• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / News / Yet again! This time Adderstone told to stop loading sub-letting fees

Yet again! This time Adderstone told to stop loading sub-letting fees

May 10, 2013 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Dock Mill, Shipley: where – yet again – a freeholder has been trying it on with sub-letting fees
Dock Mill, Shipley: where – yet again – a freeholder has been trying it on with sub-letting fees

A Leasehold Valuation Tribunal has had to tell Adderstone, a freeholder, to stop loading sub-letting fees – in yet another ruling on this subject.

This time it is the Adderstone Group, based in Newcastle, but Estates and Management repeatedly does the same thing.

This is spite of a string of LVT rulings and a clear multiple ruling by the Land Tribunal that a reasonable fee for sub-letting – where there are not special terms and fees in a lease – should be £40 plus VAT.

The Land Tribunal ruling can be read here

The latest ruling (in fact, October 27 2012) involved two leaseholders at Dock Mill, in Shipley, West Yorkshire.

Adderstone attempted to charge £130.20, £104.16 and £78 respectively – which are at the low scale for freeholder try-ons over sub-letting fees.

The LVT was having none of it.

“The Tribunal determines that the Applicants require consent to sublet the Property and the fee for each consent is £40 plus VAT.

“The Tribunal further determines that each sublet of the Property by reason of an Assured Shorthold Tenancy does not require registration under the terms of the lease and consequently no fee is payable for such registration.”

The Adderstone Group was ordered to repay the money, was barred from claiming its costs for the proceedings – £270.48 – and ordered to re-pay to the applicants their application fee of £100.

Adderstone’s attempts to charge the leasehold residents for a couple of emails, a letter and the witness statement for the hearing were dismissed.

Why is the tribunal service having to deal with these ridiculous sub-letting try-ons when the Land Tribunal’s binding ruling is quite clear?

Why are ordinary homeowners or property investors, who have far better things to do, having to go to court repeatedly over this issue?

The full ruling can be read here: subletlvt

Related posts:

Sub-letting leasehold flats should be around £40, LVT rules quoting precedent Default ThumbnailSub-letting fees should not be more than £40, landlords are told (four times by the Land Tribunal) Default ThumbnailTroy Court £912 leasehold sub-letting fee cut by £400 thanks to LKP (with more to come?) Default ThumbnailOFT cuts deal with Tchenguiz on leasehold retirement sub-letting fees, but exit fees on sale still stand BBC told Charity Commission should stop dawdling over recognition of LKP

Category: News, SublettingTag: Adderstone, sub-letting

Sign up to the LKP newsletter

Fill in the link here

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (44) ARMA (91) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (33) CMA (46) Commonhold (55) Competition and Markets Authority (42) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (55) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (55) Israel Moskovitz (32) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (36) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (31) Justin Bates (41) Justin Madders MP (75) Katie Kendrick (40) Law Commission (61) LEASE (68) Leasehold Advisory Service (65) Leasehold houses (32) Liam Spender (39) Long Harbour (51) Lord Greenhalgh (32) Martin Boyd (87) McCarthy and Stone (43) National Leasehold Campaign (42) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Retirement (38) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (67) Sir Peter Bottomley (211) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (34) Vincent Tchenguiz (45) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « LKP managing agents can end your leasehold nightmare
Next Post: Feuding Chelsea leasehold owners find a court-appointed managing agent makes all decisions »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Lou Valdini

    May 11, 2013 at 12:42 pm

    Any rational person would think this ruling is definitive, yet Adderstone and their various ‘associated’ companies insist on continuing the same practice at different developments, clearly in the hope that most owners are not joined up in their actions against the landlord, and feel threatened enough to simply pay up and suffer.

    ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! It is a waste of everyone’s time and money.

    At our development at Ings Road, Wakefield, where Adderstone is the landlord, they have been playing these games for years, to the point where we have now taken away the management of the property from them. A small victory, but one which will save us money and give us some control.
    The latest response from Adderstone, UKGRE, Forte or whoever decides to respond, is that no subletting charges will be refunded because the property in question is different to Ings Road, with different leases. The problem for Adderstone is that owners at Ings Road appear to have a variety of leases, and then there is the question of the Housing Association tenants. I doubt they will play these games with their legal team!

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Barry Passmore

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2025 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web