• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / News / ‘Fleecehold’ estate management contracts are the latest fiddle from taxpayer-subsidised house builders

‘Fleecehold’ estate management contracts are the latest fiddle from taxpayer-subsidised house builders

January 23, 2019 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Inflated “fleecehold” private estate management contracts came under scrutiny yesterday in the Commons yesterday, as exasperated MPs yet again waded-in to our tax-payer subsidised house builders.

The debate was called by Helen Goodman, Labour MP for Bishop Aukland, (above) who described the proliferation of private estate income streams as “a scandal. There has clearly been mis-selling.”

‘https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2019-01-22/debates/69D31E91-49DD-4DF4-B638-4620B5314D15/FreeholdEstateFees

She thanked Cathy Priestley and Halima Ali of the Homeowners Rights Network—HorNet—campaign group

HorNet – NO to fleecehold! | Campaigning for a fair deal for all home owners on privately managed estates

Helen Goodman MP has organised a Westminster Hall debate on estate charges. It is on Tuesday 22nd January at 4.30pm. It is not too late to email your MP to ask if they could support this initiative to put pressure on the housing minister to act and address the problems we are facing.

She asked:

“If offered the choice between a leasehold property and a freehold property, most prospective homebuyers would opt for freehold. Who would not want the permanent and absolute tenure of their property, with all the freedom and security that promises?

“However, the large property developers—Barratt, Bellway, Persimmon and Taylor Wimpey—sell properties that are not free from hold but come with financial obligations and restrictive covenants administered by property management companies such as Greenbelt, Gateway, FirstPort and Trinity Estates, which take ownership of communal spaces once the developer has moved off the site.”

Fury as new home owners hit by unexpected annual bills to cut the grass

Owners of newly-built homes are being stung for unexpected annual fees of hundreds of pounds which they weren’t told about during the sale, MPs have warned. The proud owners of new homes have been shocked to discover they are liable to pay for the maintenance of nearby playgrounds, car parks or grass verges, on top of their council tax.


Justin Madders, Labour MP for Ellesmere Port and Neston, who has been a leading figure in the leasehold campaign, said:

“What is wrong with just building and selling family homes?

“Why are buyers being subjected to covert efforts to squirrel in extra income? Is the sector so avaricious that it has to squeeze every last penny out of young families who have to scrimp and save just to get on the housing ladder?

“As with ground rent, consent fees and leaseholds, our plc house builders have had £8 billion of help through the Help to Buy scheme.

“They have trousered that assistance to rip off customers in their own schemes. Developers simply cannot be trusted to play fair with their customers, or with us, as wider taxpayers.”

Mr Madders also referenced “reliance on a small group of developers has been a very poor deal for the taxpayer, and was the backdrop against which the leasehold scandal emerged”.

He added: “It cannot be right that the companies that are guilty of the industrial-scale rip-offs that we have heard about regarding both leaseholds and the issue being discussed today are the same ones that we end up relying on to get out of our very real and damaging housing crisis.”

Mark Tami MP also waded into the fleecehold dispute:

Related posts:

Labour MP Helen Goodman fights ‘fleecehold’ rip-offs with Private Members’ Bill ‘Fleecehold’ petition launched to stop housebuilders creating YET ANOTHER revenue stream from their customers Brokenshire to meet house builders and freehold investors … but no leaseholders First squawk from the (smaller) house builders Will CMA investigation at last give cheated leaseholders the chance to sue plc house builders?

Category: Fleecehold, Justin Madders MP, Latest News, News, ParliamentTag: Fleecehold, Helen Goodman MP, HorNet, Justin Madders MP

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (45) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (41) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (42) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (67) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (201) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (43) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « Furious attack on government Grenfell cladding inaction in Commons
Next Post: Theresa May also thinks that ‘building owners’ – freeholders – will pay for Grenfell cladding »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. chas Willis

    January 24, 2019 at 6:02 pm

    Fleecehold Estate Management Contracts -the latest fiddle from Taxpayer-Subsidised House Builders – Has this been Happening for circa – 20 Years?

    18/07/2018
    A Freeholder recently posted on ABOUT FIRSTPORT they had issued Court Proceedings against Firstport and were waiting for Court Directions.
    In the mean time they received an aggressive letter from an In-House Solicitor at FirstPort Property Services Ltd.

    FirstPort had been informed of the claim some 18 months previously and had ignored every type of correspondence for nearly 2 years. The Freeholder was now aware that receiving an aggressive letter from FirstPorts Solicitor was par for the course. FirstPort has deemed some of the claims being over 6 years are not refundable citing the limitation act 1980. Limitation period under a deed is 12 years and the Freeholder managed to get 12 years of the Estate Management Fee overcharge.

    A Freeholder of 18 years living on a 200 home estate split 50/50 Lease & Freehold. FirstPort Property Services Ltd (Lead Legal Consultant) wrote saying:
    Despite pointing out clear deficiencies in the claim made, we note your reluctance to enter into any form of settlement negotiations.

    Purely on a commercial basis and without admitting any guilt FirstPort were prepared to settle the claim, in full and final settlement, that they paid the full claim covering 12 years of the 18 years of £733.32.

    FirstPort also demanded the Freeholder Terminate the Claim in the Courts, by filing a Notice of Discontinuance which basically means they didn’t have a Claim in the first place?

    This could be a problem if this Discontinuance Notice is filed because FirstPort could then claim their costs which would be more than the settlement, Be Aware!

    • Michael Epstein

      January 25, 2019 at 7:41 pm

      When negotiating a settlement (usually at the very last moment) Firstport or their representatives often J.B. Leitch will ask a claimant to sign a Discontinuance Notice “purely for administrative purposes”. As Chas so eloquently wrote, never ever do this under any circumstances.
      By doing so, you leave yourself liable to costs, which cannot be challenged.
      This is because you will have withdrawn the claim, which is a technical admission that your claim has failed . for any claimed costs the court will only consider who withdrew the claim, not the result.
      So if you are asked to sign a Discontinuance Notice you must refuse stating that this matter can be settled without me signing this. It is Firstport that must withdraw their claim, meaning you can now recover your costs.
      If no progress is made simply turn up at the court and show the judge that an agreement has been reached save to the signing of the Discontinuance Notice.

  2. Chris

    January 25, 2019 at 3:31 pm

    A stellar write up as normal Chas! Keep up the good work.

    • chas Willis

      January 25, 2019 at 5:22 pm

      Chris thanks mate – I believe we need to highlight that Managing Agents such as FirstPort Property Services LTD or OM Management Services Ltd have been getting away with charging for items that were not included and:-

      Outside the Terms of a Transfer Deed when a Builder such as Barratt Homes Ltd (3018173) completed a Development and where the Local Authority had relinquished the right to the Adoption of the Common Areas. (Taken from HM Land Registry) 1999.

      An email I received from the Freeholder went on to say the following:-

      It should be a perfect way to send a message on behalf of all Leaseholders highlighting the way a simple Statute of 1705 can be misused by Developers which has caused a variety of subsequent problems. A real concern is Central & Local Governments refusals to accept there are real problems for all Leaseholders, let alone that deception may have been involved.

      A new phenomenon based on what Lawyers/Solicitors believe their clients can get away with in a Post Truth Age. The shift in opinion is derived by Landlord Led Wishful Thinking and has become commonplace and accepted by Housing Ministers and others in Authority.

      It serves Government Cost-Cutting as well as Developers and Landlords., where the underlying mechanics may have a serious criminal logic fault in how business has been carried out. The Common Practice of relying on the 1705 Statute (s. 142 of the LPA 1925) to transfer a Freehold without the Tenants Consent and the obligations Assigned needs overhauling.

      It would be a considerable Public Service if LKP and other similar Websites would lend Moral Support towards bringing a prosecution where repeated deception is recorded, as could be with further postings, relating to the Estate Management of Developments where the four largest companies mentioned in the original posting.

      • chas Willis

        January 25, 2019 at 6:46 pm

        Further to my last posting The Freeholders are subject to the following Clauses in the Transfer Document.

        THS SIXTH SCHEDULE (Managers Covenants)
        1. To carry out the works and do the acts and things set out in the SEVENTH SCHEDULE as appropriate to each type of Dwelling PROVIDED THAT:

        AND
        SEVENTH SCHEDULE (Communal Areas and Facilities Costs)
        Keeping the gardens and all other soft landscaped areas of the Communal Areas and Facilities generally in a neat and tidy condition

        What happens is charges outside an Agreement, can be added which are in no way connected or related in anyway to Soft Landscaped – Parts of any Communal Areas.

        Expenses Type Charged, Not Applicable, can be:-

        General Repairs
        Landscape Costs
        Fire Equipment
        Health & Safety
        Insurance
        Pest Control
        TV Areal
        Monitoring Costs
        Refuse Bins

        All the above have been found charged to Freeholders under Estate Management Fees.

        Information was extracted from FirstPorts Annual Statement. 2016.

        From 2001 – 2005 inclusive – the costs reflected the works required and averaged £350 per year, divided by the 202 Freeholders.

        Then in 2006 the costs escalated by c450% to £2,020 – in 2016 had risen to £3,574. The total Over Charged was £25,294.00. The total amount claimed by one Freeholder was £663.32.

        If all 202 Freeholders had overpaid then this would amount to £133,990.64 before individual Court Fees of £14,140.00 making the total £148,130.32, from one single development???

        Latest information received – further Freeholders are making similar claims, against FirstPort, who continue to, as in 2016, denying any claims made, as happened to my friend the Freeholder mentioned.

        Sebastian has my details.

  3. Mrs C

    January 30, 2019 at 2:13 pm

    I am a freeholder in the process of a court case on similar grounds. Any support is hugely appreciated.

    • chas Willis

      January 30, 2019 at 4:00 pm

      Mrs C ask admin for contact or check out About Firstport or About Peverel and there Admin will contact me so we can help.

      There are thousands of House Holders in the same position as the Estate Management Scams are now being highlighted the process differs as companies who loose the case change their procedures which usually begins with ignoring the first contacts then replies and says they will look into any claim then ignores so another period goes by and this continues for the first year, unless you post different.

  4. Dan

    February 8, 2019 at 9:13 am

    Whilst I certainly agree that management companies are ripping people off as they please with estate charges pretty much completely unfettered by current legislation, is the problem not that local authorities are unwilling to adopt communal facilities, even estate roads any more?

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web