• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / News / Competition and Markets Authority / OFT / Fury as OFT may give Peverel immunity over Cirrus price-fixing scandal

Fury as OFT may give Peverel immunity over Cirrus price-fixing scandal

July 9, 2013 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

Pricefixingscandal

UPDATE July 10 2013: LKP / Campaign against retirement leasehold exploitation received this email from the Office of Fair Trading this afternoon, shortly after a meeting with Sir Peter Bottomley at which this scandal was discussed:

I am the team leader for the OFT’s investigation into certain access control and alarm systems companies, with respect to which the OFT issued a Statement of Objections on 5 July 2013.
I understand that you have approach Peverel to ask when Peverel first reported the matter to the OFT. I can confirm that Peverel reported this matter to the OFT in December 2009, prior to any complaint being received by the OFT. 
I trust that the above answers your query. 
Kind regards,
Yael Shine

Three leasehold activists who reported Peverel for price-fixing over Cirrus door-entry systems by running bogus tendering processes feel betrayed by the Office of Fair Trading, which reported on the scandal on Friday.

The OFT claims that Cirrus Communication Systems “engaged variously in a number of collusive tendering arrangements”.

Between 2005 and 2009, residents were duped into thinking a proper tendering process had taken place whereas in fact Peverel handed the contracts to its subsidiary Cirrus, the OFT says.

Three other smaller companies, two of whom have now gone out of business, acted as stooges and provided their own quotes to provide alarm and door entry systems, the OFT alleges.

One of them was routinely 15 per cent higher than Cirrus. But the tendering process was a sham, the OFT claims.

The matter was raised with the OFT in January 2010 by Campaign against retirement leasehold exploitation activists Susan Wood, Ken Kilmister and another long-standing supporter of the Campaign Against Retirement Leasehold Exploitation, who chooses not to be named.

A string of emails confirms their long-standing dealings with the OFT. Last week the three were even asked whether they were willing to be named in the full OFT “statement of objections”.

They replied that they were, and also wanted to be identified as Campaign against retirement leasehold exploitation activists.

The OFT, however, is dealing with the matter as though Peverel itself reported the alleged fiddle.

 “The matter was brought to the OFT’s attention by one of Cirrus’ then parent companies, Peverel Group Limited,” reads the OFT press statement.

 “Under the OFT’s leniency policy when a company is the first to report its participation in cartel conduct it may qualify for immunity from penalties. Provided it continues to cooperate, Cirrus will be immune from any penalty imposed in this case.”

A Peverel spokesman claims the company reported the matter to the OFT “prior to the change of ownership”.

The Campaign against retirement leasehold exploitation activists had several meetings with the OFT over the past three years and were legally represented. Their lawyer is now demanding an explanation why the OFT is claiming that Peverel turned itself in.

“As far as we are concerned, Peverel was simply co-operating with inquiries that we began,” said a spokesman for the three.

Leaving aside the penalties Peverel faces, the OFT is still accusing the largest property management company in the country – and one with an overwhelming presence in retirement leasehold – of signing up its own subsidiary which, the OFT says, was cheating residents through a bogus tendering process.

If money has been paid wrongly then civil courts are unlikely to be persuaded by a “leniency policy” of the OFT.

This is the second occasion that the OFT has ducked out of confrontation with the troubled retirement leasehold sector.

Last summer it offered the opinion that exit fees were wrong, but came up with a deal with the Tchenguiz Family Trust freehold companies.

Anyone who has paid exit fees, must fight it out themselves in court (Campaign against retirement leasehold exploitation recommends small claims court action and can assist with this).

Now we have the claim that Peverel turned itself in after the tendering process was fiddled in favour of Cirrus, and should benefit from the OFT’s “leniency policy”.

Meanwhile, the retirement leasehold sector is virtually static and confidence in it has drained away. This is highly damaging to the wider housing market.

The price-fixing allegations concern Peverel before its takeover by its current owners.

Owens Installations Limited has admitted its involvement in a collusive tendering arrangement with Cirrus and entered into a settlement agreement with the OFT in February 2013.

 The four companies named by the OFT are:

Peter O’Rourke Electrical based in York went into liquidation in June 2012.

Glyn Jackson Communications based in Leeds went into liquidation in September 2012.

Owen Installations based in Dorchester is still operating and shown in Duedil as having an estimated turnover for the year ending Feb 2013 of £129.643. Directors Jeremy David Owens and Joanne Owens.

Peverel Building Technologies (previous name Cirrus Business Technologies Limited and Cirrus Building Technologies Limited) of which Careline UK Monitoring and Cirrus Communications are subsidiaries, had a turnover of  £19,836,753.00 for the last published accounts ending December 2011

Link  to Peverel statement:

Related posts:

Default ThumbnailCampaign against Residential Leasehold Exploitation meets lawyers over Peverel price-fixing scandal The Oldie reports Peverel / Cirrus price-fixing scandal OFT will report on the Peverel / Cirrus price-fixing scandal on Friday Peverel Cirrus price-fixing stooge says sorry … Guardian examines the Peverel / Cirrus price-fixing scandal tomorrow

Category: Competition and Markets Authority / OFT, FirstPort, NewsTag: Cirrus, Glyn Jackson Communications, Ken Kilmister, OFT, Owen Installations, Peter O’Rourke Electrical, Peverel, Susan Wood

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (45) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (41) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (43) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (67) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Liam Spender (31) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (201) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (32) Vincent Tchenguiz (43) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « Tchenguiz gets a reprieve from Lloyds Bank
Next Post: Bottomley: ‘possible criminal behaviour involving Peverel’ over tendering scams »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Paul

    July 10, 2013 at 8:39 am

    There are some pretty outrageous things going on in leasehold in England and Wales, this bad practice needs to be stopped as leaseholders already have zero confidence in a very dodgy system, this will just add more alarm to leaseholders.

    • LHA

      July 12, 2013 at 10:05 am

      “alarm” – no pun intended ? 🙂 No matter what the system Paul, be it commonhold, Scottish factoring or the numerous strata title or condo laws in other countries, the fact is that those in control ( even elected residents groups) have the scope for abuses like this. In some ways the tribunal system and the law, imperfect as it is, is far better than you think, as it requires consultation and provides independant review. This is not the case in our commonhold and in many cases abroad, the residents board is “God” and an owner has far less rights, often needing the active support of a majority to affect the outcome.

      • Paul

        July 15, 2013 at 4:10 am

        I note when the Scottish Parliament was set up, they looked into keeping leasehold, however, when they realised that the system was feudal ie leaseholders were the surfs, and freeholders were the knights equivalent they ditched this 800-year-old feudalistic system.

        The case of the freeholder developing on top of leaseholders flats is not unusual, plus renting the roof out to mobile phone companies when the roof was not designed for that purpose, I have seen a new extension built where the leaseholder down stairs can no longer open her window fully don’t think there is any start and stop to how a leasehold site can be changed. Anything goes!

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web