• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / 71% of leasehold house buyers used developer recommended solicitors

71% of leasehold house buyers used developer recommended solicitors

April 21, 2017 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

The All Party Parliamentary Group on April is told that 71% of leasehold house byers used developer recommended solicitors

We estimate that 37,960 leasehold houses have been registered on the Land Registry since 2010.

It has hugely increased: 3,420 leasehold houses were registered in 2010; that became 8,775 in 2015. Figures for 2016 are still coming through. They are 8,230 to date, but we are only getting into December registrations now.

Since we began this campaign, persuading the Guardian to take it up – and I want to pay tribute to Patrick Collinson, the newspapers personal finance editor who spoke at our last APPG on December 14 – we have inviting leaseholders of houses and flats with onerous ground rent terms to fill out an online survey.

The results are hugely weighted towards the North West and Taylor Wimpey.

Taylor Wimpey because it came up with the extraordinary idea that doubling ground rents were a good idea at sites built between 2007 and 2011. The North West because of the activities of the women present here, who have formed a 3,000-strong Facebook group called the National Leasehold Campaign.

There are some interesting findings from our survey, which we will share, in confidence, with senior civil servants in the DCLG.

429 of these responses were house buyers and 263 of them were from Taylor Wimpey customers.

Of those 200 said they faced doubling ground rents and 169 faced ground rents rising with RPI.

The really interesting finding concerns the solicitors.

With highly ingenuous marketing, housebuilders have made the homebuying process something akin to an impulse buy at the end of a supermarket queue.

With a stroke of the pen, a consumer can sign up for solicitors, mortgage advisors, additional fixtures and fittings for a house.

The pressure to use the developer’s recommended solicitor in order to complete in time to qualify for Help To Buy and within a bogus deadline dreamed up by the sales team is considerable.

71% of respondents said they had used the solicitors recommended by the developers.

Bannister Preston, a legal chain in the North West, accounted for 45% of all the conveyancing at Taylor Wimpey sales.

All of these respondents replied no to the question: Did the solicitors indicate that the ground rent terms would affect the resale value of the property?

41% of Taylor Wimpey respondents said that they used the government’s Help To Buy scheme.

Related posts:

Bannister Preston and Cohen Filippini Solicitors ‘errors’ over ground rents, says BBC BBC R4 You and Yours exposes Taylor Wimpey buyers facing doubled ground rents to £500 before 10 years have passed Developer recommended solicitors could face £500m bill, says Daily Mail Taylor Wimpey CEO to meet MPs over ‘cancer’ of doubling ground rents (which were deterring astute buyers in 2007!) Taylor Wimpey recommended conveyancing solicitors go bust after one is jailed for stealing £280,000

Category: APPG April 19 2017, Ground rent scandal, Latest News, News, Parliament, Taylor WimpeyTag: Bannister Preston Solicitors, National Leasehold Campaign, Patrick Collinson, Taylor Wimpey

Sign up to the LKP newsletter

Fill in the link here

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (44) ARMA (91) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (33) CMA (46) Commonhold (56) Competition and Markets Authority (42) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (55) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (55) Israel Moskovitz (32) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (36) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (31) Justin Bates (41) Justin Madders MP (75) Katie Kendrick (40) Law Commission (61) LEASE (68) Leasehold Advisory Service (65) Leasehold houses (32) Liam Spender (39) Long Harbour (51) Lord Greenhalgh (32) Martin Boyd (87) McCarthy and Stone (43) National Leasehold Campaign (42) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Retirement (38) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (67) Sir Peter Bottomley (211) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (34) Vincent Tchenguiz (45) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « Why are leasehold house owners mobilising while flat owners suffer in silence?
Next Post: Adriatic Land now wants £54,000 for my freehold that Taylor Wimpey said would cost £6,000 »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Leaseholder

    April 22, 2017 at 9:37 pm

    A lot of people don’t have much contact with solicitors and we don’t get to ‘instruct’ them very often to act on our behalf, therefore we are just grateful when someone recommends a firm. I for one only ever ‘ instructed’ solicitors when I bought my little flat. I have never been in any sort of conflict with anyone, therefore not an equal battle with the freeholder. The freeholder has solicitors on tap.
    How am I supposed to compete with that? It’s the law that needs to change and be brought up to the 21st c… leaseholders should become homeowners rather than cows to be milked.

  2. Pro Bono

    April 26, 2017 at 3:03 pm

    It’s ironic that Bannister Preston are, like all the other firms involved in this fiasco, members of the so called `Conveyancing Quality Scheme’. This was set up by the Law Society to drive small, independent forms of solicitors out of conveyancing and direct house buyers towards the conveyancing factories, where the conveyancing can be dealt with by mostly unqualified `conveyancing executives’.

    As with all such stupid window-dressing schemes it’s a triumph of style over content. It doesn’t matter how poor the advice is, provided it’s delivered in a way that enables the solicitors to tick the right boxes.

    Accepting instructions via developers is one of the most glaring examples of a conflict of interest that it’s possible to envisage. What solicitor in one of these firms is going to warn a client not to proceed if it means that the lucrative stream of instructions from the developer will dry up immediately?

    The Law Society / SRA should explicitly forbid firms from accepting instructions via developers and make it a disciplinary offence to do so.

    But I’m not holding my breath.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Barry Passmore

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2025 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web