The government was under attack in the Commons today over its inactivity over Grenfell cladding in private blocks of flats.
John Healey, Labour shadow housing secretary, made a powerful attack on Housing minister Kit Malthouse, asking “if the government cannot deal with this, what is it in office for?”
Mr Malthouse said, “as a result of our interventions” there are commitments from owners [MEANING: the freeholders] of 268 privately owned buildings, 212 of whom have either started works, completed them or have commitments in place to remediate. There remain 42 for which the owner’s plans are unclear.
Sir Peter Bottomley urged leaseholders to be involved in government consultations over the issue. LKP was the first organisation that assembled the affected leaseholders to talk to government via the APPG.
APPG hears agony of Grenfell cladding on private sites, while Lendlease sites head to tribunal to get leaseholders to pay
Tower Blocks: Dangerous Cladding – Hansard
Hansard (the Official Report) is the edited verbatim report of proceedings of both the House of Commons and the House of Lords. Daily Debates from Hansard are published on this website the next working day.
John Healey said: “It should be a cause for national shame that, over 19 months after the Grenfell Tower fire, I am having to drag Ministers to the House because there are still buildings in this country cloaked in Grenfell-style cladding and residents who do not know whether their homes are safe.”
Jim Fitzpatrick, LKP patron MP, raised the case of New Providence Wharf in his Poplar and Limehouse constituency, which is owned by Dublin developer Ballymore.
“He [the minister] repeatedly says that there are measures under active consideration to get these owners to comply. When will we actually see what these measures are?”
Robert Neill, Conservative MP for Bromley and Chislehurst, raised the issue of Northpoint in his constituency, where 57 leaseholders face bills of £4 million to remove cladding.
Mr Neill referenced the Tchenguiz Family Trust, the freeholder of Northpoint, declining to pay up to remove the cladding. It receives £7,000 a year in ground rent from the leaseholders, who have a right to manage company in place.
“Assertive measures are urgent for my constituents at Northpoint in Bromley, one of the 42 buildings where the owner—in this case Citistead, an offshoot of the Tchenguiz family trust—refuses to meet its obligations and insists that it will use a term in the lease to pass on the costs to the flat owners regardless. The Government need to introduce a legally foolproof mechanism to override those provisions and prevent my constituents and others from being forced to pick up the tab. Words are not enough.”
Again, Mr Malthouse repeated that leaseholders should not pay.
There were repeated references to “building owners”, meaning the freeholders. In fact, they only own the legally enforceable income streams and are most definitely not the long term custodians of a building.
Clive Betts, Labour MP for Sheffield South East and chair of the Communities Select Committee, was concerned that the government does not dump the costs on local authorities, but pay for it itself.
He also appeared well aware that government threats to make freeholders pay for this were bogus:
“When building owners will not act and the local authority acts instead, it may incur costs that it can try to recover from building owners. Can we have an absolute guarantee from the Minister that when local authorities find it impossible to do so, the Government will find that money so that it will not have to be found from hard-pressed local authority budgets?”
Karen Buck, Labour MP for Westminster North, also referenced “no legal status whatsoever” for forcing freeholders to pay up.
Lucy Powell, Labour MP for Manchester Central, raised the issue of anger in Manchester, where leaseholders in cladding blighted homes cannot sell up or move on with their lives.
She raised the Mirror article about testing at the X1 Eastlands block in Manchester.
Families living in tower covered with cladding which failed tests
Residents in X1 Eastlands block in Manchester were not told for weeks that one panel lasted only 10 minutes before being engulfed in flames during testing The failed test came just two months before the Grenfell disaster, with the bosses that built the tower block accused or covering up the results The construction firm involved, called Forrest, went into administration without showing the buildings owners the information Hundreds of families are living in a tower block covered in Grenfell-style cladding which failed a safety test.
Grenfell-style cladding branded a ‘national shame’ as Mirror reveals ‘cover-up’
The state of tower block cladding 19 months after the Grenfell Tower fire has been branded a “cause for national shame” after the Mirror revealed a “cover-up”. Ministers were blasted in the House of Commons today after we obtained footage of a panel failing a fire test that was meant to last an hour after 10 minutes.
‘Cover up’ over Grenfell-style cladding that burns at 600C in just 10 minutes
Hundreds of residents are living at a tower block covered in cladding similar to that in the Grenfell disaster. One panel failed a fire test in Dubai which should have lasted at least an hour after just 10 minutes.
‘Grenfell two’ on the way as new tower block with danger cladding revealed
Government ministers were warned “Grenfell two is in the post” after the Mirror revealed a tower block in Manchester is covered in combustible cladding. Labour ‘s Emma Dent Coad, the local MP to Grenfell Tower, made the warning after the Mirror found the X1 Eastbank block failed a fire-spread test after just 10 minutes.
Dr Matthew Offord, Conservative MP for Hendon, raised the case of Premier House in Edgware, where “my constituents have already paid out thousands of pounds to their freeholder, a small independent developer”.
“Although they are grateful for the Minister’s support, the leaseholders want legal clarity and certainty that they will not be forced to pay any additional moneys.”
Dame Louise Ellman, Labour MP for Liverpool Riverside, said:
“I have previously raised in the Chamber the situation of my constituents in Heysmoor Heights in Liverpool. They live in a high-rise property owned by the offshore company Abacus Land 4. My constituents have already paid for replacement cladding. The situation in relation to insurance cover is completely confused: constituents were told that it was covered, but are now told that it is not. In view of the Minister’s commitment that private owners should not pass on the cost of replacement cladding to leaseholders, will he intervene in the case of Heysmoor Heights?”
When this government can’t function and act on preserving the sanctity of human life. What are they for?
What Mr Malthouse also needs to be called out on is when he says the govt has taken steps to ensure that people are safe in their homes when they go to bed tonight. This is incorrect.
We innocent leaseholders are PAYING to make sure we are safe when we go to bed tonight. Leaseholders at Northpoint paid over £220,000 in waking watch costs in 2018 for the “privilege” of going to bed safe. We face a similar bill this year, just for waking watch costs, and possibly for many more years to come.
We leaseholders are being financially ruined to make sure we go to bed safe tonight.
Why does Mr Malthouse not mention this debilitating cost at all – especially the fact that it is leaseholders who are being forced to pay for it?
Waking watch costs in England….Similar to reported payments by law abiding citizens to security guards for home protection living in a country with drug cartels and terrorism .. How can one sleep at night with all these added costs by unregulated merciless companies