• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / Latest News / Conveyancing Association’s Beth Rudolf attacks the HomeOwners Alliance for ‘scaremongering’ over leasehold

Conveyancing Association’s Beth Rudolf attacks the HomeOwners Alliance for ‘scaremongering’ over leasehold

April 8, 2017 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

… after inviting ‘sympathy’ for solicitors who landed leasehold house buyers with onerous lease terms

Beth Rudolf, of the Conveyancing Association, and Paula Higgins, of the HomeOwners’ Alliance, disagree about whether leasehold can be described as ‘home-ownership’. Because Miss Higgins says it isn’t, Miss Rudolf has called Miss Higgins’ report ‘scaremongering’

Beth Rudolf, the spokesman for the Conveyancing Association, has launched an astonishing attack on the HomeOwners’ Alliance for “scaremongering” over leasehold.

The two organisations, which have co-operated in the past – along with LKP – have fallen out over the Alliance’s report published this week.

The report has received significant media coverage and is an elegant resume of grievances that will be familiar to LKP readers. Here is Patrick Collinson in the Guardian

Furthermore, it has come out in the same week when ministers have pledged to ban leasehold houses and onerous “feudal” ground rents. The Council of Mortgage Lenders has also expressed concerns as lenders decline loans on properties with onerous lease terms.

Ground rent scandal risks becoming full-blown crisis as loans are refused on blighted homes

So the report could be said more to reflect mainstream thinking than would have been the case a couple of weeks’ ago.

But Miss Rudolf, a former estate agent, has rounded on the HomeOwners’ Alliance, founded by former DCLG civil servant Paula Higgins, over whether a leasehold tenancy can be described as home “ownership”.

It is an old wrangle, much debated, that goes to the heart of leasehold.

The proposition that a long lease amounts to homeownership is strongly favoured by developers, estate agents, commercialisers in the sector and, one must assume, members of the Conveyancing Association. Or, perhaps, simply Miss Rudolf herself.

The law is rather more precise, however, referring to leaseholders as “tenants” in every document that regulates the rights and obligations of leasehold owners.

If the law uses the word “tenant” and “tenancy”, there is no good reason for anyone to use a different term to describe this form of tenure. There may, however, be plenty of bad reasons to do so.

“When is your home not really your home?” asked Miss Higgins in the opening sentence of her report, and answers: “When it is owned by the freeholder.

“We see first-hand how the leasehold system too often turns the dream of homeownership into a nightmare.”

Miss Rudolf disagreed, telling the estate-agents funded Property Industry Eye website. “While we congratulate the HomeOwners Alliance on its leasehold report, we would not want to see unnecessary concern amongst leaseholders that they do not own their property in ‘the eyes of the law’ as the report suggests.

“This is clearly not correct and leaseholders should know they have complete security so long as they comply with the terms of the lease.

“We are concerned that the implication that leaseholders are not legal owners could be considered scaremongering, which we do not support in any way.”

It is unfortunate to see the Conveyancing Association disparage this report, which is a very welcome contribution to the debate on leasehold. LKP wholeheartedly congratulates Miss Higgins for producing it.

Its recommendations are broadly welcome to LKP:

  • Scale back leasehold
  • Review “the whole leasehold system” (not sure what that means)
  • Outlaw new leasehold houses (Sajid Javid is with the Alliance on this one)
  • Outlaw doubling ground rents (ditto, and add in mortgage lenders, too)
  • Mandatory commonhold
  • Lease extensions to be 250 years
  • Standard lease terms
  • ‘Faster and fairer’ to sell leasehold properties (the Conveyancing Association probably agrees with this)
  • Easier for leaseholders to contact their freeholder (hopefully with reverse charges, if they are in the British Virgin Islands)

The Conveyancing Association has made a useful contribution over issues concerning the frustrations and delays in leasehold conveyancing.

Leasehold sales are bedevilled with ‘extortionate’ charges and game-playing, says the Conveyancing Association

But it has made unfortunate interventions when it has considered wider leasehold issues.

Miss Rudolf’s contribution to the Victoria Derbyshire Show, broadcast by BBC TV on February 2, was greeted with hoots of derision after she invited viewers to sympathise with the conveyancing solicitors who had landed leasehold house buyers with onerous ground rent terms.

Some of the criticisms shared with LKP have come from other members of the legal profession.

Miss Rudolf was invited by BBC reporter James Longman to look at the Bellway lease of Katie Kendrick, one of the founders of the National Leasehold Campaign Facebook group.

“It looks like she has had the right advice from the conveyancer,” Miss Rudolf announced.

“But it would appear that the conveyancer was unaware of the intentions of Bellway to sell on the freehold.

“And you have got to have sympathy for the solicitor or any conveyancer in this position because this is a new phenomenon. It is not something that would happen in the past that developers would routinely be looking to sell on the freehold.”

In fact, developers routinely sell off their freeholds and have done so for decades. It would be extraordinary for a conveyancing solicitor to assume a developer would retain the freehold of a leasehold house.

Mr Longman then asked: “She [Katie Kendrick] came into the showroom and the sales team sort of said to her that this is as good as freehold but it quite clearly isn’t. Isn’t there an obligation on the part of the solicitor on the part of the developer and also the solicitor who the developer recommended to tell her these things?”

Miss Rudolf replied: “Anybody marketing a property is covered by the consumer protection from unfair trading regulations. Which means that if there is something that would impact their decision-making process then they should be advised of that before they view the property.

“This is a really important point. The reason being that it is too late at the point that they have moved into the house to find this out. They need to know before they have viewed the property; before they have thought about where they are going to put their sofa and how the kids are going to get to school and all of that.”

The question here is: if that conveyancing advice from developer-recommended solicitors was so independent and useful, why are other solicitors advising potential buyers of these properties now not to touch them?

And why are litigation solicitors now queuing up to sue the firms concerned?

 

HOA report here: MAR-88 Leasehold Report_FINAL (1)

Related posts:

Conveyancing Association’s ‘Dirty Dozen’ questions buyers of leasehold need to ask 98% of rip-off lease sales broke consumer protection rules, says Conveyancing Association Conveyancing Association snubbed over bid to make freeholders join a redress scheme Leasehold needs to stop being a means to produce ‘ever-increasing profits’, says Conveyancing Association Leasehold sales are bedevilled with ‘extortionate’ charges and game-playing, says the Conveyancing Association

Category: Conveyancing Association, Ground rent scandal, Latest News, NewsTag: Beth Rudolf, Conveyancing Association, HomeOwners Alliance, Patrick Collinson, Paula Higgins, The Guardian

Sign up to the LKP newsletter

Fill in the link here

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (44) ARMA (91) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (33) CMA (46) Commonhold (56) Competition and Markets Authority (42) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (55) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (55) Israel Moskovitz (32) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (36) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (31) Justin Bates (41) Justin Madders MP (75) Katie Kendrick (40) Law Commission (61) LEASE (68) Leasehold Advisory Service (65) Leasehold houses (32) Liam Spender (39) Long Harbour (51) Lord Greenhalgh (32) Martin Boyd (87) McCarthy and Stone (43) National Leasehold Campaign (42) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Retirement (38) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (67) Sir Peter Bottomley (211) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (34) Vincent Tchenguiz (45) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « Ground rent scandal risks becoming full-blown crisis as loans are refused on blighted homes
Next Post: The Sun demands end to ground-rent rip-offs »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Michael Epstein

    April 8, 2017 at 7:43 pm

    Dear Beth Rudolph, Conveyancing Association,

    I agree with you and the Conveyancing Association when you say “We would not want to see unnecessary concern amongst leaseholders that they do not own their property in the “eyes of the law”

    That is why the campaigning sites and media have gone out of their way to only expose the NECESSARY concern amongst leaseholders that they do not own their property in the “eyes of the law”

    As a legal executive and having great experience in conveyancing, could you advise me as to the legal status of “eyes of the law?”

  2. Lesley Newnham

    April 8, 2017 at 9:55 pm

    Well done Paula Higgins for the best report I have read to date on the TRUE nature of leasehold tenure!!! ( excluding anything reported by LKP of course!)

  3. Karen

    April 9, 2017 at 2:47 pm

    The only reason, in my opinion, that Beth Rudolph has got involved In this discussion is because she is concerned she will be spending a lot of her time ‘protecting’ those who have blatantly turned a blind eye to this or they are just inept at their job!

    Would she allow her relative/dependants to purchase a leasehold property? I bet the answer is no.

    Either way, the LCA will end up having to sort this mess out for their members, very time consuming!

    So maybe that is the real reason for her comment!

    • Michael Hollands

      April 9, 2017 at 7:55 pm

      Her approach is only to be expected. It is a trade organisation whose first priority is to protect its members.
      We see exactly the same with ARMA and ARHM protecting their management companies and the IRPM protecting their individual managers who work for these companies The RICS are keeping quiet, but the Chartered Institute of Building ( bless them ) have spoken out.
      The big question is, will the Government act for the Leaseholders, which no doubt would stir things up amongst some of their wealthy sponsors.

  4. B

    April 11, 2017 at 9:41 am

    All Leaseholders need better protection. I still say that Lawyers today are not taught Law. The most expensive asset an individual can either own, buy and /or inherit is land or property. The problems arise when one looks at legislation that has lumped together both Leaseholders & Tenants in to the same category Yrs ago Leaseholders were instantly recognisable .for being ‘Tenants in Equity’. Lord Denning made it abundantly clear that Lessees own the Equity in the building ; being able to procure a Mortgage, whereas the Lessor owns the Equity in the land ; the Ground Rent. GR is the bone of contention here as to how it has become a licence to print. Beth needs to push the ownership point home. How about assigning all alleged Conveyancing legals today a historical test as to Leasehold & lets see who sinks or swims. The Lease wording is where the knowledge is severely lacking today as to explaining the actual various definitions.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Barry Passmore

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2025 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web