• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
Donate

Leasehold Knowledge Management Logo

Secretariat of the All Party Parliamentary Group on leasehold reform

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • What is LKP
  • Find everything …
  • Contact
  • Advice
  • News
    • Find everything …
    • About Peverel group
    • APPG
    • ARMA
    • Bellway
    • Benjamin Mire
    • Brixton Hill Court
    • Canary Riverside
    • Charter Quay
    • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
    • Cladding scandal
    • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
    • Commonhold
    • Communities Select Committee
    • Conveyancing Association
    • Countrywide
    • MHCLG
    • E&J Capital Partners
    • Exit fees
    • FirstPort
    • Fleecehold
    • Forfeiture
    • FPRA
    • Gleeson Homes
    • Ground rent scandal
    • Hanover
    • House managers flat
    • House of Lords
    • Housing associations
    • Informal lease extension
    • Insurance
    • IRPM
    • JB Leitch
    • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
    • John Christodoulou
    • Justin Bates
    • Justin Madders MP
    • Law Commission
    • LEASE
    • Liam Spender
    • Local authority leasehold
    • London Assembly
    • Louie Burns
    • Martin Paine
    • McCarthy and Stone
    • Moskovitz / Gurvits
    • Mulberry Mews
    • National Leasehold Campaign
    • Oakland Court
    • Park Homes
    • Parliament
    • Persimmon
    • Peverel
    • Philip Rainey QC
    • Plantation Wharf
    • Press
    • Property tribunal
    • Prostitutes
    • Quadrangle House
    • Redrow
    • Retirement
    • Richard Davidoff
    • RICS
    • Right To Manage Federation
    • Roger Southam
    • Rooftop development
    • RTM
    • Sean Powell
    • SFO
    • Shared ownership
    • Sinclair Gardens Investments
    • Sir Ed Davey
    • Sir Peter Bottomley
    • St George’s Wharf
    • Subletting
    • Taylor Wimpey
    • Tchenguiz
    • Warwick Estates
    • West India Quay
    • William Waldorf Astor
    • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
  • [Custom]
Menu
  • Advice
  • News
      • Find everything …
      • About Peverel group
      • APPG
      • ARMA
      • Bellway
      • Benjamin Mire
      • Brixton Hill Court
      • Canary Riverside
      • Charter Quay
      • Chelsea Bridge Wharf
      • Cladding scandal
      • Competition and Markets Authority / OFT
      • Commonhold
      • Communities Select Committee
      • Conveyancing Association
      • Countrywide
      • MHCLG
      • E&J Capital Partners
      • Exit fees
      • FirstPort
      • Fleecehold
      • Forfeiture
      • FPRA
      • Gleeson Homes
      • Ground rent scandal
      • Hanover
      • House managers flat
      • House of Lords
      • Housing associations
      • Informal lease extension
      • Insurance
      • IRPM
      • JB Leitch
      • Jim Fitzpatrick MP
      • John Christodoulou
      • Justin Bates
      • Justin Madders MP
      • Law Commission
      • LEASE
      • Liam Spender
      • Local authority leasehold
      • London Assembly
      • Louie Burns
      • Martin Paine
      • McCarthy and Stone
      • Moskovitz / Gurvits
      • Mulberry Mews
      • National Leasehold Campaign
      • Oakland Court
      • Park Homes
      • Parliament
      • Persimmon
      • Peverel
      • Philip Rainey QC
      • Plantation Wharf
      • Press
      • Property tribunal
      • Prostitutes
      • Quadrangle House
      • Redrow
      • Retirement
      • Richard Davidoff
      • RICS
      • Right To Manage Federation
      • Roger Southam
      • Rooftop development
      • RTM
      • Sean Powell
      • SFO
      • Shared ownership
      • Sinclair Gardens Investments
      • Sir Ed Davey
      • Sir Peter Bottomley
      • St George’s Wharf
      • Subletting
      • Taylor Wimpey
      • Tchenguiz
      • Warwick Estates
      • West India Quay
      • William Waldorf Astor
      • Windrush Court
  • Parliament
  • Accreditation
You are here: Home / News / FirstPort / Is Peverel gearing up for another sale?

Is Peverel gearing up for another sale?

May 14, 2013 //  by Sebastian O'Kelly

PeverelmanagementIt’s a question worth asking, as its current owners venture capitalists Electra and Chamonix will get shot of it at the propitious moment.

In February 2012 they bought Peverel, which had been part of the Tchenguiz empire from 2007 until it went into administration in March 2011. The deal involved a £62 million transaction supported with further working capital via a NatWest Bank loan.

In recent months, Peverel has appointed a £90,000 a year press guru, although a lot of the company’s efforts concern staying out of the public eye.

Recent LVT cases have been kicked into the long grass by arriving at settlements, where the parties sign confidentiality agreements. A recent example concerned Kingsborough commissions at a retirement site near Kingston, in Surrey.

Janet Entwistle, the CEO, has made it clear that LVT cases must be headed off, and she is a strong supporter of confidential Ombudsman schemes.

Then there is the fact that key figures of the past have been shown the door, such as Lee Middleburgh, the former head of residential, and Keith Edgar, the ex-head of Peverel Retirement. Former head of legal David Edwards has joined the Anchor Trust.

Most intriguing is Peverel’s relationship with the only  customer who really counts: the Tchenguiz Family Trust. It owns the bulk of the freeholds that Peverel manages (including those of 53,000 retirement flats).

These freeholds have been up for sale for a year or so, and is an open question what Peverel’s relationship would be with a new owner.

It is odd that at a number of important sites – Palgrave Gardens, near Regent’s Park, and the massive 422-unti Metro Central Heights Metro Central Heights at the Elephant and Castle – Peverel has not resisted right to manage. Instead, it has co-operated with the process in exchange for a one-year management contract.

Why?

The Right To Manage Federation, which handled the RTM at Metro Central Heights, has contacted LKP to point out that it was actually the RTM Company that chose to continue with Peverel on an interim basis. It did not think the acquisition date gave sufficient time to select a new agent.

Of course, ownership of Peverel has been a game of pass-the-parcel from the early days. It was originally a Bournemouth estate agent that got lucky tying up with John McCarthy, the founder of retirement leasehold pioneer McCarthy and Stone.

At some point in the eighties it was absorbed into the housebuilder only to be sold again in 1993 after the first retirement leasehold mutiny. This is when John McCarthy sued the Daily Telegraph for £800,000, but abandoned the case after blowing £200,000 on lawyers.

Peverel was then sold off to Electra in 1993 for £30 million.

John McCathy recalls in his autobiography Building a Billion:

“Interesting, in the formative days of us moving into the provision of sheltered housing in the private sector, a number of institutions including Housing Associations were not interested in taking on the management. They seem to have missed out.”

A management buyout followed and in 2007 Peverel ended up in the hands of Tchenguiz.

It has now lost the management of the pick of its prime London sites, and none of the prestige housebuilders will touch it. Nor will McCarthy and Stone, curiously, which is now attempting to manage its properties – the very few it has built since 2008 – itself.

Related posts:

Default ThumbnailWill a new spin doctor on £90,000 with ‘personal integrity’ work wonders for Peverel? Palgrave Gardens gives Peverel its marching orders Default ThumbnailMetro Central Heights wins largest ever right to manage action Default ThumbnailPeverel loses 2,376 prime London units Default ThumbnailSmall-scale builder left high and dry after Tchenguiz / Peverel meltdown

Category: FirstPort, News

Latest Tweets

Tweets by @LKPleasehold

Mentions

Anthony Essien (34) APPG (37) ARMA (87) Bellway (30) Benjamin Mire (32) Cladding scandal (71) Clive Betts MP (31) CMA (45) Commonhold (52) Competition and Markets Authority (41) Countryside Properties plc (33) FirstPort (42) Grenfell cladding (56) Ground rents (54) Harry Scoffin (150) James Brokenshire MP (31) Jim Fitzpatrick (35) Jim Fitzpatrick MP (30) Justin Bates (40) Justin Madders MP (67) Katie Kendrick (37) Law Commission (60) LEASE (66) Leasehold Advisory Service (62) Leasehold houses (32) Long Harbour (48) Martin Boyd (80) McCarthy and Stone (39) National Leasehold Campaign (38) Persimmon (49) Peverel (61) Property tribunal (49) Redrow (30) Retirement (37) Robert Jenrick (33) Roger Southam (47) Sajid Javid (38) Sebastian O’Kelly (55) Sir Peter Bottomley (201) Taylor Wimpey (106) Tchenguiz (33) The Guardian (33) The Times (31) Vincent Tchenguiz (43) Waking watch contracts (40)
Previous Post: « Stuff a leaseholder and win an iPad! The unpromising debut of ARMA-Q
Next Post: ARMA-Q solves ARMA’s problems, not those of leasehold »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Michael Epstein

    May 16, 2013 at 2:47 pm

    What to other companies may just appear to be a coincidence, in the case of Peverel, there is normally a reason behind every Peverel Action( just to mention another site who mentioned the possible sale of Peverel!)
    We have a situation in which Peverel are almost exclusively dependent on the Tchenguiz Family Trust as their customer base. Though Janet Entwistle often refers to leaseholders as “customers” this is rather akin to a shark referring to the turtle he is lunching on as a customer!
    What is clear is the inter dependence that the freeholding and managing companies had, and how vital to both companies survival keeping connected was.
    Initially it was thought that the Tchenguiz Family Trust could buy Peverel out of administration.
    When this did not prove possible the next idea was to sell to a private equity company and then the Tchenguiz Family Trust could buy it.
    As we know this did not happen either. This left Peverel adrift and more importantly the Tchenguiz Family Trust lost the income they needed to support their interest payments.
    It is proving very difficult to sell the property portfolio, in part because of lack of liquidity in the market, in part because the scheme thought up by Tchenguiz that “could not go wrong” did go wrong(very badly wrong!) and in part because of gross over valuations and finally the reputation of the Tchenguiz Family Trust.
    Purely speculation on my part, but given the problems selling the freeholding companies, i would not be surprised if Bill Proctor was not working on some weird and wonderful plan to finance the purchase of the freeholds. Certainly, i shall be keeping a very sharp eye on him.
    It is to my mind very significant, that Peverel are trying to get as much cash in as possible in the short term, indicated by trying to appoint a “County Court Administrator.”
    It is also of note that Peverel are very keen to avoid LVT’s or RTM’s. They want to keep things very quiet at present and in exchange for confidentiality will refund excess insurance premiums, but express those refunds in unusual ways(perhaps reducing Careline fees?)
    Peverel are doing all they can to “Buy Time”

  2. Karen

    May 17, 2013 at 8:16 am

    Well said. If any of their developments would like a little free help on how to do a RTM or enfranchisement, I would be more than happy to point them in the right direction. It is time for these Leaseholders to start fighting back.
    If these companies have the audacity to think they can case win over leaseholders over by giving them a ‘refund’ on excess insurances that owners have probably been overpaying for years then that just shows their barefaced arrogance.
    Leaseholders, please do not sell your soul and sign any confidentiality agreements, you just need to do an RTM … Start now!

  3. Michael Epstein

    May 21, 2013 at 8:02 am

    It has recently been brought to my attention that the attempted sale of the Tchenguiz property portfolio,actually began around 2 years before it is commonly thought.
    It would appear that the process was started after administrators for Kaupthing placed Tchenguiz loans in default, which triggered senior debt defaults. It is believed that Vincent Tchenguiz pledged shares in the first tranche of loans to support his brother Robert and subsequently took loans to service other loans. Following a “confidential agreement” following the Kaupthing bank collapse, (i cannot say with any certainty which side came out best) i understand that at this point moves were made to sell the property portfolio. I have been led to believe this was before not after the SFO raid.
    It also appears to coincide with the period that Estates and Management and Peverel were at their most voracious in finding ways to extract money from leaseholders.

Above Footer

Advising leaseholders. Avoiding disasters.
Stopping forfeiture. Exposing abuses. Urging reform.

We depend on individuals for the majority of our funding.

Support Us and Donate

LKP Managing Agents

Become an LKP Managing Agent

Common Ground
Adam Church
Blocnet property management2

Stay in Touch

To achieve victory in the leasehold game where you are playing against professionals and with rules that they know all too well - stay informed with the LKP newsletter.
Sign Up for Newsletter

Professional Directory

The following advertisements are from firms that seek business from leaseholders.
Click on the logos for company profiles.

Footer

About LKP

  • What is LKP
  • Privacy and data

Categories

  • News
  • Cladding scandal
  • Commonhold
  • Law Commission
  • Fleecehold
  • Parliament
  • Press
  • APPG

Contact

Leasehold Knowledge Partnership
Open Data Institute
5th Floor
Kings Place
London N1 9AG

sok@leaseholdknowledge.com

Copyright © 2023 Leasehold Knowledge Partnership | All rights reserved
Leasehold Knowledge Partnership Limited (company number: 08999652) is a company limited by guarantee that is a registered charity (number: 1162584) with the Charities Commission.
LKP website is hosted at www.34sp.com
Website by Callia Web