments Rebecca Long-Bailey leaseholdRebecca Long-Bailey asks Will Astor why Long Harbour is demanding £10,000 to vary toxic doubling ground rent leases Press reports how freehold doubled in price to £15,900 after being sold to Landmark Investments

Category: Ground rent scandal, Latest News, NewsTag: Landmark Investments, Long Harbour, Mark Hawthorn, Mark Hawthornthwaite, Rebecca Long-Bailey MP

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (70) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (44) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (39) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (39) Grenfell cladding (55) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (64) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (47) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (200) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (42) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: «Paul Dennett Andy Burnham Northern mayors and MPs to join cladding demo outside Parliament on February 25
Next Post: Welsh government grapples with ‘fleecehold’ woes, issues call for evidence closing April 3 »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Pauline

    February 18, 2020 at 11:46 pm

    Setting aside how they can possibly be in a position to judge ability to pay and on the face of it, this looks like a weasely attempt to extract cash (apologies in advance for the insult to weasels) … if Long Harbour is looking for ‘fair compensation’ by calculating the cost of a lease variation on a case by case basis, based on a perceived ability to pay, rather than on an open market valuation, and see this as justifying a significant extra premium for leaseholders they judge to be ‘wealthy’ does this mean that leaseholders who can show they are not wealthy, e.g. with little or no savings, can expect a variation for a nominal fee? Or is that too fair?

    And whether or not we believe the assertion that they are seeking to maximise income for pension fund investors (for their own pension fund possibly given the lack of transparency?) I would suggest that pension funds should not be investing in ground rents – certainly those funds serving everyday folk are simply ‘robbing Peter to pay Paul’ and should get themselves out of this racket and invest elsewhere, ideally somwhere where they can add value by investing in areas that will create wealth, rather than drain it.

  2. Michael Epstein

    February 19, 2020 at 8:46 am

    So if the ultimate owners of Abacus Land (based in Guernsey) are unknown, not only would we not know if pension funds were investors, we would not know how many criminal acts the owners may have participated in? We would not know if funds are being laundered? We would not know if funds were supporting terrorist activity? I am not suggesting this is what is happening, simply that we have no way of knowing if we do not know the true identity of the freeholder? And remember, even the director of Landmark uses different names?

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web